General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeter King: Boehner exit means 'the crazies have taken over the party'
I think it signals the crazies have taken over the party, taken over to the party that you can remove a speaker of the House whos second in line to be president, a constitutional officer in the middle of his term with no allegations of impropriety, a person whos honest and doing his job. This has never happened before in our country," King said in an interview with CNN's Dana Bash on Friday afternoon. "He could have stayed on.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/john-boehner-resigns-peter-king-reaction-214083#ixzz3mucLNHR6
madaboutharry
(40,208 posts)is crazy himself. If he is calling them crazies it must be pretty bad.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)"Shut it down"? Let's see some links to this. I can't wait to see this. Hint - we won't!
Hint - Iowa
madaboutharry
(40,208 posts)after the 2000 election.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)You go back to 2000? The king that is a jerk is from Iowa who is saying that today???? That is who should be ostracized constantly.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts). . . held hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims?
That moderate Peter King?
Well, maybe by the standards of Ted Cruz or Scott Walker, he's moderate.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)The reason I give the New York king a bit of slack is because he is a thorn to the tea party. As far as 2011 and anything for the Muslims. I think it's because he is in New York. But I don't know if he is anti Muslim though. I guess I want you to hate Iowa rep King too.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)But he'd have to live with his conscience after that private moment with the pope, something he knows he cannot do.
valerief
(53,235 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)will stop being cons.
If that mental illness is just good ole fashioned racism, then that is what it is.
But it can be more complicated than that as well.
1monster
(11,012 posts)was responsible for the Pope's visit to Congress and looked forward to it.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Can we PLEASE stop pretending the pope has anything to do with this?
The crazies took control of the party with Reagan, after they had been gunning for it since Nixon at least.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)that was not already firmly in place 30 years ago. They were warmongering, anti-union, anti-gay, anti-black, anti-woman, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, anti-environmental, anti-abortion, anti-tax, anti-science, anti-intelligence, anti-public sector and anti-just about anything else decent you care to name. What they are now is the absolutely logical continuation of all that.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)The Doom clock of climate change is ticking...and it has no mercy.
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)And with every model the affects are more accelerated than predicted.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)The devils eventually take over.
I just hope some of the fistfights at the RNC are televised next year.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)guess his mirror isn't big enough
jalan48
(13,859 posts)seafan
(9,387 posts)As discussed in this thread:
None Dare Call It Stolen, Harper's Magazine, August, 2005
King, who is well known in Washington for his eccentric utterances, says he was kidding, that he has known Pelosi for years, that she is a clown, and that her project was a spoof. Still, he said it. And laughter, despite the counsel of Kenneth Blackwells press flack, seems an inappropriate response to the prospect of a stolen electionas does the advice that we get over it. The point of the Conyers report, and of this report as well, is not to send Bush packing and put Kerry in his place. The Framers could no more conceive of electoral fraud on such a scale than they could picture Fox News Channel or the Pentagon; and so we have no constitutional recourse, should it be proven, finally, that the wrong guy won. The point of our revisiting the last election, rather, is to see exactly what the damage was so that the people can demand appropriate reforms. Those who say we should move on from that suspicious race and work instead on bigger issueslike electoral reformare urging the impossible; for there has never been a great reform that was not driven by some major scandal.
AP
Peter King: Boehner exit means 'the crazies have taken over the party', September 25, 2015
We will never forget the thieves.
And our voting system remains infinitely vulnerable to this day.
1monster
(11,012 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)DFW
(54,355 posts)Just think, on election day, 2004, at the White House, Peter King said to a TV camera, "We won. It's all over but the counting. And we'll take care of the counting." Well, at least he was honest about it. But he has no business wondering how the crazies took over his party. He helped enable them. No Bush would have meant no Roberts and Alito, thus no Citizens United, and no majority of crazies in the House Republican caucus.
Remember Goethe's Sorcerer's Apprentice: "Die ich rief, die Geister werd ich nun nicht los." Rep. King, the crazies ARE your "Geister."
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)I would consider anyone pro-NSA-surveilance-state of "the crazies."