Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:44 PM
stockholmer (3,751 posts)
Women march in Rio to protest 'green economy'
Thousands of women representing social and farm movements marched in central Rio Monday to rail against the "green economy" advocated by the Rio+20 conference on sustainable development. Behind a large banner from the international peasant movement Via Campesina proclaiming "the peoples are against the mercantilization of nature", they marched several miles to the Flamengo park, the venue for the "People's Summit" organized by civil society groups on the sidelines of the Rio+20 event. Several hundred men closed off the march to show their solidarity.
Perched atop a truck fitted with loudspeakers, a female activist howled: "This is a march of urban and rural women against this Rio+20 charade." "No to green capitalism! Yes to an economy based on solidarity, yes to people's sovereignty," she added.
People's Summit militants view the "green economy" concept touted by organizers of the official Rio+20 gathering as just "another stage of capitalist accumulation" after the failure of the current model. World leaders are to gather here from Wednesday to Friday to debate how to steer the planet toward a greener and more sustainable future.
"We are out on the streets to give visibility to our world struggle for an end to violence against women, for peace and demilitarization, access to common goods and economic empowerment for women," said 36-year-old Celia Alldridge, a member of the march secretariat who described herself as "half English, half Swiss". The marchers comprised women of all walks of life, students, rural and indigenous people, some carrying placards reading "women are not meant to be slapped on the face or the buttocks."
Rio+20: Farmers, Indigenous peoples mobilise against green capitalism and the privatisation of nature
The “green economy” and other false solutions: a new assault on the people and their territories.
Capitalist profit-seeking has generated the biggest systemic crisis since 1929. Since2008, the hegemonic system has looked for ways out of its structural crisis, searchingfor new possibilities for accumulation that support its logic. It is in this context that thecorporate takeover of agreements on biodiversity and climate change have occurred,and consequently, the development of this new financial engineering called GreenCapitalism.
Governments, business people, and the organizations of the United Nations have spent these last years constructing the myth of the “green economy” and of the “greening of technology”. They present it as a new possibility to bring together environmental stewardship and business, but it is in fact the vehicle to obtain new advances of capitalism, putting the entire planet under the control of big capital. . There are various mechanisms that will be advanced by the green economy and all of them will increase the destruction.
1.The green economy does not seek to reduce climate change or environmental deterioration, but to generalize the principle that those who have money can continue polluting. Up to now, they have used the farce of purchasing carbon bonds to continue emitting greenhouse gases. They are now inventing biodiversity bonds. This is to say, businesses can continue destroying forests and ecosystems, as long as they pay someone to supposedly conserve biodiversity somewhere else. Tomorrow they may invent bonds for water, natural “views”, or clean air.
2.These systems of buying environmental services are being used to take lands and territories away from indigenous peoples and peasants. The mechanisms that are most forcefully promoted by governments and businesses are the systems known as REDD and REDD plus. They say that these are systems to reduce greenhouse gas emissions produced by deforestation and degradation of the forests, but they are being used to impose, for a ridiculous price, management plans that deny families and rural communities access to their own lands, forests, and water sources. In addition, they guarantee businesses unrestricted access to collective forest areas, enabling biopiracy. They also impose contracts that tie communities to these management plans for 20 years or more and that leave indigenous and peasant territories with mortgage liens, that increases the likelihood that these communities will lose their lands. The objectives of these environmental services are to take control of nature reserves and of the territories that are under the control of these communities.
4 replies, 1772 views
Women march in Rio to protest 'green economy' (Original post)
|Jim Lane||Jun 2012||#4|
Response to stockholmer (Original post)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 12:02 AM
Scootaloo (22,826 posts)
Agence France-Presse doesn't seem like it's taking a neutral stance here...
Good on the protestors.
Response to stockholmer (Original post)
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jim Lane (7,708 posts)
4. Climate problems are urgent, so suboptimal stopgap solutions have to be accepted.
The climate doesn't have time to wait for the radical transformation of global economics. Implementing the program outlined in the second linked article is a political project that would take decades (if it succeeded at all).
In 2032 (Rio+20+20), much of the world's economy will still be organized according to capitalist principles. The protesters and the socialist journal article denounce the "green economy" measures, but the stark fact is that, if those measures are implemented, then greenhouse gas levels in 2032 will be lower than if those measures are not implemented. Yes, GHG levels would probably be lower still if capitalism were abolished or radically restructured, but that simply isn't going to happen anytime soon. The actual short-term choice is between the status quo and a somewhat greener version of capitalism, and the latter is preferable.