Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,035 posts)
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 05:43 PM Sep 2015

Obama Administration Set To Take Away Money From Cities That Criminalize Homelessness

Bravo!!

http://www.occupydemocrats.com/obama-administration-set-to-take-away-money-from-cities-that-criminalize-homelessness/


Obama Administration Set To Take Away Money From Cities That Criminalize Homelessness
by James DeVinnie • September 24, 2015


In an important step for the rights of the homeless, the Obama administration has announced that federal funding to combat homelessness will be tied to municipalities cracking down on criminalization of the homeless. The move comes after the administration argued last month in federal court that local ordinances criminalizing homelessness – an pressing issue given the recent uptick in homelessness in many cities – are a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

The change in policy comes at a time when inhumane laws criminalizing the homeless have proliferated at an astounding rate. A recent report by UC Berkeley, for example, identified more than 500 such laws on the books in only 58 cities in California, where the homeless population has reached epidemic proportions and efforts to address it have generally ranged from the misguided to the totally inhumane. Such laws, typically shrouded in language identifying them as “quality-of-life,” or – without any irony regarding the similarity to Reconstruction-era Black Codes – “anti-vagrancy” laws, make it illegal to do things like sit down on a sidewalk, panhandle, or sleep in public places. Given the shameful inadequacy of most cities’ shelter programs and their often-inhumane conditions, these new laws have left the homeless, many of whom are working, with very few options to live a law-abiding existence.

The administration’s move applies specifically to almost $2 billion of Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) grants that are provided to localities annually to combat homelessness in public-private partnerships. Under the Fed’s new rules, in order to qualify for the grants cities must describe the efforts they are making to combat the criminalization of the homeless through working with law enforcement and promoting new, more humane ordinances. Homeless advocates hope the policy will have a similar effect to an earlier Obama administration initiative, Race to the Top, that tied the provision of federal education funding to local districts raising their standards. Maria Foscarinis, Executive Director of the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, praised the move, saying: “We welcome the federal government’s direction of tax limited dollars to the places that will most effectively use that money to address homelessness.

Besides the obvious human rights benefit of directing sparse homelessness funding to beneficial rather than combative initiatives, the new policy will save money for both taxpayers and municipalities given that criminalization initiatives have been found to be counterproductive and leaving the homeless on the streets – as criminalization without funding for support ensures – costs more than three times as much as providing basic housing and services to the homeless population. The Obama administration deserves to be commended for its efforts to support the homeless, who often seem to exist in a marginalized and disadvantaged world outside the aegis of the rights and freedoms that most of us take for granted.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Administration Set To Take Away Money From Cities That Criminalize Homelessness (Original Post) babylonsister Sep 2015 OP
Woo! Gobama! Scootaloo Sep 2015 #1
So he is going to take money from Berkeley? yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #28
It's about time! elleng Sep 2015 #2
How bout just "GOOD" would any con ever do this? NoJusticeNoPeace Sep 2015 #4
Yes, go Bama! Whoo-whoo-whoo! This one thing is so important Hortensis Sep 2015 #3
A great big thank you Mr. President!! mmonk Sep 2015 #5
Right on, Mr. President! Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #6
WOW! Obama's certainly on a roll. ... no fucks left to give. Thank you Mr. President. -nt- 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #7
The fact that Obama had to threaten this action means ... DrBulldog Sep 2015 #8
Thank you, President Obama! Or Thanks Obama :-) Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #9
Remember when we were told it didn't matter which party held office? cally Sep 2015 #10
so very needed k/r n/t w0nderer Sep 2015 #11
Kicked and recommended! Wonderful idea! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #12
K&R. This is a great development. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #13
Well done Mr. President mcar Sep 2015 #14
Great news malaise Sep 2015 #15
Do it! yuiyoshida Sep 2015 #16
Thank you President Obama think Sep 2015 #17
K & R historylovr Sep 2015 #18
Great news! Thank you Mr. President! CrispyQ Sep 2015 #19
But didn't the Pope say to criminalize homelessness? Oh, no. Just the opposite. Gobama. nt valerief Sep 2015 #20
K & R mountain grammy Sep 2015 #21
Wonderful news! n/t JimDandy Sep 2015 #22
good cindyperry2010 Sep 2015 #23
I think he is doing pretty good being a lame duck, maybe the best now that he is not beholding to LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #24
Bravo A Little Weird Sep 2015 #25
K&R brer cat Sep 2015 #26
The government is mainly responsible for putting them in this situation... Frustratedlady Sep 2015 #27
Yeah and the next democratic president could have reopened them yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #29
Agreed rpannier Sep 2015 #31
And Madison Wisconsin will lose money AllyCat Sep 2015 #30
OMG... that POSUCS... JTFrog Sep 2015 #32
Good move. I have watched as the police go into the homeless jwirr Sep 2015 #33
in fundieville where I live, the reichies on the city council have proposed a sit-lie niyad Sep 2015 #34
Great! NealK Sep 2015 #35
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
28. So he is going to take money from Berkeley?
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 01:10 AM
Sep 2015

Well if true that should change their tune. I am stunned Berkeley being so progressive would be so hard on the homeless. Can you imagine if the president seriously stopped all federal funding to states that have cities that are not respectful to the homeless. Holy cow! You would see respect and help happen yesterday. The reason I said states is because I don't think the federal money gives money directly to cities.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
3. Yes, go Bama! Whoo-whoo-whoo! This one thing is so important
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 05:49 PM
Sep 2015

if we are going to be the America we once thought we were. A land of the free may not be as tidy and "respectable" looking as pubs like, but that's just too bad.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
8. The fact that Obama had to threaten this action means ...
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 06:14 PM
Sep 2015

. . . the United States now has so much institutionalized hate within it, so much so that it gets harder each day to look at ourselves in the mirror and have any respect for what we see.

cally

(21,591 posts)
10. Remember when we were told it didn't matter which party held office?
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 06:16 PM
Sep 2015

Another example of why we have to elect another Democratic President next time.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
17. Thank you President Obama
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 07:17 PM
Sep 2015

Being homeless is not a crime. It's the sad reality of an uncaring and unjust society...

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
27. The government is mainly responsible for putting them in this situation...
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 10:49 PM
Sep 2015

Reagan closed the mental hospitals, Bush took their homes and money, plus put the vets in a hell hole, ruined some of their lives with PTSD and broke up families...good for Obama. He's giving them back some of what was taken from them.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
29. Yeah and the next democratic president could have reopened them
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 01:13 AM
Sep 2015

Yes Reagan did bad things but sheesh they could have been corrected by now. Everyone acts like he was the strongest president ever. Changes could have happened well after he left. 35 years is a long time to still have Reagan policies.

rpannier

(24,328 posts)
31. Agreed
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:50 AM
Sep 2015

Sadly, I agree.
Sadly in that I wish people in power had done something about it, but throwing people in jail or the streets seemed to be the cheapest answers

AllyCat

(16,152 posts)
30. And Madison Wisconsin will lose money
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 09:46 AM
Sep 2015

Thanks to our "progressive " mayor who throws away their few possessions and harasses people trying to feed them.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
32. OMG... that POSUCS...
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 12:37 PM
Sep 2015

[URL=http://www.sherv.net/][IMG][/IMG][/URL]



And as for the DU talking point that Hillary would be more of the same... well we should be so lucky as to have a POSUCS 2.0.



Just sayin, things certainly look different outside of the DU bubble.








jwirr

(39,215 posts)
33. Good move. I have watched as the police go into the homeless
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 12:49 PM
Sep 2015

areas to clear them out and destroy everything these people own. That is a total disgrace. It only makes the problem bigger.

Everything I own is in my small bedroom. I cannot begin to know what it would be like to be living in a makeshift tent city and lose everything.

This should have been done years ago.

niyad

(113,074 posts)
34. in fundieville where I live, the reichies on the city council have proposed a sit-lie
Sat Sep 26, 2015, 12:55 PM
Sep 2015

law. this city provides few resources for the homeless, frequently goes after their camps, etc., perhaps I should mention this to the reichwing mayor.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Administration Set ...