Thu Apr 26, 2012, 05:53 PM
MrScorpio (55,316 posts)
The Republican War on Women Visual Cavalcade (and kids too) - Dial up Warning
Thirty-two Arizona state legislators received hand-knit, googley-eyed stuffed uteruses from a pro-choice activist yesterday, the Arizona Republic reports. Each uturus toy was stuffed into a clear plastic bag, along with a letter from Peggy Tinsley, who spearheaded the project, explaining why she opposes a bill that would limit birth control coverage in the state. “Please treat the women in your life as the intelligent persons they are,” Tinsley wrote. “I have provided you with a uterus. Please leave ours alone.”
“There is no reason that it should be any different this time,” Murray said of the need for all lawmakers to get behind the Democratic bill. But Democrats want to expand the original law to include provisions that seem to invite opposition from Republicans. Their bill would increase the number of visas available to victims of domestic violence who are undocumented immigrants; ban discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender victims of domestic violence; and give more authority to Native American tribes to address domestic violence. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) disputed that those additions were aimed at making Republicans take a politically uncomfortable vote — and potentially go on record opposing a bill focused on protecting women from violence. Violence Against Women Act Prompts Partisan Debate Among Female Lawmakers
If this book were a person, it would be old enough to drive this year. I’m not even kidding, check it out: http://www.amazon.com/The-Republican-War-Against-Women/dp/B000O688DQ/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_2
|
23 replies, 3450 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| MrScorpio | Apr 2012 | OP | |
| hifiguy | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| freshwest | Apr 2012 | #15 | |
| MrMickeysMom | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| Scuba | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| BlancheSplanchnik | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| GoneOffShore | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| Tesha | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| Liberal_in_LA | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| AsahinaKimi | Apr 2012 | #8 | |
| alittlelark | Apr 2012 | #9 | |
| salin | Apr 2012 | #11 | |
| Chorophyll | Apr 2012 | #10 | |
| Tikki | Apr 2012 | #12 | |
| Canuckistanian | Apr 2012 | #13 | |
| alittlelark | Apr 2012 | #14 | |
| progressoid | Apr 2012 | #16 | |
| cliffordu | Apr 2012 | #17 | |
| madamesilverspurs | Apr 2012 | #18 | |
| nolabear | Apr 2012 | #19 | |
| philly_bob | Apr 2012 | #20 | |
| Uncle Joe | Apr 2012 | #21 | |
| mlevans | Apr 2012 | #22 | |
| SalviaBlue | Apr 2012 | #23 |
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:03 PM
hifiguy (13,029 posts)
1. Kick and REC!!
|
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:15 PM
MrMickeysMom (10,683 posts)
2. This is s great...
|
My new motto... "Are you fucking kidding me?" gif is now a keeper. I can't think of a better way to express feeling of the moment.
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:21 PM
Scuba (26,764 posts)
3. Great compilation. Thanks. Many new ones, all on the mark.
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:30 PM
BlancheSplanchnik (7,705 posts)
4. Mr. Scorpio!
|
This is TRULY a work of love!
Thank you!!!!! ![]() |
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:33 PM
GoneOffShore (11,125 posts)
5. Thank you for the compilation.
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 06:52 PM
Liberal_in_LA (28,680 posts)
7. kick
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:14 PM
AsahinaKimi (18,092 posts)
8. right on!
|
K&R
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:25 PM
alittlelark (14,800 posts)
9. I wish I could rec. this many times.
|
Thank You!
|
Response to alittlelark (Reply #9)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:35 PM
salin (45,823 posts)
11. What alittlelark said!
|
fantastic compilation.
Thank you! |
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:33 PM
Chorophyll (5,042 posts)
10. Fan-tastic!
|
Kick and Rec! Thank you, MrScorpio!
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:00 PM
Tikki (9,609 posts)
12. Excellent there, Sir...Thank You...
|
Tikki |
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 10:27 PM
Canuckistanian (42,197 posts)
13. I can't recommend this enough
|
Great collection.
Thanks for posting. |
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 03:43 AM
progressoid (27,322 posts)
16. Super duper rec!
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 04:05 AM
cliffordu (29,436 posts)
17. KAY AND ARE
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:36 AM
madamesilverspurs (6,762 posts)
18. Thank you for this.
|
Incredible that it's necessary, eh?
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:53 PM
nolabear (14,720 posts)
19. Brilliant! I'd like to send this whole post to everyone I know.
|
Thanks Mr. Scorpio. You are officially declared Friend of Women.
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 02:52 PM
philly_bob (1,790 posts)
20. Excellent collection. My latest take on women's issues.
|
Suggested by article by Johan Galtung discussing whether war itself can be abolished:
"Is that (abolition of war) at all possible? Of course it is. To wit:
- in the 19th century we abolished slavery - in the 20th century we abolished colonialism - in the 21st century we are abolishing patriarchy. Note how reframing it this way -- as the abolition of patriarchy ("Patriarchy is a social system in which the males, especially fathers, have central roles of political leadership, moral authority, and property") -- allows us to portray "women's issues" as universal rejection of a self-evidently stupid idea (patriarchy) just like slavery was universal rejection of a self-evidently stupid idea. Making it a "women's issue" often excludes male allies and portray the issues as a struggle for slices of a shrinking pie between 50% men and 50% women. Abolition in the 19th century was not slave-owners v. slaves. It was (or is viewed now as) universal opposition to the very idea of slavery. I hope we move away from dispute between men and women to a near-universal rejection of patriarchy. Because most of these Republican anti-woman issues are really just forms of patriarchy. And when you think about it, patriarchy is pretty ridiculous. What high school debater would want to argue for patriarchy? (Preliminary thoughts) |
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 03:12 PM
Uncle Joe (24,997 posts)
21. Well done!
|
Thanks for the thread, MrScorpio.
|
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 03:58 PM
mlevans (839 posts)

