Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat “Orwellian” Really Means: An Animated Lesson About the Use & Abuse of the Term
In all of our minds, the word Orwellian conjures up a certain kind of setting: a vast, fixed bureaucracy; a dead-eyed public forced into gray, uniform living conditions; the very words we use mangled in order to better serve the interests of power. We think, on the whole, of the kind of bleakness with which George Orwell saturated the future England that provides the setting for his famous novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Almost seventy years after that books publication, we now use Orwellian to describe the views of the political party opposite us, the Department of Motor Vehicles anything, in short, that strikes us as brutish, monolithic, implacable, deliberately stripped of meaning, or in any way authoritarian.
We use the word so much, in fact, that it cant help but have come detached from its original meaning. I can tell you that we live in Orwellian times, writes the Guardians Sam Jordison. Or that America is waging Orwellian wars, that TV is Orwellian, that the police are Orwellian, that Amazon is Orwellian, that publishers are Orwellian too, that Amazon withdrew copies of Nineteen Eighty-Four, which was Orwellian (although Orwell wouldnt like it), that Vladimir Putin, George W. Bush, David Cameron, Ed Milliband, Kim Jong-un and all his relatives are Orwellian, that the TV programme Big Brother is both Orwellian and not as Orwellian as it claims to be, that Obama engages in Obamathink, that climate-change deniers and climate change scientists are Orwellian, that neoclassical economics employs Orwellian language. That, in fact, everything is Orwellian, Jordison continues.
Here to restore sense to our usage of the most common word derived from the name of a writer, we have the Ted-Ed video at the top of the post. In it, and in the associated lesson on Ted-Eds site, Noah Tavlin breaks down the terms meaning, its origin, the failings of our modern interpretation of it, and how truly Orwellian phenomena continue to invade our daily life without our even realizing it. The next time you hear someone say Orwellian,' says Tavlin, pay close attention. If theyre talking about the deceptive and manipulative use of language, theyre on the right track. If theyre talking about mass surveillance and intrusive government, theyre describing something authoritarian, but not necessarily Orwellian. And if they use it as an all-purpose word for any ideas they dislike, its possible that their statements are more Orwellian than whatever it is theyre criticizing an outcome Orwell himself might well have foreseen.
We use the word so much, in fact, that it cant help but have come detached from its original meaning. I can tell you that we live in Orwellian times, writes the Guardians Sam Jordison. Or that America is waging Orwellian wars, that TV is Orwellian, that the police are Orwellian, that Amazon is Orwellian, that publishers are Orwellian too, that Amazon withdrew copies of Nineteen Eighty-Four, which was Orwellian (although Orwell wouldnt like it), that Vladimir Putin, George W. Bush, David Cameron, Ed Milliband, Kim Jong-un and all his relatives are Orwellian, that the TV programme Big Brother is both Orwellian and not as Orwellian as it claims to be, that Obama engages in Obamathink, that climate-change deniers and climate change scientists are Orwellian, that neoclassical economics employs Orwellian language. That, in fact, everything is Orwellian, Jordison continues.
Here to restore sense to our usage of the most common word derived from the name of a writer, we have the Ted-Ed video at the top of the post. In it, and in the associated lesson on Ted-Eds site, Noah Tavlin breaks down the terms meaning, its origin, the failings of our modern interpretation of it, and how truly Orwellian phenomena continue to invade our daily life without our even realizing it. The next time you hear someone say Orwellian,' says Tavlin, pay close attention. If theyre talking about the deceptive and manipulative use of language, theyre on the right track. If theyre talking about mass surveillance and intrusive government, theyre describing something authoritarian, but not necessarily Orwellian. And if they use it as an all-purpose word for any ideas they dislike, its possible that their statements are more Orwellian than whatever it is theyre criticizing an outcome Orwell himself might well have foreseen.
http://www.openculture.com/2015/10/what-orwellian-really-means-an-animated-lesson-about-the-use-abuse-of-the-term.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 688 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What “Orwellian” Really Means: An Animated Lesson About the Use & Abuse of the Term (Original Post)
MerryBlooms
Oct 2015
OP
Ichigo Kurosaki
(167 posts)1. Says a lot about PC speak. [nt]
MisterP
(23,730 posts)2. "logocracy"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logocracy
(though delightfully Orwell loved the idea of Anglish as its counterpart)
(though delightfully Orwell loved the idea of Anglish as its counterpart)