Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,977 posts)
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:24 PM Jun 2012

President Obama winning battle for small donors -- Analysts cite enthusiasm factor

"What we're seeing are two very different models of fund-raising."

As of the end of April, 43 percent of the donors who contributed to the Obama campaign gave $200 or less, generating a total of $88.5 million, according to the Campaign Finance Institute, a nonpartisan Washington research group. By contrast, only 10 percent of those who gave to former governor Mitt Romney’s campaign had made donations of $200 or less, accounting for $9.8 million . . .

While Obama has embarked on a grass-roots fund-raising drive based largely on small donations, as he did four years ago, Romney has relied on contributions from more generous donors to his campaign, and unlimited contributions from wealthy individuals and corporations to the independent super PACs sympathetic to his candidacy . . .

“Small donations matter a lot because they indicate enthusiasm and energy for a campaign,’’ said Rob Gray, a Boston political consultant who was an adviser to Republican John McCain’s 2008 campaign. “The shortage of small donors means the Republican and conservative base is not jumping on board with Romney in big numbers - at least not yet.’’

“Obama has a huge advantage there,’’ said Philip W. Johnston, an Obama fund-raiser and former chairman of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, noting Romney’s reliance on wealthier donors. “Wall Street bankers are unlikely to be knocking on doors in the neighborhood anytime soon.’’


read: http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/06/07/president-obama-attracts-far-more-small-donations-than-mitt-romney/qdpY8H4mNWrYThyJsGWIBM/story.html


18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama winning battle for small donors -- Analysts cite enthusiasm factor (Original Post) bigtree Jun 2012 OP
That's what I expected and hoped for!! Wait Wut Jun 2012 #1
+200 bigtree Jun 2012 #2
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2012 #8
Thanks for the reminder. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2012 #12
I loved ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #3
true. good argument. bigtree Jun 2012 #5
No ... No ... No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #6
. bigtree Jun 2012 #9
And some in the media are doing everything they can, it seems, to discourage voters....... AverageJoe90 Jun 2012 #4
2.5 million 25usd donations > than 7 10million dollar donations... uponit7771 Jun 2012 #7
I'm kicking this again... Wait Wut Jun 2012 #10
This is good news. I especially like the "New Donors" number. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2012 #11
right bigtree Jun 2012 #13
I couldn't agree more. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2012 #14
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #15
I love that story Kingofalldems Jun 2012 #16
so they think their profit-taking is 'helping everybody? bigtree Jun 2012 #17
kick bigtree Jun 2012 #18

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
1. That's what I expected and hoped for!!
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:32 PM
Jun 2012

I donated this morning. Um...less than $200. Love knowing I'm part of that 98%!

Fuck the Koch Bros.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
3. I loved ...
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:48 PM
Jun 2012

Former Justice Steven's argument regarding the problem with current campaign finance rules ... it gives a disproportionate naked advantage to the wealthy donors.

He used the analogy of a presidential debate where the various candidates' time to speak was determined by the amount of money they had. He correctly pointed out that this would be widely disparaged as "unfair"; yet this is the system under which we find ourselves.

bigtree

(85,977 posts)
5. true. good argument.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jun 2012

putting a finer point on it:

“First, it did reverse a century of law; second, it did authorize unlimited election-related expenditures by America’s most powerful interests; and, third, the logic of the opinion extends to money spent by foreign entities.”

Stevens also said that he could not understand why, if “corporations have no right to vote,” they should have the right to sway elections.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
6. No ... No ... No ...
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 03:09 PM
Jun 2012
Stevens also said that he could not understand why, if “corporations have no right to vote,” they should have the right to sway elections.


"You don't understand ... corporations are people, it says so in this Clerk's footnote, inserted to anopinion on a completely unrelated matter. We just haven't given THIS classification of people the right to vote ... just like the Blacks and the wimens. THAT'S DISCRIMINATION!

I demand that we end this unjust disenfranchisement of these powerless victims."

S/0
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
4. And some in the media are doing everything they can, it seems, to discourage voters.......
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jun 2012

I've seen this for a long time now. The Establishment REALLY doesn't want Obama to win a second term. They would be horrified if the Supreme Court was to see honest men and women on the bench, instead of sell-outs like Alito and wanna-be traitors like Antonin Scalia, etc.

A lot of ordinary working class people are standing up and giving their support to Obama, even if they may not be stalwart Dems, or perhaps even a few moderate Republicans tired of the GOP's extremist bullshit.

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
7. 2.5 million 25usd donations > than 7 10million dollar donations...
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jun 2012

....if you're into the whole democracy thing

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
10. I'm kicking this again...
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jun 2012

...'cause these numbers make me happy.

What is it they say in that book (and 2112) about the "meek"???

Fuck the Koch Bros.

bigtree

(85,977 posts)
13. right
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 08:38 PM
Jun 2012

we're going to win by organizing. That part of the campaign doesn't look to have a ceiling right now.

Response to bigtree (Original post)

bigtree

(85,977 posts)
17. so they think their profit-taking is 'helping everybody?
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 10:52 PM
Jun 2012

Of course they're enamored with Romney's economic policies . . .

Romney’s Tax Plan Would Save Him Millions

http://business.time.com/2012/01/25/romneys-tax-plan-would-save-him-millions-but-not-as-much-as-gingrichs/
______________

In a campaign speech in Columbus, Ohio, on May 5, 2012, Obama said the Romney's economic plan would raise taxes for millions of low-income Americans while cutting them for the wealthy. Obama told the crowd that Romney "doesn’t seem to understand" that helping the rich doesn’t automatically trickle down to benefit the poor.

"Why else would he want to spend trillions more on tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans? Why else would he propose cutting his own taxes while raising them on 18 million working families?" Obama said.

How Romney would pay less

Romney’s tax plan would affect what he personally pays in federal income taxes. With a fortune estimated at between $80 million and $250 million and 2010 earnings of around $21 million, Romney falls in the top tax bracket. That class currently pays a 35 percent rate. His plan would reduce that to 28 percent.

"The tax plan would cut taxes on the rich a lot," said Roberton Williams, an economist with the non-partisan Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution think tanks that published an analysis of Romney’s plan.

The 20 percent cut, Williams said, is "a huge savings for the people at the top end."

read: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/08/barack-obama/obama-says-romney-would-cut-his-own-taxes-while-ra/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama winning b...