General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm tired of democratic activists being thrown under the bus...
...by the institution that is the Democratic Party.
I'm tired of having to vote for "the lesser of two evils" to have my vote count.
I'm tired of having to hold my nose and vote for Republican lite.
I'm tired of every progressive promise being betrayed, broken, and sold down the river.
I'm tired of the military being stretched to the breaking point, and of a Democratic President continuing and expanding the polices of a Republican President.
I'm tired of this President's utter indifference to the plight of LGBT Americans.
I'm tired of this Party embracing everything the Republican Party stood for, in many cases going further to the right than Ronald Reagan,
I'm tired of having to negotiate for unemployment extensions by agreeing to huge tax cut extensions for the wealthy.
I'm tired of the false choice between the two right-wing parties.
And most of all, I'm tired of vesting my hopes in the Democratic Party.
randome
(34,845 posts)You can make the claim that things haven't changed as quickly as many would like but that's a hyperbolic statement.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)Hyperbolic? They are PEOPLE just like you,and deserve the same protections under the law that the rest of us enjoy.
And don't tell me DADT, that did NOTHING for the average LGBT.
Selatius
(20,441 posts)Then, you can condition those campaign checks on them doing what you want, but then again, that's the problem facing this country, isn't it?
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)I am an avid democrat that supports progressive democratic candidates with money and my vote. I contributed several hundred to Elizabeth Warren and plan to contribute up to the maximum and get out and pound pavement for her. Warren is a progressive's dream, I am a moderate. If Warren wins, I will be blissful. If Warren doesn't win, I will be unhappy, but unaffected financially or otherwise. I lived under Reagan and the two Bushes. I loved seeing Bill Clinton elected and loved Jimmy Carter as President. But I am educated and am a scientist that has not been unemployed and have accumulated solid assets. I get inducements from republicans to join them and get asked why I vote 100% democrat, I say fuck republicans, abeit more graciously than I wrote. Why do I give a story that the hot tempered will call bragging? Because at my core, the values that I stand for are important to me. I can support a progressive with vigor, even as they say stuff that I don't agree with or vote in ways that I am not thrilled about. Why would I support a progressive that I don't agree with on many issues? Well, the alternative IS worse and will be destructive to my core values in the final analysis.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)since you don't like anything about the Democratic Party?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Change doesn't start from the president on down, it starts in your local city/county government, your state government, your mayors and supervisors and commissioners and judges and school boards, on up!
And, of course, your senators and representatives in DC.
Even the most perfect progressive president would not be able to accomplish much with the current congress we have.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)So, he's not voting for Democrats in any election, local, state, federal or galaxy.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)DiverDave
(4,886 posts)the poster is telling how they FEEL, not how they will vote.
Can you tell me who's gonna win in the 5th at Hollywood park?.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)How ya been??
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)universe, but maybe there's a galaxy far, far away...
[url=http://www.cosgan.de/smilie.php][img][/img][/url]
I'm good. You?
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)...
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Maybe, because he isn't as good as you think. Face it, he has governed as center-right President, so don't expect a lot of people to be too enthusiastic about voting for him, even though most people will simply because we have no real choice in this country. Sure, Obama will get my vote, but not because he's earned, but because this country gives us no choice.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)...than any President since FDR.
C) He's been a damn good President, by any modern standard. At least a solid B to B+.
The activists bitch because that's what they do. You can't please everyone. But on the whole, he's been better than any President since at least early LBJ ('64 to '65).
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)The cornerstone of his healthcare bill is a give away to insurance companies that originated with the Heritage Foundation. He could have at least fought for single-payer or a pubic option. He could have vetoed the extension of the Patriot Act. He offered cuts to social-security, we are just lucky the Republicans didn't take him up on that offer. Seriously, if he is the best president since the 60s, that speaks volumes about how messed up this country is. Once again, I'll vote for him, but don't expect me to do anything more than that. He is a center-right president at best.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Interesting, isn't it? And apparently several people agree with him. Again, interesting.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
like that.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)The OP specified where this consternation originates. I agree with most of it, sans the last sentence.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)rightwing sewer they would be in if not for moderates that side with progressives. It feels like being the kid in school that respects everyone, but has a weaker kid constantly slapping him or her across the face because the thoughtful kid does not overtly take their side. I am at nearly the Michael-Fredo stage with progressives, but I will bite my tongue and not only support with money, but with my feet and ultimately with my vote and anyone that I can convince to vote as I vote. I can't wait until the day when rightwingers have been forced back into the basement, locked in and I can settle my differences with some of the more obnoxious progressives.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)for you and Sid that progressives aren't running this country.
WonderGrunion
(2,995 posts)It really wouldn't affect him much.
stranger81
(2,345 posts)what this country would be like without progressives have fought for and won -- no help, I might add, from those standing in the center of the aisle. Like laws prohibiting child labor. The eight hour work day. The five day work week. Etc. etc.
If you really think progressives owe staying out of the right wing sewer to the ever capitulating middle, then I'd sure like to have some of what you're smoking.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)chearleading for a guy that is in bed with the god damned enemy is sorta CREEPY.
And what part of giving away the store to wall street is DEMOCRATIC?
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)to find supporters of the President on Democratic Underground. Your call for "Dude give IT up!" is likely to not get any takers here. What we really need is less hyperbole such as "cheerleading for a guy that is in bed with the god damned enemy" for example. Obama has not given away the store to wall street. One doesn't need to look very far really to find that is untrue, and at best hyperbole.
President Obama signs most sweeping Wall Street reform bill since Great Depression
Obama Outlines Credit Card Reforms I probably don't need to tell you that not only did he call for Credit Card Reforms, but he signed it into law.
The President has made mistakes to be sure, and he hasn't given us everything that we want. I would hardly classify him as sleeping with the enemy. Not even close.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)and the banks are BIGGER then ever.
I still lost my house, and I HAD a job.
Yeah, that helped me alot.
He just wanted the money.
Change the lobby laws and take money out of elections.
He is NOT doing that.
I will vote for him, you think I want romney?
I dont have to be happy about it.
And neither does the OP
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)but what about this:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-wall-street-killed-financial-reform-20120510?print=true
So take you snide tude and...well I wont say.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)I guess you really proved it then. Thanks for submitting an opinion from a reporter.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)...doesn't matter what the actual policy is.
rug
(82,333 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)but that's just me.
rug
(82,333 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)here is one of its links.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8674179.stm
That anti-Obama?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)that's why it was hidden, remember?
Sid
rug
(82,333 posts)Glad you think it's not anti-Obama.
Here's another, at random.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072203281.html
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)to an anti-Obama site.
I'm surprised you're having so much trouble remembering. It was only a couple of days ago. Did you need to see the jury results again, to refresh your memory?
Sid
rug
(82,333 posts)Brush up on your history, Sid. That site was a response to a puff site that is deliberately incomplete. It hardly makes it "an anti-Obama site", much though you relish that phrase.
Here's another of its links, at random.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/world/10tapes.html?_r=3&partner=rss&emc=rss
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Take nothing to be one other than the ability to shove your head deeply up your fanny and ignore any rational evidence that you're wrong and/or misguided.
bighart
(1,565 posts)but don't see you offering any alternative view point.
I think the point the op is making is that when we vote for change we actually expect change to occur. Is there something wrong with that? That isn't to say that some change hasn't occurred, it was bound to regardless of who won the election. Much of the change we were promised, open and transparent administration, closing gitmo, progressive legislation regarding health care, has not occurred and will not occur. And don't use congress as the reason, leaders lead, politicians don't, and I feel we got a politician not the leader we were promised.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)the Women's movement , the Vietnam War, the Kent State atrocity, and never gave up being a activist. That's what we do. If someone tries to throw me under a bus, I will crawl out and continue. These battles are never over. The truth one speaks, might cost him his job, friends, and family. So be it. Everyday we win some battles, and everyday we lose some. So the struggle for Justice. fairness, and equality must continue.
hairy krishna
(12 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)I never get tired of it.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)"Taffeta, darling!!"
Sid
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)Just checking. It's a big internet out there.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)when now all the sudden he's sick of the Democratic Party completely. It's absolutely certain he won't be voting for any Democrat in any election after writing all that he just wrote. Strange to name yourself after something you hate, isn't it?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)so we can take bets on PPR dates.
Sid
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)LASlibinSC
(269 posts)a lot of passion. Support you local politicians or perhaps run for a local position yourself. Don't shut down!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Obama has ended the Iraq war.
So yes, very little difference there.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)hairy krishna
(12 posts)until this wise man told me: "No, it's the EVIL of two LESSERS." Love that.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)hairy krishna
(12 posts)One sentence-Sandy!
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)I guess I will do my best to advance to questions. Who is the EVIL of the two lessers you are talking about? If it's two lessers, there must be a more...who or what would that be?
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Sorry
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Seriously, you can't make this shit up.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=284328&sub=trans
"Repeat zombie"
Sid
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)And where is our hit-and-run original poster, anyway?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)nothin' but net.
Sid
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)seriously he could have meant "Hey look! It's you again!" as a greeting after I replied to his reply to my original post to the OP. Phew, I don't know about you but just typing that made me dizzy.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)Thanks for sharing your rant...would you care to specify? President? Senate? Congress? State Legislature? Dog Catcher?
Is there a specific Democrat you're unhappy with? Or is it the the entire field?
And if you're tired of vesting your hopes in the Democratic Party, why are you complaining at DEMOCRATIC Underground?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)I think that pretty much tells us what we need to know about Mr. "YoungDemCA".
hairy krishna
(12 posts)It's utterly true and so very sad. But what do you expect from the Material World--sunshine and unicorns? I have heard theories that is is actually hell. Interesting...
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)hairy krishna
(12 posts)But it's understandable because you have no real case to be made. It's just siss-boom-bah on automatic. Sorry, sister. Ain't gonna cut it anymore!
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)I have to do a better job of keeping that power in check.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)I knew it was a matter of time. I truly believe in conserving energy when possible and I worked really hard today. My fingers needed a rest
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I'm tired of the military being stretched to the breaking point, and of a Democratic President continuing and expanding the polices of a Republican President."
...say anything list of complaints. You're worried about the "military being stretched to the breaking point"? What the hell does that mean?
The President ended a war and recently announced the biggest restructuring/reduction of the military in decades. The other peculiar thing about that statement is its focus on the military and not the excessive military spending.
"I'm tired of having to negotiate for unemployment extensions by agreeing to huge tax cut extensions for the wealthy."
Well if people stopped pretending that both parties are the same, Republicans wouldn't have the numbers to hold legislation hostage. States wouldn't be trying to recall asshole Governors.
"I'm tired of the false choice between the two right-wing parties."
No difference, huh: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/05/07/479229/house-gop-military-cut-programs-poor/
Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese stressed that President Obama and Mitt Romney are far apart on gay rights on MSNBCs Andrea Mitchell Reports Monday. Though Solmonese would like to see Obama be more forceful on gay rights, he stressed Obamas accomplishments to expand rights, and how far ahead of Romney those actions are.
The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Obamas re-election bid last year.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/hrc-president-obama-way-better-than-romney
Lesser of two evil is bullshit, always was.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)By definition, an activist cannot be a good governor, since that requires compromise, taking into account the best interests of everyone, as well as teh country as a whole. That is not an activist's purpose. They push the envelope, agitate, protest, push. Usually on one or a small handful of specific issues.
It's good to have activists. But they will never be front and center in forming general public policy in a government. They can't be. That's not their purpose.
JI7
(89,241 posts)people who actually are understand things can be difficult. you just sound ignorant of the workings of govt and politics to me.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)All politics is local. I don't know if you follow baseball or not, but the way baseball's minor league system works is a good comparison to how politics works. Baseball teams scout high school and college players to play for their minor league teams, which are later a farm system for the big league team.
Now to compare this to politics, local and county elected officials are the high school/college teams and the local Democratic parties (and the GOP for that matter) will look to them to run for state legislature. State legislatures are the minor leagues of politics as many members of Congress get their start in the statehouse.
In my own county, all of the candidates that appear on the primary ballot (as we don't have contested primaries) are voted on at the county convention. Getting involved locally and at the county level gets you a vote at the county convention. I don't always agree with the candidate that is chosen (this year I did not), but it's the process and I will accept who the county backs. Being involved locally also lets you meet the candidates and get to know them. I now have a Congressman that I can to go for any issue (even though I was redistricted out of his district) and is on a first name basis with me. Without my local involvement, he would be just another guy in Washington.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)I doubt very much that this guy is voting for Democrats at any level.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)In fact I was very anti blue dog in 2010. Then I started working on campaigns for a living, and end up on a coordinated campaign with a blue dog on our ticket. That Blue Dog won his re-election by less than 1000 votes, and having been to that part of the country where I worked, I am very convinced a progressive could not have won that seat.
The Democrats are a big tent party, and people need to embrace that. The only way to change things is at the local level.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Breakfast of champions.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Really, if all you do is choose to see the dark side of everything, it will be very tiring. After that rant, you have no where to go but some obscure third party and the work to get that party into power is going to be well, tiring.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)He's saving his energy up to work for whichever third party he chooses. On edit: Or rather, already chose.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Isn't that the point? Drown any OP out with a big rush of ridicule and insults?
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)...for those who object to the mainstream ,status-quo political process.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)forum that supposedly supports democrats.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Stop wasting my bandwidth.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)That says it all right there. Sorry you don't understand it.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)And what, pray tell, is "it"?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Sometimes posting on an iphone doesn't work out well.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Who cares??
If you REALLY feel the way you claim you do, run for office and show us all how it's done.
WonderGrunion
(2,995 posts)This poster is ARDENT15 over at Old Elm Tree. They have a post in their private forum about how happy they are over disrupting DU. I sent a TOS alert to the admins for that reason.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)The concerted effort to disrupt DU is well-known (shout-out to the trolls at OET).
It's up to DU admin to deal with it appropriately.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)I thought it smelt like outraged elm around here.
Bitter former DUers are funny.
Hi Naja
Sid
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Thanks.
Number23
(24,544 posts)He hit every note in the "Trolling DU" checklist.
Edit: Although I'm really shocked that OET still exists. I haven't heard anyone talking about that place in forever. Thought it was dead.
Kaleva
(36,259 posts)Last time I looked not long ago, there wasn't much going on there.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)guardian
(2,282 posts)n/t
polichick
(37,152 posts)imo we have one corporate party with two faces - like good cop, bad cop - and it serves to divide the people so that corporations/Wall Street/the 1% conquer. Better I think to be CITIZEN ACTIVISTS rather than party activists.
The hope is in grassroots activism like Occupy and in our social media connected worldwide network of citizen activists.
That said, Dems remain the lesser of evils and I'll vote for the president in November - even though this "democracy" still doesn't have verifiable voting and neither party seems to want it.
k&r