Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,860 posts)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:07 PM Jun 2012

High court throws out FCC fines vs. broadcasters

Source: Associated Press

High court throws out FCC fines vs. broadcasters

MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press
Updated 08:56 a.m., Thursday, June 21, 2012

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court unanimously threw out fines and sanctions Thursday against broadcasters who violated the Federal Communications Commission policy regulating curse words and nudity on broadcast television.

But the justices declined to issue a broad ruling on the constitutionality of the FCC indecency policy. Instead, the court concluded only that broadcasters could not have known in advance that obscenities uttered during awards show programs and a brief display of nudity on an episode of ABC's NYPD Blue could give rise to sanctions. ABC and 45 affiliates were hit with proposed fines totaling nearly $1.24 million.

The justices said the FCC is free to revise its indecency policy.

It was the second time the court has confronted, but not ruled conclusively on, the FCC's policy on isolated expletives. Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his opinion for the court that "it is unnecessary for the court to address the constitutionality of the current policy."

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/entertainment/article/High-court-throws-out-FCC-fines-vs-broadcasters-2453257.php
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
High court throws out FCC fines vs. broadcasters (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2012 OP
8-0 with Sotomayor recusing herself because hifiguy Jun 2012 #1
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
1. 8-0 with Sotomayor recusing herself because
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:23 PM
Jun 2012

she was involved in an earlier ruling on the same case while on the Court of Appeals.

Nothing surprising here. No judge, not even a Scalia, will vote to uphold a law that requires ESP on the part of broadcasters as to the content of live TV.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»High court throws out FCC...