General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFive years in prison for a dollar's worth of soda. Guess where?
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/florida-man-charged-felony-allegedly-stealing-1-cup-002830215--abc-news-topstories.html
A Florida man was arrested and held on $6,500 bond after police in Collier County said he left a McDonald's without paying for a cup of soda valued at $1.
Mark Abaire, 52, had apparently asked staff at the Naples restaurant for a courtesy cup of water, but instead he allegedly filled the cup with soda from the soda fountain and sat outside of the restaurant, according to a story in the Naples Daily News which cited the police report...
He was charged with petty theft, trespassing and disorderly intoxication after the Thursday arrest, and sent to Collier County jail. Petty theft is usually a misdemeanor, but because Abaire has previous convictions for theft, the charge was upgraded to a felony. The trespassing and disorderly intoxication charges are misdemeanors.
Abaire could face five years in prison if he is convicted of the felony.
That's about a month per sip!
Gold Metal Flake
(13,805 posts)obamanut2012
(26,064 posts)And was apparently abusive to staff, and also refused to leave when told to.
If the truth of the matter was what the headline reads, I would be appalled, but it seems like it's a bit more than that.
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)That's one of the stupidest statements I've ever read. So WHAT if he was rude to the staff and had a history of theft? So WHAT? What happened to the concept of the punishment fitting the crime? As for his history of theft, do you really consider getting a cola instead of water, with a courtesy cup, such a danger to the community? What a crock of bullshit. The prosecutors threw the book at this guy because they COULD. This is not justice, or anything resembling justice, and we should all be pissed off, if at nothing else, that our tax money is being spent on shit like this.
"And was apparently abusive to staff, and also refused to leave when told to.
If the truth of the matter was what the headline reads, I would be appalled, but it seems like it's a bit more than that.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Come on! Do you REALLY think that five years imprisonment fits the crime? Is that REALLY justice, in your book? Get real.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Instead of spending hundreds of OUR tax dollars on putting him in prison.
onenote
(42,685 posts)you can relax.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)And what about the drunk and disorderly. Does he have to get us drunk now?
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)I don't think you actually want to talk about the issues. I'm not going to waste my time anymore.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)did you?
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Simply because you don't agree with me doesn't mean that I'm wrong.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)The punishment seems severe...The person has a history of theft...that is taken into consideration when one prosecutes.
I still remember one guy we caught breaking into my partner's vehicle one night. In court a month later, the defense attorney pleaded that his client was trying to cleanup his life.."Why, he's only been arrested three times this year your Honor." This was in May...
hack89
(39,171 posts)what then? I don't know what the perfect solution would be but the one thing I would not do is physically confront the guy.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)Javaman
(62,510 posts)Ezlivin
(8,153 posts)Luce Nox
(19 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Pro-Gun Nut laws and racists are ruining the state.
Why don't they all move to Iran and get the full experience?
Meiko
(1,076 posts)Just askin'.........
libodem
(19,288 posts)Every incident could have been exsponged to show a clean record.
Wonder if the bail will be a million $ or if he can run around free for a couple of months?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)onenote
(42,685 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:32 AM - Edit history (3)
The article states that Abaire "could face five years in prison" if he is convicted of the felony. That's very misleading. While it is true that the maximum penalty that can be imposed for a third-degree felony in Florida is five years, Florida has a fairly convoluted sentencing structure in which points are assigned to each felony (past or current) that an individual commits in order to determine the recommended sentence. If your point total is below 44, the judge doesn't have to sentence you to any time at all (and that is usually what happens). Once the point total gets to 44, a formula determines what your sentence can be: the minimum (one year), the maximum (five years), or something in between. This guy's felony -- petit theft, is a level one offense worth four points. While he has a long rap sheet, most of the offenses are misdemenors and the felonies appear to be low level offenses. While I haven't bothered to calculate the point total, it seems quite likely, if not certain, that its below 44 and that this guy, if convicted, could be released without serving any time (although he might get a month or two) and in no case will he be subject to five years in prison.
But it made for a nice bit of Florida bashing by the OP and others misled by the article.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And I take pains to ensure that my Florida-bashing does not shade over into Floridian-bashing. Most of you down there (especially the DUers!) aren't responsible for the messed-up criminal justice system any more than they are for "stand your ground". Would a post attacking "stand your ground": be considered "Florida-bashing"? 'Cause there are an awful lot of them these days.
onenote
(42,685 posts)That you were led astray by a misleading article. And, in answer to your question, bashing a bad law, such as SYG, would not be Florida bashing; however, bashing Florida for its sentencing structure, which actually is a lot less messed up than some others, is off base imo.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)it makes a much better headline to imply that all this guy has ever done was steal 1 dollar worth of soda and now will go away for 5 years.
All that other stuff confuses the issue and might lead to people not clicking on the link.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)stranger81
(2,345 posts)Then he could have walked.
Keep it klassy, Florida.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)ornotna
(10,798 posts)And ruin a good chance to bash Florida. Yer kidding right.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)To hell with prison! Fire up Ol' Sparky!!
Srsly, there simply isn't enough room to imprison everyone who curses at a fast-food employee.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)No comment on that, huh?
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)But why screw up a more sympathetic narrative...
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)My reply is still,
onenote
(42,685 posts)when its been shown that under Florida sentencing guidelines, a judge is free to let him off without serving any time. There is not a chance in hell he's getting five years. Its highly unlikely he'd even get one year. At most he may get a month or two because his repeat offender status. And its more likely than not he won't get any time.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)You have a point. Here's our man:
But what if he looked like this?
The judge would have the power to "throw the book" at him (also known as "selective enforcement" .
onenote
(42,685 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)That is all.
onenote
(42,685 posts)Let's assume for the moment that you don't think that it should be legal for someone to steal a bottle of soda even if its worth a dollar. And let's assume the first time, or even the first few times, that someone does get caught stealing a bottle of soda, the appropriate punishment that fits the crime is probation or community service or something short of prison time. What if they continue to commit petty thefts. Is there a point at which the punishment should increase? If so, how should that punishment be set. By giving the judge discretion to decide what is appropriate under the circumstances of the particular case or a mandatory sentence?
Under Florida law, the sentence for stealing a bottle of soda is left to the judge's discretion (not to exceed a maximum). At some point, a multiple offender becomes subject to a minimum sentence as well as a maximum sentence, but the minimum sentence itself is the product of a formula that takes into account the nature of the offense and the offenders' past record.
You seem to be dissatisfied with this approach, so I'm curious what approach you think would be better.
onethatcares
(16,165 posts)as governor after stealing billions in Medicare funds.
Yep, this state has some fucked up priorities.
Let's not forget the stealing billions from our education system, that should be worth some time.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)just sticking a water fountain outside somewhere.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)As it stands now it is highly inaccurate.