Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glad you love your kids. We love ours too. (Original Post) kpete Apr 2012 OP
i wish we would leave this woman alone. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #1
It is her husband's policies and political stances we need to focus on... hlthe2b Apr 2012 #3
then talk about the policies. that is not what is happening here. it is more putting woman under seabeyond Apr 2012 #4
I do think the hypocrisy needs to be addressed. It is relevent. hlthe2b Apr 2012 #7
I think this needs to be talked about also. laundry_queen Apr 2012 #12
+1. What's happening is *that* message is being drowned out, though. Weirdly or perhaps not HiPointDem Apr 2012 #13
Yes, once again Democrats are way behind on this. nt laundry_queen Apr 2012 #15
It's not the woman ,it's what she Doesn't orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #5
all i am seeing this generate is attack on all women, all the time, regardless of choices seabeyond Apr 2012 #6
She's a 1% privileged Being . Period orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #8
and instead what i am seeing on du is the judgment of all women, thru this situation with this woman seabeyond Apr 2012 #10
As far as my reasoning your right.... orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #20
I can't agree with you on this, sea.... hlthe2b Apr 2012 #9
discuss the issue and leave the individual out. you do not know what this woman was as a mother seabeyond Apr 2012 #11
I disagree. this is not an attack on women. laundry_queen Apr 2012 #14
I hear your anger... but I'm not seeing that myself... hlthe2b Apr 2012 #21
Gynovision will lead to that Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #16
what are you talking about? nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #18
You are spot-on, seabeyond! October Apr 2012 #23
Yes. She is not running for office. emilyg Apr 2012 #17
Feel free to leave her alone... ljm2002 Apr 2012 #19
As soon as her party decides to leave women alone. progressoid Apr 2012 #22
I don't have kids ,but I have your view ! orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #2

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
3. It is her husband's policies and political stances we need to focus on...
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 12:57 PM
Apr 2012

She should be a non-entity. The problem is that she is making herself a spokesperson and lead advocate for those policies. And to the extent she points to herself as a "role model" for those policies, it is hard to fathom not pointing out the hypocrisy. But, the comments need to be directed at her husband's policies and not at her personally.


edited for typo

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
4. then talk about the policies. that is not what is happening here. it is more putting woman under
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:01 PM
Apr 2012

microscope to judge women and choices. and we all fail, regardless of what our choice is. it has been relentless, nonstop, attack on women for too long now. not just with this. but in all things.

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
7. I do think the hypocrisy needs to be addressed. It is relevent.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:07 PM
Apr 2012

While I agree that she has every right to her own choices, that hypocrisy in attitudes and what is "ok" for the wealthy, yet not for the rest needs to be addressed.

This just about says it for me:

Mitt Romney: Mothers Should Be Required To Work Outside Home Or Lose Benefits
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/15/mitt-romney-mothers-welfare-moms_n_1426113.html



Mitt Romney’s doubletalk on motherhood
His wife's "job" is "more important" than his, but he'd make welfare moms work "from day one if we could"
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/mitt_romneys_doubletalk_on_motherhood/

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
12. I think this needs to be talked about also.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:16 PM
Apr 2012

Yes, often it becomes a pointless debate about who is the best mom, but I think if the light is shown on this in the correct way, showing how Rmoney sees a distinction between classes and how mothers should act, women are generally smart enough to figure out exactly what he's getting at. It is important to show that, once again, his proposed policies don't match how he conducts his own life - that he sees himself as 'above' his own policies.

Look, most women have already figured out how this Hilary Rosen comment and the following faux outrage was manufactured and that Ann Romney is hopelessly out of touch. On mainstream sites, comments against Ann by women are at least 7-1. Women simply aren't buying into the media narrative. I think the media has yet to figure that one out.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
13. +1. What's happening is *that* message is being drowned out, though. Weirdly or perhaps not
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:19 PM
Apr 2012

so weirdly, as that message is a politically effective one that many on the other side would agree with (or couldn't disagree with).

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
5. It's not the woman ,it's what she Doesn't
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:03 PM
Apr 2012

represent ,and you can't blame people for criticizing people ,who not only don't want to be " left alone " , but want to help Lead us ,alone indeed.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. all i am seeing this generate is attack on all women, all the time, regardless of choices
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:05 PM
Apr 2012

that a woman makes. just another created battle pitting women against women as we all label and judge.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
8. She's a 1% privileged Being . Period
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:11 PM
Apr 2012

Trying to speak to what she couldn't possibly know ,Thats an insult to all Woman.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
10. and instead what i am seeing on du is the judgment of all women, thru this situation with this woman
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:41 PM
Apr 2012

you, i or anyone else on this board knows SHIT about what this woman did in her life with her children. and we are ALL feeling very fuckin comfortable judging her as a mother. you. do. not. know. shit.

why pretend otherwise. you want to discuss her being rich, or romneys hypocrisy on his comments, fine.

but that is not what i am seeing on du. i am seeing the working against the non against the rich against the poor against the "life of leisure" for ALL women if they are able to pay their bills. it is so beyond what this ONE situation is. and ALL of it is attack on women and putting her under the microscope to judge......

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
20. As far as my reasoning your right....
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:40 PM
Apr 2012

and I. DON'T . KNOW . SHIT . about being a woman , or a mother ,or the wife of a misanthrope ,who probably adores him with all her heart ,so on a human level . Sorry

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
9. I can't agree with you on this, sea....
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:11 PM
Apr 2012

While I definitely don't want Ann Romney or any other candidate's wife attacked in any way--much less for the choices they made in life, neither do I intend to let them attack others for the choices they are not ABLE to make.

I think the issue here is the elitism and the fact that they think nothing of the 99% and their struggles. THAT is a very real issue independent of women.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
11. discuss the issue and leave the individual out. you do not know what this woman was as a mother
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:44 PM
Apr 2012

yet we all arrogantly talk about her hands off as a parent. who the fuck are we? because i can pay my electric bill we have a thread calling me a "lady of leisure". a thread in feminist room telling us if you fuckin RAISE your kids and arent handing responsibility to the older children and out in ADULT world of workforce, you are.....

i am seeing a massive attack on women on du, and everyone participating saying it is all about this woman.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
14. I disagree. this is not an attack on women.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:20 PM
Apr 2012

It's an attack on the 99%. It's shining light on hypocrisy. Most places I've seen comments online, women understand this distinction. I haven't seen anyone say 'Ann Romney is a bad mom" anywhere. They are just saying that she shouldn't be saying she worked as hard as those women who struggle to feed their family by getting up at 5 am everyday. It's a rich vs poor, not an anti-woman debate.

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
21. I hear your anger... but I'm not seeing that myself...
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:47 PM
Apr 2012

Have women come under attack on DU--increasingly? Absolutely. But, I'm not sure I can tie it to this.

I don't think most DUers think less of stay-at-home Moms if that is what you are saying. I do think there has been evolution on that score. What it seems to me that they are concerned about is how rarely that is even an option. It certainly is no longer an option for any of my friends. No matter how much they diminish their standard of living. Had both not been working-- at least two couples would likely have been on the street after one or both lost jobs.

If Duers are accusing Ann Romney of being a "hands off parent"--I haven't seen that either. Many are surmising she very likely had help, but that doesn't mean she was "hands off." Who wouldn't have a housekeeper or cook or whatever, if you could afford it--especially with five BOYS.

SeaBeyond, I believe you when you say you are seeing this... but I haven't

October

(3,363 posts)
23. You are spot-on, seabeyond!
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 04:20 PM
Apr 2012

Choice is choice.

I do not begrudge Ms. Romney's 'good' fortune or her choices. I want us all to be able to keep those choices open for our daughters and granddaughters...

The judgment of women here and in the media is just another media circus.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
19. Feel free to leave her alone...
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 02:33 PM
Apr 2012

...but she put herself out there into the political fray, by tweeting about her stay-at-home-mom-ness, therefore she is fair game, WITHIN the bounds of civility. I'm not seeing too much incivility, actually, although there's always someone somewhere who will go too far; and of course there is also often disagreement about what constitutes "too far".

Anyway. This daughter of privilege, wife of privilege, has no concept of the struggles of real people in this country every day, not to mention the struggles of real women who don't have the financial security of the Romneys. If she wants to put her opinions out there, that's fine, she gets to. But the rest of us get to respond to those opinions as well.

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
2. I don't have kids ,but I have your view !
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 12:57 PM
Apr 2012

Not knowing what they are is their objective , without knowing it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glad you love your kids. ...