Sun Apr 29, 2012, 09:42 AM
mucifer (8,537 posts)
On Chicago local fox news Interview Sen Durbin Just Was Asked How He Would Improve the Health Care
bill .He said the health care reform bill should have had a public option or medicare for all.
|
8 replies, 1339 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| mucifer | Apr 2012 | OP | |
| Warren Stupidity | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| nevergiveup | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| Scuba | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| dkf | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| SDjack | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| SammyWinstonJack | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| stupidicus | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| zipplewrath | Apr 2012 | #8 |
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 09:50 AM
Warren Stupidity (32,336 posts)
1. yes and it didn't because of the timidity of the party leadership.
|
Including of course Senator Durbin.
|
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #1)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 11:22 AM
nevergiveup (3,720 posts)
5. Bingo!
|
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 09:59 AM
Scuba (27,175 posts)
2. So let's get it done by Feb 28, 2013.
|
Medicare for All should be a top agenda item if we can win the House and increase our majority in the Senate. And keep BHO in place too, of course.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 10:12 AM
dkf (33,368 posts)
3. Isn't that what we said all along?
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 10:53 AM
SDjack (1,075 posts)
4. If public option or Medicare for all is passed, the GOP knows
|
that it will not occupy the WH or control Congress for at least 40 years. That's why they fight it so hard.
|
Response to mucifer (Original post)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 11:28 AM
SammyWinstonJack (35,161 posts)
6. Yeah well...
|
But apparently this was the best we could get...at this time.
Now the repugs will kill Medicare, leaving that option unavailable to be brought up for discussion or anything else. |
Response to stupidicus (Reply #7)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 12:40 PM
zipplewrath (9,022 posts)
8. Definition of a "deal"
|
The argument amongst the insiders has always been about when the White House abandoned the public option. I think you'll find that even the insiders don't agree. Some became aware as early as July that it was THE major obstacle to cutting almost any of the other deals. It is traceable that about that time "leaks" started coming out about how the public option was gone. It was probably more likely that these leaks came from people who were trying to save it. That doesn't really mean that the deals had been cut yet. IF there is something to "blame" here, it is that the insiders began as early as July to let it be known that the PO was "trade-able". When Obama himself was on board may be never known. To some extent Obama himself may not really know. Considering he had twice gone before congress and declared his demand for the PO, it is probably true that he may have been one of the last "on board".
|

