Thu Jun 21, 2012, 09:58 PM
Segami (5,767 posts)
Obama's Top Campaign Lawyer, DEMANDS Retraction From KARL ROVE" The Obama campaign's top lawyer fired off a letter to Karl Rove Thursday, demanding a retraction of a "mystifying" comment Rove made and raising questions about his upcoming appearance at a Mitt Romney campaign event. The letter is the second that Bob Bauer has sent to Rove this week. The first argued that Rove could no longer insist that his advocacy group, Crossroads GPS, was policy oriented -- a distinction that allowed it to shield the names of its donors. The follow-up letter, obtained by The Huffington Post, makes that same point, arguing that there is no "social welfare" component to the group's operations. But it also challenges Rove in more direct terms. Bauer hints that Rove, the chief strategist to former President George W. Bush, is colluding with Romney, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, by homing in on Rove's presence at a Romney retreat in Utah this upcoming weekend. He also expands the scope of his complaint to Rove's role with American Crossroads, the super PAC arm of Crossroads GPS. "I understand that you will traveling to join Governor Romney this weekend at a luxury fundraising event in Utah –- an appearance that press reports note 'could raise questions because of campaign finance laws barring any coordination between super PACS and actual campaigns,'" Bauer wrote, likely alluding to American Crossroads, the super PAC arm of Crossroads GPS. "But I would ask that this trip not delay the immediate correction of your misstatements I am requesting." The letter also picks up on an exchange between the two that was escalated Wednesday night when Rove accused Bauer of having a political vendetta against him that was rooted in earlier legal conflict. In an appearance on Fox News, Rove insisted that Bauer had represented Dana Jill Simpson, the former Republican operative in Alabama who served as a whistleblower against Rove and others in the case of former Gov. Don Siegelman. READ THE FULL LETTER http://www.docstoc.com/docs/123162095/BauerRove cont' http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/21/bob-bauer-obama-campaign-karl-rove_n_1616021.html
|
23 replies, 4418 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Segami | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| clang1 | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| pacalo | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| jaysunb | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| annabanana | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| Mz Pip | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| NEOBuckeye | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| Volaris | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| AlbertCat | Jun 2012 | #23 | |
| frylock | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| 2banon | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| McCamy Taylor | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| progressoid | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| emulatorloo | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| sad sally | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
| TrollBuster9090 | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
| emulatorloo | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
| Blue Owl | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| sellitman | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| malaise | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
| sellitman | Jun 2012 | #22 | |
| spanone | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| TrollBuster9090 | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
| indepat | Jun 2012 | #21 |
Response to Segami (Original post)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 10:03 PM
clang1 (884 posts)
1. re: there is no "social welfare" component
|
That is unless you count death as a social welfare component.
|
Response to jaysunb (Reply #3)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 10:33 PM
annabanana (45,582 posts)
4. 'bout time! . . . . n/t
Response to Segami (Original post)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:13 PM
Mz Pip (23,808 posts)
5. Rove doesn't care
|
He's operated beyond the law for so long he thinks he's invincible. Sadly, he probably is.
|
Response to Mz Pip (Reply #5)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:30 AM
NEOBuckeye (2,353 posts)
7. No one is invincible.
|
Which will make it that much more devastating for Rove when he is finally brought down.
|
Response to NEOBuckeye (Reply #7)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:50 AM
Volaris (1,583 posts)
8. And satisfying for those of us who still believe in such noble concepts like Laws and Justice...
Response to NEOBuckeye (Reply #7)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 11:55 AM
AlbertCat (10,450 posts)
23. more devastating for Rove when he is finally brought down.
|
What.... did he not do well on Dancing with the Stars? or has been on yet?
|
Response to Segami (Original post)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:21 AM
frylock (19,050 posts)
6. that's adorable..
|
Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:21 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) this is the guy that said fuck you to congressional subpoenas and walked free, despite the fact that pelosi "could have arrested him." i'm sure rover is really shitting his pants over this.
|
Response to frylock (Reply #6)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:52 AM
2banon (970 posts)
9. exactly. this article is almost laughable, considering the past decade.
|
Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:54 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) except that political finger wagging isn't funny, and the response/reaction to Rove vis a vis campaign attorneys public memo's to the press (as if Rove gave a shite in the least) is almost pathetic. Rove is laughing his ass off no doubt. almost makes our guy's peeps seem very naive at best.
|
Response to Segami (Original post)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:55 AM
McCamy Taylor (13,710 posts)
10. Rove thinks he can break the law and no one will notice.
Response to McCamy Taylor (Reply #10)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 09:47 AM
progressoid (27,322 posts)
11. It's worked well for him in the past.
|
Even when people notice, nothing happens.
|
Response to progressoid (Reply #11)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 02:33 PM
emulatorloo (24,220 posts)
13. Maybe his luck will run out.
|
I'm glad to see this Obama attorney is pursuing this.
|
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #13)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:50 PM
sad sally (2,627 posts)
17. Too bad Mr. Bauer's letter doesn't have any "or else" teeth to it.
|
"Bauer's letters allowed him to make his point without actually putting many legal or political resources behind the effort."
|
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #13)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:06 PM
TrollBuster9090 (1,604 posts)
19. Here's an important point: have you noticed the conspicuous absence of talk about TORT REFORM
|
in this election cycle?
There are two main sources of FUNDING for the Democratic Party: 1. LABOR UNIONS, and 2. LITIGATION LAWYERS. Traditionally, the Republicans have gone HARD after BOTH. This time around they're only going after the Unions, and leaving the lawyers alone. Why? I think they realized they awoke a sleeping giant. If you go after lawyers, and their ability to make money by suing corporations in class action lawsuits, they'll fight back with LAWSUITS. Well...how is Obama fighting VOTER PURGES? Lawsuits. How is Obama trying to take down Roves Superpack? Lawsuits. The Republicans have toned down their rhetoric about Tort Reform, but I think it might be too late. I think their free ride on political dirty tricks with no consequences may be over. The civil suits are on the way. |
Response to TrollBuster9090 (Reply #19)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:44 PM
emulatorloo (24,220 posts)
20. Very interesting point. Thanks. n/t
Response to Segami (Original post)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:14 PM
Blue Owl (8,511 posts)
12. Here's an idea -- toss that fuck in jail for contempt of court
|
I mean, just look how great it's been for America to have Karl Rove free to rape and pillage what's left of our democracy.
n/t |
Response to Segami (Original post)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:17 PM
sellitman (9,305 posts)
14. Rove is untouchable
|
Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:18 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) He has proved it so many times that I'm surprised anyone on DU would think otherwise. So is Bush, Cheney and all the other GOP henchmen.
Obama let them walk Scotfree. Why bother now? |
Response to sellitman (Reply #14)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:43 PM
malaise (106,050 posts)
16. Whatever happpened to this story
Response to malaise (Reply #16)
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 12:29 AM
sellitman (9,305 posts)
22. Wow
|
I've never seen this one. So glad the Liberal Media is on it.
|
Response to Segami (Original post)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 06:54 PM
TrollBuster9090 (1,604 posts)
18. It was a dumbass thing for Bauer to do, IMHO.
|
He should have waited until Rove got BACK from the meeting with Romney, then filed a complaint with the FEC and DOJ regarding collusion between the Romney campaign and one of its PACs, and then used Rove's presence there as probable cause to launch a civil lawsuit against Crossroads, and subpoena Rove's emails as evidence of the collusion.
True, generally the FEC doesn't do anything to enforce actual federal election law, but it would be observing form in preparation for the civil suit. |
Response to Segami (Original post)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:59 PM
indepat (18,909 posts)
21. May several large rockets be shot up Rove's
|
ass simultaneously and with much gusto and verve.
|

