General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Progressive: Right-to-Work Laws Are a Fatal "Cure" (X-post from Labor)
http://www.progressive.org/news/2015/02/187983/right-work-laws-are-fatal-cureEventually, this translates into the erosion and near-complete decimation of unions in right-to-work states, the decline of worker safety, the marginalization of advocates for a strong social net, and predictably, primitive indicators of neglected health and educational needs. Instead, reflecting the hollowing-out of real democracy right-to-work states, these state typically neglect social needs and lavish vast public incentives on huge and profitable corporations.
But to avoid discussing the deplorable results of right-to-work laws, the Wisconsin Right to Work groupwith close ties to Americans for Prosperity, the Koch brothers (see here, here, and here), and the well-funded Bradley Foundationis raising the phantom specter of a non-existent threat called forced unionism. In reality, no one in the United States can ever be compelled to become a union member under any circumstances.
...
Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Congressional Research Service concluded in a December, 2012 report that states permitting fair-share or union-security provisions showed sharply higher median wages: $50,867 compared with $43,641 in right-to-work states, a 16.5 percent differential amounting to $7,226 per year. Numerous other studies confirm this substantial advantage for workers in states allowing fair share contracts, while those in right-to-work states banning fair-share contracts suffering significantly lower pay and benefits.
Click through to the article for more information and links.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)The 1% obsess about unions because, in my view, unions are able to educate and organize a working class that otherwise would be at the mercy of the capitalists. Even though white male workers frequently support Republicans, white male union members generally vote democratic.
I am sure that the Kochs, the Waltons, the Scaifes and the Bradleys secretly wish for a feudal style society. With them as the aristocracy of course.
The problem is the word freedom. Republicans talk about freedom from unions, selling the notion that in a Republican utopia, all workers would be "free" to go to Wal Mart, or McDonalds, and "freely" negotiate appropriate wages. As if a peasant could negotiate with the king!
Even in a closed-shop union workplace, union membership is not compelled. People who do not wish to join merely have to pay what are called "fair-representation" fees. That is, they pay for the cost of representing them because all unions are legally required to represent all workers in a bargaining unit.
From a 40 year retired union member who was a Union Steward/Representative for 33 years.
Great post Scuba!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... your views on the oligarch's obsession is on the money. Unions give voice to the little people, so the wealthy oppose them.
Thanks for your reply, and for your 33 years as a Union Steward.
pampango
(24,692 posts)have right-to-work states along side with 'union' states. Their unions don't have to worry about companies moving from one state to another to avoid strong unions. Moving within the same country allows companies to keep access to the same transportation, education and legal networks. Right-to-work allows them to maintain all of this and weak unions at the same time.