Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:23 AM Jan 2015

Toll Of 5 Years Of Drone Strikes: 2,400 Dead .The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama

The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama reached its fifth anniversary on Thursday having tallied up an estimated death toll of at least 2,400 people.


Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued a pair of reports in October fiercely criticizing the secrecy that shrouds the administration's drone program, and calling for investigations into the deaths of drone victims with no apparent connection to terrorism. In Pakistan alone, TBIJ estimates, between 416 and 951 civilians, including 168 to 200 children, have been killed.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/obama-drone-program-anniversary_n_4654825.html

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Toll Of 5 Years Of Drone Strikes: 2,400 Dead .The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama (Original Post) glasshouses Jan 2015 OP
Holy cow yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #1
He's never going to top the Total dead that Bush caused glasshouses Jan 2015 #2
Sorry folks but for the continuance of this program he will leave the WH tainted. Shame. YOHABLO Jan 2015 #3
It's a bad policy that he ramped up glasshouses Jan 2015 #4
do you mean by our guys, the guys shouldn't be there? Skittles Jan 2015 #5
He could bring them all home glasshouses Jan 2015 #7
How does it keep anyone safe? Scuba Jan 2015 #8
I don't disagree... But the only way to not have collateral damage... Adrahil Jan 2015 #25
Another thing glasshouses Jan 2015 #6
And this article was written a year ago. RiverLover Jan 2015 #9
Disgusting!!! wavesofeuphoria Jan 2015 #10
Is it worse that the bombs are delivered by a pilot on the ground and not a pilot in the air? Oklahoma_Liberal Jan 2015 #11
Yes, I think so... elias49 Jan 2015 #16
I can't see any difference. Never could. Adrahil Jan 2015 #26
Well that's what war is about. elias49 Jan 2015 #28
No. I can't see the difference between.... Adrahil Jan 2015 #29
Like a video game you mean? elias49 Jan 2015 #30
I think your dividing line is odd. Adrahil Jan 2015 #31
I'm just tired of this country 'delivering weapons' all over the world. elias49 Jan 2015 #32
Moral cesspool. Blood, looting, torture, profit, lies. woo me with science Jan 2015 #12
c'mon, woo, this country became what it is a long time ago. KG Jan 2015 #13
These drone attacks are war crimes. PatrickforO Jan 2015 #14
Next #1 movie coming to a theatre near you! "American Drone" n/t benz380 Jan 2015 #15
That strikes me as an extremely low death count from a 5 year bombing campaign. stevenleser Jan 2015 #17
You're aware that it's probably dumb luck that the girl in your sig line hasn't been droned, yes? nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #18
No, it's not. The chances of someone in one of the worlds most populous countries being one of 2500 stevenleser Jan 2015 #19
Gee, maybe you're right. How many weddings can a girl go to, anyway? nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #20
I know I'm right. Thanks for noticing. nt stevenleser Jan 2015 #21
I guess you proved Obama holds the moral high ground on children killed glasshouses Jan 2015 #22
You, they are not randomly selecting weddings to strike.... Adrahil Jan 2015 #27
kick woo me with science Jan 2015 #23
Welcome to DU... SidDithers Jan 2015 #24
Oh, shush!! They were killed for their own good...or something. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #33
kick woo me with science Jan 2015 #34
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Holy cow
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:24 AM
Jan 2015

That is scary. He is getting closer to Bush numbers. He was at 4800 deaths total (less than a thousand for Afghanistan and about 2600 for Iraq).

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
2. He's never going to top the Total dead that Bush caused
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:29 AM
Jan 2015

How many Iraqis died in the 8 years Bush was in?

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
4. It's a bad policy that he ramped up
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:34 AM
Jan 2015

It keeps our guys safe but even one child killed because he or she was in the wrong place is one too many.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
25. I don't disagree... But the only way to not have collateral damage...
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 07:57 AM
Jan 2015

... Is to do nothing at all. That is, of course, a position one can take, but I think it's a bit of a Polly Anna position. The real world is very messy.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
6. Another thing
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 02:39 AM
Jan 2015

I remember how upset I felt when just 2 or 3 years ago the estimate of innocent children killed
by drones was 28

Now it's 200

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
9. And this article was written a year ago.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 07:46 AM
Jan 2015

Imagine how much the death toll of innocents has risen since then.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
16. Yes, I think so...
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 11:01 AM
Jan 2015

remote control murder. Maybe an individual sitting in Florida, waiting for his lunch break. Then he/she will go home to his family with nary a hair out of place. It's disgusting.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
26. I can't see any difference. Never could.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 07:59 AM
Jan 2015

I can't understand your point of view. Would you be happier if occasionally one of our pilots were killed?

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
28. Well that's what war is about.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 08:05 AM
Jan 2015

It makes life cheap when you can eliminate your adversary with a joy stick 5,000 miles from the 'battlefield'.
You don't see that?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
29. No. I can't see the difference between....
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 08:11 AM
Jan 2015

A pilot dropping a bomb from 25,000 ft, and UAV operator doing it remotely. Neither will see the target as anything more than a target on a screen.

And no, war is not about putting people at risk. It's a nasty, brutal thing. And when it must be executed, it should be executed in the most lopsided, unfair manner possible. Hit when they ain't looking and don't give them a chance to strike back.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
31. I think your dividing line is odd.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 11:51 AM
Jan 2015

I'd say "video games" are more like the real thing, rather than the other way around. But yeah, technology is here to stay. That technology has also helped us advance precision delivery of weapons to greatly reduce civilian casualties as compared to, say, WWII.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
32. I'm just tired of this country 'delivering weapons' all over the world.
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 04:22 PM
Jan 2015

This isn't our planet. As another op points out, we've deployed 'black ops' to 105 countries around the world. Those that don't play our game - won't buy our capitalist system, and our goods - get the poop end of the stick. Or destabilized (Ukraine).
One of the reasons the Vietnam war ended when it did is because the American public SAW what war was about. It's about dismemberment, burned bodies (phosphorous) and children without parents. IMO, you can't get precise enough. Never will.
War is the last vestige of megalomaniacs. Maybe if people could see what the landscape looked like after a major battle during the Civil War they'd say "Enough".

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
12. Moral cesspool. Blood, looting, torture, profit, lies.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 09:44 AM
Jan 2015

With a slick, morally bankrupt propaganda machine to sell it all.

I weep for what my country has become.

KG

(28,751 posts)
13. c'mon, woo, this country became what it is a long time ago.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jan 2015

the propaganda machine's been selling it since the 1800's

PatrickforO

(14,558 posts)
14. These drone attacks are war crimes.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 10:57 AM
Jan 2015

I have a friend who makes the point that every president since Truman is guilty of some war crime, except Carter. No shots were ever fired in anger during his administration. And, after leaving office, he has become a great man.

We have to face it, the military crazies are pretty much running the show.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
17. That strikes me as an extremely low death count from a 5 year bombing campaign.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jan 2015

In comparison, even the 9th and 10th most devastating bombing attacks of WW2 had five times as many civilian deaths during one attack and the efficacy in terms of the war effort was even more in question than it is for drone attacks.

http://www.onlinemilitaryeducation.org/posts/10-most-devastating-bombing-campaigns-of-wwii/

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
19. No, it's not. The chances of someone in one of the worlds most populous countries being one of 2500
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 11:28 AM
Jan 2015

killed in three countries over five years is miniscule. Its not "dumb luck"

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
27. You, they are not randomly selecting weddings to strike....
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 08:02 AM
Jan 2015

I know that rains on your narrative, but the strikes are not occurring all over Pakistan, but in a very narrow zone controlled by the Taliban.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Toll Of 5 Years Of Drone ...