Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The great turnout in Chicago on Tues shows that the electorate still (Original Post) CK_John Feb 2015 OP
To what would the electorate evolve? Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #1
Perhaps the OP meant to type "getting involved." merrily Feb 2015 #2
That would make more sense, yes. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #3
First time I find myself in agreement with you. Starting with most of my Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2015 #4
A mayoral primary in a year that is not even a national midterm year, let alone a Presidential year. merrily Feb 2015 #5
It was February, 0 degrees and uber windy, with most of the races uncontested frazzled Feb 2015 #6

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
1. To what would the electorate evolve?
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:08 PM
Feb 2015

Those who did not vote don't give a damn.

Evolution has nothing to do with it.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,494 posts)
4. First time I find myself in agreement with you. Starting with most of my
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:17 PM
Feb 2015

own friends who mostly don't give a fuck.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
5. A mayoral primary in a year that is not even a national midterm year, let alone a Presidential year.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:51 PM
Feb 2015

In the Arctic Freeze, or whatever they're calling this bizarre weather. With incumbent Rahm having outspent all his competition combined and getting endorsements from both a sitting President and the Daley machine.


I vote in every election, including every primary. I enjoy voting, my polling place is an easy walk from my home and, even if I have to wait in a log line, I am rarely on line outdoors for long--and never for a primary. But, I am not surprised turnout was low, even though it seems this primary offered voters some real choices.

I hope turnout for the election is better.

In general, turnout may improve when voters believe their vote might actually make a difference in their lives. For many, that seems less and less likely.

Way too many jobs gone out of the country is one reason. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=247962

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
6. It was February, 0 degrees and uber windy, with most of the races uncontested
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 12:53 AM
Feb 2015

Unless you had a competitive aldermanic race (and there were not that many), and unless you cared a whole lot about the mayoral race, you had to be pretty motivated to walk six blocks there and back to your polling place.

I did, even though my alderman was running uncontested and the four races besides mayor were also uncontested. But then I've voted in every local, state, and federal election since I was eligible to vote in 1972. I just do it.

I've been saying this since I moved here 10 years ago: this city should not have elections in February. The turnout is always around 30%.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The great turnout in Chic...