Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Considers FDA Chief Who Says People Should Use Medicines At Their Own Risk"
By Sheila Kaplan, Ike Swetlitz
WASHINGTONPresident-elect Donald Trump is weighing naming as Food and Drug Administration commissioner a staunch libertarian who has called for eliminating the agencys mandate to determine whether new medicines are effective before approving them for sale.
Let people start using them, at their own risk, the candidate, Jim ONeill, said in a 2014 speech to a biotech group.
ONeill, has also called for paying organ donors and setting up libertarian societies at seaand has said he was surprised to discover that FDA regulators actually enjoy science and like working to fight disease.
more
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-considers-fda-chief-who-says-people-should-use-medicines-ldquo-at-their-own-risk-rdquo/
Bet that doesn't include MJ.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1328 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Considers FDA Chief Who Says People Should Use Medicines At Their Own Risk" (Original Post)
n2doc
Dec 2016
OP
madaboutharry
(40,199 posts)1. And of course there will be no recourse
for horrible side effects. If people go blind, or have seizures, or die....well they took the risk...
This man, Jim O'Neill, must have known Dr. Mengele.
RKP5637
(67,101 posts)4. Apparently, this is what the deplorables want. FFS, he's trying to kill off America. n/t
Eugene
(61,843 posts)2. It's all for a greater good delivered by the market place.
So what if a few people get hurt?
/sarc
Dump's cabinet picks aren't here to govern.
They're here to burn the place down.
Liberty Belle
(9,533 posts)3. Insanity!
<kick>
David__77
(23,365 posts)5. I think I agree, if I understand correctly.
I do think that least in certain circumstances people should be free to use experimental medications prior to them being formally approved by the FDA. If that's what he's talking about, I believe I agree.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)6. Side effects may include mood swings, anger...
Anger? What anger! I said WHAT ANGER!!!
wishstar
(5,268 posts)7. Trumpsters worship de-regulation as the wonder drug panacea for this country along with tax cuts