Sat Apr 14, 2012, 05:14 PM
WillyT (50,350 posts)
The Long Struggle For A Progressive Counterweight To ALEC - FDL
The Long Struggle for a Progressive Counterweight to ALEC
By: David Dayen - FDL
Saturday April 14, 2012 8:53 am
A coalition on the left, including Color of Change, People for the American Way, Common Cause, the Center for Media and Democracy and others, have been targeting large corporations to drop their underwriting for ALEC, the right-wing model legislation factory. Because nobody had spotlighted the source of ALEC’s funding in this way before, they have been successful. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, McDonald’s, Intuit, Coca-Cola, Pepsi and Kraft Foods were among the first to drop their support, and now Mars Inc. (the maker of Skittles), Arizona Public Service, Wendy’s, Reed Elsevier, and American Traffic Solutions have joined them. Some companies, like Ticketmaster, got annoyed by the mere suggestion of their support of ALEC, which they deny. Even state legislators who were former members of ALEC have repudiated the organization as “too extreme.”
Clearly ALEC has been knocked for a loop by this coordinated effort. As Phoenix Woman pointed out, they described it as an intimidation campaign and an effort to chill free speech. A former national chairman of ALEC, now Speaker of the House in Virginia, berated an ALEC critic, including telling her “I guess I’m not speaking in little enough words for you to understand.” He has since apologized.
The campaign has garnered national attention, but I’ve been wondering where this game ends. The problem with ALEC is of corporate underwriting. Companies support the organization with funding, and Republican state legislators join up as members, sit down with these corporate interests, and share legislation that they model and bring back to their states. What’s getting these corporations into trouble is that they are having to answer for ALEC-modeled legislation well far afield of their core business, like anti-abortion laws or the pro-gun Stand Your Ground law. For consumer operations, this is just terrible branding; Democrats eat at Wendy’s and McDonald’s and drink Pepsi and Coke as well.
But the idea of a central clearinghouse for legislation, to support often part-time, underfunded and understaffed state legislators, is not an inherently evil one. In fact, progressives have been trying to create such a space for 40 years, pretty much since the creation of ALEC.
For example, the Progressive States Network is a group founded seven years ago whose mission is to “engage and build the capacity of state and national leaders to advance public policy solutions that uphold America’s promise to be a just and equitable democracy.” They are but one of several attempts in this space to help coordinate state legislative activities on the progressive side. “We see ourselves as connective tissue,” said Charles Monaco, director of communications and new media for PSN. The organization works closely with state-based groups as well as national policy shops, providing connections to policy research, campaign strategies and legislative initiatives to state legislators and their staffs. “If there’s a great immigration policy in one state, that’s the type of thing that should get traded across state lines,” Monaco said.
Unlike ALEC, state legislators are not formal members. In that sense, it differs from ALEC, which is strictly a pay-to-play operation. State lawmakers who join up with ALEC quite literally pay for access to corporate interests, who they know can support them in future campaigns if they carry their bills for them. That structure doesn’t exist on the progressive side. “It’s a question we’ve been trying to answer for years in number of ways,” said Monaco of PSN. “We try to get state legislators to think of themselves as a national progressive movement.” But that doesn’t equal the lure of money to finance future elections.
And this is why it has been such a challenge to create a progressive version of ALEC. PSN is not the first and hasn’t been the last effort. Katrina vanden Heuvel wrote this week about a meeting among progressive...
6 replies, 1119 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
The Long Struggle For A Progressive Counterweight To ALEC - FDL (Original post)
Response to WillyT (Original post)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 01:11 AM
eridani (40,094 posts)
3. Progressive States Network--the anti-ALEC
Jesus: Hey, Dad? God: Yes, Son? Jesus: Western civilization followed me home. Can I keep it? God: Certainly not! You don't know where it's been!
Response to WillyT (Original post)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 10:49 AM
Doctor_J (27,942 posts)
5. This won't amount to much
Unlike ALEC, state legislators are not formal members.
So...fail. This won't be any more successful than Occupy. Not that these "informal members" will get pepper-sprayed or arrested for being part of it, but wrt getting legislation passed...forget it. Won't amount to a hill of beans. First time they get a single one of the ALEC initiatives undone, let me know.
Spreading Republican propaganda at DU for 12 years . Besides wanting the government to tell me who they're spying on, I also want socialized medicine, stronger environmental laws, capped CEO pay, and a $15.00 minimum wage. Libertarian???