Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,564 posts)
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 10:15 AM Feb 2015

NYT Editorial: Forty Years of Servitude, and Counting


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/01/opinion/sunday/labor-rights-for-home-care-aides-are-delayed-yet-again.html?_r=0

Labor Rights for Home Care Aides Are Delayed Yet Again

By THE EDITORIAL BOARDJAN. 31, 2015

An enduring injustice was supposed to end on Jan. 1. That was the effective date for new rules by the Labor Department that would have required employers of home care aides for the elderly and disabled to pay at least the federal minimum wage and time and a half for overtime. Specifically, the new rules would have ended a federal regulation from 1974 that labeled home care aides “companions,” a designation that lets their employers — generally, for-profit agencies — ignore basic labor protections.

Justice, however, has been delayed. The Jan. 1 effective date was postponed late last year when a federal judge, Richard Leon, said he first had to issue a decision on a challenge filed by the International Franchise Association and other home care employer groups. On Jan. 14, Judge Leon overturned the new rules, on the highly debatable ground that only Congress can remove the companionship label. The Labor Department has filed an appeal, but the issue won’t be resolved until June, at the earliest.

Judge Leon’s decision is at odds with a unanimous Supreme Court decision in 2007 that raised many questions about how to change the companionship designation and concluded that “Congress intended its broad grant of definitional authority” to the Labor Department “to include the authority to answer these kinds of questions.”

In an even more indefensible part of his decision, Judge Leon agreed with the industry position that home care workers are akin to occasional babysitters, who are designated “companions” (and rightly so) under the labor law. A babysitter, Judge Leon wrote, “often is responsible for feeding, bathing and changing the clothes and diapers of the child” as well as “regularly” preparing food and driving children to places they can’t get to on their own.

FULL story at link.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT Editorial: Forty Year...