Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:18 PM

Hugabear (9,879 posts)

So conservatives think too much attention is being given to Trayvon Martin

Yet still get pissed off over OJ Simpson

11 replies, 1012 views

Thread info

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

11 replies	Author	Time	Post
So conservatives think too much attention is being given to Trayvon Martin (Original post)	Hugabear	Apr 2012	OP
Just read a thread on DU the other day that explained the OJ actually did not kill	teddy51	Apr 2012	#1
As a guy who watched a lot of the trial	rufus dog	Apr 2012	#7
I will try and find the post, but apparently there was a PI that has spent the past 18 years on	teddy51	Apr 2012	#8
yup, saw that	rufus dog	Apr 2012	#11
It's sucking too much attention out of their vagina wars	Autumn	Apr 2012	#2
And drawing attention to their beloved "Stand Your Ground" laws	Iris	Apr 2012	#3
It brings attention to one of the many very insane Republican laws.	The Wielding Truth	Apr 2012	#5
Can we PLEASE talk about more important stuff?	gratuitous	Apr 2012	#4
Fuck em	guitar man	Apr 2012	#6
It seems that the opposite in true. The authorities in Florida seemed to be trying to cover up	ladjf	Apr 2012	#9
ALEC getting it's curtain yanked and they don't like it.	lonestarnot	Apr 2012	#10

Response to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:22 PM

teddy51 (3,491 posts)

1. Just read a thread on DU the other day that explained the OJ actually did not kill

Nicole or Ron, but his son did. His name is Jason... Who knows the answer?

Reply to this post

Response to teddy51 (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:59 PM

rufus dog (4,946 posts)

7. As a guy who watched a lot of the trial

It may have been a possibility, if it wasn't O.J. it was the kid, but I am 99% sure that O.J. did it. (cuts on his hand) If the cops (like in the Trayvon killing) weren't so inept they would have looked in the duffle bag that Kardashian walked out of the house with and we would have the answer.

Reply to this post

Response to rufus dog (Reply #7)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 11:03 PM

teddy51 (3,491 posts)

8. I will try and find the post, but apparently there was a PI that has spent the past 18 years on

this case, and says his conclusion is it was Jason and not OJ.

Reply to this post

Response to teddy51 (Reply #8)

Sat Apr 7, 2012, 12:48 AM

rufus dog (4,946 posts)

11. yup, saw that

his theory is DNA was not good enough to pick up the difference between O.J. and his kid. O.J. had cuts on his hands so I still think it is O.J. and the guy is out to sell some books. My original thought was that is O.J. or his son, with the DNA markers it was the father.

Reply to this post

Response to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:28 PM

Autumn (11,623 posts)

2. It's sucking too much attention out of their vagina wars

and they can't have that.

Reply to this post

Response to Autumn (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:34 PM

Iris (13,882 posts)

3. And drawing attention to their beloved "Stand Your Ground" laws

Reply to this post

Response to Iris (Reply #3)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:52 PM

The Wielding Truth (8,450 posts)

5. It brings attention to one of the many very insane Republican laws.

Reply to this post

Response to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:39 PM

gratuitous (49,292 posts)

4. Can we PLEASE talk about more important stuff?

Like birth certificates. And whether Obama is a Muslim. Or if the First Lady had too much security on her last outing. Or too little security. You know, the real important stuff that we need to discuss in this country.

Reply to this post

Response to Hugabear (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:55 PM

guitar man (15,996 posts)