General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary vs Bernie re: supporter point of view
Last edited Sat May 23, 2015, 01:57 PM - Edit history (5)
Hillary supporter, I was born into this world, I need to help make opportunity available to everyone so that we all have an equal chance at success.
Bernie supporter, I was born into this world I have a right to food shelter clothing education and healthcare. Someone needs to provide it for me.
On edit:
Who provides Bernie's free education?
Who pays for it?
Who has the knowledge to share with students
Who puts in the effort to become a professor?
Speak to that
That is what I am getting at
You never talk about that part
We just say pass a law and everyone else get in line
If you can't answer me without an insult how are you going to answer the rest of the electorate when they say the same thing I did?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They now openly push Mitt Romney's, 'Takers vs Makers' meme.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)that the education benefits paid for themselves in more and higher paid jobs, entrepreneurial advances, number of people moving out of poverty and no longer using assistance programs. Companies also benefited by having more better educated employees.
But no free education is now a rallying cry to anyone who does not want to pay for taxes. Apparently it is not about making our economic system work anymore. Just about low taxes. The only candidate I see offering that is Rs.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Last edited Sat May 23, 2015, 01:36 PM - Edit history (1)
Not sure that was your point, but your OP could be found on any right wing site.
Hillary vs Bernie re: supporter point of view [View all]
Hillary supporter, I was born into this world, I need to help make opportunity available to everyone so that we all have an equal chance at success.
Bernie supporter, I was born into this world I have a right to food shelter clothing education and healthcare. Someone needs to provide it for me.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Get about 100 hours of Union labour work in per pay period (two weeks), own and operate my own side business, and raise a child as a single parent. Do not talk to me about hard work, I know what it is.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I never said you did not work hard. I said, his post sounds like someone who works hard. Food, shelter, clothing and medical care are basic human rights and that is why I pay a ton in taxes. But, no one owes anyone a free college education. If you can get it by taxing the rich, that would be awesome. But, my piddly retirement check is not up for grabs so someone else's child can go to college free. And you and I both know that the rich will never be taxed for it so it will be the middle class people trying to raise families and us old folks who would feel the pain.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Well, this is one reason why I support Bernie and not HRC. Third way will not tax the rich. That is true because third way are Republicans.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So why even try?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)many people will not be able to get an education. Why do you have so little concern about the youth today?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)No one is gleeful about it. The problem is the middle class and old folks can't afford it and these are the people who pay all the taxes.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)point. Bernie often speaks of the unfairness of our tax system.
For the most part Bernie is telling us what we need to do to make this country a better place for all of us. Things worth fighting for. He does not say it is going to be easy. He just says he will fight with us as he has been for 40 years.
And yes, congress will still be R for at least 2 years after the election. President Obama tried to get them to work with him by compromising but that did not work. I doubt we will be able to ever make that work as long as the teabaggers are in control.
I also will say that he and Hillary agree on a lot of this.
I tend to vote on issues and who articulated them the best. So far Hillary has not talked about what she thinks on a lot of issues so I am open.
And if she wins the primary I will vote D.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Teabaggers suck!
jwirr
(39,215 posts)eloydude
(376 posts)Oh let me guess, you're a rich person.
No you're not. You're a retired person who probably has investments in the stock market and have vested interest in seeing their stock market continue.
With Hillary? No. Her economic policies are unsound. You stand to lose again, just like you lost in the Great Recession of Chimp.
With Bernie? Yes, your investment will be quadrupled, or even better if wisely invested.
Hekate
(90,633 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They want Hillary to be a foregone conclusion. The corporate media is trying to ignore him, and he keeps plodding forward.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win"
Mahatma Gandhi
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)Or is electability an unacceptable discussion point?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Because he is a threat to Wall Street.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)But he is ignored when it comes to policy discussions.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)how is his coverage any different than Marco Rubio or Scott Walker?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Watch the video I posted.
Hekate
(90,633 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's called 'hedging their bets'. They donate to Democrats just in case they win the election.
https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&cid=n00000019
eloydude
(376 posts)while Hillary Clinton flames out YET again....
Going to prop her up for 2024?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)But, there is no Executive order that can be presented or bill that any Democratic President can get passed that will raise taxes on the rich with the House controlled by Repukes.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...so why even try? Just cede everything to the right without a fight.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)investment in our country. That was one of the underlying basics for LBJ's war on poverty.
And at that time we fully understood that education was a good investment. It allowed more people to pay into the revenue. It allowed for better trained workers. It allowed for workers to be a bigger part of the economy - spending they did to improve their lifestyle. It allowed for entrepreneurial opportunities. And a lot more things that work in favor of not only the people but also our nation. It allowed us to increase the number of teachers, doctors, nurses etc that we needed in our economy.
Today education cost too much for most people. They do not want to owe a debt that they will never be able to pay off in their lifetime. And I doubt that Bernie expects the rich to get away with not paying into this. After all they are the ones most likely to benefit from better trained workers.
One of the sayings back then was "What if that child in the ghetto has the cure for cancer in him but we do not educate him?"
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)The problem is that it is never the rich who pay the taxes for it. It is always the middle class and old folks and we can't afford it.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)let the Rs create a voting process that is anything but fair. This whole argument about free education really upsets me because I am watching my grandchildren work at idiot jobs EVEN when they have the brains to advance - just not the money.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)The nice thing about idiot jobs as that your grandchildren may be able to take one class at a time at the community college and pay for it as they go. Sure, it might take a long to to graduate, but they can do it. Better than taking out loans they couldn't pay back
jwirr
(39,215 posts)not have the money for education because they have families to support. The mother did go to school for a while but she had to quit to keep heat in the house.
I don't think your statement reflects how truly bad it is down here. It is hard to imagine what our kids today are facing.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Keeping ones money in the US is for us peons. If you can find one 1%er who has money in this country, please give name, address and bank account number! Grandma needs new shoes!
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)wealth" and not "expropriate their money." To wit, there are many beachfront mansions in Malibu (California) that would make wonderful old-age homes, veterans' hospices and housing for the homeless.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)The ones who have to be convinced. They are not just going to vote for Bernie. They may come up with questions like that. Isn't there an answer?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Hillary forget what I've done in the past remember the future
Bernie look at my past to see what I'll do for your Future .
Supporters point of veiw should reflect what their canidate say's as opposed to what they do.
Keep Trying, gravity will obey eventually, or as Secratary Clinton once said" Common people can't we just get on with it " .
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)He can't even get Democrats in congress to go along with his ideas. He's about as effective as Dennis Kucinich was in congress.
Why would it be different if he were President?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Does he have the right values? Yes, IMO, he does.
But we need more than that in a President. He's too far to the left for a lot voters and the people in congress that represent them. Like Kucinich that prevents him from really being effective.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)DONE .
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Is that what you're saying?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)do whatever I can to elect someone that I can Trust and Respect .
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Same for me with Bernie. I'd vote for him if I had to, but I'd rather support someone who I also trust and respect AND who would be more effective in my view. That's HRC for me.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)"Far Left" Bernie in that case led the charge and worked with REPUBLICAN congressman Ron Paul in the House to put together a bill that was passed that let us audit the Federal Reserve, that had long been too secretive to show much of anything they'd done before they passed that bill!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Transparency_Act
It was auditing the Fed that helped provide senators like Ms. Warren the ammo to propose a bill where students would be able to borrow at rates that the fed charges banks.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2015/03/18/warren-sees-popular-momentum-for-student-loan-bill/NyocLbPmTgRKTx3SYH1aGJ/story.html
There are also many other things he's done too, but this one bill pretty much discounts what you've tried to criticize him with here.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Then it means nothing. As I have been told routinely.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I liked the other version of you better
Autumn
(45,042 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)She already has in fact.
cali
(114,904 posts)are now in some kind of business having to do with health care insurance?
Do you know what a CHC is? Look up Bernie Sanders, CHC funding ACA. You can manage that, right?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts).... But since I started my business long ago. HRC was instrumental in getting SCHIPs passed 20 years ago.
ETA - she had a greater impact as first lady than your pal as an elected representative. And THAT says something.
cali
(114,904 posts)there is exactly no hope that you ever will, magg
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Devoted & Deluded or in other words D&D .
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)anything but concessions, cover-ups, and denials, which she was good at, still is . Second Eleanor Roosevelt had more impact on society than any other First Lady in history . Bernie Sanders Ideals, Votes and visage of his work resembles what FDR had in mind . Hillary for all her accolades and how she started and how she ended up, ressembles Prescott Bush .
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Sad that you believe that.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/giving-hillary-credit-for-schip/
Response to MaggieD (Reply #169)
orpupilofnature57 This message was self-deleted by its author.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)onecaliberal
(32,814 posts)And my family foundation. And please don't worry about my positions, I can change those in the blink if an eye when polling goes south.
Senator Sanders is fighting for the same things he's always fought for. He has a very long and distinguished record.
Look for yourself if you dare.
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Bernie_Sanders.htm
cali
(114,904 posts)Let me reduce to the personal: I'm a Sanders supporter. I was born into great financial and cultural privilege. I'm set for the rest of my life. I want others to have at least some of the financial benefits I did. I never even thought about paying for college- let alone how much it cost to send me to the most expensive Country Day schools and prep school. I want people to have healthcare and education and a decent roof over their heads and not have to worry about where their next meal comes from.
And I believe that the vast majority of DUers are with me on that, whatever their backgrounds.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Your honesty is the only thing lets people know what's really going on, your Great .
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cali
(114,904 posts)feel as I do. The OP has presented a false dichotomy, and whoever in this thread remarked that the op made Hillary supporters sound like republicans, is spot on.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Despite the new populism rhetoric, all need to remember that HRC started political life as a Republican. Seems her stripes are most comfortable adorning those robes.
And despite popular sentiment, all need to remember that WJC was an ardent supporter of the DLC / Third Way which clearly does not represent democracy for the people.
So, the Clinton's are a mixed bag at best.
There fondness for the ultra wealthy at the expense of the people is documented fact - witness the devastating effects of NAFTA.
Adding insult to injury - witness the repeal of Glass-Steagall.
Continuing - witness the reform of welfare.
And finally - witness the the vote for the Iraq War.
The case is clear - the Clinton's are bad for 99% of Americans.
cali
(114,904 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Last edited Sat May 23, 2015, 02:59 PM - Edit history (1)
eom
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Hillary is not a Patron of the Oligarchs, that is ridiculous. And most voters in the US don't talk like that.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
treestar
(82,383 posts)The average voter is not going to hear or consider it long.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)mostly live off of rents and dividends, i.e., parasitism.
cali
(114,904 posts)to my father, who spent his twenties beach bumming it and sort of pursuing anthropology and history, he invented and started manufacturing first counters and then computer peripherals. He worked his ass off. He paid his employees well and in many ways was a much better employer than he was a father. I still remember the time and money he put into employee gifts at Christmas. Everyone from the people who swept floors to secretaries and execs, got a bonus. He picked out a gift that everyone got, and then there were personal gifts for quite a number of people. And they really were personal. No shopping service crap. (and we kids always got the gift that went to everyone)
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)turned out more than OK, if I might be so presumptuous. If every capitalist were like your father, we probably wouldn't even be having this discussion, I'm guessing.
But I'm also sad that you deserved a better father (as did I). Water under the bridge and all that.
cali
(114,904 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)It's good to get away from the keyboard and do something for those less fortunate sometimes. PM me if you need some suggestions.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)in considerable pain. My mobility is limited. And I spent most of my working life in social services and volunteered as a guardian ad litem, as a "big sister", and for a battered women's group
now do go away,dear mags.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)You could be a pen pal to women in prison, tutor kids for free, stuff envelopes for non- profit mailers, or make donation calls for them. I can think of tons of things you could do given that you can work at a computer all day.
Just a suggestion.
cali
(114,904 posts)Seriously, you are a piece of work.
Now don't you have some more truthiness to bestow on DU, maggs?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I'm a big believer in volunteerism. I even give my employees paid time off to work for non-profits. It helps other people, makes people more empathetic, and gives them a more positive attitude. IMO.
It wasn't a dig at you. I was serious.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)One scores higher than the other.
Sanders:
Rated 93% by the ACLU, indicating a pro-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)
Rated 97% by the NAACP, indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)
Clinton:
Rated 60% by the ACLU, indicating a mixed civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
Rated 89% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)
Rated 96% by the NAACP, indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)
http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/bernie_sanders.htm
http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)NYC_SKP I get more comprehensive ammo from you , Thanks.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Does the 57 refer to your year of birth?
If so, me too!
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)That isn't even close. You are wrong on all premises.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)based on my many years of background knowledge when it comes to liberal/conservative and Democratic/Republican talking points, your statements like this:
DLC/"centrist"/"New Dem"/3rd Way/neo-liberal/Republican/UNRESTRICTED CAPITALIST rhetoric
In other words, arrogance and greed.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)If you are a defense contractor.
If you are an executive (like Ed Rendell) at a huge Energy firm.
If you are a Monsanto executive.
If you are an insider on Wall Street.
If you are part and parcel of Big Industrialized Medicine and Big Pharma.
****
But for the rest of us "rank and file" -- not so many opportunities.
Although won't those self driving cars be great! (Although not so great when we wake up and realize those cars are about putting delivery drivers out of their jobs.)
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)are in other countries.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)certainly are basic human rights. You sound like a republican.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I would hope not anyway.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Food, clothing, shelter and medical care are basic human rights. College tuition, not so much and certainly not on the backs of middle class workers and us old folks because that is who would be feeling the pain. The rich are never going to be taxed and never have been. It has always been the middle class paying the taxes and those folks have a hard enough time just buying groceries for their kids, much less paying more taxes disguised as college freebies.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I certainly don't agree with it. I don't think Hillary would either, actually.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)When I slash an artery I want someone to provide a trip to the emergency room. What's wrong with that?
Why not just call it a safety net that it is.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)The proposition is horrid, creating opportunity, this is a RW position.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I am glad this person outed themselves for future reference.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Sanders supporters believe in govt of, by and for the people.
840high
(17,196 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Last edited Sat May 23, 2015, 02:26 PM - Edit history (1)
EOM
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Bernie supporter, I was born into this world I have a right to food shelter clothing education and healthcare. Someone needs to provide it for me.
My formulation
The goal of a just government is to provide that every individual has the right to fulfil his or her potential and should be there to help him or her should they fail.
-Hubert H. Humphrey
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Hillary has so much money she doesn't need votes, apparently.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts).
"opportunity available to everyone" = "get government out of the way"
And healthcare, are you saying you're opposed to education and universal health care for all?
Wow.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Keep making shit up
You are so good at it
Someone has to provide the service
You never talk about that part
Just that it should be available.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)is us .
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)the needs of others who thinks this is the way to live. It would make them happy.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Autumn
(45,042 posts)An amplification of Bernie's 12 Steps from his website
1. Rebuilding Our Crumbling Infrastructure
We need a major investment to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure: roads, bridges, water systems, waste water plants, airports, railroads and schools. It has been estimated that the cost of the Bush-Cheney Iraq War, a war we should never have waged, will total $3 trillion by the time the last veteran receives needed care. A $1 trillion investment in infrastructure could create 13 million decent paying jobs and make this country more efficient and productive. We need to invest in infrastructure, not more war.
2. Reversing Climate Change
The United States must lead the world in reversing climate change and make certain that this planet is habitable for our children and grandchildren. We must transform our energy system away from fossil fuels and into energy efficiency and sustainable energies. Millions of homes and buildings need to be weatherized, our transportation system needs to be energy efficient and we need to greatly accelerate the progress we are already seeing in wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and other forms of sustainable energy. Transforming our energy system will not only protect the environment, it will create good paying jobs.
3. Creating Worker Co-ops
We need to develop new economic models to increase job creation and productivity. Instead of giving huge tax breaks to corporations which ship our jobs to China and other low-wage countries, we need to provide assistance to workers who want to purchase their own businesses by establishing worker-owned cooperatives. Study after study shows that when workers have an ownership stake in the businesses they work for, productivity goes up, absenteeism goes down and employees are much more satisfied with their jobs.
4. Growing the Trade Union Movement
Union workers who are able to collectively bargain for higher wages and benefits earn substantially more than non-union workers. Today, corporate opposition to union organizing makes it extremely difficult for workers to join a union. We need legislation which makes it clear that when a majority of workers sign cards in support of a union, they can form a union.
5. Raising the Minimum Wage
The current federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour is a starvation wage. We need to raise the minimum wage to a living wage. No one in this country who works 40 hours a week should live in poverty.
6. Pay Equity for Women Workers
Women workers today earn 78 percent of what their male counterparts make. We need pay equity in our country equal pay for equal work.
7. Trade Policies that Benefit American Workers
Since 2001 we have lost more than 60,000 factories in this country, and more than 4.9 million decent-paying manufacturing jobs. We must end our disastrous trade policies (NAFTA, CAFTA, PNTR with China, etc.) which enable corporate America to shut down plants in this country and move to China and other low-wage countries. We need to end the race to the bottom and develop trade policies which demand that American corporations create jobs here, and not abroad.
8. Making College Affordable for All
In today's highly competitive global economy, millions of Americans are unable to afford the higher education they need in order to get good-paying jobs. Further, with both parents now often at work, most working-class families can't locate the high-quality and affordable child care they need for their kids. Quality education in America, from child care to higher education, must be affordable for all. Without a high-quality and affordable educational system, we will be unable to compete globally and our standard of living will continue to decline.
9. Taking on Wall Street
The function of banking is to facilitate the flow of capital into productive and job-creating activities. Financial institutions cannot be an island unto themselves, standing as huge profit centers outside of the real economy. Today, six huge Wall Street financial institutions have assets equivalent to 61 percent of our gross domestic product - over $9.8 trillion. These institutions underwrite more than half the mortgages in this country and more than two-thirds of the credit cards. The greed, recklessness and illegal behavior of major Wall Street firms plunged this country into the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. They are too powerful to be reformed. They must be broken up.
10. Health Care as a Right for All
The United States must join the rest of the industrialized world and recognize that health care is a right of all, and not a privilege. Despite the fact that more than 40 million Americans have no health insurance, we spend almost twice as much per capita on health care as any other nation. We need to establish a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system.
11. Protecting the Most Vulnerable Americans
Millions of seniors live in poverty and we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country. We must strengthen the social safety net, not weaken it. Instead of cutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and nutrition programs, we should be expanding these programs.
12. Real Tax Reform
At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we need a progressive tax system in this country which is based on ability to pay. It is not acceptable that major profitable corporations have paid nothing in federal income taxes, and that corporate CEOs in this country often enjoy an effective tax rate which is lower than their secretaries. It is absurd that we lose over $100 billion a year in revenue because corporations and the wealthy stash their cash in offshore tax havens around the world. The time is long overdue for real tax reform.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)The resume really sounds like Hillary's also.
Autumn
(45,042 posts)Maybe to small stunted republican minds that would be a minus but not to any intelligent thinking person.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)if you don't like him then pick another for the commune.
Autumn
(45,042 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Autumn
(45,042 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)sounds like Rush Limbaugh's characterization of Liberals! This post is all I need to know about you.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Where markets and incentives work I am in favor of markets and incentives. Where markets and incentives don't work or lead to inefficiencies that hurt people I favor government intervention .
Tax wealth for the benefit of all.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Because you just repeated his 'takers vs makers' position.
Commies!!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Mitt Romney "There are 47% of people who feel entitled to healthcare, to food, to housing!"
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Don't be ridiculous. I have been a Democrat all of my life and will remain a Democrat for the rest of my life. Accusing me of such is not acceptable.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)And if we elect her she'll help to make that opportunity available to everyone???
Like, get government out of the way? Enable people to lift themselves up by their bootstraps?
OH, man, you'll never live this down on this board.
Hillary supporter, I was born into this world, I need to help make opportunity available to everyone so that we all have an equal chance at success.
Bernie supporter, I was born into this world I have a right to food shelter clothing education and healthcare. Someone needs to provide it for me.
That's just some sick shit, there.
think
(11,641 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)No, that's not right.
cali
(114,904 posts)meme that you're parroting. Not saying you were aware that that's a classic republican line, but you've been informed of it repeatedly in this thread.
marym625
(17,997 posts)You are quoting every right wing candidate, just exchange Hillary for Republican and Sanders for Democrat.
You also seem to miss the FACT we have working poor, millions of children going to bed hungry that have working families
Please quote ANY Bernie supporter that said this.
You really should be ashamed of yourself. But then again, your whole point was to bait and ditch.
Some people don't belong on a democratic site.
Autumn
(45,042 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,713 posts)to step forward and fight for the people. A compassionate person willing to do more for others than for themself. Someone intelligent, forthright, with an ability to think outside the normal Washington ideas. A fighter wiling and capable to take on corporations, banks, Wall Street. A politician that is willing to say to the very wealthy, ENOUGH! Pay your own way also.
Now that leader is here and the negative discourse is staggering.
Bernie Sanders is just the right man for the job at this time. Someone with the vision to put this country back into the hands of the people where it rightly belongs.
I'm a Dem for life always was. I will vote for the choice of my party.
Ah yes, the but, always the but....
I hope that choice is Bernie!
Autumn
(45,042 posts)I see why it would upset poor mistreated republicans and why they would think that supporting that big bad Bernie Sanders would make us welfare queens.
Special thanks to Jackpine Radical for this Op
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12808348
We need a major investment to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure: roads, bridges, water systems, waste water plants, airports, railroads and schools. It has been estimated that the cost of the Bush-Cheney Iraq War, a war we should never have waged, will total $3 trillion by the time the last veteran receives needed care. A $1 trillion investment in infrastructure could create 13 million decent paying jobs and make this country more efficient and productive. We need to invest in infrastructure, not more war.
2. Reversing Climate Change
The United States must lead the world in reversing climate change and make certain that this planet is habitable for our children and grandchildren. We must transform our energy system away from fossil fuels and into energy efficiency and sustainable energies. Millions of homes and buildings need to be weatherized, our transportation system needs to be energy efficient and we need to greatly accelerate the progress we are already seeing in wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and other forms of sustainable energy. Transforming our energy system will not only protect the environment, it will create good paying jobs.
3. Creating Worker Co-ops
We need to develop new economic models to increase job creation and productivity. Instead of giving huge tax breaks to corporations which ship our jobs to China and other low-wage countries, we need to provide assistance to workers who want to purchase their own businesses by establishing worker-owned cooperatives. Study after study shows that when workers have an ownership stake in the businesses they work for, productivity goes up, absenteeism goes down and employees are much more satisfied with their jobs.
4. Growing the Trade Union Movement
Union workers who are able to collectively bargain for higher wages and benefits earn substantially more than non-union workers. Today, corporate opposition to union organizing makes it extremely difficult for workers to join a union. We need legislation which makes it clear that when a majority of workers sign cards in support of a union, they can form a union.
5. Raising the Minimum Wage
The current federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour is a starvation wage. We need to raise the minimum wage to a living wage. No one in this country who works 40 hours a week should live in poverty.
6. Pay Equity for Women Workers
Women workers today earn 78 percent of what their male counterparts make. We need pay equity in our country equal pay for equal work.
7. Trade Policies that Benefit American Workers
Since 2001 we have lost more than 60,000 factories in this country, and more than 4.9 million decent-paying manufacturing jobs. We must end our disastrous trade policies (NAFTA, CAFTA, PNTR with China, etc.) which enable corporate America to shut down plants in this country and move to China and other low-wage countries. We need to end the race to the bottom and develop trade policies which demand that American corporations create jobs here, and not abroad.
8. Making College Affordable for All
In today's highly competitive global economy, millions of Americans are unable to afford the higher education they need in order to get good-paying jobs. Further, with both parents now often at work, most working-class families can't locate the high-quality and affordable child care they need for their kids. Quality education in America, from child care to higher education, must be affordable for all. Without a high-quality and affordable educational system, we will be unable to compete globally and our standard of living will continue to decline.
9. Taking on Wall Street
The function of banking is to facilitate the flow of capital into productive and job-creating activities. Financial institutions cannot be an island unto themselves, standing as huge profit centers outside of the real economy. Today, six huge Wall Street financial institutions have assets equivalent to 61 percent of our gross domestic product - over $9.8 trillion. These institutions underwrite more than half the mortgages in this country and more than two-thirds of the credit cards. The greed, recklessness and illegal behavior of major Wall Street firms plunged this country into the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. They are too powerful to be reformed. They must be broken up.
10. Health Care as a Right for All
The United States must join the rest of the industrialized world and recognize that health care is a right of all, and not a privilege. Despite the fact that more than 40 million Americans have no health insurance, we spend almost twice as much per capita on health care as any other nation. We need to establish a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system.
11. Protecting the Most Vulnerable Americans
Millions of seniors live in poverty and we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country. We must strengthen the social safety net, not weaken it. Instead of cutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and nutrition programs, we should be expanding these programs.
12. Real Tax Reform
At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we need a progressive tax system in this country which is based on ability to pay. It is not acceptable that major profitable corporations have paid nothing in federal income taxes, and that corporate CEOs in this country often enjoy an effective tax rate which is lower than their secretaries. It is absurd that we lose over $100 billion a year in revenue because corporations and the wealthy stash their cash in offshore tax havens around the world. The time is long overdue for real tax reform.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/fdr-s-second-bill-rights-necessitous-men-are-not-free-men
LoveIsNow
(356 posts)And which like a Republican?
Without equal access to food, shelter, clothing, education, and healthcare (and transportation), equal opportunity does not truly exist.
When you are unable to feed yourself or put a roof over your head, when your clothes are torn to shreds, when you have teeth broken or missing that you can't afford to fix, when you couldn't afford college and had to drop out, when you can't afford a car, how do you have equality of opportunity with someone whose parents sent them into the world with a good education, good healthcare, and a car?
The success of the second individual is all but preordained, as is the failure of the first. Surely our life choices can make or break our lives, but when some have a rocky path to success, and others a red carpet, that is simply unequal opportunity to succeed.
The system you call Hillary's only offers us the equal opportunity to survive. Bernie's point of view (and mine) is that our society would work better if it we looked at survival as a human right, and worked on giving people the equal opportunity to thrive, so that they can make a contribution to their community, country, and world.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Or do we want to raise the minimum wage to a "real" living wage and create more jobs?
Autumn
(45,042 posts)only the wealthy and corporations and Wall Street, Fuck them they have gotten a free ride long enough. Time for them to pay. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but Ronald Reagan is still fucking dead and was a fucking moron in life.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)When was the last time the wealthy were taxed for social programs. Never! Even if there was a tax raised on them, where does it go? Pentagon!
Autumn
(45,042 posts)It's amazing what a President willing to fight for something can do. Take Fast track for example. That shows what a President can do if they really want something done.
ms liberty
(8,572 posts)We've done it before, and we know it works. We can do it again.
LoveIsNow
(356 posts)Essential commodities like that should be kept, if not free, affordable to anyone. However I understand that the more social programs that are free to their recipients, the greater the resentment from those who are paying taxes and not receiving the benefits of these programs. Therefore, I think: (A) it is important that there be some kind of contribution required from all able citizens to receive the benefits of living in our country, be that in the form of copays for government benefits, a basic citizen's tax, or community service, and that (B) we should extend our welfare state beyond just the very poor, so that those in the lower and middle class (outside of the very poor) can see the direct benefit of them paying taxes. (Also, because they aren't doing too hot either). In short everyone should have a give and take relationship with the government.
As for the minimum wage, it is obvious that it is well overdue for a raise. When there are college-educated people who can only get minimum wage jobs, we must make it a true living wage. However, I have several reservations about using the minimum wage as our only tool to improve the lot of workers and stimulate monetary flow:
First, I think that if you increase the minimum wage, you will not do all that much to increase access to healthcare and education, because the price of these commodities will rise as there is more demand, or they will become scarce - universities will become more selective, and it will be harder to see a doctor. We will need to invest in new and existing schools, and we will need to provide incentives for people to fill key shortages in the medical sector.
Secondly, while the minimum wage protects workers from slave wages, it cannot protect them from a host of other abuses - not from fake managerial promotions to avoid paying overtime, not from being intimidated into doing things that aren't part of one's job. It can't make sure you get sick days or that you don't face retaliation for using them. This is why we need to streamline the process for forming a union, so that instead of the government defending workers (a task at which they have proven ineffective), they can defend themselves. Better yet, the government could provide grants or low-interest loans for the founding of worker cooperatives, removing the boss, so that the process for setting wages can be democratic rather than adversarial.
Also, by focusing on building trade unionism and cooperativism in this country rather than on the minimum wage, the wages achieved will be tailored to the location and industry, rather than a one size fits all approach. What is a fair minimum wage in Gallup, New Mexico is far too low in Seattle, but the reverse is true, and in desperately poor Gallup, a $15 minimum wage would be a severe burden for many businesses.
Finally, I think that most minimum wage jobs are "busy work". They are service jobs, hospitality, etc. that do not contribute anything to anyone but the owners. If you work a job like this your whole life, how high will your self esteem be? How long before your day is just: work for the man, stop for food and beer, consume, sleep, repeat? What will your child's career day be like when you have to tell their class that you work at Starbucks? I think our country can't settle for this type of economy. When we have a shortage of general practitioners, teachers, and nurses, and when our whole national infrastructure is wholly inadequate, why waste our human capital on cahshiers and servers? The government needs to step in with investment where the private sector won't, so that these jobs can go back to being temporary or starter jobs, instead of simply settling for a nation of adequately-paid baristas, and declaring okay a situation that is clearly not okay.
In summation, I would say that while a substantial increase in the minimum wage, as well as pegging it to inflation, are a part of the solution, on their own they are merely a patch, not a true solution. Also, in regards to the welfare state, that it cannot replace a robust welfare state either.
Sorry for the long response, but, hey, you asked.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)First, the fact you don't know the answer just shows how uninformed you are.
Second, you can't respond with any sincerity to the call outs on your original, RW propaganda post so you changed your story.
Third, still right wing propaganda.
Do some research. You will have answers to your questions. Though, I suspect you don't care what the answers are
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Who puts in the effort to become a professor? " has to do with... what exactly?
Who pays for Hillary's vague "opportunities"?
cali
(114,904 posts)run, run, run away, come back edit the shit- not that it's much of an improvement and then duck off again.
And if you're going to post stuff, do some research, so you don't demonstrate your abysmal lack of knowledge, loopa.
Bernie is talking only about public universities and colleges. If you knew anything about the history of those institutions you'd know that there were once many that were either tuition free or very inexpensive for instate student.
Here's his plan, oh poster of puerile flamebait:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2015/05/19/bernie_sanders_free_college_plan_make_wall_street_pay_for_higher_education.html
Bernie Sanders Wants to Make College Tuition Free. Heres Why We Should Take Him Seriously.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/apr/11/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20120411
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_tuition_in_the_United_States
Your op really is a towering, reeking pile of .....
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Post removed
Autumn
(45,042 posts)Where's your poof of that statement of your belief?
I always wanted to ask the idiot republicans who pull that out of their ass but never had a chance.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Just a hit and ditch post. Ridiculous
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)There has to be better ways to present the difficulty a candidate will have in enacting the programs he or she advances.
AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)When most public universities were free or charged a nominal tuition? Taxpayers. Because education was seen as furthering the common good, especially when it was veterans we were paying for. Even private institutions were more accessible if you were poor, by working part time during the school year and full time during summer. Make the upper middle class, the wealthy and corporations pay their fair shares to support not just higher education but public K-12 as well instead of public funds going to charter schools and even religious ones.
And BTW you DO NOT REPRESENT Hillary supporters in general!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bobjacksonk2832
(50 posts)I can't believe so-called "progressives" here would resort to such sophomoric arguments. In any case, I much prefer Sanders to Clinton any day of the week.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)along with increases on capital gains taxes above a level to be debated later.
You know, everything that Progressives support.
Why do you think the question you asked is difficult to answer? Bernie is a Socialist. We know exactly how he will pay for things.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Who has the knowledge to share with students? The same professionals we have doing it now.
Who puts in the effort to become a professor? People who want to.
Now can we count on your support?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)For better or worse, Bill and Hillary are well-intentioned technocrats, and believe in using the levers of government to achieve what they feel to be worthy ends. We might disagree on some means and ends, and those disagreements aren't trivial, and Bill might have a more telegenic personality than Hillary, but thats what they are. That's also why Bill won many elections and why Hillary will probably win in 2016.
Bernie on the other hand is great at saying no, and that's probably just what Vermonters want to hear. He can call himself whatever he likes but he's basically a libertarian with a thinning New Deal comb over. His "Robin Hood" plan is an unconvincing toupee. His public role in all the years I've been aware of him has been to attack Dems from the left and he's played it with relish and continues to play it. Wonderful guy if you like that kind of thing but it won't win many Dem primaries much less get him elected president.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)ms liberty
(8,572 posts)Interesting to see some of these comments. Very revealing. Of course, the OP is bullshit...
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Although I don't accept your parameters for either of them.
No matter people think, we are in a social contract with everyone, whether we like them or not.
I don't go for the demonization of banks, oil companies, the needy, or anything. There are reasons for all of those things, in moderation. When things get out of balance, is when there is a collapse and great misery.
Example of the social contract is that people work for each other, and should be able to survive and thrive. Different people have different abilitis. Confront me with a spreadsheet, and my brain leaves the room. Have me try to be a teacher, and my body will leave first. I've done a lot of physical labor. Now I can't, I run from it but others can handle. Give me a menial job I think is pointless, repetitive and boring, and I go utterly batshit.
But I need someone who can do all of those things.
In politics, the social contract means some people do believe wars need to be fought to save the nation, others thinks they don't need to happen. Some believe that we should have social services, others think they are worse than going to war.
In each case taxes are paid for each of those things. The point of balance and justice are in finding a medium range. In that reckoning, your context fails.
OTOH, if you are looking at things from a Libertarian POV, every little tax or every big one, and all forms of government are 100% evil unless they are going to directly benefit.
Neither Democratic candidate is goine to give you that. Despite your example , HRC is known as a 'big, no, huge government' advocate. If she's changed her mind due to her latest foray across the USA, it'll be because she ran into a lot of LIbertarians who think what you ascribe to her but doesn't fit her record.
But then again, you may be speaking on a very different plane and we are not getting thriough to each other. Bernie is my first choice, but I look for good things about HRC, too.
Sorry if that's not where you were going there.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)When you can ask me without an insult, I will answer you without an insult.
SO what sort of folk form an insult as a 'question'? I suspect you are one.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Sat May 30, 2015, 08:39 AM - Edit history (1)
there to help others while Bernie supporters are looking for a handout for doing nothing.
(recs from cantbeserious, freshwest, Thinkingabout, Moon River and leftofcool)'
ETA: lunamagica has now joined the ranks of the very few who agree that supporting Bernie means I want a free ride. So make that six.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)no need to name names.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The names of people who rec threads are visible to anyone who wants to see them.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)who doesn't want anyone to get any trouble. Seen too many silly alerts.
merrily
(45,251 posts)All anyone has to do to see the names of the reccers is click on the number that shows how many recs the thread has. I cannot imagine I would get a hide, just for saving readers the trouble of clicking. However, if you are worried about an alert in the future, pm is the way to go. Otherwise, you are only making an alert more likely by kicking the thread and drawing negative attention to the post you think might be alertworthy.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)I could talk about how it's not a matter what's owed to some one, but what's the best investment we as a nation could make for our future.
But that's not what you want.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Someone just came out.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Your first statement sounds like something a Republican would say.
And your second sentence sounds like something a conservative would claim a liberal would say.
...and if a student has access to affordable college, doesn't that help him or her achieve their dream of becoming a professor (to use your example)?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)This one was such a success for you.