General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Duggars (19 Kids and Counting) consider Halloween "demonic"
Gee, I'm SOOOO surprised!
Is anyone surprised that the Duggars do not celebrate Halloween? "Magic, sorcery, witches, spell-casting and the like are all part of the demonic realm that God wants us to stay away from. One specific thing that our parents have always been careful about is magic, which often shows up in children's movies. As harmless as it may seem, it's not a joke in God's eyes."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/duggar-family-refuses-to-celebrate-halloween-relates-holiday-to-demonic-realm-127023/
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)So really, who cares?
sakabatou
(42,148 posts)or the fake money with bible verses:
FourScore
(9,704 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)to be demonic.
So there...
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It means you support a woman's right to choose what to do if she is pregnant.
It doesn't mean you have to actually agree with the choice she makes.
Just that you recognize that the decision is hers to make, not yours or anyone else's.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Women are not brood mares and the men that press them into such a chattel role (and the parents/church members who brainwash them into this role) should rot in the hell of their own making.
Children deserve a childhood, which does not happen when they become indentured servants to cleaning the house and raising the younger children--all an outcome of these gargantuan families. In centuries past, large families served a purpose--to ensure the survival of at least a few, given the high rate of childhood mortality. That time is long past.
This is not a "pro-choice" issue. No one has taken her choice away during any of her 19 pregnancies. It is a world-responsibility issue, however and they are thus fully open to the criticism they receive as a couple.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Besides it will help with Social Security having them work and pay SS taxes. Don't forget our country is aging big time. We as a whole are not having that many children. It is one family not everyone.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Excellent post.
Wella
(1,827 posts)It did not mean that third parties could interpret your choices and tell you that you were wrong, wrong, wrong. If you choose to have an abortion, no one gets to tell you that's the wrong choice. If you decide to have many children, no one gets to tell you that's the wrong choice. Period.
You may disagree with how Mrs. Duggar has chosen to spend her life, but as a pro-choice person, one must respect her choice.
In the same way, if you decide to have only one child or no children, that is ALSO a choice and one must respect your choice.
alp227
(32,018 posts)What happened to critical thinking? Not all opinions/choices are equally worthy. In my book "pro choice" is only in the eyes of the law - not MY eyes.
Wella
(1,827 posts)Don't misquote me.
alp227
(32,018 posts)others' choices, our else that phrase is empty words to shut down thinking.
Wella
(1,827 posts)Then I'll think about granting your request.
alp227
(32,018 posts)So what does it mean to respect others' choices?
Wella
(1,827 posts)You understand that different people can make different choices in regard to pregnancy and childbirth. It means that you philosophically respect a multitude of choices and don't eviscerate people for making those choices.
If a given woman wants to remain child-free through her life, she should be allowed to do that, and not be judged for not wanting children. It is a valid choice.
If a given woman wants a single child and no more, it is a valid choice.
If a given woman really wants to have a dozen or more children, it is a valid choice.
If a given woman wants to have an abortion, it is a valid choice.
If a given woman wants to carry a pregnancy to term and give the resulting child away for adoption, that is a valid choice.
If a given woman wants to carry a pregnancy to term and raise the child, regardless of her marital status or sexual orientation, that is a valid choice.
Your right to a choice is based on the rights of others to their choices. It is a philosophical position, but also a legal one. Roe v. Wade is based on the right to privacy in reproductive matters. Your right to an abortion is based on the right to privacy, and your right to make private decisions outside of government control. Mrs. Duggar's right to have many children is also based on her right to privacy, her right to make private decisions outside of government control.
If you are truly pro-choice, you respect the choices that others make based on their privacy rights (guaranteed by Roe v. Wade) and you respect their own ability to make those choices.
alp227
(32,018 posts)about why choice x is superior to choice y, for instance?
Wella
(1,827 posts)of your own choices.
So, if you decide that the Duggars made a "less good" (worse?) choice, then you will have to be ready to defend your own choices and cannot philosophically fall back on a pro-choice argument. Let's say you have no children and one abortion. In a pro choice model, there is no judgement for that. Once you destroy the model by assessing value to the Duggars' choice, you open yourself up to people criticizing your choice. You cannot say, "It's my right to have an abortion, end of story," because it is the Duggar's right to have many children, end of story, but you have challenged that. So they would have a right to challenge you: under what circumstances did you have the abortion? Wouldn't it have been a better choice to let that child live and put it up for adoption? Etc.
Pro-choice is actually a difficult position because it requires philosophical consistency.
What some people actually are is "anti-population growth", not pro-choice. If you are "anti-population growth" you support fewer births, whether that is by abortion or birth control (family planning) and, very often, more deaths, as in assisted suicide or euthanasia. If this is your world view, then you are not pro-choice, you are anti-population, and you can criticize the Duggars from that perspective. But to be intellectually honest, you have to admit that you want the entire world to have that same world view for your goal to materialize. It is a short jump from wanting the world to agree with you to supporting legislation limiting family size (like they do in China). This, of course, counters the whole notion of reproductive privacy in Roe v. Wade. It makes reproduction a state matter, not a personal one.
I am a strong believer in the undergirding of Roe v. Wade: the right to reproductive privacy. I strongly believe in supporting the right of a woman to have zero children or many children, of having an abortion or choosing an adoption--all without government interference.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)need to get a clue.
Wella
(1,827 posts)I think I know what pro-choice is supposed to mean.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)umm hmm.
Wella
(1,827 posts)There's not much I can do about that.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)get to have an opinion on that choice?
Wella
(1,827 posts)need to have an opinion consistent with that philosophy. Otherwise, it's called "hypocrisy".
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Hint: It doesn't mean precluding disagreeing with the choice.
Wella
(1,827 posts)on what pro-choice means to you.
Wella
(1,827 posts)Write out your definition.
Wella
(1,827 posts)Seriously. If you can't back up what you say, then don't say it.
Wella
(1,827 posts)....
HoustonDave
(60 posts)Got some bad news for you - some families welcome lots of kids and enjoy them. That doesn't mean the women are brood mares or that the men (or their churches) pressure them into it - they have large families because they WANT to. Kids are not indentured servants because they help out around the house - but it does help teach them about responsibility and personal obligation.
I personally would have no desire to have that many children, but think you could lighten up on their choices and could stop projecting so much into them. Just an opinion.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)than is healthy either for the woman or the children-- and thus relegate the children to raising the younger siblings and losing their childhood to indentured servitude, you are DAMNED right I am judgmental. Damn them all. Children deserve a childhood. Women deserve to be treated like human beings. We aren't talking a "large" family of five or eight or even ten---we are talking 19 children!
And those who defend women being treated like this are again, free to enjoy the hell of their own making.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Criticizing someone's decisions in no way denies her right to make those decisons.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)As long as they are just critizing a womans decision?
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Wella
(1,827 posts)That's why you must separate your philosophical outlook from your kneejerk reactions.
alp227
(32,018 posts)It's intimidation/coercion/discouragement. Otherwise why would the protesters spend all that energy going to clinics?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)So much for rational thought...
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)those who want to have more than what is socially acceptable should be shunned. It's really not worth the argument. You're not going to get these so called pro choice people to agree to allow conservatives to have as many children as they want.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Nonetheless, I still think the Duggars are idiots. Frightening idiots at that.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Childhood mortality rates have, for centuries driven such decisions--rather understandably. But, even in those times, 19 children would have been excessive to most. AND, this is a very different time.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Just the profound narcissism, xenophobia and conspicuous consumption that Quiverfulls confuse with virtue.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It says so right in the Bible.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)They just hate rival magicians.
Wella
(1,827 posts)No one has a real clue as to why life exists at all and why there's not just nothing. Religious traditions give certain guesses about how this was accomplished. You can think they are non-scientific (which they are) but you can't assume they all refer to magic.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Just sayin'
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)into your 40's. Seems to work for stupid Mrs. Duggar. Oh, and make the first pumpkins fucking raise the rest of the pumpkins, yanno - Ponziparenting.
Worried senior
(1,328 posts)to grow at all.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)and there were many - wereblown off by the early Christians as Magicians -m a very highly perjorative term.
Of course Moses allegedly pulled a ton of magic-y shit prior to Jesus, but HE was DIFFERENT. Says who? The editors. Fuck all that shit and the crazy Tali-Duggs.
Also, their smarmy, soft, uneducated first son (Jackas, maybe? can't recall his stupid J name) is a fucking dipshit.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)I had Halloween every year as a kid, and I still don't worship Satan. So there, Duggars.
wandy
(3,539 posts)It is not a joke in god's eyes and once the blue smoke and magic escape it you will be rendered into the dark ages.
Or at least I'm beginning to understand how the dark ages happened. Dugger like primitives fearing magic, sorcery, witches, spell-casting and harmless things they don't understand.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)It is also a miracle mankind invented light bulbs. We would all still be sitting in caves eating raw meat in the dark if people like the Duggars had their way.
jmowreader
(50,554 posts)Response to Archae (Original post)
Post removed
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)people you criticize?
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Disgusting term.
Terms like that come out of very, very ugly people.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)yet just started posting. I do hope they enjoy their stay.
greyl
(22,990 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)greyl
(22,990 posts)A simple search shows your statement was false, and should probably be retracted for the sake of honesty.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Have a great night.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Then again, his church used to feed the homeless and welcomed everyone regardless of race or national origin, so he wasn't exactly a stereotypical right-winger.
I don't believe in the supernatural. But I always have, and always will, respect him, his generous spirit, and his commitment to everyday people.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I figured the ol' neighborhood would get a kick out of that.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)and the results will be the same.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)For Halloween he tries to do something different.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And now you figured me out! Curses!
JI7
(89,247 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Neoma
(10,039 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)That i have never, ever seen and have no desire to. I don't think a thread on DU is significantly going to impact their public perception.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)Bad publicity is good publicity for these folks. Why should anyone give a shit about these people?
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)All other highly improbable magic events are demonic.
catbyte
(34,373 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)My church is going to have a big Halloween bash.
No super scary costume because of the little kids, but you don't have to dress as a pumpkin, either.
And heaven forbid, our pastor loves Harry Potter!
Archae
(46,318 posts)Supposed to scare the kiddies into being Christians.
Shows terrible stuff, dope addicts, abortions, all the fundy bugaboos.
Talk about stupid.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)I guess it takes all kinds.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Although most churches share a bit of fundamentalist elements here and there. That's ok, though. No one on this board completely agrees, either.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)had a special service on October 31st that was for rememberng those who have died.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Things have changed since I was a child I guess.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)I suppose to those who did not grow up ij the Christian faith (which I understand is looked down upon by many DUsrs) it is erie.
For a party that regularly proclaims tolerance, I find some irony when it comes to religion.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Tolerance only if agreed on the subject matter. Always shake my head with that one.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Too bad nobody every waved that wand over these assholes.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Female anatomy, especially the womb, has for centuries been shrouded in mystery and misunderstanding, defining the social place of women in male dominated cultures. Even with advances in medicine, some in today's society believe they can control women's sexual identity.
The Wandering Womb is a provocative tour through religious, medical, and social histories, pinpointing humorous, outrageous, and hair-raising beliefs, practices, and longstanding falsehoods that permeate human cultures. In Egyptian times, it was believed that the womb was an entity unto itself capable of "wandering" in the body, and also into the world beyond in search of nourishment! This idea, and many others were entwined in medical ignorance and religious superstition, which have often labeled women as incomplete, inferior, imperfect, and even inherently evil.
Sexual myths have viewed menstruation as dirty, designing outrageous rituals around this natural process, from strange diets and prescriptions to mandated isolation and violent practices. Sexuality and desire in women has been viewed as taboo and dangerous, while child rearing is considered the highest calling. In Western history, women's health problems were often written off simply as an "unsatisfied uterus," or "hysteria" of their weak and demon possessed bodies, while physical characteristics were used to label women as witches.
This fascinating, often maddening romp through the bedrooms and birthing rooms of time illustrates why women have been sexually "enslaved," and reminds us that we've come a long way from the mythical virgin birth to women's liberation and beyond.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1573922641/?tag=googhydr-20&hvadid=35012767164&hvpos=1t1&hvexid=&hvnetw=s&hvrand=13428328478262683615&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_4iuijz8lka_b
The first review is also good, but it was written back in 1999. I think the country has regressed to something slighter newer than 3000 B.C. with the GOP take over of school boards and churches.
elleng
(130,865 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)There really is a War on Halloween. Seeing Rudolph and Santa standing next to witches and pumpkins is kind of odd, but at Lowes in my hometown last year, that is exactly what happened. I actually like Christmas too, but not before Halloween.
JustAnotherGen
(31,810 posts)Eh? I'd rather hang with those who practice earth religions anyways.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)They're basically Fundies.....and southern Fundies at that.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)"Demonic" is a pretty accurate term for that, I think!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)maryellen99
(3,788 posts)But nobody cares that the religious right has been waging a war on Halloween.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)CANDO
(2,068 posts)Mrs Duggar is a stepford wife. She's always way too chilled out for a mother with 19 kids. She so non chalant in her demeanor it frightens me.
Archae
(46,318 posts)She seemed to be brainwashed.
"Gawd told me to do everything my husband wants!"
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)Her older daughters do. There was one episode of the show where she was trying to get her younger kids to do something and they would not listen to her, but listened to an older daughter. Two of the younger girls, Jennifer and Jordyn (#17 and #18) barely get any attention from her at all and Jennifer responds better to (now married and pregnant) Jill instead of Michelle. Jordyn truly is the lost girl because she was less than 1 when Josie (youngest, born very premature) was born.
I think she's on many meds and that's what is causing her to act the way she does.
And I really want one of those kids to rebel and take a few siblings with him/her. And I'd love to see the episode "A Duggar Comes Out."
(Their TV show is one of my guilty pleasures).
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I can see it now. I watch too occasionally.
3catwoman3
(23,973 posts)...we can dress up on Halloween if we choose to, as long as it is not creepy axe murderer type stuff. I usually opt for a cape and a pointy wizard type hat. One year, a mom looked at me very severely, and announced, "WE don't celebrate the devil's birthday." After being briefly at a loss for words, I simply said, "Neither do I."
mnhtnbb
(31,382 posts)like, "Well, give yourself a pat on the back for being so holy."
And gotten myself fired!
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)It's intended to be fun to mock death and winter and short days right before All Saint's Day and All Soul's Day, or Dia de los Inocentes and Dia de los Muertas on Nov. 1st and 2nd.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Jawsh Duggar is the poster boy for wingnut welfare.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)good about it.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)a burning bush, a dead guy who turns out to be a zombie, cannibalism, and creatures including unicorns, satyrs, cockatrices (rooster-serpents that kill when looked upon), and a race of giants. Oh, and there are lots of lovely little stories such as this one:
Judges 19:22-30:
A man and his concubine are wandering the streets when they decide to seek shelter for the night, and find a man kind enough to let them stay. That night however, a group of men turn up at the door and demand to see the guest so that they may have sex with him. The owner is unwilling to let his male lodger be raped and so offers up his virgin daughter instead. However, this is still not good enough for the men, so the owner offers them his guests concubine and the men accept. The men brutally rape the woman and leave her on the doorstep where she bleeds to death. If that is not enough, when she is found by her husband, he chops her up into twelve pieces which he sends to each of the twelve tribes of Israel.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Is that actually a story in the bible?
If so, it's no wonder they are so f***ed up.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Don't forget to read about Lot and his Daughters right after that...it's part of the same story.
I'd much rather carve a pumpkin, eat some of it, freeze the rest, and watch horror movies all night one night a year than live THAT reality the entire year.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)later after that happened. You missed the grand finale of that part.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lot_%28biblical_person%29#Lot_and_his_daughters
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)No wonder people want to use this book to guide their lives.
Ugh.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)And THAT is the story they use to beat gay people over the head with the Bible. Un-fricken-believable.
LibertyLover
(4,788 posts)they are extremely conservative fundy Christians, probably with little or no sense of humor or knowledge of history. Honestly, it would be a news story if these idiots came out and said they liked the holiday, encouraged their children to participate in trick-or-treating and celebrated it each year with a big party for the entire neighborhood. The OP in entirely correctly - why is anybody surprised? What also doesn't surprise me is that the Duggars don't know that Halloween really is a Christian holiday, the eve of All Saints' Day. Besides, witches don't celebrate Halloween either - but ask us about Samhain.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Are they from my area of the country? They have Hell Houses down here instead of Haunted Houses and it's freaking backasswards. I was just wondering if they are from the Bible Belt. Or do other areas have backasswards people who go to extremes to appear holier-than-thou like that too?
maryellen99
(3,788 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)and to think I thought that 8 was enough!
Yikes!!
benld74
(9,904 posts)show, they would slowly disappear
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)hunter
(38,310 posts)The Christmas Creche, with baby Jesus, Mary, Joseph, and the Three Wise Werewolves is a big hit with neighbors. Their favorite part is the gory realistic crucifixions in the background, randomly and shockingly lit by simulated lightening and thunder. Oh, yeah, there's also a burning bush speaking in tongues. If you listen long enough you can almost make out the words. It's rather like a Rorschach test. The faithful will hear God just as they might see images of Christ or the Virgin Mary on their toast.
Okay, can I be a television celebrity now?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...akin to trying to set a record for most marriages. It relegates women to the nurseries. Go thou forth and raise up an army of believers to fight for Jesus!
Military recruiters with such mandates cut a lot of corners, too.
Raffi Ella
(4,465 posts)They're so isolated and controlled and watched that they are not able to think for themselves, and if they try to they are "trained" out of it.
It fascinates me that the older children continue to go along with it. I realize it's hard to break away, almost impossible really, but still. I keep hoping to see some glimmer of independent thought from one of the kids...
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)Well a Christian boot camp. He strikes me as a likely rebel (and probably gay) and I think Dim Bulb, err Jim Bob saw the writing on the wall.
He just turned 18 and I would love to be his gateway to escape.
libodem
(19,288 posts)There are no seasons. There is to time to be born. No time to die. To time to sow. No time to reap.
Death does not happen on God's watch? Right?
Big ol' sarcasm tag:
ellie
(6,929 posts)Who cares what they think?
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)Do Evangelicals not allow Halloween, either?
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I want to see the show where they discover that.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)who served in the Arkansas House of Representatives. They also endorsed Rick Santorum for President.Demonic for sure.
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Stupid fucking religious breeders...
GReedDiamond
(5,311 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)trying to influence politics. I heard Mrs. Duggar had some pretty nasty things to say about a law that was being proposed to protect transgender people. That is what we should be outraged about. Who gives a shit what they believe about Halloween?
Arkana
(24,347 posts)what Baby Factory Inc. has to say about anything?
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)guy who grew up celebrating Halloween. There's photographic evidence of him carving a jack-o-lantern as a kid. He also attended a secular university and dressed up as the school mascot. His mother is a career woman who wears pants. Hoping some of this rubs off on his wife and she enters the 20th century at some point.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Jezebel!!!
eridani
(51,907 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Yep. Decorations are already up!!!!
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)It's just rival wizards they object to, right?