Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,622 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:57 PM May 2016

It’s Not Just Merrick Garland: Republicans Are Blocking So Many Nominees It’s Caused a Judicial Emer

It’s Not Just Merrick Garland: Republicans Are Blocking So Many Nominees It’s Caused a Judicial Emergency
by Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/16/it-s-not-just-merrick-garland-republicans-are-blocking-so-many-nominees-it-s-caused-a-judicial-emergency.html

"SNIP............


Over the past 16 months, the Senate has confirmed 17 lifetime-appointment judges. In the same period in 2007-08, the Democrat-led Senate confirmed 45; in 1991-92, when Democrats controlled the Senate and George H.W. Bush was president, it confirmed 82. In other words, the GOP Senate is confirming just 38 percent as many judges as the Democratic 2008 Senate, and 21 percentof the Democratic 1992 one.

And it’s not just judges. The Congressional Research Service found that President Obama has had the fewest presidential nominees confirmed in decades: 198, compared with 345 for George W. Bush, and 268 for Bill Clinton.

For judicial confirmations, Baker lay the blame squarely on Sen. Charles Grassley, the chair of the Judiciary Committee who—in part because of the Garland fiasco—is now locked in a fierce re-election battle.

“Sen. [Patrick] Leahy [D-VT] worked hard in the last two years of Bush’s presidency to continue processing nominees,” she said. “Grassley is not. He is not just the judiciary chair for the Republican Party—he’s the judiciary chair for the whole country. It’s indefensible.”



...............SNIP"
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Ohioblue22

(1,430 posts)
1. They want to pack the courts if a con is elected all the while complaining that the dems are trying
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:27 PM
May 2016

To pack the courts

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
3. Well Maybe If Democrats Grew A Pair And Nominated Far Left Candidates
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:04 PM
May 2016

Then the GOP would be happy with moderate Democrat choices and take what they could get. Moving the center to the Right as the Clinton's have done has only eviscerated us.

Chicago1980

(1,968 posts)
6. Feel free certain Sanders supporters to either
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

not vote, go third party, or write in Bernie's name, so that President Trump can install a SCOTUS justice and other federal judges who'd have lifetime appointments.

I'm not trying to be me, but I have no problems calling people out who don't see the bigger picture.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
8. the GOP are plutocrats, pure and simple. They are out to undermine all vestiges of responsible,
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:05 PM
May 2016

effective democratic (for, of and by the people... even mere commoners) government. welcome to the Republican Dystopia.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
9. The republicans have no desire to help govern
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:20 PM
May 2016

they are more interested in getting jobs and making others live as they want them to

LS_Editor

(893 posts)
10. It's undeniably racist and obstructionist politics.
Wed May 18, 2016, 12:10 AM
May 2016

But Garland is a terrible choice for the left, and he is pretty pathetic as far as political moves go. Obama should have selected someone like the current US AG. Senate has already confirmed her once, she is extremely qualified, and the politics of denying a black woman a seat on the Supreme Court during a presidential election year would be a far more dangerous agenda for the GOP to pursue than keeping some old white guy off it. Obama screwed up a defining moment of his presidency.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
11. Been telling you for years
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:30 AM
May 2016

That this an obstructive bitch of a bunch of obstructionist worthless, need to be impeached, if there were a process, bunch of worthless assholes.

Sorry for cussing.

pansypoo53219

(20,972 posts)
12. they did the same shit during clinton. its sedition from the federalists.
Wed May 18, 2016, 08:49 PM
May 2016

putting THE GOP finger on the scales of justice.

raging moderate

(4,297 posts)
14. It's an old Republicon practice, exacerbated by racism.
Sat May 21, 2016, 12:16 PM
May 2016

They just can't stand having a Black US President.

 
15. And what this means to me is...
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:26 AM
May 2016

even more gains for us in the Senate this November! Hell, I wouldn't be surprised is we ended up in the high 50s!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It’s Not Just Merrick Gar...