HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » George Carlin on "bi...

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:04 AM

George Carlin on "bi-partisanship"...

8 replies, 2466 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply George Carlin on "bi-partisanship"... (Original post)
kentuck Jun 2012 OP
TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #1
byeya Jun 2012 #2
JitterbugPerfume Jun 2012 #4
byeya Jun 2012 #6
Odin2005 Jun 2012 #3
scheming daemons Jun 2012 #5
awoke_in_2003 Jun 2012 #7
stupidicus Jun 2012 #8

Response to kentuck (Original post)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:09 AM

1. "Bipartisan" means fucked coming and going.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:18 AM

2. Carlin was a combination of Paine and Twain. He didn't

 

write as well as the latter but he was funnier than the former and was truly insightful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to byeya (Reply #2)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 09:39 AM

4. a combination ofPaine and Twain--

I really like that!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JitterbugPerfume (Reply #4)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 10:51 AM

6. I thought that George was funny from his Al Sleet, Hippy Dippy Weatherman days, and he

 

just got funnier and more relevant as he grew older. For being in an ultra-competitive profession, he stayed on top
for 30+ years which is quite an accomplishment. I miss him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 09:35 AM

3. "Bipartisan" means the corporatists are about to fuck you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 10:01 AM

5. please stop with the "Republicans and Democrats" are the same meme

That's intellectually lazy and demonstrably false.

If you think Obama is no different from Romney, Pelosi is no different than Boehner, and Reid is no different than McConnell...

... Then you need to have your head examined.


Look.. I am the biggest Carlin fan in the world (see my signature below), but George hasn't been around the past four years to see shit like the Ryan budget and the Tea Party. Carlin would NOT think there's no difference now.


Quit doing the GOP's dirty work of lowering Democratic enthusiasm for the President.

Posts like these, that present false equivalences, do nothing positive. They only act to help depress our turnout. Which helps Romney.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scheming daemons (Reply #5)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:02 AM

7. We can agree...

that repubs are batshit crazy these days, right? That being said, when the puke are agreeing with the dems, which doesn't happen often, we should be very, very worried.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scheming daemons (Reply #5)

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:23 AM

8. I'd say his attitude would be the same

it's not that there aren't diffs worthy of a distinction, but rather whether the distinctions ALWAYS make for much of a difference in fact or perception-wise in "bipartisan" efforts.

Carlin made a very narrow case here involving "bipartisanship", which of course means that a significant portion/proportion on both sides are unified on a political/legislative goal, good or bad, which he qualified with "usually". Given that was the narrow case made, I'd say the only way to determine the validity of his observation would be to compare and contrast ALL of the "bipartisan" legislative efforts in recent times to determine if "usually/more often than not" is a valid characterization.

In other words, in his opinion, "usually" when that happens, but not always, it means you should look for your tube of KY jelly.

It's not a statement meaning that both sides are identical on ALL issues or even approximately so. I've long argued that we have a faux duopoly, good cop/bad cop condition in DC, but that's not an argument for the parties and their political goals being "identical". It does however, certainly come close on foreign policy issues more often than not.

The Iraq War for example, was a bi-partisan effort, no doubt in part because of all the Bill Clinton lies on the matter, which paved the way for Bush selling his. But their shared evil somewhat ended at our shorelines, given the diffs on domestic policy, e.g. tax raising v cuts, etc, with other similarities Clinton's DLC goonage on that front notwithstanding, e.g. desire to privatise SS, the repeal of Glass- Steagall, etc.

Another bad one is here http://educate-yourself.org/cn/patriotact20012006senatevote.shtml

then we have the good http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0531/House-approves-veterans-health-measures-in-bipartisan-vote

there's no false equivalence here, there's merely you conflating the observation that "usually" as Carlin observed, both sides work together to screw us all, with a case for both parties being identical that nobody has made.

this is the origin of the "lesser of two evils" concept voters like me base their decisions on.

as a side note, as such a voter, I've argued for years now, that the fear of the far more evil rightwingnuts insures BHO's reelection, because it will eclipse and bury the many disappointments BHO has accumulated in the voting booth.

But by all means, keep thinking that he/the dems should be free of criticisms (which was implied by Carlin there) because of the enthusiasm-dampening effect that might have, and keep ignoring the lack of any motivation on their part to change silence would certainly result in.

That's what Bushbots did for 8 years, and look what happened...

The idea that Carlin would be supportive of giving the dems or BHO a pass based on fears of election losses, is ludicrous. I'm real sure for example, that he's have been wholly supportive of BHO's drone strikes, assassination of US citizens, or current defense he's mounting of the right to tap your phone. http://dailykos.com/story/2012/05/31/1096289/-Open-thread-for-night-owls-Civil-liberties-be-damned


"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread