Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 04:33 PM Oct 2015

Army intelligence system said down during hospital attack

WASHINGTON — The Army's $5 billion intelligence network, which is designed to give commanders battlefield awareness but has been criticized for years as a boondoggle, was not working in Afghanistan during the recent American air attack on a hospital, according to a member of Congress who has been in touch with military whistleblowers.

Significant elements of the Distributed Common Ground System, a network of computers and sensors designed to knit together disparate strands of intelligence, were off line in Afghanistan when U.S. commanders approved an air strike Oct. 3 that killed 22 staff, patients and others at a Doctors without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Rep. Duncan Hunter wrote Tuesday to Defense Secretary Ash Carter.

"The purpose of DCGS is to enable commanders and service members to 'see and know' the battlefield and prevent incidents like the airstrike on the hospital in Kunduz," wrote Hunter, a California Republican, combat veteran and armed services committee member who has been a persistent DCGS critic.

"Senior Army leaders have gone to extraordinary lengths in recent years to deny evidence of the failures of the DCGS program, and I am asking for your help to prevent them from doing so following this tragic incident," he wrote.

It's unclear whether the breakdown of key DCGS systems contributed to the decision to approve the air attack, which Pentagon officials say was a mistake. But the coordinates of the hospital were entered into an intelligence database that is part of the DCGS intelligence network, according to a U.S. official who would not be quoted because he was not authorized to discuss the matter.

http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/military/2015/10/20/army-intelligence-system-said-down-during-hospital-attack/74281194/

FIVE BILLION?? Did they try turning it off and turning it back on again?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
2. It seems less like a new iteration and more just additional, relevant information...
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 04:38 PM
Oct 2015

It seems less like a new iteration and more just additional, relevant information-- as it's neither excusing, nor being be used as an excuse for the incident.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
5. IF this is true, and I have my doubts, why was there no backup system in place to verify targets?
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 05:03 PM
Oct 2015

We had the coords of the hospital, if the system is down then manually check the coords of known friendly sites if need be, or hold off on using lethal force.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Army intelligence system ...