Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:36 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

So are there any vagina's on the morning shows or just the usual wht.male men w/impotence?

Last edited Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:37 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Or is it constipation, never can keep this thing straight.

53 replies, 2781 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

53 replies	Author	Time	Post
So are there any vagina's on the morning shows or just the usual wht.male men w/impotence? (Original post)	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	OP
All penises...n/t	monmouth	Jun 2012	#1
Oh thank God. To think of all those religious shows of years ago replaced by bra burners-heavens!	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#3
white and shriveled?	magical thyme	Jun 2012	#53
Well, Mitt is.....oh, never mind	TheCowsCameHome	Jun 2012	#2
Doing an ad for Viagra by chance?	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#4
Sunday morning parade of right wing pricks.	undeterred	Jun 2012	#5
lets keep the man bashing out of it	quinnox	Jun 2012	#6
Let's quit shitting on women first. Sides' none of those birds look capable of thought	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#7
i would like to not refer to women as a vagina.... and i dont need to male bash either. lol	seabeyond	Jun 2012	#8
The poster is being facetious, so it's ok by me.	kestrel91316	Jun 2012	#31
There is no "first".	lumberjack_jeff	Jun 2012	#16
No, dear. That would be the mras who	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#21
Nicely put. Pity I'm less reasonable but whadda ya' gonna do. :)	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#24
Women are called barren.	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#10
'Consider me a "male bashing" radfem, feminazi.'	quinnox	Jun 2012	#18
I am proud to be called by the neo-con/ultra-con	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#19
oh, so because you see women being bashed	quinnox	Jun 2012	#20
Don't ya just hate it when we refuse to be	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#22
I don't think you do a great job of	quinnox	Jun 2012	#23
Honey, I've been called everything from	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#25
Oh, so now you get to call me "Honey"	quinnox	Jun 2012	#29
.	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#32
ok, now we are getting somewhere	quinnox	Jun 2012	#35
Off topic.	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#39
why do you keep saying that	quinnox	Jun 2012	#41
Off topic again. The thread began about vagina's on Sunday morning talk shows.	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#42
you sound like a broken record now, michigan	quinnox	Jun 2012	#44
No, dear. 1980s. What planet are you on?	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#40
I apologize	quinnox	Jun 2012	#43
Better yet, I'll give you a link...	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#45
ok, thanks	quinnox	Jun 2012	#47
I hoped you would be. Thank you.	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#48
that's a serious run-on sentence.	Warren DeMontague	Jun 2012	#51
So she/he isn't ladylike enuf'? Since you object to this thread, why are you bothering to read?	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#26
I think your thread is over the top	quinnox	Jun 2012	#30
Yeah, well I think that men who legislate women's body parts are vulgar	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#34
I am totally loving your posts in this thread!! Sic 'em!!	kestrel91316	Jun 2012	#33
Thank you.	Cerridwen	Jun 2012	#37
Well the ditto heads they have on each Sunday morning deserve bashing.	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#28
All penis-havers	longship	Jun 2012	#9
No, no, the Rose Bowl Parade isn't until January.	Warren DeMontague	Jun 2012	#11
vagina's = belonging to a vagina.	EFerrari	Jun 2012	#12
Deep thought. Can't wait to read the article on it.	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#14
Forming Plural Nouns in English	EFerrari	Jun 2012	#38
male men?	HarveyDarkey	Jun 2012	#13
Oh so sorry. So which would you prefer, wht. no nothing males or wht. no nothing men?	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#15
Redundant writer is reduntant. n/t	lumberjack_jeff	Jun 2012	#17
Off topic.	MichiganVote	Jun 2012	#27
Yes	Warren DeMontague	Jun 2012	#50
The usual.	cherokeeprogressive	Jun 2012	#36
Actually there are some women on tomorrow.	bluedigger	Jun 2012	#46
Both, I'd say.	freshwest	Jun 2012	#49
...And to think of what I've been missing on TV, by sleeping in!	Warren DeMontague	Jun 2012	#52

Response to MichiganVote (Original post)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:39 PM

monmouth (21,078 posts)

1. All penises...n/t

Reply to this post

Response to monmouth (Reply #1)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:45 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

3. Oh thank God. To think of all those religious shows of years ago replaced by bra burners-heavens!

:Sarcasm: for the feeble minded.

Fat white men with nothing on their minds except a hot bath, a private pull and an occasional thrill of the improbable-so comforting. Let's see, John McCain?, Bonerhead? Karl Rove?

Who the fuck watches this crap?

Reply to this post

Response to monmouth (Reply #1)

Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:38 AM

magical thyme (4,064 posts)

53. white and shriveled?

or orange boners?

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Original post)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:44 PM

TheCowsCameHome (27,699 posts)

2. Well, Mitt is.....oh, never mind

Reply to this post

Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:45 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

4. Doing an ad for Viagra by chance?

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Original post)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:47 PM

undeterred (33,222 posts)

5. Sunday morning parade of right wing pricks.

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Original post)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:47 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

6. lets keep the man bashing out of it

please. Re: the crack about impotence.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #6)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:53 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

7. Let's quit shitting on women first. Sides' none of those birds look capable of thought

let alone action.

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Reply #7)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:55 PM

seabeyond (85,892 posts)

8. i would like to not refer to women as a vagina.... and i dont need to male bash either. lol

Reply to this post

Response to seabeyond (Reply #8)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:23 PM

kestrel91316 (45,405 posts)

31. The poster is being facetious, so it's ok by me.

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Reply #7)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:42 PM

lumberjack_jeff (24,536 posts)

16. There is no "first".

DU is quickly becoming a community of the blind due to the fondness for an eye for an eye justice dealt out to one another.

Reply to this post

Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #16)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:59 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

21. No, dear. That would be the mras who

think women gaining means men losing.

If you have a problem with the way some men are treated, I suggested you look to feminist scholars who pointed out that ALL of us are subjected to those who rule; rather than blame women for your plight.

If, in fact, women, especially those who speak out, were your problem, you'd be dead. Based on the crap I've read on the mra boards and limgaugh's dittoheads.

We have been trying to tell you that the systems in place fuck over all of us. You don't lose rights because women, or "blacks" or "others" gain theirs. You lose your rights because some "men" are useful idiots to the 1%.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #21)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:09 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

24. Nicely put. Pity I'm less reasonable but whadda ya' gonna do. :)

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #6)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 09:56 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

10. Women are called barren.

Perhaps you'd like to use that.

Oh wait! There aren't enough women to talk about barren.

Nevermind. Impotence it is. Consider me a "male bashing" radfem, feminazi.

By the way, can you tell me what is the sex of the dominant majority who runs this planet? You know, the military leaders, the political leaders, the social leaders, the "religious" leaders? Oh, and before you show me the exceptions, show me the history of the planet and who has run it into the shit in which we live today.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #10)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:48 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

18. 'Consider me a "male bashing" radfem, feminazi.'

Fine. You sound proud of it.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #18)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:54 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

19. I am proud to be called by the neo-con/ultra-con

that which is regarded as human.

I have opinions. I state them. I have ideas I state them. I have knowledge I share it.

Well mannered women do not make history; and in some cases, don't live very long.

Why do you buy their frame?

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #19)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:58 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

20. oh, so because you see women being bashed

then its fine to bash men. Good for you. Bash away. Great philosophy you got there. So about your crack about being well-mannered, I suppose that means you think its better to be rude to make your point.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #20)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:02 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

22. Don't ya just hate it when we refuse to be

intimidated.

"It's a man's world."

Some of us are trying to define what that means.

If you don't like militarism...define something else.

Quit justifying crap as biology.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #22)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:05 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

23. I don't think you do a great job of

representing your views by coming across like you do. Out of curiosity, how old are you?

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #23)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:10 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

25. Honey, I've been called everything from

mighty-white to nigger-lover to cunt to bitch to ho to dyke to "liberal" to commie to pinko to ball-busting to...insert your favorite BS name-calling tactic. Now you think you're calling me names is a bad thing?

Now you want to check my lady-like manners or lack thereof. Oh, and my age? Seriously?

You're pixels on a screen on a political board that works "within the system" and you think you're cool. Go post at reddit. The mras have a subreddit for you.

Good luck.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #25)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:15 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

29. Oh, so now you get to call me "Honey"

Last edited Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

And I'm the one who is the problem. I bet if the situations were reversed, and someone called you Babe or Honey, you would blow your stack. Yea, and I was just curious about your age. You didn't have to say exactly of course, over 30 or over 40 or over 50 would do.

And tell me what name I called you. I didn't call you any names.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #29)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:24 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

32. .

'Consider me a "male bashing" radfem, feminazi.'

Fine. You sound proud of it.

I take the names called me of the ultra-conservative and say "GODDAMNED RIGHT!". Why does that bother you? I should be more feminine? Er, lady like?

It's pretty simple, the honey part. You see, I was one of the first women to tend bar in the Vegas casinos. We were called honey, ho, cunt, bitch, useless, and the every euphemistic, "too stupid to be a bartender" crap. I have had my breasts discussed as real or fake, my intelligence discussed as non-existent, while I was in the room, and the fact that my red hair made me more or less of a cock-sucking whore.

I was the first micro-computer specialist in my field, in my state, male or female. I've had "geeks" discuss whether or not I was worthy or being a "fellow" geek.

Now I get to read on a "progressive" board about us uber evil feminists and I'm supposed to just fall in line with the right wing talking points.

No.

I don't think so.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #32)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:29 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

35. ok, now we are getting somewhere

So I take it when you said you were one of the first women to tend bar in a casino, we are talking the 1960s? Do you have any pics of that time in the casino, I like historical pictures.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #35)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:35 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

39. Off topic.

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Reply #39)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:40 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

41. why do you keep saying that

She brought up her experience as one of the first women to tend bar, so I asked about that time. That is on topic in the conversation we were having.

Why do you play thread monitor, you know you can't control what people want to talk about in a thread, that is poor form.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #41)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:41 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

42. Off topic again. The thread began about vagina's on Sunday morning talk shows.

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Reply #42)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:45 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

44. you sound like a broken record now, michigan

I repeat, you have no power to control how people respond to your threads and what new directions the thread could go in as a result, and you can take that to the bank.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #35)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:39 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

40. No, dear. 1980s. What planet are you on?

Last edited Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:44 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

You believe the mra shit that women took control of the world in the 1970s?

You can see we took control of the world since motherhood is a paid profession in the world of credit-ratings=worth crowd, and that child care is now universally known as as a human right, and women are honored with Nobel prizes and rape is almost as disgusting as incest, and violence against women is in every country's constitution, and health care is universally accepted as a human right and poverty, which affects women in disproportionate numbers has been cured world wide and women's uterit have solidified from our exposure to higher education and women are no longer pro-creating and so on and so forth.

Oh, yeah, and if you're reading the mra boards, HILLARY CLINTON RULES the world...or not.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #40)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:43 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

43. I apologize

The 1980s, so you are younger than I had thought. Can you tell me what you mean by "mra", I don't know what you are talking about with that reference.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #43)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:47 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

45. Better yet, I'll give you a link...

to one who tracks them these days. I no longer have the stomach for it.

First, trigger alert. That's what we radfem types try to do when we know those reading may read the words and have to re-live their experience; i.e., it's a form of PTSD.

http://manboobz.com/2012/03/04/mras-the-way-to-defeat-feminism-is-not-through-debate-but-by-inflicting-pain-on-feminists/

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #45)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:53 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

47. ok, thanks

now I understand what you are talking about. That is a pretty horrible website, I must admit. I'm with you there.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #47)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:56 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

48. I hoped you would be. Thank you.

That is the type of crap many of us fight every day in our lives.

Please understand that.

It's ugly; scarey; dangerous. When you see the anger, please recognize one of the sources. There are, unfortunately, many more sources.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #40)

Sun Jun 17, 2012, 12:44 AM

Warren DeMontague (46,312 posts)

51. that's a serious run-on sentence.

Last edited Sun Jun 17, 2012, 12:46 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Edit: Sorry, I see you answered my question already upthread.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #23)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:11 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

26. So she/he isn't ladylike enuf'? Since you object to this thread, why are you bothering to read?

Reply to this post

Response to MichiganVote (Reply #26)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:20 PM

quinnox (15,687 posts)

30. I think your thread is over the top

and has a lot of man bashing, and is vulgar too. Yup.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #30)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:27 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)

34. Yeah, well I think that men who legislate women's body parts are vulgar

And I think that men who don't get that and men who don't object to that sad fact today are vulgar. But if this offends your sensitivities, shove off. No one requires you to take part in the discussion about Sunday morning "news" shows and the fact that women other than Bachman and a couple of others-- are not included. And now they are banned from a legislative floor for the use of the word vagina? That's BS.

They routinely place the same women with the same polarizing views on these GOP PR shows.

Reply to this post

Response to Cerridwen (Reply #22)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:25 PM

kestrel91316 (45,405 posts)

33. I am totally loving your posts in this thread!! Sic 'em!!

Reply to this post

Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #33)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:32 PM

Cerridwen (11,871 posts)

37. Thank you.

I think of you often. Ya, I know, it's just pixels on a screen.

We have two senior dogs. We have "lost" one over the past couple of years. And a senior horse and a senior goat. Another friend lost a dog and another lost a horse.

"Silly", isn't it? I think of your pixels on a screen as a vet who takes care of our four-leggers.

You are my hero...hera. Whatever. You care for "the least among us."

Thank you.

Reply to this post

Response to quinnox (Reply #20)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:14 PM

MichiganVote (18,987 posts)