General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs a gay woman, I don’t feel safe in America right now. So I bought a gun.
by Bree Schmidt on June 16, 2016
Ive been staring at the gun lying on my desk for more than an hour now. Its not loaded. In fact, I own no bullets for it. But I've decided I need it just in case.
As a gay woman living in the American South, "just in case" for me means that I expect one day to be followed into a womens restroom by some "concerned citizen" because Im not feminine-presenting, hardly at all, and dont adhere to traditional gender standards.
"Just in case" means the next time an old man decides to spit at me again while Im simply walking down the sidewalk.
"Just in case" means the next time a random frat boy leans out of his buddys lifted truck window and yells, "DYKE!" as they hastily pull away from the stoplight next to me.
"Just in case" means I expect things to escalate, because, for me, they always have.
more
http://www.vox.com/2016/6/16/11949302/gun-purchase-orlando
irisblue
(32,932 posts)me the f-word then dyke
I will not be afraid.
ileus
(15,396 posts)irisblue
(32,932 posts)however where she says in the essay she would brandish it....her words not mine... gives me pause.
. .
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,610 posts)and regardless, might stir up even more trouble. I don't blame someone for wanting some protection when they are threatened or harassed on a regular basis but at the same time, carrying a gun can create problems of its own. I don't know what I'd do if I were in that situation.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)and I'm a supporter of oppressed people arming themselves in self-defense. But PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE take some training on when, where, and HOW to use that weapon. Everybody who owns a gun should.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)But you know this, tired of your gun fondling post here of late - off to iggy.
irisblue
(32,932 posts)Dem2
(8,166 posts)The ileus person I was responding to - I think - I can't see the subthread cuz I put them on ignore.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)due to flawed sample selection. Criminals have family members, y'know.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)What are you saying?
Edit: never mind, I see you're a perennial gun fetishist who pedals the fear of losing (get's called a Republican a lot) as an EXCUSE for doing nothing. Ever. Basically, you support mass-slaughter while a reasonable gun-owner like myself sees no advantage in treating the 2nd Amendment with kid (NRA) gloves even though other rights are restricted in many ways.) Off to ignore with you.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)Forty+ times more likely to have it used against you than in self-defense.
MH1
(17,573 posts)Straw Man
(6,622 posts)Absolutely false. Kellerman's statistics compared dying by one's own gun to killing someone in self-defense. Needless to say, it isn't necessary to kill someone to successfully defend oneself. Furthermore, he included suicides in his figures of those gun owners who died by their own guns. Killing oneself with one's own gun is hardly "having it used against you."
For people who are trained with the use of their gun, who store it safely, who are not suicidal, who don't live in situations of domestic violence, and who don't live a criminal lifestyle, the risk is small.
cali
(114,904 posts)Straw Man
(6,622 posts)I read that as the yelling being a precursor to an attack.
maxsolomon
(33,252 posts)She'd be more likely to use it to kill herself than defend herself, unless she plans to brandish it illegally.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)+1000
Separation
(1,975 posts)First of all I am happy to hear that she is willing to protect herself or others if the needs arise.
However, carrying an unloaded pistol is probably more dangerous than having one at all. Hopefully I'm guessing that she will eventually buy ammo and the part of it being unloaded is just literary.
Secondly, I hope she doesn't think that because somebody spits on you, or call you a name it gives you a reason to shoot them. Once again, I hope that is just a literary description on how she feels.
Lastly, I hope she takes a CCW course, then goes to the range several times a month. Shooting any type of gun isn't natural. When something goes wrong, and it will go wrong, she needs to have the muscle memory to be able to react.
Lastly, I hope she never has to use it. Taking a life no matter the reason has certain.. consequences.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)carrying it unloaded won't do much
when people are attacked it happens so so quickly that she will not have time to display the gun and tell them to back off
in that instance an empty gun is just a club
in that case get a 1911. it is all metal an weighs a ton, not half plastic like a glock
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Bigmack
(8,020 posts)BE SURE TO TAKE ONE OR MORE GUN-SAFETY COURSES. I have owned guns off and on in my life (not now, tho), and I do know how to use them, and I also know that in the hands of inexperienced people, guns are MORE THAN DANGEROUS. Take care and be careful in this STRANGE and dangerous land. Ms Bigmack
lapfog_1
(29,194 posts)you need a one to two week training course on active shooter defense.
And you need it every six months.
Otherwise studies and simulations have shown that you are either ineffective at best or a danger to other innocents at worse.
The good person with a gun only works when that person is trained to a point of muscle memory reactions.
Straw Man
(6,622 posts)And you need it every six months.
Yes, you need it. No, you don't need it every six months. If you have access to a range where you can practice drawing and shooting while you move, that will be sufficient to retain your skills.
If you're talking about the ABC News simulation, that was complete rigged bullshit. In any case, "ineffective" is a wash, and "a danger to other innocents" is meaningless in a "kill 'em all" situation. If you do something, some may live. If you do nothing, they all die.
And again, it doesn't take a two-week course every six months to train and retain muscle memory.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)to include what the law says sbout use and non-use of ANY weapon in confrontational situations.
jtx
(68 posts)is like buying a guitar without lessons.
Either don't buy one, or commit to learn what you are doing safely, thoughtfully, and effectively.
Without actual training and practice, a gun is likely to be grabbed and taken away from you and then used against you putting you in a worse position overall.
I'm all for people having the right to own a gun for self-defense including concealed carry (no open carry), but only if they commit to do so safely, learnedly and with proficiency.
But, I am glad you and others are thinking about taking responsibility for defending themselves, their friends, and family.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I rather doubt it has actually happened though.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Relf died on May 14, 1976 in a bizarre incident at his home. The veteran musician was apparently playing an improperly grounded electric guitar in his basement recording studio when he was electrocuted.
http://ultimateclassicrock.com/keith-relf-strange-rock-deaths/
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I hadn't considered electric guitars, I was thinking about falling on a guitar breaking the neck and getting stabbed by a sharp splinter or garroted by a string or something..
msongs
(67,366 posts)hunter
(38,304 posts)He still got shot.
Buying a gun for "self protection" is lunacy.
Bad guys shoot first, and they don't fight fair.
phylny
(8,368 posts)Straw Man
(6,622 posts)He still got shot.
He didn't get killed. A very important distinction, that.
Bad guys shoot first, and they don't fight fair.
You'd better tell the cops and the secret service to throw those things away, then. They're obviously useless.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)So are many of my friends.
None of us carry guns, nor do we feel the need to do so.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)But if she thinks putting a gun in somebody's face over them insulting her or even spitting on her is prudent, she's going to be in for a nasty surprise.
Guns aren't universal grievance alleviators.
She sounds like she needs to reevaluate the criteria under which she'd be willing to use lethal force, because based on what I'm reading hee, she's going to end up in prison in a hurry.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)slur shouted at you very often proceeds a violent attack. In the US each year there are over 1,500 hate motivated crimes against LGBT persons officially listed as such by the FBI. There are of course many more that don't get reported. So those slur shouts are not to be taken lightly.
I'd be very happy if every straight person in America believed all LGBT were armed ace shots. That way we'd not have to be armed to scare off all the bullies that straight America sends after us.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Get off your high horse and calm down
I'm all for training and arming lgbt persons, and have volunteered my time to do so. Part of that is telling someone that if they stick a gun in someone's face when not facing a profound physical threat, they're going to jail. If you'd rather have lgbt folks play Zimmerman cowboy, that's your business, but the law is pretty clear in most places about sticking a gun in someone's face when you are slurred.
But hey, be my guest, encourage lgbt persons to brandish and pull guns when insulted. You are ignorant of the law, and your suggestion that guns should be used to "scare people off" is so laughably illegal and ill advised, I wouldnt be shocked if the real goal here was trying to get gay people arrested because some idiot with zero knowledge of the law gave them shit advice.
Privilege indeed.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)I hope she changes her mind and takes it back.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)awareness.
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)Needs it in case someone yells dyke at her???
now she joins the stupids
Bathroom issue -I think pepper spray or something non lethal would suffice.
Yes I know 2 Trans now that are carrying pepper spray since the bathroom issue but never did they think a gun was what they needed
mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)Separation
(1,975 posts)It's illegal to carry a concealed gun in a place that sells alcohol.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)So there's that.
Straw Man
(6,622 posts)So there's that.
So when they cornered him in that rest room, allowing the rest of the club-goers to escape and the wounded to be evacuated, you would call that a failure? They weren't there when the shooting started.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Straw Man
(6,622 posts)So he initiated the armed response, and was then joined by the other two officers. Without this response, Mateen would have had much more to time to carry out the slaughter of club patrons unimpeded.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)This subthread started with "Someone in Pulse should have had a gun, they could have shot the guy.". Someone did, a LEO. They the shooter ran back inside.
Armed LEO wasn't able to shoot him. Point 1.
Point 2 is that by trying to do so, he caused the shooter to go BACK inside.
Straw Man
(6,622 posts)He was just on his way home to see what was on TV? Please.
The security guard engaged Mateen as he entered the club. The guard was outgunned and couldn't stop him.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article84076637.html
Once more officers arrived, they were able to contain him. They forced him out of the main room. Had they not been there to engage him, he would have been able to slaughter everyone in the club.
That's not the way it happened. And even if it were, what would have been the alternative to engaging? Stand down and hope he's finished? That would have been criminally irresponsible.
The only lesson here is that in this scenario, the more guns that are shooting back at the perpetrator, the better.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)I am assuming that what she means to say is that whenever one of these situations arises whereupon she is spit on or insulted, she fears that the scenario may escalate. In fact, the excerpt claims that. She doesn't know if that person who called her a name might decide to start beating on her. Or stabbing her. Or shooting her.
At the end of the article she talks about how she might have to take out one life to save many if she found herself in a similar situation to what happened at Pulse. She contemplates the moments when she might be called upon to use her weapon, but never once claims that she would use it in the scenarios she describes in her introduction.
This is a very good article, and I believe its author is being grossly misinterpreted here.
Response to Tsiyu (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)You don't get to shoot someone for spitting at you, much less yelling from a car. You certainly don't gain a license to kill for going to the bathroom.
I hope she never gets depressed. The presence of her gun will make it awfully easy to find a "permanent solution to a temporary problem."
Guns increase your danger, not decrease it.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Attack me - I'll be the last person to hear you take a breath.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Deciding is everybody else that is standing around's job.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Not gonna argue with her choices. Her experiences. Her fears.
She is very smart for not doing anything with it till she makes up her mind whether she would be able use it or not.
And not in some half-ass brandishing stunt.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)unless you are 100% mentally and morally ready to use it.
The same goes with other weapons, including physical training in martial arts.
DinahMoeHum
(21,774 posts). . .a local chapter of the Pink Pistols in her area.
http://www.pinkpistols.org/about-the-pink-pistols/
roamer65
(36,744 posts)If you decide to do concealed carry, you need to be educated on the permit process and know the liabilities that it entails.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)I own guns. Grew up with them and am comfortable with them. For a very specific reason I got a CC license but never actually carry concealed.
But buying a gun on a whim is so dangerous. It is not something like running a coffee maker where you do it a few times and it is easy. More like driving. It takes a long time and lots of practice to master. And like driving a car if you do it with little experience you are likely to get hurt. Or with a gun, killed.
So while I respect the author's feelings, I have trepidation.
If someone wants to at least get a good safe. That way your guns will not be used to kill a stranger.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Never really used it and the money was better spent on other things. If one makes a mistake with CC, the civil case will bankrupt you.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)When mine(and the wife's) expire. We kayak fish in very remote locations and on one occasion when returning to the truck we had a dicey situation with some less than respectable citizens. We were in the middle of nowhere with no cell coverage at all. I realized there are actually a few limited times when the defense of my wife and I is all on us. And having a firearm concealed on the kayak requires a permit.
Have a nice evening.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Good eve to u 2.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)you could also run into some hostile 4 legged residents as well - although they usually avoid people
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)With a rabid coon. He treed me in the bed of my truck with the wife trapped in the cab as I was loading up the kayaks. It was 2:00pm on a hot Florida summer day and it is trying it's damnedest to get at me in the bed of the truck. Had me worried for a while. And I had no firearm with me as this was not that remote an area.
Luckily he was a small one around 10lbs not a big old 30lb boar. Cause a big one could easily have crawled up on the bumper and got at me.
Looking back it was a clown show with me trying to knock it in the head with a $300 carbon fiber kayak paddle.
I use an old iron window sash as an anchor and I finally applied it to its head and diffused the situation.
Would have loved to have had a .22 with me.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)like you. They act on whims and emotions while you are a full human being and thus have the right to arms those people should not have.
Right. The heavily armed explain why they should have all the guns, while the LGBT should have a coffee maker. Good stuff. It's like 1956 in here.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)LGBT had nothing to do with my post and I never referred to the issue. Did not even enter my thinking.
I was thinking gun safety which is a subject often discussed here. So many times when people run out and buy guns it leads to tragedy.
I fully support anyone legally eligible to own a gun doing so. And I can certainly understand why a member of a group so often the victims of violence as our LGBT citizens are feeling the need to have one.
But that does not change the undeniable fact that when you own a gun, you or a family member are the most likely to be shot. And those odds go thru the roof when, as is often the case, gay or straight, it is not practiced with on a regular basis.
So please read my post from the position of firearms safety and realize my entire post applies equally to anyone buying a gun.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)quite the respect for them.
She was already considering using the pistol to get back into shooting. Purchasing one wasn't "a whim".
I have the feeling if she decided she would actually use her Glock outside of target practice, that she would put the time & effort in to do so safely.
"In the grand scheme of things, I dont think shooting another to save just my life is worth it."
THAT is part she needs to think long and hard on.
In the mean time, she can shoot, and learn, and enjoy, and master it.
My sister is doing that now with her pistol.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)We can recreate ourselves.
I'm bigger than 107lbs ever should have been, and goddamn well, you should be scared of me.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)I encourage her to get training and education to go with her decision. A choice such as this should not be made lightly. Her narrative suggests she has been thinking about her decision.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)and develops her situational awareness. Just having a gun with no training or practice will only make her a danger to herself and others. And if she draws on an old man for the mere crime of spitting at her, or on some frat boy for yelling mean things, I hope she enjoys spending the night in jail. You don't get to play Wyatt Earp and just wave your gun around. That's called brandishing and it's against the law.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)At very least a pump shotgun and a pistol.
That 'learn how to use them' is the key here.
Better to have and not need then need and not have.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)If that's really true, then explain to me why this isn't the safest country on the planet.
This is right up there with the claim that we have the best health care in the world. We don't. Period.
Guns do not make us safe. Period.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
6000eliot This message was self-deleted by its author.