General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGlad you love your kids. We love ours too.
Ann Romney Is All That Stands between Your Baby and The Slavering Jaws of Joseph Stalin
....................
The state -- our democracy, what's left of it -- is the counterweight to you.
Glad you love your kids. We love ours too.
You fear communism, which is batshit. We fear plutocracy, which is actual.
So, bite me. You know? Parent to parent? Bite me.
http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com/
http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com/whiskey_fire/2012/04/ann-romney-is-all-that-stands-between-your-baby-and-the-slavering-jaws-of-joseph-stalin.html
http://upwithchrishayes.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/15/11209115-romney-welfare-parents-need-to-go-to-work?lite
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)She should be a non-entity. The problem is that she is making herself a spokesperson and lead advocate for those policies. And to the extent she points to herself as a "role model" for those policies, it is hard to fathom not pointing out the hypocrisy. But, the comments need to be directed at her husband's policies and not at her personally.
edited for typo
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)microscope to judge women and choices. and we all fail, regardless of what our choice is. it has been relentless, nonstop, attack on women for too long now. not just with this. but in all things.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)While I agree that she has every right to her own choices, that hypocrisy in attitudes and what is "ok" for the wealthy, yet not for the rest needs to be addressed.
This just about says it for me:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/15/mitt-romney-mothers-welfare-moms_n_1426113.html
His wife's "job" is "more important" than his, but he'd make welfare moms work "from day one if we could"
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/mitt_romneys_doubletalk_on_motherhood/
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Yes, often it becomes a pointless debate about who is the best mom, but I think if the light is shown on this in the correct way, showing how Rmoney sees a distinction between classes and how mothers should act, women are generally smart enough to figure out exactly what he's getting at. It is important to show that, once again, his proposed policies don't match how he conducts his own life - that he sees himself as 'above' his own policies.
Look, most women have already figured out how this Hilary Rosen comment and the following faux outrage was manufactured and that Ann Romney is hopelessly out of touch. On mainstream sites, comments against Ann by women are at least 7-1. Women simply aren't buying into the media narrative. I think the media has yet to figure that one out.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)so weirdly, as that message is a politically effective one that many on the other side would agree with (or couldn't disagree with).
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)represent ,and you can't blame people for criticizing people ,who not only don't want to be " left alone " , but want to help Lead us ,alone indeed.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that a woman makes. just another created battle pitting women against women as we all label and judge.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Trying to speak to what she couldn't possibly know ,Thats an insult to all Woman.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)you, i or anyone else on this board knows SHIT about what this woman did in her life with her children. and we are ALL feeling very fuckin comfortable judging her as a mother. you. do. not. know. shit.
why pretend otherwise. you want to discuss her being rich, or romneys hypocrisy on his comments, fine.
but that is not what i am seeing on du. i am seeing the working against the non against the rich against the poor against the "life of leisure" for ALL women if they are able to pay their bills. it is so beyond what this ONE situation is. and ALL of it is attack on women and putting her under the microscope to judge......
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)and I. DON'T . KNOW . SHIT . about being a woman , or a mother ,or the wife of a misanthrope ,who probably adores him with all her heart ,so on a human level . Sorry
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)While I definitely don't want Ann Romney or any other candidate's wife attacked in any way--much less for the choices they made in life, neither do I intend to let them attack others for the choices they are not ABLE to make.
I think the issue here is the elitism and the fact that they think nothing of the 99% and their struggles. THAT is a very real issue independent of women.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)yet we all arrogantly talk about her hands off as a parent. who the fuck are we? because i can pay my electric bill we have a thread calling me a "lady of leisure". a thread in feminist room telling us if you fuckin RAISE your kids and arent handing responsibility to the older children and out in ADULT world of workforce, you are.....
i am seeing a massive attack on women on du, and everyone participating saying it is all about this woman.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)It's an attack on the 99%. It's shining light on hypocrisy. Most places I've seen comments online, women understand this distinction. I haven't seen anyone say 'Ann Romney is a bad mom" anywhere. They are just saying that she shouldn't be saying she worked as hard as those women who struggle to feed their family by getting up at 5 am everyday. It's a rich vs poor, not an anti-woman debate.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Have women come under attack on DU--increasingly? Absolutely. But, I'm not sure I can tie it to this.
I don't think most DUers think less of stay-at-home Moms if that is what you are saying. I do think there has been evolution on that score. What it seems to me that they are concerned about is how rarely that is even an option. It certainly is no longer an option for any of my friends. No matter how much they diminish their standard of living. Had both not been working-- at least two couples would likely have been on the street after one or both lost jobs.
If Duers are accusing Ann Romney of being a "hands off parent"--I haven't seen that either. Many are surmising she very likely had help, but that doesn't mean she was "hands off." Who wouldn't have a housekeeper or cook or whatever, if you could afford it--especially with five BOYS.
SeaBeyond, I believe you when you say you are seeing this... but I haven't
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)October
(3,363 posts)Choice is choice.
I do not begrudge Ms. Romney's 'good' fortune or her choices. I want us all to be able to keep those choices open for our daughters and granddaughters...
The judgment of women here and in the media is just another media circus.
emilyg
(22,742 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...but she put herself out there into the political fray, by tweeting about her stay-at-home-mom-ness, therefore she is fair game, WITHIN the bounds of civility. I'm not seeing too much incivility, actually, although there's always someone somewhere who will go too far; and of course there is also often disagreement about what constitutes "too far".
Anyway. This daughter of privilege, wife of privilege, has no concept of the struggles of real people in this country every day, not to mention the struggles of real women who don't have the financial security of the Romneys. If she wants to put her opinions out there, that's fine, she gets to. But the rest of us get to respond to those opinions as well.
progressoid
(49,978 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Not knowing what they are is their objective , without knowing it.