Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Earth to Log Cabin Republicans: You are now officially the 21st century equivalent of ... (Original Post) 11 Bravo May 2012 OP
Exactly atreides1 May 2012 #1
K&R pinboy3niner May 2012 #2
I had the same thought cali May 2012 #3
Checkmate! Rex May 2012 #4
Hahahaha Stinky The Clown May 2012 #5
But the Uncle Tom's Cabin Republicans are trying so darn hard.... Moonwalk May 2012 #6
Log Cabin Morons! nt Walk away May 2012 #33
"But it's more complex than that" nxylas May 2012 #44
Excuses, they have many and we don't need them. Lost-in-FL May 2012 #51
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2012 #7
K&R Blue Owl May 2012 #8
Yep. Sarcasticus May 2012 #9
K&R LASlibinSC May 2012 #10
K&R TheCowsCameHome May 2012 #11
So True fascisthunter May 2012 #12
yes Mkap May 2012 #13
As much as I HATE Hitler references on the innertubes I gotta K&R this. cliffordu May 2012 #14
I completely agree with you, (but I really couldn't conjure up a more apt analogy)! 11 Bravo May 2012 #17
Turkeys voting for Thanksgiving? KamaAina May 2012 #18
I gotta say.... cliffordu May 2012 #35
May I say.... 47of74 May 2012 #15
Harsh, but true. Faygo Kid May 2012 #16
Being gay and being a selfish, hateful, greedy prick are mutually exclusive? corkhead May 2012 #19
They are ignore by the Republican anyway underpants May 2012 #20
But Hitler's economic policies did so much good for Germany. baldguy May 2012 #21
I really think we should retire the whole "jews for..." analogy. Please. CTyankee May 2012 #22
And it denigrates the suffering of Jews during WW2. AlbertCat May 2012 #30
Good point treestar May 2012 #40
And that can be said, and said better, without bringing in anything else. CTyankee May 2012 #41
actually, you could say "gays for hitler" newspeak May 2012 #49
It is a better focus, yes. It should be looked at in the context of persecution of gay people CTyankee May 2012 #55
I like this better: Cooley Hurd May 2012 #23
MUCH better. Thanks. nt. SunSeeker May 2012 #24
J.C. Watts, Sr. said that back in 99 CBGLuthier May 2012 #42
I think that's where I got it from... Cooley Hurd May 2012 #61
While it avoids Godwin's Law, I don't like even the hint of comparison of gay people CTyankee May 2012 #43
Must think these things through from every angle.... Cooley Hurd May 2012 #62
Spam deleted by Ruby the Liberal (MIR Team) JeffBootstrapsFisher May 2012 #25
Spam deleted by cyberswede (MIR Team) JeffBootstrapsFisher May 2012 #26
The absolute spam Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #29
Most of them will pick their money... AlbertCat May 2012 #27
Bingo! sarcasmo May 2012 #28
Not really. First of all, they already have picked a side RZM May 2012 #31
That was really thoughtful and well put ... Danascot May 2012 #36
Thank you RZM May 2012 #37
Why the hell can't we rec individual posts yet? AtheistCrusader May 2012 #47
Log Cabin has never been about Gay Rights, it's a bunch (mostly) guys who don't want to pay taxes JI7 May 2012 #32
K & R !!! WillyT May 2012 #34
African Americans for Strom Thurman Dragonbreathp9d May 2012 #38
K & rec #100 MrScorpio May 2012 #39
Union members and school teachers for republicians. nt bonniebgood May 2012 #45
100% raouldukelives May 2012 #46
Slaves for the Conferderacy ? yesphan May 2012 #48
Roaches for Raid. nt Lost-in-FL May 2012 #52
They have. The $$$ side. nt valerief May 2012 #50
MENSA for Bachmann 2012! nt Lost-in-FL May 2012 #53
my favorite gejohnston May 2012 #54
Excellent! xxqqqzme May 2012 #56
Excellent point Caeser67 May 2012 #57
Bristol for Condoms cr8tvlde May 2012 #58
I have reached the conclusion that Jamaal510 May 2012 #59
I know why they are torn, so I advise them to stay Republican't Dustlawyer May 2012 #60
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. Checkmate!
Wed May 9, 2012, 04:55 PM
May 2012

I believe Obama just won his three dimensional chess game! You can either pick a party that hates you inherently hates you btw OR you can pick a party that has a leader that supports gays in the military and also human rights.

As a vet, I find his support of gays in the military to be enlightening for a POTUS! A win for human rights!


However,

if you pick the party of hate...don't expect anything but a knife in your back at the most vulnerable point in your career.

Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
6. But the Uncle Tom's Cabin Republicans are trying so darn hard....
Wed May 9, 2012, 05:20 PM
May 2012

...to have it both ways I mean NC pulls this vote and instead of expressing their outrage over their own party's part in that, they express anger at Obama, calling his dismay at the vote and support for gay marriage "too little too late."

Talk about eyes not being on the prize. Hello? I don't know what effect Obama might have had on that vote if he'd announced this earlier, but let's look ahead, shall we? Who's going to appoint new supreme court justices (and there's every chance new ones will be needed in the next four years)? Justices who will be judging the constitutionality of this NC law? You really want anti-gay Romney doing that?

Morons.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
44. "But it's more complex than that"
Thu May 10, 2012, 09:44 AM
May 2012

They are tying themselves in knots to explain how it's not just a bipartisan issue and how some Democrats in NC supported the amendment and yargle blargle blaaargh.

Lost-in-FL

(7,093 posts)
51. Excuses, they have many and we don't need them.
Thu May 10, 2012, 01:31 PM
May 2012

To quote comedian John Leguizamo; "Hispanics for Republicans is like 'Roaches for Raid'".

I guess in that sense, the Log Cabin Republicans have something in common with some other groups.

Mkap

(223 posts)
13. yes
Wed May 9, 2012, 06:27 PM
May 2012

Saying your a log cabin republican is like saying your a jew for hitler

LOL thanks i have to use that line sometime

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
16. Harsh, but true.
Wed May 9, 2012, 06:52 PM
May 2012

I always caution against using this analogy, but it may fit here. Check out the Freepers today. This quote stood out:

"In the closet, or in the crosshairs."

That wasn't the worst, just the most succinct.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
19. Being gay and being a selfish, hateful, greedy prick are mutually exclusive?
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:03 PM
May 2012

They must not be single issue voters.

underpants

(182,632 posts)
20. They are ignore by the Republican anyway
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:11 PM
May 2012

it's like being gay at a Baptist Thanksgiving dinner (I would suspect).

CTyankee

(63,893 posts)
22. I really think we should retire the whole "jews for..." analogy. Please.
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:16 PM
May 2012

This is not even funny. It's infuriating. And it denigrates the suffering of Jews during WW2.

This is not the same. Really, it isn't. Don't do it.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
30. And it denigrates the suffering of Jews during WW2.
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:54 PM
May 2012

How about Gays for Hitler?

Or does that denigrate the suffering of gays during WW2?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
40. Good point
Thu May 10, 2012, 08:43 AM
May 2012

We needed a reminder of that on this thread! Gays were one of Hitler's targets themselves.

CTyankee

(63,893 posts)
41. And that can be said, and said better, without bringing in anything else.
Thu May 10, 2012, 08:52 AM
May 2012

Persecution of gay people is its own subject and needs to be discussed and examined thoroughly. We can and should certainly say "never again!" to such persecution. Let's do that.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
49. actually, you could say "gays for hitler"
Thu May 10, 2012, 12:33 PM
May 2012

because hitler was definitely against gays back then. Remember the pink armbands?

CTyankee

(63,893 posts)
55. It is a better focus, yes. It should be looked at in the context of persecution of gay people
Thu May 10, 2012, 02:49 PM
May 2012

by a tyrant.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
23. I like this better:
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:26 PM
May 2012

:Being a Log Cabin Republican is like being a Chicken for Colonel Sanders."
I never want to run "afowl" of Godwin's Law...

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
42. J.C. Watts, Sr. said that back in 99
Thu May 10, 2012, 08:54 AM
May 2012
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_17_95/ai_54731475/

Watts Jr., 42, is the only Black Republican in Congress. His father, Watts Sr., 75, is a staunch Democrat.

"A Black man voting for the Republicans makes about as much sense as a chicken voting for Col. Sanders," Watts Sr. recently told the Los Angeles Times. "I couldn't be no Republican because the Republican Party is against the poor man."



True then and more true now.

CTyankee

(63,893 posts)
43. While it avoids Godwin's Law, I don't like even the hint of comparison of gay people
Thu May 10, 2012, 09:17 AM
May 2012

to chickens. I assume that gays who call themselves Log Cabin Republicans have their reasons. I think it is an interesting subject to look at. Wouldn't it be better to have a full fledged discussion of the issue with both sides participating? I don't see that denigrating gays with whom we disagree politically advances our own progressive agenda.

Response to 11 Bravo (Original post)

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
27. Most of them will pick their money...
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:48 PM
May 2012

.... like they already have. Got dough? Then it's OK to be a second class citizen!



And your mom won't find out you're gay to boot!


 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
31. Not really. First of all, they already have picked a side
Wed May 9, 2012, 08:07 PM
May 2012

It's not like it's breaking news that most Republicans don't support marriage equality. Any gay American whose paramount concern is marriage equality probably wouldn't be associated with the Log Cabin Republicans in the first place. A better analogy would be with anti-abortion Democrats. Such Democrats may feel strongly about abortion, but on balance that's just one issue. They favor the Democratic party because they agree with Democrats on many other separate issues. Same thing with the Log Cabin Republicans. They may dislike the party's stance on marriage, but they are on board with much of the rest of the platform.

Having major differences with one's own party but sticking with that party anyway isn't all that uncommon. Just look at DU for evidence of that. Many DUers are strongly opposed to things that Democratic politicians support (or support things that they oppose). They don't have to 'pick a side' either, because they already have.

And what's more, nothing is stopping either group here from kicking back and letting the other party do their work for them on these specific issues. That's kind of the best of both worlds for them. Let the other party fight one of your battles while you help fight the rest of the war with your own party.

Sorry to say, this is just another unwarranted Nazi reference. There are plenty more relevant analogies within our own system.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
37. Thank you
Wed May 9, 2012, 11:33 PM
May 2012

Applying the Nazis to American politics is one of my pet peeves. That's not saying that minor, selective comparisons don't occasionally have some value. But most of the time the intention is not to make an accurate comparison but to wield the evil of the Nazis as a weapon against one's contemporary ideological enemies. I feel that diminishes the memory of their tens of millions of victims and the millions of soldiers who gave their lives to defeat that regime.

BTW, today, May 9, is 'Victory Day' in Russia, where they celebrate the end of WWII in Europe.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
47. Why the hell can't we rec individual posts yet?
Thu May 10, 2012, 12:20 PM
May 2012

This response is head and shoulders above the rest.

JI7

(89,241 posts)
32. Log Cabin has never been about Gay Rights, it's a bunch (mostly) guys who don't want to pay taxes
Wed May 9, 2012, 08:09 PM
May 2012

calling dick cheney a leader on gay rights ????????? what did he do as VP to support gay rights ?

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
46. 100%
Thu May 10, 2012, 10:34 AM
May 2012

It's like claiming to be a liberal environmentalist and then investing in the stock market. Weird shit.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
59. I have reached the conclusion that
Thu May 10, 2012, 04:46 PM
May 2012

any woman, ethnic minority, or person of the homosexual persuasion who votes Republican is clearly only interested in money, and they could care less about the policies that are against their interest such as anti-abortion and gay marriage bans. If they're rich, they believe that Republicans will help them stay rich or get richer, and if they're poor, they see it as a chance at winning the lottery.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
60. I know why they are torn, so I advise them to stay Republican't
Thu May 10, 2012, 05:46 PM
May 2012

They fit the mold since they are hypocrites. They want their equality (which I agree they should have), but still want to take advantage of other folks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Earth to Log Cabin Republ...