Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, here's an interesting chart showing who's really living off Federal subsidies! (Original Post) canoeist52 May 2012 OP
Sort it by dollar figure high to low.. Fumesucker May 2012 #1
A contract is not a subsidy. Indydem May 2012 #2
Of course they are. Remember, the gov't could hire employees to do a job.... Scuba May 2012 #3
No they couldn't dems_rightnow May 2012 #5
Your argument leads to the conclusion that the government can do very little.... Scuba May 2012 #6
The government can do things that further the functions a government provides. dems_rightnow May 2012 #7
They could build their own computers to be used for the government's work.. JDPriestly May 2012 #14
Because a computer is so much more complicated than a fighter jet?! nt. harmonicon May 2012 #17
You really have to look at it on an industry basis. bluedigger May 2012 #21
The first programmable electronic computer was built by a research station of the British HiPointDem May 2012 #22
Lucrative contract sought by lobbyist becomes congressman's pet project liberal N proud May 2012 #4
Not only can it be a subsidy, toddwv May 2012 #10
And then the pay-off comes full circle in the form of campaign gifts JDPriestly May 2012 #18
Only fixed-cost contracts are legit, cost-added are welfare parasite scam subsidies nt msongs May 2012 #12
What about "no bid"? patrice May 2012 #16
Mind if I insert that sarcasm emoticon for you? patrice May 2012 #15
Bingo! Like I've been saying for years, the real Welfare Queens are the military. Gregorian May 2012 #8
Reads like the backbone of any sound retirement portfolio. raouldukelives May 2012 #9
Great source Oilwellian May 2012 #11
I'll say. mahina May 2012 #13
Yeah.... Plucketeer May 2012 #19
K&R. This matters, but I doubt it will get much attention. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #20
Check out 64-65 and 69-70. More misconduct than conduct. Festivito May 2012 #23
I hate it when I'm right. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #24

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. Sort it by dollar figure high to low..
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:06 PM
May 2012

The list gets even more interesting then..

Drugs in the top three and the next two are oil companies.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
3. Of course they are. Remember, the gov't could hire employees to do a job....
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:12 PM
May 2012

.... when they contract that work it subsidizes the firm that gets it.

dems_rightnow

(1,956 posts)
5. No they couldn't
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:39 PM
May 2012

They the government does have some specific powers, enumerated in the Constitution.

I agree that they could build fighter planes if they wanted. I see Dell on that list. I deny that the government could build computers.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
6. Your argument leads to the conclusion that the government can do very little....
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:41 PM
May 2012

... and must privatize anything and everything that isn't explicitly allowed in the Constitution. I don't buy that.

dems_rightnow

(1,956 posts)
7. The government can do things that further the functions a government provides.
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:53 PM
May 2012

Other things, they can't do. It really is that straight forward, purchased or not.

The Constitution isn't very explicit at all about what is included in those powers. The "necessary and proper" clause gives them plenty of leeway. Competing in the computer manufacturing industry.... well.... you'd have to really be grasping at straws to consider that a government function.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. They could build their own computers to be used for the government's work..
Thu May 3, 2012, 02:35 PM
May 2012

Tax and spend is a very broad authority.

And the authority to regulate commerce is even broader.

Might I add that the Founding Fathers lived in a mercantile economy. The crown of England -- the King -- authorized companies to do business just as our government authorizes corporations and other business entities to do business.

Capitalism is a fairly new concept. Businesses of any size needed the King's approval to exist.

I seriously doubt that the Founding Fathers would like what is going on with business today. The King was supposed to be replaced by the Will of the People, not the Will of the Corporations.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
21. You really have to look at it on an industry basis.
Fri May 4, 2012, 01:43 AM
May 2012

Drug companies are heavily subsidized both with R&D and Medicare/Medicaid, etc... Oil companies are another heavily regulated industry that also does much business with the government. Then there are the many, many companies that directly feed the war machine.

I worked for #14, URS - they provide consulting services and don't make anything. All their contracts could be internalized, if we were willing to grow the government workforce. They should be. D. Feinstein's husband is one of the owners.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
22. The first programmable electronic computer was built by a research station of the British
Fri May 4, 2012, 02:10 AM
May 2012

government:

The Post Office Research Station at Dollis Hill, London, was first established in 1921 and opened by Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald in 1933. In 1943 the world's first programmable electronic computer, Colossus Mark 1 was built by Tommy Flowers and his team, followed in 1944 and 1945 by nine Colossus Mark 2s. These were used at Bletchley Park to break the Axis Lorenz cipher.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Office_Research_Station

The US army financed ENIAC, built by research teams at the U of PA in 1945.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eniac

Much of the early work on computers/IT was publicly financed and done either in government research units or universities.

You mean government couldn't build computers for the mass market? Of course it could, if it chose to.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
4. Lucrative contract sought by lobbyist becomes congressman's pet project
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:29 PM
May 2012

Yea, it is a subsidy.

If the government bid jobs like private sectors do, many of these companies wouldn't get the jobs at the prices they do.

The subsidy would be the difference between what they get paid and what the true cost would be.

toddwv

(2,830 posts)
10. Not only can it be a subsidy,
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:17 PM
May 2012

but it can be a payoff.

So are all contracts subsidies? No. But if a company is allowed to defraud the US government out of billions of dollars and gets a slap on the wrist and a new contract, then, yes, it is a subsidy.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
18. And then the pay-off comes full circle in the form of campaign gifts
Thu May 3, 2012, 02:41 PM
May 2012

(including paying for the cost of lavish fund-raising parties) and returns into the pockets of the politicians who pay the subsidies or the overruns in the first place.

Meanwhile we are told that people on Social Security are sucking at the teat of the government. Yeah, sure.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
8. Bingo! Like I've been saying for years, the real Welfare Queens are the military.
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:05 PM
May 2012

It's a bad habit. And we waste money on the war on drugs. The real threat to this country is the military spending.

I wait for the awakening of the human race. But I'm not holding my breath.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
9. Reads like the backbone of any sound retirement portfolio.
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:10 PM
May 2012

Must be lots of little owners out there rejoicing at the good news. Besides it helps the super wealthy get away with fraud when mom & pop next door are aiding & abetting.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
11. Great source
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:44 PM
May 2012

Thanks for posting. Follow the links and see why we should stop blaming the poor for this country's financial woes. I recall Clinton signing a Bill that would end contracts with companies that continually committed fraud against US taxpayers. I remember Halliburton was on that chopping block...that is until Bush and Cheney became president and ignored the new law. And so it continues.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
19. Yeah....
Thu May 3, 2012, 09:02 PM
May 2012

And here WE are at our collective keyboards, carping and wishing for the good fairey to come along with her magic wand and fix it all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well, here's an interesti...