Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:28 AM Jan 2016

We need a world wide ban on manufacturing of all weapons

The manufacturing of weapons is what need to make illegal. It would not violate the Constitution. It would not violate human rights.

We need international treaties and UN enforcement of a complete ban on weapons of mass death.

If the world can make treaties to ban a plant that never harmed anyone then the world can definately ban tools of murder.

You never hear a world leader say we need to go after the manufactures of murder. No instead we pump trillions of dollars in the weapons industry every year and then wonder why there is so much death and destruction.

Until leaders of the world lead through non-violence there will never be peace.

Obama is the biggest hypocrit of them all asking for gun control while sending billions of dollars of guns and bullets to cause death and destruction in another country.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We need a world wide ban on manufacturing of all weapons (Original Post) WDIM Jan 2016 OP
Good luck. Warpy Jan 2016 #1
This shit again. Here are the facts on our exports whatthehey Jan 2016 #48
Yeah. GGJohn Jan 2016 #2
Far out man. linuxman Jan 2016 #3
This may be your most substantial contribution to any discussion to date. LanternWaste Jan 2016 #50
You sure like to type. linuxman Jan 2016 #51
Can people still get that plant any time they want? The2ndWheel Jan 2016 #4
Sure and people will still use weapons to kill WDIM Jan 2016 #5
What about those of us that want to use firearms legitimately? GGJohn Jan 2016 #6
Hunt like a real man use a bow. WDIM Jan 2016 #8
A bow is a weapon and I thught you wanted all weapons to be banned. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #11
I do hunt with a bow during bow season, GGJohn Jan 2016 #12
The same business as any law passed for the safety of all people. nt WDIM Jan 2016 #17
No such law has been passed, nor will any such law ever be passed, GGJohn Jan 2016 #19
Its the most feasible WDIM Jan 2016 #25
Well, then, I can only conclude that you're not serious about gun control, GGJohn Jan 2016 #26
There is no serious gun control until we stop building the guns. nt WDIM Jan 2016 #31
The reason homo sapiens invented tools was because he didn't have big claws or teeth. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #7
And now that we have killed all the predators besides WDIM Jan 2016 #9
There's still quite a bit of the world where humans are considered lunch by the wildlife. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #15
Really? GGJohn Jan 2016 #16
Coyotes and Cougars aren't good listeners. Do you you have any fluffy bunnies I could tell it to? el_bryanto Jan 2016 #22
We have Jacks and Cottontails, will those do? eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #24
So you think you'll get Russia & China & N Korea & Iran on board with this? EX500rider Jan 2016 #56
We actually need realistic proposals. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #10
If we are serious about gun control the first step WDIM Jan 2016 #13
Not gonna happen. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #14
Then there are no realistic proposals. WDIM Jan 2016 #18
Thanks for admitting you have no realistic proposals. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #20
Neither do you or anybody else. WDIM Jan 2016 #21
One question... sarisataka Jan 2016 #23
That will go unanswered Glassunion Jan 2016 #34
A campaign of sternly-worded letters. Dr. Strange Jan 2016 #59
But, but, but that contradicts the Law of the Profit LiberalEsto Jan 2016 #27
It Also Contradicts The Law of Common Sense ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #28
It contradicts the law of common sense WDIM Jan 2016 #30
No, Professor made an excellent point. Glassunion Jan 2016 #36
Then by your rationale we should just legalize heroin. nt WDIM Jan 2016 #42
It's working quite well in Switzerland. Glassunion Jan 2016 #45
And heroin totally disappeared, right? Codeine Jan 2016 #39
"If you are building a machine built for murder.... EX500rider Jan 2016 #57
Not A Gun Owner ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #58
You're playing right into the hands of Infowars. This is exactly what they want. Initech Jan 2016 #29
Anything can be used as a weapon... ileus Jan 2016 #32
Indeed Glassunion Jan 2016 #37
No (nt) bigwillq Jan 2016 #33
In the US TeddyR Jan 2016 #35
It does not violate the second amendment WDIM Jan 2016 #41
If something is protected the government cannot prohibit/inhibit the manufacture of that thing. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #47
You are as crazy as the NRA. Silly plan. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #38
Then the country that made weapons would rule the world LittleBlue Jan 2016 #40
Anyone with a halfway well-equipped workshop Binkie The Clown Jan 2016 #43
Seriously, what fantasy world are you living in? Lurks Often Jan 2016 #44
I am sure Putin, Iran, and ISIS would comply n/t MosheFeingold Jan 2016 #46
People have been making weapons since the stone age davidn3600 Jan 2016 #49
sorry, this is flamebait nt steve2470 Jan 2016 #52
People will still stab each other with unicorn horns. Throd Jan 2016 #53
That would be nice... deathrind Jan 2016 #54
What exactly is it that you want? To eliminate violence? Or to eliminate violence by guns? Or? jonno99 Jan 2016 #55
As a hunter, good luck with that, LOL. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #60

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
48. This shit again. Here are the facts on our exports
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016

All military added together doesn't come close to equalling, for example, Pharma OR cars OR medical equipment OR industrial machines OR fuel oil OR vehicle parts and that's just from a quick eyeball scan. Military exports aren't even close to 5% of our industrial exports (the data exclude our massive IP exports such as entertainment and consulting)

http://census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/product/enduse/exports/c0000.html

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
50. This may be your most substantial contribution to any discussion to date.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

This may be your most substantial contribution to any discussion to date.

(The petulance of children is often best met by more petulance, regardless of how it may be rationalized as something else)

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
51. You sure like to type.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jan 2016

If it were ever anything of consequence I might care.

You remind me of me back from when I was 14 and thought I was the only kid on the block with a thesaurus.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
4. Can people still get that plant any time they want?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jan 2016

There are laws against a lot of things, and people still find a way to get and do everything that is illegal.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
5. Sure and people will still use weapons to kill
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jan 2016

But we dont have to allow the manufacturing of weapons whose sole purpose is to murder.

No where is there a right to the manufacturing of machines of death. And banning the manufacturing of these murder machines would be the first realistic step to taking the tools away.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
8. Hunt like a real man use a bow.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jan 2016

Human kind went thousands of years without using guns to hunt or target practice i think we'll be alright.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
12. I do hunt with a bow during bow season,
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jan 2016

but I also like to hunt with my AR-10, what business is it of yours to decide what I may or may not use to provide my family and the needy with food?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
19. No such law has been passed, nor will any such law ever be passed,
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jan 2016

try starting with something feasible, not fantasy.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
26. Well, then, I can only conclude that you're not serious about gun control,
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jan 2016

or you're living in some kind of fantasy land.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
9. And now that we have killed all the predators besides
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jan 2016

ourselves these tools have become adequated.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
22. Coyotes and Cougars aren't good listeners. Do you you have any fluffy bunnies I could tell it to?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:02 PM
Jan 2016

I'd do that.

Bryant

EX500rider

(10,835 posts)
56. So you think you'll get Russia & China & N Korea & Iran on board with this?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jan 2016

Or is the US just suppose to unilaterally disarm? And rely on.....prayer I guess? Good luck maybe?

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
13. If we are serious about gun control the first step
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jan 2016

is to stop the manufacturing of weapons of mass murder. no other proposal is serious until that happens.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
18. Then there are no realistic proposals.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jan 2016

If the world can't say enough. We will no longer build these weapons of mass death then there are no other realisitic proposals.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
21. Neither do you or anybody else.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:01 PM
Jan 2016

This is the most rational realistic proposal to stop the manufacturing. But if that cant be done then nothing can be done we need to just accept gun violence and mass murder as a permanent part of human life.

War death destruction will never cease till we take their tools away.

We might as well start WW3 and get it over with.

sarisataka

(18,570 posts)
23. One question...
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:03 PM
Jan 2016

how will the UN enforce this weapons manufacturing ban if, say NK or China says "no, we will keep making weapons"?

Dr. Strange

(25,917 posts)
59. A campaign of sternly-worded letters.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jan 2016

Unless those are considered weapons too, in which case we're screwed.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
27. But, but, but that contradicts the Law of the Profit
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jan 2016

As in the Holy Weapons Manufacturers must rake in their Profits regardless of how much war, death and misery they wreak upon humanity.

ProfessorGAC

(64,983 posts)
28. It Also Contradicts The Law of Common Sense
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jan 2016

Prohibition doesn't work. It didn't with alcohol. It's not with drugs. And remember, with alcohol, the first thing they went after was the manufacturers and distributors to shut off the flow.

Along comes organized crime and then things were pretty much back to normal, except for the extra blood in the streets.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
30. It contradicts the law of common sense
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:53 PM
Jan 2016

To keep creating murder machines and expect them not to be used.

It contradicts the law of common sense to say you're against gun violence death and murder but pump trillions of dollars into the gun industry.

There is no other proposal out there that makes any sense then to stop the manufacture of tools whose sole purpose is to murder.

Its illegal to manufacture heroin because its dangerous and it kills people and it should be illegal to manufacture weapons who are dangerous and are meant to kill people.

Will people try to violate the law ofcourse but the penalty should be death. If you are building a machine built for murder you are the murderer and murderers should be put to death.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
36. No, Professor made an excellent point.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:08 PM
Jan 2016

If you make it illegal to manufacture something, it will continue to be manufactured. No matter how illegal you make it, like even super secret probation level of illegal, it will still be manufactured. Just like drugs, just like booze, someone will still make them. Period.

Except now it is being manufactured with zero regulation possibilities. The government can regulate businesses. Right now the gun industry does have many regulations to abide by. If you shut them down, and an illegal manufacturer opens up shop, you will never have the remote possibility of regulating that business. Period.

You're missing the point. You say it's illegal to manufacture heroin, correct? Then why is it that you can buy heroin from a completely unregulated illegal market?

Death penalty? Please...

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
45. It's working quite well in Switzerland.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

It's very regulated, and is having a rather positive effect.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
39. And heroin totally disappeared, right?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jan 2016

Oh wait; I could score some in all of about 15 minutes if I were so inclined.

EX500rider

(10,835 posts)
57. "If you are building a machine built for murder....
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jan 2016

......you are the murderer and murderers should be put to death."

So your solution to people being killed is to kill people? lol

ProfessorGAC

(64,983 posts)
58. Not A Gun Owner
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:27 PM
Jan 2016

So you're preaching to the choir. Unfortunately, your plan is doomed to make things worse.

Initech

(100,059 posts)
29. You're playing right into the hands of Infowars. This is exactly what they want.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jan 2016

They would be willing to start a war over this sort of thing, and it's the very thing that Alex Jones is preaching would happen. I'm willing to bet that militia in Oregon are followers of theirs.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
35. In the US
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:05 PM
Jan 2016

Such a ban arguably violates the Second Amendment (and not sure how you ban production of a legal item). And the US will never get cooperation from countries that have companies that export a lot of firearms they make, like Belgium, Germany and the Czech Republic.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
41. It does not violate the second amendment
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jan 2016

There is no right to manufacture weapons of mass murder.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
47. If something is protected the government cannot prohibit/inhibit the manufacture of that thing.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jan 2016

For example, you cannot tax printer's ink because it impedes the exercise of 1A rights.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
40. Then the country that made weapons would rule the world
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jan 2016

That suggestion just doesn't work unless every country on earth is 100% trustworthy.

North Korea as hegemon? Nah. I'd rather the good guys keep the biggest weapons.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
43. Anyone with a halfway well-equipped workshop
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jan 2016

can make guns in his garage. They aren't really all that high-tech.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
44. Seriously, what fantasy world are you living in?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:53 PM
Jan 2016

Your proposal has zero chance of ever coming true.


deathrind

(1,786 posts)
54. That would be nice...
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 03:47 PM
Jan 2016

Make all the wanna be toughies go back to up close and personal with pointy objects if they really wanna try to hurt someone but not likely to happen without a catastrophic reset.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
55. What exactly is it that you want? To eliminate violence? Or to eliminate violence by guns? Or?
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 03:53 PM
Jan 2016

I think you'd make a better start by eliminating the MEAN PEOPLE. If you can't accomplish that, you're just kicking the can down the road...

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
60. As a hunter, good luck with that, LOL.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 12:58 AM
Jan 2016

Nonsense like that is why a lot of sensible gun owners are easily scared by the NRA.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We need a world wide ban ...