Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

katmondoo

(6,454 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:38 AM Apr 2016

In order to be qualified for President a woman must be intelligent yet non-controversial

deferential to powerful males, check every fact before making a statement, speak softly, win by being demure and factual, there are other traits that can be filled in by more experienced men who really know how a woman seeking a high roll in government should be. I will leave it up to them.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In order to be qualified for President a woman must be intelligent yet non-controversial (Original Post) katmondoo Apr 2016 OP
An oxymoron is what's running successfully on the GOP ticket. Hortensis Apr 2016 #1
As a woman, my requirements for supporting/voting for ANY candidate for president are that they djean111 Apr 2016 #2
Did you vote for Barack Obama in 2012? (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #3
In 2008 and 2012 katmondoo Apr 2016 #6
Controversial doesn't bother me. Corrupt does. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #4
how can she be corrupt when as a woman she's automatically an outsider? Bucky Apr 2016 #9
How about this Uponthegears Apr 2016 #5
I would not vote for this type of woman katmondoo Apr 2016 #7
that is the worst description of Elizabeth Warren I have ever heard Bucky Apr 2016 #8

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
1. An oxymoron is what's running successfully on the GOP ticket.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:43 AM
Apr 2016

As far as women go, there is of course no such thing as an "intelligent but noncontroversial" female candidate to the knuckledragging portion of the population -- as is being demonstrated so pathetically.

This election will truly be an advance for all (American) mankind, kicking and screaming insults or whatever.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. As a woman, my requirements for supporting/voting for ANY candidate for president are that they
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:46 AM
Apr 2016

be against war and fracking and the TPP and cluster bombs and regime meddling and adding restrictions to abortions and means-testing Social Security, and FOR Single Payer and (taxes-paid) free state/community college for all.

I don't care what gender the candidate is - gender is irrelevant. I think a woman who is for the things I am against is equally as horrific as a man.

Bucky

(53,936 posts)
9. how can she be corrupt when as a woman she's automatically an outsider?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:10 AM
Apr 2016

do you think large corporations are just handing her money? No, damn it, she has to talk for that money

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
5. How about this
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:55 AM
Apr 2016

In this current system where with the greatest president in US history we have seen 2 steps back for every one step forward, ANY candidate MUST BE CONTROVERSIAL, must be honest, and must be deferential to the people.

For all the talk about our President being an essentially middle of the road leader (though that may well be true), he has moved this country forward most WHEN HE HAS BEEN CONTROVERSIAL.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In order to be qualified ...