General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsArmy intelligence system said down during hospital attack
WASHINGTON The Army's $5 billion intelligence network, which is designed to give commanders battlefield awareness but has been criticized for years as a boondoggle, was not working in Afghanistan during the recent American air attack on a hospital, according to a member of Congress who has been in touch with military whistleblowers.
Significant elements of the Distributed Common Ground System, a network of computers and sensors designed to knit together disparate strands of intelligence, were off line in Afghanistan when U.S. commanders approved an air strike Oct. 3 that killed 22 staff, patients and others at a Doctors without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Rep. Duncan Hunter wrote Tuesday to Defense Secretary Ash Carter.
"The purpose of DCGS is to enable commanders and service members to 'see and know' the battlefield and prevent incidents like the airstrike on the hospital in Kunduz," wrote Hunter, a California Republican, combat veteran and armed services committee member who has been a persistent DCGS critic.
"Senior Army leaders have gone to extraordinary lengths in recent years to deny evidence of the failures of the DCGS program, and I am asking for your help to prevent them from doing so following this tragic incident," he wrote.
It's unclear whether the breakdown of key DCGS systems contributed to the decision to approve the air attack, which Pentagon officials say was a mistake. But the coordinates of the hospital were entered into an intelligence database that is part of the DCGS intelligence network, according to a U.S. official who would not be quoted because he was not authorized to discuss the matter.
http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/military/2015/10/20/army-intelligence-system-said-down-during-hospital-attack/74281194/
FIVE BILLION?? Did they try turning it off and turning it back on again?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)When the alibi keeps changing, somebody lying.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It seems less like a new iteration and more just additional, relevant information-- as it's neither excusing, nor being be used as an excuse for the incident.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)We had the coords of the hospital, if the system is down then manually check the coords of known friendly sites if need be, or hold off on using lethal force.