Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JI7

(89,244 posts)
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 06:17 AM Jan 2015

Michael Reagan Ordered to Pay More than $600,000

<Ronald Reagan’s oldest son and two associates were ordered to pay more than $600,000 to a fellow businessman whom they deprived of an ownership interest in an email business he created to capitalize on the memory of the former president and cater to conservatives.

A Los Angeles Superior Court jury deliberated for most of the day before returning its verdict of $662,500 in favor of Elias Chavando late Tuesday afternoon.

She said the jury agreed that a partnership existed among the businessmen despite defense arguments to the contrary. She also said she was not concerned that the Reagan name would have a “star power” influence on the jury’s decision-making to Chavando’s detriment.

In his opening statement Jan. 13, the plaintiff’s other attorney, Mark Chassman, said the three defendants denied his client a $3.8 million share of the business generated from @Reagan.com when half of the business was sold to Chicago entrepreneur Anthony Saliba.

“They used greed, arrogance and strong-armed tactics … to enrich themselves,” Chassman said. “Ownership is the key to this case.”>

http://westsidetoday.com/2015/01/29/son-and-associates-of-ronald-reagan-ordered-to-pay-more-than-600000/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michael Reagan Ordered to Pay More than $600,000 (Original Post) JI7 Jan 2015 OP
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Jan 2015 #1
K&R secondwind Jan 2015 #2
So, he's a piece of shit just like his father BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #3
+1 Enthusiast Jan 2015 #5
shit takes great offense at the comparison.... lastlib Jan 2015 #8
Would that be Moe, Larry, or Curley? Tom Ripley Jan 2015 #14
Michael Reagan.................. Enthusiast Jan 2015 #4
What? A Republican was greedy? I'm shocked! vlyons Jan 2015 #6
Count me as totally unsurprised. Michael Reagan has always sought to exploit the "creation" hlthe2b Jan 2015 #7
Michael Reagan, having nothing of his own to work with, trades on his father's name. Shrike47 Jan 2015 #9
lol dfhfdjj Jan 2015 #10
How so? marble falls Jan 2015 #12
Of course Obama and Hillary are behind this! edbermac Jan 2015 #11
R#32 & K for, "greed, arrogance and strong-armed tactics" - Rethug core values!1 n/t UTUSN Jan 2015 #13

lastlib

(23,191 posts)
8. shit takes great offense at the comparison....
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 08:23 AM
Jan 2015

...but perhaps only repuglicans are lower in the grand scheme of things.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
6. What? A Republican was greedy? I'm shocked!
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 07:44 AM
Jan 2015

BTW: I don't think that Daddy Reagan was a scumbag. An ignoramous with onset dementia, yes. A criminal in the Iran/Contra scaldel, yes. A patsy dupped by Cap Weinberger and the Bechtol bigwigs, yes. An entitled Hollywood B-grade star, yes. An asshole, who let his wife run the whitehouse based on astrology, yes. But a scumbag? Why ever would you say such a thing about dear Ronnie?

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
9. Michael Reagan, having nothing of his own to work with, trades on his father's name.
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 08:40 AM
Jan 2015

It's pathetic in itself, but also pathetic that people would buy something based on the Reagan name. Like the poor people who send their few dollars to television preachers, it makes no sense but they do it anyway, happily.

Now they will appeal and drag the whole thing out for several more years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Reagan Ordered to...