NYT Editorial: Forty Years of Servitude, and Counting
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/01/opinion/sunday/labor-rights-for-home-care-aides-are-delayed-yet-again.html?_r=0
Labor Rights for Home Care Aides Are Delayed Yet Again
By THE EDITORIAL BOARDJAN. 31, 2015
An enduring injustice was supposed to end on Jan. 1. That was the effective date for new rules by the Labor Department that would have required employers of home care aides for the elderly and disabled to pay at least the federal minimum wage and time and a half for overtime. Specifically, the new rules would have ended a federal regulation from 1974 that labeled home care aides companions, a designation that lets their employers generally, for-profit agencies ignore basic labor protections.
Justice, however, has been delayed. The Jan. 1 effective date was postponed late last year when a federal judge, Richard Leon, said he first had to issue a decision on a challenge filed by the International Franchise Association and other home care employer groups. On Jan. 14, Judge Leon overturned the new rules, on the highly debatable ground that only Congress can remove the companionship label. The Labor Department has filed an appeal, but the issue wont be resolved until June, at the earliest.
Judge Leons decision is at odds with a unanimous Supreme Court decision in 2007 that raised many questions about how to change the companionship designation and concluded that Congress intended its broad grant of definitional authority to the Labor Department to include the authority to answer these kinds of questions.
In an even more indefensible part of his decision, Judge Leon agreed with the industry position that home care workers are akin to occasional babysitters, who are designated companions (and rightly so) under the labor law. A babysitter, Judge Leon wrote, often is responsible for feeding, bathing and changing the clothes and diapers of the child as well as regularly preparing food and driving children to places they cant get to on their own.
FULL story at link.