Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:24 PM Jun 2015

Read the Most Brutal Paragraph From Clarence Thomas’ Same-Sex Marriage Dissent

Justice Clarence Thomas has a fervent dissent of the Supreme Court’s historic decision to invalidate same-sex marriage bans. His argument, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, quibbles with the definition of liberty itself. “Since well before 1787, liberty has been understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement to government benefits,” Thomas writes. Working from this principle, Thomas insists that the petitioners in the case “have in no way been deprived” of their liberty. “They have been able to travel freely around the country, making their homes where they please. Far from being incarcerated or physically restrained, petitioners have been left alone to order their lives as they see fit.” And yet he takes the argument even further—because human dignity “has long been understood in this country to be innate,” here’s who else Thomas thinks hasn’t been deprived of it:

">

###

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/26/clarence_thomas_same_sex_marriage_dissent_slaves_did_not_lose_their_dignity.html?

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Read the Most Brutal Paragraph From Clarence Thomas’ Same-Sex Marriage Dissent (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2015 OP
One has to wonder how such stupid people obtain such positions of power. notadmblnd Jun 2015 #1
He was nominated by a Bush mythology Jun 2015 #16
Logic is obviously not one of Thomas' strengths. nt Live and Learn Jun 2015 #2
No, Thomas' greatest strengths are: (1) balancing pubic hairs on soda cans; and Raster Jun 2015 #7
Unrelated--but I wanted to express my admiration for your work with children. panader0 Jun 2015 #3
Thank you! DonViejo Jun 2015 #6
Thomas doesn't know the difference between "dignity" and "rights"? Boomerproud Jun 2015 #4
He has no dignity. Live and Learn Jun 2015 #9
Not only stupid, wendylaroux Jun 2015 #5
"How do people end up like this?" Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #18
It is frightening he is on SCOTUS. What an abrasive unfair fool! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2015 #8
This confirms something I have long suspected. arcane1 Jun 2015 #10
It's easy to claim what someone living as a slave or concentration camp inmate should feel stevenleser Jun 2015 #11
I'll buy that HassleCat Jun 2015 #12
he speaks bigtree Jun 2015 #13
So? G_j Jun 2015 #14
what a sad little man handmade34 Jun 2015 #15
UGH! BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #17
Am I the only one who realizes other countries read this shit too? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #19
 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
16. He was nominated by a Bush
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:47 PM
Jun 2015

The family isn't exactly known for requiring intelligence from their lackeys. Rumsfeld, Quayle, Gonsalves, Wolfowitz. Not exactly a group known for being competent much less of being towering intellectuals.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
7. No, Thomas' greatest strengths are: (1) balancing pubic hairs on soda cans; and
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:32 PM
Jun 2015

(2) dry humping Scalia's leg.

NEVER FORGET: Anita Hill WAS RIGHT!!! Thomas does NOT belong on the SCOTUS.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
3. Unrelated--but I wanted to express my admiration for your work with children.
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:29 PM
Jun 2015

The OP about you the other day was inspiring. We have some very good people here at DU!

And Clarence Thomas is an idiot.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
11. It's easy to claim what someone living as a slave or concentration camp inmate should feel
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:37 PM
Jun 2015

if you never had to live it or try at all to understand it and are completely lacking in empathy.

As others have noted its completely sick of Thomas to try to use slavery as a justification for trying to deny LGBT equality. And I would bet that if we could ask people who lived as slaves, they would completely contradict his assessment.

Of course many contemporary folks who minimize the experience treat slavery as if it was merely people compelled to work. As if they lived in a nice house, woke up at 7, had a nice breakfast with their family, and an alarm clock rang at 8:30 and the person said, oh, I need to go to that job, and then worked in good conditions until 5pm when they returned to their house with their family.

They willfully don't take into account the beatings, whippings, forced separation of families, rapes, mutilations and murders and all kinds of other depravities. Thats the only way you get to Thomas' twisted opinion here.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
12. I'll buy that
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:38 PM
Jun 2015

From a strictly libertarian point of view, it makes sense. Government should have nothing to say about marriage, which should be left entirely up to religious institutions to handle as they see fit. Government merely has to recognize (or not) what the churches have done. As long as all citizens are treated the same, Thomas is right. Of course, he's not in favor of that. He is simply lying when he says gays and lesbians had the same freedoms as other Americans.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
13. he speaks
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:39 PM
Jun 2015

...and betrays just how ignorant he actually is.

What does this Scalia toady know about dignity?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Read the Most Brutal Para...