Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:17 AM Nov 2014

park employees begin painstaking process of removing Casey Nocket's grafitti from 8 national parks



Painted faces at parks need painstaking removal

http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Painted-faces-at-parks-need-painstaking-removal-5861494.php

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A series of graffiti-like paintings on rocks in national parks across the West set off a furor on social media this month, angering people who say they desecrated some of the nation's most famously picturesque landscapes. They've also created a headache for park managers who have the delicate task of cleaning up the sites without causing further damage.

It won't be easy to get rid of the paintings, photos of which were posted on Instagram and Tumblr and then picked up by hiking blogs. Sandblasting and some chemical strippers can cause even more damage to irreplaceable natural features, especially if graffiti is near ancient rock art.

In some cases, workers use plastic kitchen spatulas to painstakingly scrape off paint. Workers test different chemicals to figure out which will loosen the material without damaging rock, then rinse it off with lots of low-pressure hot water, gently scraping each layer away with the spatula, said National Park Service spokesman Jason Olson.


Casey Nocket, the 21-year-old suspect identified by the park service this week, allegedly used acrylic paint and signed with the handle "creepytings." Attempts to reach Nocket were unsuccessful. A phone listing for her was disconnected and her social media accounts have been shut down or made private.

The National Park Service said this week they've found paintings in Yosemite, Death Valley and Joshua Tree in California; Crater Lake in Oregon; Zion National Park and Canyonlands in Utah; and Rocky Mountain in Colorado, where Colorado National Monument was also tagged.
85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
park employees begin painstaking process of removing Casey Nocket's grafitti from 8 national parks (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 OP
I hope they catch her soon Warpy Nov 2014 #1
She's pretty much on the entire country's shit list at this point. arcane1 Nov 2014 #3
Perhaps when they catch the talentless twit Warpy Nov 2014 #4
I wouldn't trust the idiot to do a good job of cleaing it up csziggy Nov 2014 #9
Good points! And that random graffiti probably took more talent. arcane1 Nov 2014 #11
Hopefully she gets a bill from the US taxpayers. Historic NY Nov 2014 #17
I don't want her ever near any national parks again. magical thyme Nov 2014 #40
Torn. Saying something about it would validate what she is doing. Lochloosa Nov 2014 #2
let's have her speak at Berkeley! nt MisterP Nov 2014 #24
Send her the bill. She can sell a couple works of her art closeupready Nov 2014 #5
It would take more than a couple. theHandpuppet Nov 2014 #8
I was being facetious, and forgot the sarcasm tag. closeupready Nov 2014 #15
Take only photos, leave only footprints. What a stupid thing to do an several levels. uppityperson Nov 2014 #6
My husband and I collect garbage as we walk through parks and wild areas csziggy Nov 2014 #14
What the Heck Leith Nov 2014 #7
What made her think it was a good idea? theHandpuppet Nov 2014 #13
Before she took down her social media accounts... Princess Turandot Nov 2014 #19
Pathological narcissism fertilized by Bansky (who only graffitis KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #41
What, she's not even going to get billed for this? No charges? Can't find her? freshwest Nov 2014 #10
feds are still looking into it Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 #12
And this is different from Mount Rushmore how? MontyPow Nov 2014 #16
Yeah, right . . . NBachers Nov 2014 #18
! DeSwiss Nov 2014 #20
Cool. Thank you! MontyPow Nov 2014 #21
Someone defaced Mount Rushmore? pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #23
They faced it, actually. nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #25
... petronius Nov 2014 #37
Yes!!!! Well done! MontyPow Nov 2014 #50
Good one CanonRay Nov 2014 #78
No. MontyPow Nov 2014 #26
Who is this "we" of which you speak? (nt) enough Nov 2014 #28
You know, the collective we of Americans. MontyPow Nov 2014 #49
I dislike it.They took the Paha Sapa from those who lived there to carve into faces of the occupiers uppityperson Nov 2014 #60
I'm thinking that pipi_k Nov 2014 #73
Ah, no they didn't have then...... DeSwiss Nov 2014 #83
Well, for one thing Rushmore wasn't a National Park when sculpting started Lee-Lee Nov 2014 #29
The fact that Rushmore was not a national park is a valid point. MontyPow Nov 2014 #48
Huh Lee-Lee Nov 2014 #66
The Lakota would disagree. progressoid Nov 2014 #81
That was not a one person decision treestar Nov 2014 #33
Quantity does not make it right. It just makes it popular. MontyPow Nov 2014 #53
When it comes to art, what is "right?" treestar Nov 2014 #74
Wow. Seriously?...nt SidDithers Nov 2014 #34
I'm going with unseriously.. IDemo Nov 2014 #36
Seriously, do you have anything relevant to say? Wow. MontyPow Nov 2014 #54
Dude, you can stop pretending... SidDithers Nov 2014 #68
People and their hobbies. nt uppityperson Nov 2014 #69
I don't get the appeal of trolling a messageboard so much... SidDithers Nov 2014 #70
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #71
Off to create another new account?... SidDithers Nov 2014 #72
Borglum Got Sponsorship and Funding from the Government Leith Nov 2014 #45
Well, getting permission to deface is slightly better, but only slightly. MontyPow Nov 2014 #55
The govt commissioned Mt. Rushmore? Rex Nov 2014 #51
Getting Government approval doesn't make it better. MontyPow Nov 2014 #57
So is Mount Rushmore cool? Rex Nov 2014 #59
What? cwydro Nov 2014 #52
How is what she did different from Mount Rushmore? MontyPow Nov 2014 #58
I assume that's sarcasm, if not, Mt. Rushmore, for one, isn't a national park.. joeybee12 Nov 2014 #63
The epitome of selfishness... Drunken Irishman Nov 2014 #22
She needs to pay for every dime of this! Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #27
How could she go undetected? alphafemale Nov 2014 #30
The parks are big Retrograde Nov 2014 #38
will she use onethatcares Nov 2014 #31
Nevada Barr was once a National Parks ranger... Bigmack Nov 2014 #32
I like that idea. GoCubsGo Nov 2014 #39
Narcissistic idiot etherealtruth Nov 2014 #35
I love how pissed off everybody gets about this...she's really doing hilarious work! alcibiades_mystery Nov 2014 #42
I would also feel something if she started a forest fire or trashed a campground IDemo Nov 2014 #43
Ah, I knew there'd be one. MH1 Nov 2014 #44
Kisses alcibiades_mystery Nov 2014 #46
The art itself sucks. It's the actions of the artist that causes the fuss. arcane1 Nov 2014 #47
But was that her point? Should I give her accolades for unintended consequences? Rex Nov 2014 #56
ISIS beheading vids are "art" by your definition. n/t Psephos Nov 2014 #61
It's garbage, it's vandalism...you like painting over ancient petroglyphs joeybee12 Nov 2014 #64
That does raise an interesting question treestar Nov 2014 #75
She's not preserving an ancient language or telling a story joeybee12 Nov 2014 #79
She could do her "hilarious work" on a napkin, a piece of toilet paper or on her own property csziggy Nov 2014 #67
More hilarious work... pipi_k Nov 2014 #77
Blowing up Bamayan was performance art. The rubes just can't understand it. Throd Nov 2014 #80
Artists should suffer for their art.... Bigmack Nov 2014 #85
I hope this self-centered, narcissistlc little piece of shit hifiguy Nov 2014 #62
Family of Now Infamous National Parks Tagger Speaks csziggy Nov 2014 #65
thx for the update Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 #84
Vain asshole n/t tabasco Nov 2014 #76
the trashy images should be 2naSalit Nov 2014 #82

Warpy

(111,252 posts)
1. I hope they catch her soon
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:18 AM
Nov 2014

I don't want to see that shit in the few places in this country where you can get away from advertising.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
3. She's pretty much on the entire country's shit list at this point.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:34 AM
Nov 2014

It's a shame she isn't the one doing the painstaking restoration.

Warpy

(111,252 posts)
4. Perhaps when they catch the talentless twit
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:36 AM
Nov 2014

that will be some of the hard labor she's expected to do.

I suspect she won't like doing it enough to maybe discover canvas.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
9. I wouldn't trust the idiot to do a good job of cleaing it up
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:50 AM
Nov 2014

No matter how carefully she was monitored. I'd rather that people who care about our national parks do the restoration. And then part of her sentence will be paying for every cent it costs to do it - AFTER she gets out of jail for desecrating the nation's parks. In fact, I would like for part of her sentence to be banned from ever entering a national park, wildlife refuge or and similar wild place ever again in her lifetime!

If we want her cleaning things up, she can scrape gum and dog shit off of city sidewalks or clean the toilets while she's in jail, or clean graffiti off random New York City buildings.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
17. Hopefully she gets a bill from the US taxpayers.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 02:19 AM
Nov 2014

she is from a small hamlet Highland N.Y. not to far from me. She is talk and its not good of the area.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
40. I don't want her ever near any national parks again.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:38 PM
Nov 2014

Let her painstakingly break rocks for a few years since she has so little respect for them or for other people's rights.

Lochloosa

(16,063 posts)
2. Torn. Saying something about it would validate what she is doing.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:31 AM
Nov 2014

Telling her what she is doing is wrong is also validating her art in her mind.

Telling her what a piece of shit she is validates it for me.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
5. Send her the bill. She can sell a couple works of her art
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:37 AM
Nov 2014

to help pay damages and expenses in cleaning it up.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
14. My husband and I collect garbage as we walk through parks and wild areas
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:58 AM
Nov 2014

Otherwise, we do just as you say - "Take only photos, leave only footprints."

People like "creepytings" disgust me. She's old enough to not be ignorant about what she's doing so she is willfully ignoring the purpose of national parks and refuges. She should never be allowed to set foot in any park or refuge again.

Leith

(7,809 posts)
7. What the Heck
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:44 AM
Nov 2014

made her think that it was a good idea?

A couple few years ago, some vandals grafitti-ed up ancient petroglyphs in Red Rock (outside Las Vegas). It was a rotten thing to do.

I went through my wild youth, too - but I was never destructive. I hope she gets community service in national parks where she can learn the value of our natural heritage. Make her help clean her mess up.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
13. What made her think it was a good idea?
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:56 AM
Nov 2014

Perhaps because she's a totally selfish, self-absorbed little twit? I'm not sure how you really teach someone like that a lesson. It's one thing to punish her for the damage but will she really comprehend why it was so horrible?

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
19. Before she took down her social media accounts...
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 02:29 AM
Nov 2014

there was a post from someone asking what medium she used for these images. Her reply? That she used acrylic paint (as opposed to something like chalk which, while still outrageous, would be eventually washed away by weather.) Then she added, "Yes, I'm a really bad person."

A totally selfish, self-absorbed little twit fits.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
41. Pathological narcissism fertilized by Bansky (who only graffitis
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:38 PM
Nov 2014

man-made structures in urban cityscapes, AFAIK)?

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
26. No.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:27 AM
Nov 2014

I'm arguing that carving faces into a pristine Mt. Rushmore is not all that different than what this young lady did. We just like the outcome more.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
60. I dislike it.They took the Paha Sapa from those who lived there to carve into faces of the occupiers
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:37 PM
Nov 2014
http://www.hanksville.org/daniel/lakota/BlackHills.html
For the Sioux the Black Hills, Paha Sapa, are the center of the world, the place of the gods, where the warriors would go to wait for visions and to speak to the Great Spirit. In 1868, a treaty was signed which granted Paha Sapa to the Indians forever.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
73. I'm thinking that
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:47 PM
Nov 2014

the guys who carved Mt Rushmore had permission to do it.

Whereas this self-centered little twit didn't, and probably would not have gotten permission even if she had asked first.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
83. Ah, no they didn't have then......
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 08:02 PM
Nov 2014

...and they don't have now -- and they will never have permission.



''The men that American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest the most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.'' - H.L. Mencken

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
29. Well, for one thing Rushmore wasn't a National Park when sculpting started
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 07:26 AM
Nov 2014

And for another they spent years seeking prosper approval from land managers and authorities to do the work.

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
48. The fact that Rushmore was not a national park is a valid point.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:20 PM
Nov 2014

The fact that a bunch of other people approved is not a valid point.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
66. Huh
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:14 PM
Nov 2014

That people responsible for the property, be it owners or those appointed to manage it, gave permission is an important distinction.

progressoid

(49,987 posts)
81. The Lakota would disagree.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 07:39 PM
Nov 2014

Mount Rushmore is controversial among Native Americans because the United States seized the area from the Lakota tribe after the Great Sioux War of 1876. The Treaty of Fort Laramie from 1868 had previously granted the Black Hills to the Lakota in perpetuity. Members of the American Indian Movement led an occupation of the monument in 1971, naming it "Mount Crazy Horse". Among the participants were young activists, grandparents, children and Lakota holy man John Fire Lame Deer, who planted a prayer staff atop the mountain. Lame Deer said the staff formed a symbolic shroud over the presidents' faces "which shall remain dirty until the treaties concerning the Black Hills are fulfilled."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Rushmore#Controversy

treestar

(82,383 posts)
33. That was not a one person decision
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 11:06 AM
Nov 2014

Art is in the eye of the beholder to a great extent.

Maybe some people would defend her art - there are people who don't disapprove of graffiti on the property of others.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
74. When it comes to art, what is "right?"
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:51 PM
Nov 2014

Disobeying the law is also an issue. Society, or the American public, who owned the land, clearly found that their art trumped the hillside being in its pure state. There was no law against trespassing that prevented the sculpture at Mt. Rushmore. For that matter, what is the difference between Mt. Rushmore and any other statue? The stone still came from somewhere.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
70. I don't get the appeal of trolling a messageboard so much...
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:35 PM
Nov 2014

that you get banned almost a dozen times.



Sid

Response to SidDithers (Reply #68)

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
72. Off to create another new account?...
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:41 PM
Nov 2014

Why don't you try Discussionist. No pesky MIRT, and a very broad TOS, over there.

Sid

Leith

(7,809 posts)
45. Borglum Got Sponsorship and Funding from the Government
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 01:17 PM
Nov 2014

before starting. It's a heck of a lot more skillful, too.

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
55. Well, getting permission to deface is slightly better, but only slightly.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:27 PM
Nov 2014

I agree the work is superior.

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
57. Getting Government approval doesn't make it better.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:29 PM
Nov 2014

You will agree with me once the Government approves development of the Grand Canyon.

And Easter Island is cool, and is exactly the same thing as well.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
59. So is Mount Rushmore cool?
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:34 PM
Nov 2014

There are differences in what is acceptable and getting a commission from the government makes one widely acceptable. Okay true, not everyone is going to be happy. Which level will you go to? Pictures and foot prints only or national monuments?

We supposedly get some decision in these things. That makes it cool.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
63. I assume that's sarcasm, if not, Mt. Rushmore, for one, isn't a national park..
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:03 PM
Nov 2014

It's a national monument.

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
30. How could she go undetected?
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 09:15 AM
Nov 2014

Are these things in more remote areas?

What an absolute self important wretch of a human being.

Retrograde

(10,134 posts)
38. The parks are big
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:23 PM
Nov 2014

We were in Grand Canyon last week, and even though we never got far too far off the main road, there were times when we didn't see other people for 15 minutes or more - and we weren't even trying to do something illegal!

onethatcares

(16,166 posts)
31. will she use
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 09:17 AM
Nov 2014

the Cliven Bundy excuse? That everything belongs to her and no one should do anything about it?

I say arrest her dumb ass and make her clean up the mess.

I've never seen the Grand Canyon, the Badlands, the western National Parks and the last thing I would want to see
while viewing them or enjoying them is some damn extra cirricular painting.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
32. Nevada Barr was once a National Parks ranger...
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 11:00 AM
Nov 2014

She writes novels about the Parks now.

One of her novels - "The Rope" has a character whose job it is to remove human waste that has been left in the camping spots on Lake Powell. Not in porta-potties...just dug in for the wind to uncover, or even just left on the ground.

Perfect job for our little artist. Pay her at the rate of a beginning Park aide, then deduct the cost of removing her graffiti.

GoCubsGo

(32,080 posts)
39. I like that idea.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:32 PM
Nov 2014

Cleaning up shit is a good metaphor for cleaning up her shitty eyesores. Make the self-centered, little jackass work off the cost of the clean-up doing menial, unpleasant work at the bottom of the pay scale. Excellent idea.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
35. Narcissistic idiot
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 11:22 AM
Nov 2014

As others have stated ... I am hoping she is eventually held financialy responsible for the restoration.

IDIOT, IDIOT, IDIOT

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
42. I love how pissed off everybody gets about this...she's really doing hilarious work!
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 12:58 PM
Nov 2014

Go Casey Nocket!



If art's about making you feel something, she's got you folks absolutely pinned. It's fucking brilliant.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
43. I would also feel something if she started a forest fire or trashed a campground
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 01:07 PM
Nov 2014

It would not equate to a great moment in art.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
47. The art itself sucks. It's the actions of the artist that causes the fuss.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 03:37 PM
Nov 2014

It's like talking about Ozzy Osbourne's drug use. It's says nothing at all about the quality of his music, because that's not the subject being discussed.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
56. But was that her point? Should I give her accolades for unintended consequences?
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:28 PM
Nov 2014

She might as well have signed her art Stink Butt. I guess juvenile art is to be appreciated, but her landscaping photographs are on par with some great works and I bet she completely overlooked that. Just so she could right Stink Butt on a boulder.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
64. It's garbage, it's vandalism...you like painting over ancient petroglyphs
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:05 PM
Nov 2014

and near them and damaging them?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
75. That does raise an interesting question
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:56 PM
Nov 2014

Ancient people drew on rocks, too. Anthropologists study those cave paintings. She could argue she's doing the same thing.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
79. She's not preserving an ancient language or telling a story
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 06:19 PM
Nov 2014

for others to read...she's indulging in her arrogance and ignorance...and clear lack of talent.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
67. She could do her "hilarious work" on a napkin, a piece of toilet paper or on her own property
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:16 PM
Nov 2014

Anyone that wants to "feel something" from her art should invite her to their home and let her decorate inside and out.

Most people in this country do NOT want their national parks decorated by narcissistic assholes with little or no artistic talent. What I feel for Casey Nocket is contempt and that goes for the family that didn't teach her to respect the rights of others.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
77. More hilarious work...
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 06:16 PM
Nov 2014
If art's about making you feel something, she's got you folks absolutely pinned. It's fucking brilliant.



So if art is about making people feel something, then I suppose "snuff" films and kid porn and films showing RL rape would also be "art"?

Really?

Or maybe "art" is in the eye of the beholder, in which case I'm not so sure I'd be running around acting all amused and superior at people who don't think something like defacing public property falls under the heading of "art".

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
85. Artists should suffer for their art....
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 10:46 PM
Nov 2014

.. it's a growth experience.

By the time she pays for all the restoration, she'll have grown. A lot.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
62. I hope this self-centered, narcissistlc little piece of shit
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 04:53 PM
Nov 2014

gets a good long time to think about her place in the world and her incredible stupidity. In a nice secure federal slammer.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
65. Family of Now Infamous National Parks Tagger Speaks
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 05:06 PM
Nov 2014
Today we spoke with a relative of Nocket, who has requested that she not be named. It became clear at the beginning of the first conversation that this person was legitimately concerned for a family member’s safety. While we were still introducing ourselves, that person’s voice made clear a distinct fear. We spoke for awhile about Casey’s actions, here in plain language is what we found out:

* She didn’t go into hiding or run, she contacted the Park Service investigators and is fully cooperating;

* She knows she did a horrible thing and is incredibly remorseful;

* She is aware of the seriousness of her crimes and is ready to face the music; and

* There are now people pretending to be her online, Tumblr in particular. All of her social media accounts have been deleted.
http://trailmob.com/lifestyle/articles/family-of-now-infamous-national-parks-tagger-speaks


No apologies from the family? And all this ruckus is what it takes for this idiot to realize what she did was "a horrible thing?" I completely doubt that she is remorseful for what she did - she's just sorry she was identified and will have to "face the music."

Also in the series of updates on the article at the same link:
The story demonstrates the power social media has to mobilize thousands quickly. That said, with power comes a responsibility for civility, and of the many different examples floating around the twittersphere, some are good, but some are in fact awful. Right now there is a petition to the White House stating: “Please don't allow her to receive a slap. Please pursue the most serious of charges for these offenses.” Charges should and most certainly will be brought, but in accordance with the law and within the justice system:

36 CFR 2.31 - Trespassing, tampering and vandalism

(3) Vandalism. Destroying, injuring, defacing, or damaging property or real property

Federal crimes generally don’t come with slaps on the wrist. According to the recent National Park Service Press Release, they are investigating “vandalism in at least 10 national parks in Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon, and Utah.” It’s not clear if Nocket is responsible for all ten of these incidents, but she is most certainly responsible for many and thus should be punished accordingly.

2naSalit

(86,571 posts)
82. the trashy images should be
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 07:45 PM
Nov 2014

removed by those who have the skill to do so with the least amount of damage to the defaced surfaces and SHE should be charged the top price for the work done as well as significant fines and spend some time in the crossbar hotel. She should also be monitored whenever she leaves her home (a new anklet at her expense) so that if she should ever get within even ten miles of a public property like a park, she would be in violation of probation.

Not cutting any slack for this POS.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»park employees begin pain...