Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,874 posts)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:42 PM Jun 2012

Psychological testimony allowed in Sandusky sex abuse trial

Source: Reuters

Psychological testimony allowed in Sandusky sex abuse trial

Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:18pm EDT

(Reuters) - Lawyers for accused child sex abuser Jerry Sandusky are allowed to enter expert testimony that the former Penn State football coach suffers from histrionic personality disorder, a Pennsylvania judge ruled on Friday.

The ruling by Judge John Cleland in Centre County Court opens the door for the prosecution, in turn, to have Sandusky undergo a psychological examination, raising the prospect that he could be evaluated as a pedophile.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

The defense filed a motion on Monday asking that a psychologist be allowed to explain that letters Sandusky wrote to an alleged victim were consistent with histrionic personality disorder and he was not trying to lure them into sex.

People with the disorder are highly emotional attention-seekers who show inappropriate sexually seductive behavior. The prosecution has contended that the letters are part of "grooming behavior" toward victims by a sexual predator.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/15/us-usa-crime-sandusky-idUSBRE85E1FE20120615
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Psychological testimony allowed in Sandusky sex abuse trial (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2012 OP
Who the hell cares if he's a common, garden-variety pervert XemaSab Jun 2012 #1
You and I posted at the same minute and you said what I said, only better. yardwork Jun 2012 #3
. XemaSab Jun 2012 #4
This is going to backfire on the defense. They are desperate. yardwork Jun 2012 #2
They didn't introduce an insanity defense. What punishment would be given from a guilty verdict? freshwest Jun 2012 #5

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
1. Who the hell cares if he's a common, garden-variety pervert
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:45 PM
Jun 2012

or a crazy pervert?

Fucker should have shot himself in the head before he raped the first boy.

yardwork

(61,599 posts)
2. This is going to backfire on the defense. They are desperate.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:45 PM
Jun 2012

The testimony of the victims is going to hang Sandusky. (I'm against the death penalty but I almost wish that were literally true. Child molesters test my resolve against the death penalty.)

The jury is not going to care what other pathologies Sandusky may or may not have. So what if he has hystrionic personality disorder? The jurors are going to think that sounds like something else that might be wrong with a child molester.

And if this article is correct, the defense's move opens the door to the prosecution having an expert testify that Sandusky is a pedophile. Game set match.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. They didn't introduce an insanity defense. What punishment would be given from a guilty verdict?
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:57 PM
Jun 2012

If found guilty, psychological points would be brought up then, not during the trial. Perhaps they believe the jury will feel sorry for him and not convict. I hope they find the boys testimony enough to convict and won't be swayed. No idea what is coming from this, none at all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Psychological testimony a...