Tue Jun 5, 2012, 05:11 PM
Liberal_in_LA (28,670 posts)
Wisconsin recall summed up by one graph
|
18 replies, 3701 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Liberal_in_LA | Jun 2012 | OP | |
| toddwv | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
| Selatius | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
| GoCubsGo | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
| Botany | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
| limpyhobbler | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
| freshwest | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
| HiPointDem | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
| Selatius | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
| Chorophyll | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
| Chan790 | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
| fascisthunter | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
| SoutherDem | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
| Generic Other | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
| JPZenger | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
| Voice for Peace | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
| Angry Dragon | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
| Major Hogwash | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
| Delphinus | Jun 2012 | #16 |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 05:19 PM
toddwv (2,054 posts)
1. That graph isn't 1/2 the story though.
![]() |
Response to toddwv (Reply #1)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 08:31 PM
Selatius (20,440 posts)
10. Americans for Prosperity. Is that another stomp the poor and coddle the rich astro-turf group? nt
Response to Selatius (Reply #10)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 10:54 PM
GoCubsGo (13,003 posts)
13. Yes. It's Turdblossom's group.
|
Expect to see lots more from them over the next 5 months.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 05:21 PM
Botany (36,041 posts)
2. But NBC radio news today told me that Barrett was getting a chunk of
|
..... out of State Union money.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:00 PM
limpyhobbler (6,652 posts)
3. How did this happen?
|
Don't we have rich people on our side? Where are all those Hollywood stars when we need them? Warren Buffet? Soros? I don't get how this could happen.
|
Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #3)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 10:52 PM
freshwest (31,430 posts)
12. You're the first person to ask where's the big money, but I've been thinking about it for a while.
|
Not whether or not they should give money, but why they should.
When you see people say there is no difference between the two parties and bash all Democrats equally, would you put your money there? When we get appeals in emails saying our $5 or more will be matched, it's those celebrities and the big money people who are matching it. Those appeals are a poll about what people really value, so those with money know how the world is trending. When people I know with enough to donate, are in unions even, said they "will not give a dime to Democratic Party because 'that Obama,' (insert right wing talking point here)," what message did that send to those people with big money? That's the best answer I can give you, limpyhobbler. And I won't speak about this again. N/T. |
Response to freshwest (Reply #12)
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 06:07 AM
HiPointDem (16,974 posts)
18. baloney. big money supports union busting.
Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #3)
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 06:01 AM
Selatius (20,440 posts)
17. I would say that the wealthy 1% have more purchasing power than Hollywood.
|
Yes, Buffett and Soros are both billionaires, but for every liberal business person, there are likely several more who are just as right wing in political ideology.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:09 PM
Chorophyll (5,042 posts)
4. This is really upsetting.
|
A tremendous corporate machine behind every dinky Republican governor in the country. It's frightening.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:22 PM
Chan790 (13,719 posts)
5. I prefer to look at it this way:
|
If 34% of Walker's funds came from WI donors...that's $10.37M
If 74% of Barrett's funds came from WI donors...that's $..2.89M That's a bit worse than a 3:1 spending split towards the GOP among the people and corporations of Wisconsin. We do pretty well in elections when the spending is that close. Even better admittedly when the money-gap is in our favor...but 3:1 is not terrible. The GOP and Friends is probably going to outspend the President by a wider margin than that by November...and will almost assuredly lose. |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 06:59 PM
fascisthunter (28,608 posts)
6. this isn't a democracy... it's a large Market
|
those with the money get what they want, the rest are screwed.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 08:11 PM
SoutherDem (2,151 posts)
7. Yes, but Barrett is the bad guy for taking help from unions
|
Walker has no spending limits plus takes money from ever fat cat Republican in the country and that is fair politics.
What hypocrites! |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 08:25 PM
Generic Other (20,300 posts)
8. Only the orange ones get to vote
|
There is that.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 08:29 PM
JPZenger (5,647 posts)
9. Walker had no limit on contribution per person, Barrett did
|
In a quirk in State law, because Walker was fighting recall, he could accept unlimited contributions from each person. The normal limits on the amount of contributions did not apply because it was not a regular election. Meanwhile, Barrett did have to comply with those limits because he was running for office.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 09:05 PM
Voice for Peace (8,394 posts)
11. thanks!! that's a great link for live election reporting, pictures & posts from great people
|
k/r!!!!!! WINWISCONSINWIN
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 06:45 AM
Angry Dragon (24,073 posts)
14. Politicians and government are for sale
|
so the more money you have the more politicians you can buy
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 09:11 AM
Major Hogwash (12,365 posts)
15. That's it, right there.
|
That's the whole shebang explained in 1 graph.
$60 million dollars spent on ads bashing Barrett non-stop for 2 whole months. And ads touting Walker as the next coming of Christ for 2 whole months. |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:18 AM
Delphinus (6,279 posts)
16. So glad
|
I clicked on this thread. Thanks!
|


