Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,981 posts)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 11:55 PM Apr 2012

Really Newsweek?

Jesus H Christ on a popsicle stick


In an age where women are dominating - in the workplace, at school, at home - why are they seeking to be dominated in their love lives? Recent media portrayals have shown that a rising number of modern women fantasize about being overpowered, while studies are turning out statistics that bewilder feminists. New shows like HBO’sGirls and books like Fifty Shades of Grey are showcasing the often hidden desire for powerlessness. But why? Katie Roiphe examines the submissive yet empowered female in Newsweek. “It is perhaps inconvenient for feminism that the erotic imagination does not submit to politics, or even changing demographics,” she writes.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/04/submission-rules.html

91 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Really Newsweek? (Original Post) kpete Apr 2012 OP
This can't be real. chollybocker Apr 2012 #1
here also, right hand side, "On The Cover" : steve2470 Apr 2012 #2
Note how they make it seem sexy and good with such a knock out woman? Lionessa Apr 2012 #3
Exactly, that pic shows a very skinny model, not at all representative Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #12
I think you're missing my point. Lionessa Apr 2012 #21
I get it. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #24
Women have to be pornworthy these days... ananda Apr 2012 #46
This is a very astute observation lunatica Apr 2012 #47
yup lunatica and ananda. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #55
+1000 Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #58
Is there a ship off this planet? Zalatix Apr 2012 #4
Yes, but it's owned by Newt Gingrich. Pick your poison. n/t LadyHawkAZ Apr 2012 #35
As opposed to the secret fantasy life of working men Rex Apr 2012 #5
+1 for faulsauce flamingdem Apr 2012 #8
I cannot believe they are towing the M$Ms line. Rex Apr 2012 #11
haha! The writer and editor were fetishists who had themselves some plywood in Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #13
Well if they were thinking about powerful women secretly wanting Rex Apr 2012 #20
Maybe they are afraid of the Anna Wintours of the world nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #25
I find Anna Wintour pretty frightening :) Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #28
I find Anna Wintour pretty frightening :) Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #28
You must, you must!!! Rex Apr 2012 #33
Once for that wig, the other for those bug shades Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #37
Perhaps you haven't heard who is running Newsweek, these days. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #70
She majored in sensationalism. She's clearly selling the magazine to men. Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #76
She's selling the magazine to men? Really? Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #78
The cover shows a frumpy Queen of England? Or a skinny female playing victim in a sexual fetish Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #79
Like I said, I'd be interested to see what the demographics are pre and post Tina Brown takeover. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #81
Do you think that showing women naked or in sexualized poses is done because for women? nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #83
I see a woman with a tie wrapped around her head. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #84
Then I do believe you have been entirely too sheltered, if all you see is a scarf. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #85
I see a tie, not a scarf. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #86
If all you see is a tie, then you have been unduly sheltered. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #87
Yep. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #88
:) That's ok. Trust me though, that cover is not about fashion. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #89
I know, it's about 50 shades of grey and cheesy bondage porn aimed at women. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #90
It's never too late. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #91
Isn't Tina Brown editing that thing? MADem Apr 2012 #18
That bosomy Brit vulgarian is indeed editing that thing Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #27
Well it is all about selling...ahem news. Rex Apr 2012 #34
You mean, ah, "working men" ...with names like Tina Brown? Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #38
She also wrecked The New Yorker; took it from midcult to lower-midcult Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #50
I am as surprised as you are. Rex Apr 2012 #59
I cancelled my subscription, because I now find it nearly unreadable. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #69
Looks like they are drinking the same kool-aid as the M$M. Rex Apr 2012 #75
This is so creepy flamingdem Apr 2012 #6
That woman never worked a day in her life BeyondGeography Apr 2012 #7
YOU WIN THE THREAD!!! MADem Apr 2012 #16
I hate everybody Lucy Goosey Apr 2012 #9
Fiction to you but reality to the characters in the stories. Kablooie Apr 2012 #31
I so don't believe this. Sex play is fun, whether it's one or the other playing alpha, but I Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #10
Maybe "overpower" = "show a little enthusiam for once Harry" flamingdem Apr 2012 #22
LOL! Maybe so. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #23
Funniest Comment On This Thread! ProfessorGAC Apr 2012 #53
Pro doms report that their most reliable customers are powerful men eridani Apr 2012 #41
Thanks for the insight on what is nolabels Apr 2012 #42
It's very true Marrah_G Apr 2012 #62
Man, if Helmut Newton's estate could claim all royalties due... Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #14
This shit was on TV the other day-- a woman was saying that all the "moms" MADem Apr 2012 #15
Looks more like a cover for Vogue. eom tawadi Apr 2012 #17
Sexist horseshit! Odin2005 Apr 2012 #19
I'm old enough to remember when Newsweek wrote about, well, the news. Ikonoklast Apr 2012 #26
Same here! Was trying to remember what year it was Rex Apr 2012 #36
Newsweak jumped the shark sarge43 Apr 2012 #40
I thought they folded a few years ago. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #52
All this tells me is that the marketing whizzes at Vintage books are working overtime gauguin57 Apr 2012 #30
How about one on how "Tiger Moms love Bondage!" Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #39
Ah. Now I understand women. I'll show this to my wife so she'll submit to me. Kablooie Apr 2012 #32
Please Please PLEASE let this be The Onion Ship of Fools Apr 2012 #43
Working Girl: 2012 no_hypocrisy Apr 2012 #44
This is utter bullshit. ananda Apr 2012 #45
"Fifty Shades of Grey" is what inspired this article mainer Apr 2012 #48
Here's a review from the NYT - the Cinderella fantasy + spanking flamingdem Apr 2012 #54
Blown way out of proportion Iris Apr 2012 #49
Katie Roiphe, huh? That explains it. Chorophyll Apr 2012 #51
Ms. Roiphe is quite atrocious blogslut Apr 2012 #71
Sex sells magazines. MineralMan Apr 2012 #56
That cover creeps me out whatchamacallit Apr 2012 #57
Next week I wanna see MadrasT Apr 2012 #60
So do I. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #73
I can tell you why some women like it and why some men like it. Marrah_G Apr 2012 #61
That's what I was trying to say up thread. Iris Apr 2012 #63
It's one of the reasons why supermarket historical romance books are so popular. Marrah_G Apr 2012 #64
haha! Yes, exactly! Iris Apr 2012 #66
Exactly... tallahasseedem Apr 2012 #67
Really what? jp11 Apr 2012 #65
Never mind that in an S&M type sexual relationship, the Submissive is actually in control and holds Blaukraut Apr 2012 #68
I'm not going to tell consenting adults how to get or not get their jollies. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #72
The point is, what "soccer moms" or anyone else want in the bedroom Chorophyll Apr 2012 #74
I agree with both your points. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #77
I guess I sort of don't care about the sexuality of other people all that much. Chorophyll Apr 2012 #80
Ill be honest, I didnt read the whole thing. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #82
 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
3. Note how they make it seem sexy and good with such a knock out woman?
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:15 AM
Apr 2012

I wonder how different the effect on women and men would be if that image was more representative of the 40+ #s overweight many women are, and the right age too, not too many that young are "powerful women" yet.

Just saying.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
12. Exactly, that pic shows a very skinny model, not at all representative
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:26 AM
Apr 2012

of the average and the majority of females on this planet. On the other hand, magazines are photoshopping the hell out of women today to make them all look 85 lbs.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
21. I think you're missing my point.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:00 AM
Apr 2012

I'm trying to say that by sexualizing it in such a way, they are implicitly suggesting that wanting to be dominated is something to be striven for.

I think if it was more representative of reality, more women might think, yeah, sometimes but yuck, no not something I want to strive for nor be "okay" with.

ananda

(28,856 posts)
46. Women have to be pornworthy these days...
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:25 AM
Apr 2012

... to make it in the media, show business, and often politics.

It's a very sick world we live in.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
47. This is a very astute observation
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:34 AM
Apr 2012

I wish I could rec this.

As a woman you're either June Cleaver or a whore. Nothing in between.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
5. As opposed to the secret fantasy life of working men
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:19 AM
Apr 2012

that write and edit magazines. Maybe called Newsweek. Can we crawl down into their pants with a camera? Maybe they could have at least found a woman that looks more like the average working woman and not a supermodel. I know they are going for the stupid affect, but really do they have to include all the faulsauce together on the cover? Speaking of that, why cover her eyes? Just to give it that S&M look?

Oh right, that was the whole point...carry on.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
11. I cannot believe they are towing the M$Ms line.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:26 AM
Apr 2012

Pathetic, I would rather beg for cash if it was me.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
13. haha! The writer and editor were fetishists who had themselves some plywood in
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:28 AM
Apr 2012

their pants while writing this?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
20. Well if they were thinking about powerful women secretly wanting
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:58 AM
Apr 2012

to feel powerless, they could have picked any number of visual situations besides sex to put on the cover...the fact that they went for the bondage look, meh dunno I am a guy and that was my first thought. Maybe they are into bondage and super models!?

I think it is to sell magazines.

 

Tom Ripley

(4,945 posts)
37. Once for that wig, the other for those bug shades
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:06 AM
Apr 2012

Then there's that whole plain girl making a career out of picking on the pretty girls thing...

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
70. Perhaps you haven't heard who is running Newsweek, these days.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:43 PM
Apr 2012


She's royally fucked it up, too... And I'm not saying that just because a she's British.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
76. She majored in sensationalism. She's clearly selling the magazine to men.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:38 PM
Apr 2012

I've asked some women friends about the article and issue, and they think the thing is fucking demented, and totally out of touch. However, I'll betcha anything this issue is selling like hotcakes among men who get off on that.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
78. She's selling the magazine to men? Really?
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:09 PM
Apr 2012

Men who are more interested in fashion stories and the British royal family than actual news, maybe.

I'd be extremely curious to see if you find any hard demographic data to back up that assertion.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
79. The cover shows a frumpy Queen of England? Or a skinny female playing victim in a sexual fetish
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 07:02 AM
Apr 2012

pose?

I think the cover is an attempt to get males to buy Newsweek (a la Maxim).

What happens after that, is hopefully that they'll get interested in whatever Newsweek happens to feature that week.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
81. Like I said, I'd be interested to see what the demographics are pre and post Tina Brown takeover.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 03:44 PM
Apr 2012

A week ago, Newsweek was being hailed as brave feminist fighters for standing up for "puffy" Ashley Judd against the terrible male gaze misogynists at US magazine, with its 80% female readership.

Saying "it's designed to appeal to men because obviously it's designed to appeal to men" is an opinion, but not much else.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
84. I see a woman with a tie wrapped around her head.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 07:59 PM
Apr 2012

Maybe in your neighborhood, that's "sexy". Not mine.

I think the 50 shades of grey readership is OVERWHELMINGLY female, and that's what the inconvenient article with its inconvenient assertions is about.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
86. I see a tie, not a scarf.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:05 PM
Apr 2012

The tie is a reference to 50 shades of grey, which has been enormously popular with female readers, despite the inconvenience of that fact to some small remaining islets of aging 2nd wave feminists.

I guess those women who like that book, the woman who wrote it, the woman who wrote the article for newsweek and the woman who publishes it, didn't get the memo.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
88. Yep.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:09 PM
Apr 2012

I haven't read "twilight", either, and it's been over a decade since I had sex... with a republican.

I'm sure many who read this post are much more, er, worldly in those regards than myself...

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
90. I know, it's about 50 shades of grey and cheesy bondage porn aimed at women.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:20 PM
Apr 2012

All I know is, I should have been a writer of low brow fiction.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
18. Isn't Tina Brown editing that thing?
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:56 AM
Apr 2012

I think she's following the trend, not leading it. I saw this shit on TV a few days back.

 

Tom Ripley

(4,945 posts)
27. That bosomy Brit vulgarian is indeed editing that thing
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:50 AM
Apr 2012

She's Lady Midas In Reverse; everything she touches turns to shit

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
38. You mean, ah, "working men" ...with names like Tina Brown?
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:08 AM
Apr 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tina_Brown

Sorry, but ever since her Daily Beast took over, Newsweek has been a swirling vortex of suck.

Unless you like fashion stories and endless amounts of blibber-blabber about the British Royal Family.
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
59. I am as surprised as you are.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:03 AM
Apr 2012

I figured the editors were reading one too many comic books with the impossible women as their inspiration. I believe it was about two decades ago (now that I've had a night to think about it) that I recommended an article out of Newsweek to somebody. At one time, it was a halfway decent magazine.

Seems so long ago.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
6. This is so creepy
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:19 AM
Apr 2012

Newsweek fail. I see many complaints leading to a sold out issue however and the acceptance by the mainstream that all women want to be raped, kind of, this is so fitting with the repuke drive against women. I thought Newsweek was trending a tad more liberal..

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
9. I hate everybody
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:22 AM
Apr 2012

Okay, no, but what the fuck is this? When has Katie Roiphe ever been relevant? HBO's Girls and Fifty Shades of Grey are fiction. Fiction! Why is it being presented as reality in the cover of a so-called news mag?

Kablooie

(18,625 posts)
31. Fiction to you but reality to the characters in the stories.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:29 AM
Apr 2012

You just have a different point of view.

As I do when writing this kind of inanity.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
10. I so don't believe this. Sex play is fun, whether it's one or the other playing alpha, but I
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:24 AM
Apr 2012

seriously doubt women are wanting to be overpowered regularly any more than men are regularly wanting to be overpowered by women. Besides, the same thing every time would seem boring as hell.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
22. Maybe "overpower" = "show a little enthusiam for once Harry"
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:00 AM
Apr 2012

The overpower thing could just be the idea that the guy is "so into" as opposed to "not that into" her

eridani

(51,907 posts)
41. Pro doms report that their most reliable customers are powerful men
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 05:04 AM
Apr 2012

Why wouldn't the same dynamic work for women. According to various kinky people, subs outnumber doms across the board, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. That makes a certain amount of sense--after all, there are always more people in the audience than on stage, and more readers than writers.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
42. Thanks for the insight on what is
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 05:58 AM
Apr 2012

I often wonder why large groupings of people make me apprehensive, the thoughtlessness of the follow the leader crowd and why it all seemed so foolish. Must be some inbred genetic trait i was lucky enough to miss

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
62. It's very true
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:49 PM
Apr 2012

People on the submissive side of BDSM often do so as an escape from having to make decisions and being "in charge".

MADem

(135,425 posts)
15. This shit was on TV the other day-- a woman was saying that all the "moms"
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:52 AM
Apr 2012

waiting outside the school in their minivans were reading that book while they waited , and a cadre of women were all giggling about it and talking about it as if it was the greatest thing since sliced bread.

I reached for the remote--I just didn't want to deal with that foolishness.

Point is, though, Newsweek isn't operating in a vacuum. I guess that War On Women is being fought on many fronts...?

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
26. I'm old enough to remember when Newsweek wrote about, well, the news.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:22 AM
Apr 2012

It's been years since that last happened.

When did the National Enquirer buy the name?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. Same here! Was trying to remember what year it was
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:41 AM
Apr 2012

I recommended an article out of Newsweek. Nope, drawing a blank.

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
40. Newsweak jumped the shark
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:30 AM
Apr 2012

when it glammed up Paula Jones and made her cover girl. It's been circling the drain ever since.

gauguin57

(8,138 posts)
30. All this tells me is that the marketing whizzes at Vintage books are working overtime
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:23 AM
Apr 2012

They know getting the media to analyze a trend to death (and give them an excuse to run this kind of provocative cover) will continue to sell the books of the "Fifty Shades of Grey" trilogy.

Vintage is behind all this chatter (and coverage) ... pure and simple.

Kablooie

(18,625 posts)
32. Ah. Now I understand women. I'll show this to my wife so she'll submit to me.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:32 AM
Apr 2012

for the first time in our lives.

no_hypocrisy

(46,075 posts)
44. Working Girl: 2012
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:19 AM
Apr 2012

Bad enough if a man designed and approved this cover. Worse if women signed off on it.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
48. "Fifty Shades of Grey" is what inspired this article
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:37 AM
Apr 2012

I haven't read the book, but apparently it's a HUGE hit among women. Has anyone read it?

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
54. Here's a review from the NYT - the Cinderella fantasy + spanking
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:56 AM
Apr 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/books/fifty-shades-of-grey-s-and-m-cinderella.html

This S-and-M story about a virginal college student and the handsome young billionaire who binds her sounds racier than it is. Mostly it’s an updated throwback to scandalous novels of the past, including “Jane Eyre” and the 1920s desert rape fantasy “The Sheik.” The main difference is that “Fifty Shades of Grey” and its two sequels, “Fifty Shades Darker” and “Fifty Shades Freed,” are set in modern-day Seattle and mix sexting with spanking.

In other words, “Fifty Shades of Grey” is to publishing what Spanx was to the undergarment business: an antiquated product re-imagined as innovation. When Sara Blakely, a former office equipment saleswoman, wanted control-top pantyhose without the hose and figured that other women might too, she started her own company, Spanx. Women embraced her light-weight girdle — once known as a foundation garment — as a body-shaping breakthrough. Ms. Blakely is now on the Forbes list of billionaires.

Similarly E L James, the British author of “Shades of Grey,” a former television executive who became an author by posting fan fiction online, wrote a typical romance novel, added some atypical sex and became an Internet sensation. Lots of women who weren’t used to reading erotic novels discovered “Shades of Grey.” And downloading was a huge part of the books’ success: readers who heard of the book from friends or Facebook could check it out instantly, cheaply and most of all, privately.

“Fifty Shades of Grey” doesn’t defy taboos in the way that other recent and much-talked-about books and magazine articles have, be it Toni Bentley’s ode to anal sex, “The Surrender: An Erotic Memoir”; Kathryn Harrison’s account of incest, “The Kiss”; or Daphne Merkin’s revelation of her spanking fetish in The New Yorker. Those accounts shocked mostly because the authors were well-known writers confessing to unseemly sexual vices. MORE

Iris

(15,652 posts)
49. Blown way out of proportion
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:45 AM
Apr 2012

And nothing new, really. I think it's pretty common knowledge that sexual fantasies can be born out of what happens in day to day life. Is Newsweek implying there are no business men who are submissives or have that fantasy?

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
51. Katie Roiphe, huh? That explains it.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:50 AM
Apr 2012

Her personal experience applies to ALL of us women, dontcha know. She speaks for every woman who ever had a job. And the fact that a bunch of women read "Fifty Shades of Grey" means that we ALL long to be submissive in our real lives.

Nice cover by Newsweek too.

I hope I don't need to put the sarcasm thingy.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
56. Sex sells magazines.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:08 AM
Apr 2012

and there it is. If circulation is down, put a naked woman on the cover. Problem solved. A writer can be found to write any foolishness needed to sell magazines.

Uff da!

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
60. Next week I wanna see
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:43 PM
Apr 2012

A submissive man on his knees kissing a woman's foot in a black leather stiletto boot.

Fuck Newsweek and its projections.

Kinky sex is as old as the hills, and it comes in far more flavors than "submissive female".

"Surrender is a feminist dream" my ass. Everything any woman anywhere does any time, does not equal "feminism", for fuck's sake.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
61. I can tell you why some women like it and why some men like it.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:47 PM
Apr 2012

Many people on the submissive side of things in the BDSM world enjoy that aspect because during the rest of their lives they have to constantly be taking care of others, working, running a house, raising children. They get overwhelmed with having to be constantly making decisions about everything that they use this sexual choice as an escape.

I am not making a judgement as to whether this is right or wrong, I am just relaying the reasons behind the choice for many.

Iris

(15,652 posts)
63. That's what I was trying to say up thread.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:51 PM
Apr 2012

It's sex. People's sex live are complex and private and individual. I'm not sure what the intent of this article is b/c I don't really care about reading it. I would hope it mentions somewhere that these fantasies are fairly common amongst powerful men as well.

Blaukraut

(5,693 posts)
68. Never mind that in an S&M type sexual relationship, the Submissive is actually in control and holds
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:54 PM
Apr 2012

The power. Aside from that, sexual fantasies are just that - fantasies. Most women's fantasies aren't anything they would ever want to live out in real life, threesomes being a good example. Reality would look a whole lot different that fantasy in most cases.
Newsweek is psychoanalyzing a bit too much here.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
72. I'm not going to tell consenting adults how to get or not get their jollies.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:50 PM
Apr 2012

I will even go so far as to say that I will graciously permit adult women to decide for themselves what sorts of books they choose to read, what kind of erotica they wish to view, and how they choose to get off.

Aren't I reasonable? I know, I'm skirting the bounds of making Jesus angry perpetuating the male gaze heteronormative phallopressive oppresionotronic, wisgrovenikul patriarchy, but really, if this is what the soccer moms want, shit, that's their business. Same as if Dick Morris wants to suck a toe. Just leave me out of it.

That said, I've heard the writing in these books is atrocious.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
74. The point is, what "soccer moms" or anyone else want in the bedroom
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 06:37 PM
Apr 2012

or in their erotic literature does NOT automatically mean wanting to be "dominated" in the workplace or in the world at large. If Katie Roiphe doesn't understand that, she should STFU.

Also, the notion that women are now in charge of things when we only make up about 15% of Congress (and an even smaller percentage of CEOs) is just plain silly

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
77. I agree with both your points.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:06 PM
Apr 2012

Of course, as noted elsewhere in the thread, strong successful men seem to have a higher preponderance of sub sexual orientation, too. And given that the "strong, dominant man" in these 50 shades types stories is often one of these strong successful alpha types (who in reality is possibly more likely to be looking to be on the other end of that Power exchange) its quite possible that this sexual power dynamic is something akin to a cat chasing its own tail.

Off the subject, though, patti smith rocks.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
80. I guess I sort of don't care about the sexuality of other people all that much.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:43 AM
Apr 2012

Unless I'm directly involved. But Katie Roiphe is a freaking sloppy thinker and I'm really done with her.

Patti does indeed rock!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
82. Ill be honest, I didnt read the whole thing.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 03:45 PM
Apr 2012

Nor am I all that interested in reading the book in question.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Really Newsweek?