General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe great turnout in Chicago on Tues shows that the electorate still
doesn't give a rats a** about voting or getting evolved.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Those who did not vote don't give a damn.
Evolution has nothing to do with it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,494 posts)own friends who mostly don't give a fuck.
merrily
(45,251 posts)In the Arctic Freeze, or whatever they're calling this bizarre weather. With incumbent Rahm having outspent all his competition combined and getting endorsements from both a sitting President and the Daley machine.
I vote in every election, including every primary. I enjoy voting, my polling place is an easy walk from my home and, even if I have to wait in a log line, I am rarely on line outdoors for long--and never for a primary. But, I am not surprised turnout was low, even though it seems this primary offered voters some real choices.
I hope turnout for the election is better.
In general, turnout may improve when voters believe their vote might actually make a difference in their lives. For many, that seems less and less likely.
Way too many jobs gone out of the country is one reason. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=247962
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Unless you had a competitive aldermanic race (and there were not that many), and unless you cared a whole lot about the mayoral race, you had to be pretty motivated to walk six blocks there and back to your polling place.
I did, even though my alderman was running uncontested and the four races besides mayor were also uncontested. But then I've voted in every local, state, and federal election since I was eligible to vote in 1972. I just do it.
I've been saying this since I moved here 10 years ago: this city should not have elections in February. The turnout is always around 30%.