Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cushions and crudités. .. The demands of Hillary Clinton. (Original Post) mylye2222 Nov 2014 OP
Since when are raw chopped veggies elitist. Skidmore Nov 2014 #1
That's what I was thinking. WillowTree Nov 2014 #7
Is she worth it? Maybe the sparkling water...other than that? Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #2
Well, the green room refreshments are quite simple MineralMan Nov 2014 #3
the $300,000 goes to the Clinton Foundation (or is it the Initiative, mix the two up) LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #4
Town "effing" Hall??? CatWoman Nov 2014 #8
I took that out and put the NYT article in because people wait to alert LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #9
Jeeezzzz. OffWithTheirHeads Nov 2014 #5
The story is, or should be, what does the Clinton Foundation do with their money? LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #10
Demanding raw veggies? Fetch me my smelling salts! Hekate Nov 2014 #6
I am no fan of Hillary, but DonCoquixote Nov 2014 #11
and I say that DonCoquixote Nov 2014 #12
Un Rec denbot Nov 2014 #13
Ah, we're back to Hillary bashing Wella Nov 2014 #14
Her political tone deafness is becoming epic elfin Nov 2014 #15
Yeah, she's a regular Marie Antoinette alright. Sheldon Cooper Nov 2014 #16
Let them eat hummus! tammywammy Nov 2014 #17
A very mild anecdote in the career of an arrogant Nixonian monarchist. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #18
Elitist demands access to a computer, pillows, and fresh veggies? bhikkhu Nov 2014 #19

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
1. Since when are raw chopped veggies elitist.
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 02:53 PM
Nov 2014

I wouldn't fault her on her choice of snacking material. There are other issues I'm more concerned with.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
7. That's what I was thinking.
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 03:31 PM
Nov 2014

A vegetable tray with, perhaps, some vinaigrette (and why, pray tell, do I ALWAYS have to look up the spelling of that word???) or ranch dressing for dipping, room temp water and diet soda.......

I'm not Hillary's biggest fan, but that doesn't sound fancy-schmancy or unreasonable to me. Have these people (the writers of the article) seen what most of the vapid pop singers require in their dressing rooms? Now that's outrageous. This sounds rather nice, and not the least bit capricious.

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
3. Well, the green room refreshments are quite simple
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 02:55 PM
Nov 2014

and not elaborate. I don't know about the other stuff. It's not extravagant at all, really. Compared with the demands of some others, this is not extraordinary, I think. At least there are free student tickets. That's not always the case when prominent people come.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
4. the $300,000 goes to the Clinton Foundation (or is it the Initiative, mix the two up)
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 02:58 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Thu Nov 27, 2014, 03:53 PM - Edit history (2)

are those financials open for public review as they sound like charities???

Didn't one of their institutions run into trouble on how they managed their finances and where so much money mysteriously disappeared to?

Are we sure that the best part of those donations go to..... who? To fly around hollywood stars and their dogs on expensive aircraft? To impress and schmooze with the elite for favors?

added:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?pagewanted=3&_r=3&hp&


===
There are many sources for this BBB rating. I can't give a link because I will cause strokes and gasps. If you are interested in more reading, I recommend The Goog.

President Clinton's charitable foundation failed to meet at least six of 19 accountability standards established by the Better Business Bureau, according to a recent report from the watchdog group.

The report, issued in June, said the Clinton Foundation lacks policies requiring performance reviews for its chief executive officer and for the organization as a whole. The Better Business Bureau review also observed that the foundation's annual reports and Web site do not contain detailed financial statements or information about the charity's board of directors.

In addition, the bureau's charity evaluation service, called the Wise Giving Alliance, said it could not establish whether the foundation was observing five other good-governance practices regarding board meetings, conflict-of-interest policies, budget issues, and donor privacy.

"There are a number of concerns here," the head of the alliance, Bennett Weiner, said in an interview. "We didn't get a copy of the audited financial statement. They did have an annual report, but it didn't include specifically the board roster and the summary of finances that is recommended."

Mr. Weiner said nonprofit groups that seek money on the Internet should post detailed financial reports online.






 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
9. I took that out and put the NYT article in because people wait to alert
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 03:43 PM
Nov 2014

on Anything they deem negative about the Clintons.

and I didn't realize that it was Not the NYT, that was the intent but got the wrong link - and I have no idea what Town Hall is. I can't keep up with what is approved and what isn't here.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
10. The story is, or should be, what does the Clinton Foundation do with their money?
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 03:57 PM
Nov 2014

Hillary is going to get $300,000 more dollars for a foundation that does not follow the rules for disclosure.

This hummus and room temp water 'story' is downright stupid and a waste of internet ink.

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
6. Demanding raw veggies? Fetch me my smelling salts!
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 03:21 PM
Nov 2014


Good grief. Haven't the great investigative reporters got anything else to kvetch about? Maybe they should consult Darrell Issa.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
11. I am no fan of Hillary, but
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 04:19 PM
Nov 2014

her food request pales behind many rock stars, and could be bought for 50 bucks at a target/walmart/any supermarket

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
12. and I say that
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 04:21 PM
Nov 2014

as a former Paralegal that had to arrange a party or two for the boss. You want arrogant and flashy, try a bunch of lawyers celebreating themselves. The wine bill alone would make Hillary seems like she was on food stamps. No wine, No dessert menu,No cigars, just Hummus, veggies and some beverages.

Like I said, I do think Hillary may have lost the ability to empathize with common folk; she had to give that up back when she was a Wal-Mart exec, but this list of demands as feather light. There is nothing here that cannot be taken care of with a simpeltrip to wal-mart/target/any old supermarket.

elfin

(6,262 posts)
15. Her political tone deafness is becoming epic
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 04:43 PM
Nov 2014

Just when she should be building good will prior to announcing, she and/or her team or bookers are sabatoging her image with crap like this.

She may very well become our nominee and I will support and work on her behalf -- but she will NOT win the general election with stories like this one.

All the Repubs need to do is to hide the crazy for a brief time.

I admire her many accomplishments but I really wonder about her common sense.

bhikkhu

(10,715 posts)
19. Elitist demands access to a computer, pillows, and fresh veggies?
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 05:13 PM
Nov 2014

This is a ridiculous piece. Anyone running for national office and travelling with a staff would have various needs, and has people to manage things in a way as to avoid stupid mistakes and last-minute emergencies. Anyone who's travelled and done events should know there's a great deal to prepare in advance, and the littlest things can cause the most problems. This is just another hit-piece.

I haven't heard any good reason not to support Mrs. Clinton, and I open these links from time to time to see if there's some policy or position that has something substantial I object to. So far, about all I find are assholes writing insubstantial hit-pieces, the same kind of vague-but-vicious character attacks we've had against Obama and any other progressive politician for years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cushions and crudités. .....