Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:10 PM Jul 2016

Freeper rationalize plagiarism as "resonate the same universal concepts."

Curiosity got the better of me. I had to see how and who would defend the plagiarism. What follows is an unedited OP from FR. The responses maintain this same level of 'deep thought' and 'insightful analysis' you would expect, but to be fair, I've provided the link should you desire one year's worth of buffoonish thought in one day. Here we go...






Did Melania use a few sentences that were similar to Michelle Obama’s speech? Sure, but that is common. ALL First Lady speeches resonate the same universal concepts.

The fact is, you can go back and look at Laura Bush’s speech, Nancy Reagan, and even Hillary when she was first lady and find the same type of comments.

In a speech Hillary Clinton gave in 2014 for the New American foundation. Hillary spoke of the same values saying,

” my mother and father gave us a middle-class life with opportunities she never could have imagined for herself but which she always believed could be possible for her children. And that was a great gift that I will be forever grateful for, and then Bill and I of course worked hard to pass on those values to our daughter.”

(In other words, passing on values to the next generation, like Michelle Obama said in 2008.)

Laura Bush said in her 2004 RNC speech,

“If you’re determined and you want to work hard, you can do anything you want to. That’s the beautiful thing about America.”

(The same concept of Michelle Obama’s speech in 2008.)

Even Ann Romney’s speech hit the same notes in 2012

“Mitt will be the first to tell you that he is the most fortunate man in the world. He had two loving parents who gave him strong values and taught him the value of work.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3450820/posts

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. Well nobody expects a freeper to admit to being wrong about something.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jul 2016

They don't have the ability.

Eugene

(61,819 posts)
3. A Trump surrogate made the same claim on CNN earlier today.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jul 2016

That was before Paul Manafort started blaming the whole thing on Hillary.

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
4. They are always
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jul 2016

Infinitely liberal in excusing their fuck ups as they are intensively concrete in their attacks on Democrats.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
5. Freepers think Sarah Palin has 'ideas' As conventional as those themes are Michelle wrote them
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jul 2016

and Trumps child trophy bride let a bunch of amateurs feed her text lifted word for word from Michelle's
speech

The thing with these people is that they just cheating and stealing is second nature to them They don't think there is anything wrong with reading paid for ideas and passing them off as your own

If Trump actually wrote a speech and edited it himself it would be the same self aggrandizing gibberish that comes out of his mouth in interviews. Just more boring

kimbutgar

(21,060 posts)
7. They are really stretching the truth in trying to defend Melania's plagiarism!
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jul 2016


But it won't work because they lifted her words verbatim.

yellowcanine

(35,694 posts)
8. Sorry wing nuts. Same sentiments, DIFFERENT words in the cases of Laura, Hillary, Michelle, Anne.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jul 2016

SAME words in case of Melania. Deal with it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Freeper rationalize plagi...