"It’s a wonderful illustration of the emptiness of much Beltway foreign-policy-speak."
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/stunted-debate-isis
A stunted debate on ISIS
09/02/14 10:11 AM
By Steve Benen
snip//
But it was Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), both of whom still inexplicably claim to have credibility on matters of national security, who wrote a New York Times op-ed urging the White House to adopt the hawks foreign policy.
After more than three years, almost 200,000 dead in Syria, the near collapse of Iraq, and the rise of the worlds most sinister terrorist army the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, which has conquered vast swaths of both countries President Obamas admission this week that we dont have a strategy yet to deal with this threat is startling. It is also dangerous.
Actually, as recent history makes clear, whats far more dangerous is taking foreign policy advice from John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
Peter Beinart had a terrific response to the senators op-ed yesterday.
Its a wonderful illustration of the emptiness of much Beltway foreign-policy-speak. McCain and Graham want Obama to act both deliberately and urgently because theyre both happy words. (As opposed to lethargically and rashly, which are nastier synonyms for the same thing.) But when you translate these uplifting abstractions into plain English, you see how contradictory McCain and Grahams demands actually are. You can either demand that Obama not bomb Syria until hes ensured he has a plan likely to win international and congressional support, or you can demand that he bomb as soon as possible. You cant demand both.
One reason Obama isnt bombing in Syria yet is that hes not clear on what the goal would be. McCain and Graham are. ISIS, they write, cannot be contained. Why not? Hasnt the U.S. been containing al-Qaeda ISISs estranged older brother for more than a decade now? But the two senators dont pause to explain. It must be confronted, they declare. What does that mean? If the U.S. is bombing ISIS in Iraq, arent we confronting the group already?
McCain and Graham also specifically call on Obama to pursue the very policy in Iraq that Obama has already implemented. Instead of praising the presidents approach that they agree with, the Republican senators pretended not to know what the White Houses policy is.
For more along these lines, Michael Cohen had a great piece over the weekend, exploring how the constant chorus of do something? from Obamas critics is misguided, while Fred Kaplan makes a compelling case that airstrikes in Syria probably wouldnt have the desired effect.