Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Sat May 30, 2015, 07:24 PM May 2015

MaddowBlog: Why Jeb Bush's line on Alzheimer's matters

MaddowBlog:

Why Jeb Bush's line on Alzheimer's matters

Like most Republican presidential candidates, former Gov. Jeb Bush (R) tends to emphasize his support for cutting spending on most domestic priorities. But as NBC News reported yesterday, there are apparently exceptions to Bush’s preferred approach.


Presidential candidate Jeb Bush says that the nation should increase funding to find a cure for Alzheimer’s disease and should speed up the approval process for medications to treat it.

The GOP presidential hopeful, who spoke last week about his mother-in-law’s struggle with the disease, proposed the ideas to NBC News Special Anchor Maria Shriver during an email exchange

Bush specifically said, “We need to increase funding to find a cure. We need to reform FDA [regulations] to accelerate the approval process for drug and device approval at a much lower cost. We need to find more community based solutions for care.”
. ...

But in Bush’s case, there are some notable angles to keep in mind. The Tampa Bay Times’ Adam C. Smith, for example, noted that the Florida Republican’s current position is likely to annoy the state lawmakers in both parties who “recall Bush vetoing their budget items targeting Alzheimer’s research and care while at the same time approving tax cuts often mainly for the benefit of specific businesses or wealthier Floridians.”
 
Smith noted several key measures, including Bush vetoing funding in 2003 for daycare centers in Boynton Beach serving 100 adults with Alzheimer’s Disease, and then in 2004 also vetoing funding for construction of outpatient treatment centers connected with the University of South Florida’s Alzheimer’s Research Institute.
 
At the time, the Republican governor called it a “want,” not a “need.”
 
But this also reminded me of something we talked about a couple of years ago, when then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) endorsed increased funding on medical research, in part because of his father’s struggle with a neurological disorder. Jeb Bush’s line – he wants spending cuts, except on Alzheimer’s research, in part because of his mother-in-law’s ailment – is quite similar.

More
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-jeb-bushs-line-alzheimers-matters?cid=eml_mra_20150530
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog: Why Jeb Bush's line on Alzheimer's matters (Original Post) Panich52 May 2015 OP
For them, it's a need...for everyone else, it's a want. Frustratedlady May 2015 #1
It's never a priority until a repuke's hifiguy May 2015 #2
Do you remember in the Reagan years he cut funding to Alzheimer's research. Thinkingabout May 2015 #3
I am with you on that, Thinkingabout. sheshe2 May 2015 #6
I just assumed his family owned stock in a company DawgHouse May 2015 #4
It's always that way. It's an empathy impairment. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #5

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. Do you remember in the Reagan years he cut funding to Alzheimer's research.
Sat May 30, 2015, 07:34 PM
May 2015

My father had been diagnosed during that time and I thought how cruel to cut funding. In the years afterwards when Reagan began to show signs I thought he should have been pushing funding. I saw the same looks in Reagans face as I had with my father. Until you have experienced seeing a loved one affected by Alzheimer's you may not know but it is terrible.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
5. It's always that way. It's an empathy impairment.
Sat May 30, 2015, 07:36 PM
May 2015

Republicans can't empathize with anyone different from them, or outside their narrow world. Not until someone they identify as a member of their very close in-group gets a given disease do they give an shit about that disease or its sufferers, and then only for that specific disease. So, instead of health care and programmatic research, we get this unGodly patchwork of little, individual causes, each with its little foundation.

Lately when various veterans' groups & single-issue charities call on me for donations, I tell them I'm already committed to their cause, and have decided that the most effective thing I can do is send money to the progressive politicians whose positions embrace single-payer health care, more funding for the VA, & biomedical research of all sorts. They don't seem to have an answer ready for that one in their little response files.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog: Why Jeb Bush'...