HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Obama: use half the "...

Sat May 5, 2012, 11:47 PM

Obama: use half the "money we’re no longer spending at war" to "rebuild America."

<...>

I don’t think we should prioritize things like more tax cuts for millionaires while cutting the kinds of investments that built a strong middle class.

That’s why I’ve called on Congress to take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the other half to rebuild America.

Because we’ve got more jobs to create. More students to educate. More clean energy to generate. More entrepreneurs with the next great idea, just looking for their shot at success. We’ve got to invest in things like education and medical research. We’ve got to build newer, faster transportation and communication networks. And we’ve got to secure the care and benefits our veterans have earned, so that we serve them as well as they have served us.

- more -

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/05/weekly-address-new-chapter-afghanistan



26 replies, 1970 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 26 replies Author Time Post
Reply Obama: use half the "money we’re no longer spending at war" to "rebuild America." (Original post)
ProSense May 2012 OP
NYC_SKP May 2012 #1
MannyGoldstein May 2012 #2
ProSense May 2012 #3
dkf May 2012 #4
ProSense May 2012 #5
Skittles May 2012 #6
ProSense May 2012 #12
Skittles May 2012 #26
dkf May 2012 #10
ProSense May 2012 #13
dkf May 2012 #17
ProSense May 2012 #20
Yuugal May 2012 #7
dkf May 2012 #18
ProSense May 2012 #21
dkf May 2012 #22
ProSense May 2012 #23
coalition_unwilling May 2012 #24
Edweird May 2012 #8
Historic NY May 2012 #9
bigtree May 2012 #11
Tennessee Gal May 2012 #14
spanone May 2012 #15
sibelian May 2012 #16
varelse May 2012 #19
Scurrilous May 2012 #25

Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat May 5, 2012, 11:49 PM

1. K/R (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat May 5, 2012, 11:54 PM

2. Add it to the savings from Social Security cuts

and raising the eligibility age for Medicare and we're talking serios cash.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #2)

Sun May 6, 2012, 12:02 AM

3. Obama is going

"Add it to the savings from Social Security cuts and raising the eligibility age for Medicare and we're talking serios cash."

...to cut eleventeen trillion dollars from Social Security.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002648942




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 12:26 AM

4. Use half of our "savings" to pay down debt?

Last edited Sun May 6, 2012, 12:28 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

So you are in debt up to your eyeballs, you cut some expenses and that is now savings that you can spend?

OMG.

He needs to be honest and say he wants to borrow more money to spend on things he thinks will benefit us in the future. Please don't try to con us into thinking we have "saved" anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dkf (Reply #4)

Sun May 6, 2012, 12:33 AM

5. For

Use half of our "savings" to pay down debt?

So you are in debt up to your eyeballs, you cut some expenses and that is now savings that you can spend?

OMG.

He needs to be honest and say he wants to borrow more money to spend on things he thinks will benefit us in the future. Please don't try to con us into thinking we have "saved" anything.

...the deficit hawk in you:

Mr. Obama gets too little credit. He has done more to rein in long-run deficits than any previous president.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/opinion/18krugman.html


If it was OK to use the money for 11 years of war, then there should be no problem to use it to rebuild America.

Priorities.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Reply #5)

Sun May 6, 2012, 01:24 AM

6. who said it was OK to use the money for senseless war?

oh right

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #6)

Sun May 6, 2012, 08:51 AM

12. That would

"who said it was OK to use the money for senseless war?"

...be the people who used it for "senseless war."

I mean, unless the last 11 years were imaginary, the money was used for war.

It's seems a bit idiotic to now argue against using that money for to create jobs and rebuild America.

Is that the point of the objection?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Reply #12)

Sun May 6, 2012, 07:56 PM

26. as a talking point, that is an utter FAIL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Reply #5)

Sun May 6, 2012, 03:21 AM

10. Who says its okay to use for war? That was such a waste. Please don't get me started.

Get out of Afghanistan, stay out of Iraq, and let Israel fight its own battles.

If we want to invest, get us off of oil and onto solar, which was what we should have done from the get go. But I doubt that will happen as it doesn't seem to have been any priority at a time when we had the votes and we used it to entrench big health insurance. Bah.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dkf (Reply #10)

Sun May 6, 2012, 08:54 AM

13. I read

"If we want to invest, get us off of oil and onto solar, which was what we should have done from the get go. But I doubt that will happen as it doesn't seem to have been any priority at a time when we had the votes and we used it to entrench big health insurance. Bah."

...the OP again, and it's definitely about investing in the country. So what's your point?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Reply #13)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:20 AM

17. Doing a scatter shot into all these things won't make a dent in any one of them.

We don't have the focus to do renewables properly as it should have been our Apollo mission. Instead we get half assed investments in failed ventures that should have been helped by incentives which create demand but weren't.

Obama's execution on transitioning to renewables is abysmal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dkf (Reply #17)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:30 AM

20. You have no idea what you're talking about.

It shows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dkf (Reply #4)

Sun May 6, 2012, 01:25 AM

7. I agree the deficit is huge

But Obama is right on this. When you have high unemployment and the private sector can't or won't hire, IMHO the govt has to spend the cash(even if borrowed) to create jobs to help the recovery along. Spending borrowed money sucks if it is for war, because taking out a $20 shed with a 2 million dollar missile is just a waste of 2 million dollars.

Spending that same 2 million creating jobs to repair a 2 billion dollar bridge not only creates jobs, but saves more money than letting the bridge fall down because no one wanted to maintain it......and then having to build a new bridge. A stitch in time saves nine is a good rule of thumb when it comes to infrastructure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yuugal (Reply #7)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:27 AM

18. The private sector is now back up to where it was re: employment. .

The decline in jobs is solely due to the government sector.

The States are trying to clean up their balance sheets. It would be ironic if the Federal Government takes that on and puts the entire country in a worse financial position.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dkf (Reply #18)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:31 AM

21. Huh?

"The private sector is now back up to where it was re: employment. .

The decline in jobs is solely due to the government sector."

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Reply #21)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:53 AM

22. CHART: Under Obama, Economy Has Recovered All Private Sector Jobs Lost During Bush Recession

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dkf (Reply #22)

Sun May 6, 2012, 10:21 AM

23. Do you understand what you're seeing?

The chart shows the jobs lost between 2009 and today, during the Obama Presidency, have returned to the economy. It does not show the job losses between 2007 and 2009, which are in the millions.

It also does not show the jobs needed to keep pace with population growth. It's a chart of simple numbers.

Goverment job losses, while significant, are about 5 percent of the total jobs lost during the recession.

If all public sector jobs were reinstated and doubled, it would likely result in about 1.2 million jobs. To return to normal the economy would need to add about 8 million jobs on top of that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Yuugal (Reply #7)

Sun May 6, 2012, 10:29 AM

24. You commie! (jk :) - n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 01:52 AM

8. Good to hear. Too bad it's so close to an election.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 02:50 AM

9. I hope they send out some highway money soon I've got 2 failing bridges up the street.

one built before the invention of the automobile and the other so bad they are epoxying steel plates over the ones that already rusted away. It seems it became an emergency all of a sudden. The stopped pedestrian traffic on the old one already. Mind you these are both on the key north south route.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 08:43 AM

11. one half for debt reduction and the other half for infrastructure

Last edited Sun May 6, 2012, 08:44 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

good plan . . . "That's what this election is all about."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 08:57 AM

14. Isn't it also possible that by using half the money to

rebuild America will create jobs, thus increasing the number of Americans working and taxable income will generate more funds to pay on the debt?

Just asking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 08:58 AM

15. k&r...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:02 AM

16. YES, PLEASE, Mr Obama.


These are things that I LIKE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 09:29 AM

19. Yes, please (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 11:31 AM

25. K & R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread