Read this story and see if you can figure out why this friend of mine was fired

the contract might have time built in as a cost.

who knows?

rush the job, make it take two weeks.

The boss said the job required six more days of billable hours.

They were supposed to be working 7 days a week so it was more than 6 days of billable hours.

Don

not by the job.

Did the boss's take on the job get reduced because they finished it in less time that he had told the client?

These two guys cost that owner lots of money.

Don

depends on the job and the estimation, but there is tremendous markup with labor.

I was just guesstimating.

That could have cost that company thousands of dollars.

Don

for the time these two guys would take to do the job. The boss lost money because the job was completed too soon?

so only brought home a little less than half the bacon, and made the boss look like he didn't know what he was doing when he quoted the job?

The guy he sent them to work for reneged on the 2 week payment.

Or else the guy from out of state said they did not finish the job and paid nothing.

So much for the work ethic and doing your job well.

Any of the above?

That being said, why the hell didn't your friend call the boss before driving back?

but his employees did it too fast and screwed up his plan. Instead of screwing over whomever he wanted to hurt his people ended up saving the day.

If not that then it was probably some government job where the boss would've made a killing on billing for 2 weeks and they screwed that up for him probably ruining his chance at future jobs.

Padded the job.

small circles in contractor world and word spreads fast.

it's hard to find good help.

for not letting them know that they needed to take the entire two weeks to perform the job.

If my boss told me I was on a two-week job that last bolt when in during the last hour of the fourteenth day.

This is common sense.

Don

Or they wouldn't have returned home from the gig so early. How long have they been in this line of work? You'd think between the two of them, one could figure this out.

Not sure about the other fellow.

My guess is they were too busy patting each other on the back for a "job well done", that they were about to be fired for to figure this out.

I actually had a hard time explaining this to my friend after he got fired. He didn't want to believe me.

Don

con men. Your true colors are flying high, Don.

With all the discussion about productivity and efficiency maybe this is a lost knowledge?

When I first started I remember thinking that my boss would be happy if I finished early. Luckily I sat next to a more seasoned worker who explained that was definitely not the case.

although it is rampant there. Anywhere something is billed by the hour - litigation cases in law firms for example ... Although the firms make it easier to understand. When you are given bonuses for the amount of hours you bill, you know straight up what your objective is no matter what else they say.

for trying to bilk the client.

I understand fuck-up time. I build it into my schedules all the time. My approach to the client is always, "we could get lucky and this may take 4 weeks. Or, it could go badly and take 6. If I were you, I would budget for 6 and hope for the best. Then everybody wins. If not, at least you know the worst."

From 35 years in construction,lead me to suppose that the out of state job was contracted as "time and material"...In my scenario,the 2 workers "screwed" the boss out of 6 days of built in profit,by finishing in 4 days,rather than the 10 contracted for....

They missed something(s) or got hit on an inspection and weren't there to fix whatever it was. Then the boss had to dispatch 2 other guys before they got back because they didn't call before they left.

Either that or the Boss was behind on truck payments and the Repo Man was waiting for the truck when they got home.

No company is going to fire two good workers over a one time mistake in how long a job took. It is not rational.

to sell the job/product. Actually delivering it hurts profits. The job was bid at 2 * 8 * 10 (160) * company rate, They came back with 2 * 8 * 4 (64) * company rate. From his perspective, they cost him 96 * company rate.

No business is going to fire two good workers over a one-time error.

I know that makes me an enemy of the people in your eyes but I know how business operates. It takes a lot of money to find and train a good employee. A business is not going to spend that amount of money over the supposed lost of some income for a week. That is not the real world but a world you may live in.

This is not dishonesty, it is a safety mesure....
If a project calls for 10 man days it is not unreasonable for the project to take 11 man days or 9 man days.
Coming in a touch earlier/less expensive is a good thing.

However when you tell a customer to prepair to be billed for 10 man days and the project comes in at 4 man days, you look like you were preparing to rip the customer off.
At the least you look like a total idiot.

So....

The boss was setting up to rip the customer off and was caught out by good workers, and does not want that to happen again.
or
The Boss is a total idiot.

so if we quoted it it 10 in got it done in 8 , the client was happy we only billed them for 8, we look like heroes. if we run into problems and it takes 12 hours, the client only pays for 10 and we eat some costs.

but then there's clients who want to bilk you, demanding extra work be done (for free) after the product is delivered. it goes both ways

I got nothing, Don.

they could have just gone to the client out of spite and told them how they were being screwed.

A smart boss would have congratulated them and told them to go back out and complete the two weeks. The company retains two efficient employees, keeps the client, and eliminates the basis for a lawsuit based on wrongful termination. Everybody wins.

they should take that amount of time. The job was already in the budget at 14 days.

Incremental payments are common with contracts, especially to cover the up-front costs.
There are a lot of things built into a contract that may be perfectly reasonable with a job bid to cover a prospective "2 weeks" worth of out of state work that would not normally be bid for in town work.
I've worked jobs where the customer paid 1/3 up front, 1/3rd at the 75% completed mark, and the final third at completion. Companies to this to ensure that they will get paid in a timely fashion and can purchase the materials needed for the job without risking too much.

The facts I can see in this scenario are:
the customer and business owner contracted for 2 weeks (up to 14 billable days to include travel days and "the weekend" if no OT was billed) out of state carpentry/construction work;
The guys sent out probably only stayed out 6 billable days if a day for travel is included, and;
The guys were fired on the spot when they returned.

My conjecture is that the owner was probably paid up front for half the job to cover lodging, travel, and other time-specific expenses while the guys were on the road. If they got back that early, the owner would have to take the time and trouble to re-negotiate the refund he owed the customer into a "hey, how about a early finish" bonus, changing a potential negative into a positive.

The only other issue I can see that would warrant such a dramatic reaction to an early finish is there was another project depending on the "pad" on this project to cover overage costs.

Or the owner was a libertarian asshole that saw his business as his personal ATM and believed it's perfectly okay to scam a customer and short your employees if it gives you a profit.


Haele

Common practice in 49 states. Unfortunately.

I'll take a stab. Your friend's private employer had a contract with the government, and the employer wanted to bill the government for two weeks. When they finished in 4 days, they cost the employer its con job at the taxpayer's expense.

If this is indeed the case, google the words "False Claims Act". Might be something to keep in mind.

by building it sooner, but cost the boss profit on billable hours.

Unless they did something else on the job that they didn't tell you about.

Went to wrong site and that's why it took only 4 days. And they were drunk.

plus accommodations, per diems, whatever.

if the guy was that bad at estimating time and costs, he probably did your friend a favor.

on the other hand, he could have been screwing the client...either way, the contractor's a dumbass.

It's not easy if your boss *is* bad.

the boss sounds like he's engaging in an illegal business practice.

My advice to the two fired employees would be to get angry and get even. This sounds a lot like contract fraud of some sort.

You can't charge for two men at a hundred and sixty hours and then have the job done in sixty four. You just crushed both your and the owner's pocket and severely undermined his credibility.

Speed in construction is overrated.

Because they're giving 1/15 of the true story and you're relating what you remember, which together amounts to a hill of beans. Hence, we got two saints fired by a devil. Black. White.

and the boss had a nice job with a rich \wealthy employer, even probably state job... and since they came home early....