General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFerguson: No more votes for Claire McCaskill and Jay Nixon
Its hard because its difficult to put into words the level of rage that I feel.
I keep on going back to the following pictures:
These were the pictures that were on my mind as I went to sleep.
That pain.
The unimaginable pain that their child isnt even worth a trial.
Not worth a trial.
The entire proceedings were a farce. An absolute farce. From beginning to end.
These White folks have been so used to killing Black people and being unchallenged by it, that they are actually offended that they are being challenged.
Read More
Cha
(296,848 posts)to what Michael Brown's Family is going through.. those pics of them say it all. And, all the Families who have lost their children because of gun violence and over zealous police brutality of whipping out their guns.. Shooting, no questions asked.
Mashable ✔ @mashable
Follow
"The problem is not just a #Ferguson problem, it is an American problem." - @BarackObama
1:13 PM - 25 Nov 2014 346 Retweets 203 favorites
Thank you for your OP, she~
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)kiri
(789 posts)There is no serious effort to get the black community registered to vote---and then to actually vote. Of course, we need leadership, and candidates for mayor and city council. The black community could take power easily---but they are not doing it.
The recall petition failed. Voter registration has been a failure. The African-American community in Ferguson (and neighboring towns, like Country Club Hills) has more than enough potential voters to elect a reform team---and they could fire the entire Ferguson police department. That would be a real accomplishment.
Taking political power when there is a 70% majority should be a no-brainer, and can be done without a single fire. Where is the leadership?
If there were a genuine effort to elect leaders from the A-A community to govern Ferguson, many of us would donate thousands of dollars.
pstokely
(10,523 posts)people move frequently and never register to vote
kiri
(789 posts)Sad, if true. This means there is zero hope that the majority community can ever take control of their own community's government.
In which case, there is no point in protests, or for the rest of us to give a damn.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)We need peaceful demonstrations. We are long past the illusion that merely "voting" will save us. The voting apparatus is corrupt.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)going to have to get involved much earlier to have any say other than voting for the usual slate. I even wonder if they are not better off setting up their own slate on the local level.
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)As well. Remember.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Thank you for that great info!
pstokely
(10,523 posts)we need to find a primary opponent for her
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)for a governorship? Usually, it's the other way around.
pstokely
(10,523 posts)if she resigns from the senate, Nixon would be appointing her replacement until at least 2018, she could still lose even with another Todd Akin given lower turnout in Midterms, the other potential Dem Gov candidates don't have the name recognition as she does, Brownback did the same thing in KS
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)how does she think she could win a statewide race for governor?
pstokely
(10,523 posts)higher Dem turnout would favor her if she got the nomination and ran, but maybe not after Ferguson with a potential lack of minority turnout
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but Missouri has voted for Republicans in all but two Presidential elections since 1980 (the exceptions being the two Clinton elections), so it seems like Presidential elections in Missouri would tend to favor Republican candidates at the state level.
pstokely
(10,523 posts)but MO doesn't have the electoral clout of Ohio or Florida
pstokely
(10,523 posts)nt
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)For example, in Presidential elections, the two states have voted exactly alike since 1972. The two states also have some Congressional districts that have been held by the Republicans since the 1960s. For statewide offices, Arkansas was strongly Democratic until the last two elections, when the Republicans managed to take control of virtually everything it seems. I don't see Missouri getting particularly progressive in the next two years, and my gut tells me that 2016 is not going to be a banner year for Democrats. If I were the Senator, I would consider just staying in the safe Senate seat, and take my chances in 2018.
pstokely
(10,523 posts)they lack other candidates with big name recognition
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Ferguson MO - or at least I think she did.
George II
(67,782 posts)SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)So is McCullough. Parties are looking more and more alike every day.
lobodons
(1,290 posts)Considering the alternative. Damn, Missouri is basically in the deep f'n South. Any Dems elected statewide is short lived.
Texas will go Blue before Missouri elects another Dem statewide candidate. Enjoy it while it lasts. (any Dem statewide elected official in MO.)
JI7
(89,240 posts)Zimmerman trial. even though it was probably a political move on his part as there are more minority voters in flordia and florida is not as red as missouri . and he was willing to listen to others and not spout stupid shit .
because if he had behaved as jay nixon has the minority turnout this past election would have been even higher as people would have been angry to vote against him.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)A lot of players involved (Rick Scott, Pam Bondi, Angela Corey, Benjamin Crump, etc). There are some weird relationships there among those people. And some have drawn some interesting conspiracies...
But in any case, Florida managed it all better politically. Even though the prosecution did a poor job, they skipped the grand jury and went right to the trial....possibly for fear of exactly what happened in Missouri. The grand jury either might not have indicted Zimm, or may have indicted for a charge that is too high.
In Missouri, part of the issue though is I don't know if Nixon was able to appoint a special prosecutor unless McCulloch agrees to step aside. Florida's governor can do that in Florida. I believe Nixon can do it now since McColloch says he's not prosecuting. Nixon can appoint a special prosecutor and can go in front of another grand jury. It is NOT considered double jeopardy unless Wilson is acquitted during a trial. However, it doesn't appear Nixon is going to do that.
William769
(55,144 posts)P.S. I responded to you.
lexington filly
(239 posts)craigmatic
(4,510 posts)bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)After all it was her who said QUOTE! He is my friend
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)I don't see how she wins now.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)heartedly agree with you. This state either changes or we take action to make it change.