Fri Apr 6, 2012, 06:53 PM

Conservative Confusion over Obama and 'Social Darwinism'

Apr 6 2012, 2:27 PM ET

Jennifer Rubin, blogging at the Washington Post, has this to say about President Obama's use of the term "thinly veiled social Darwinism" to describe Paul Ryan's budget: "Let's be clear about two things. The supposedly erudite Obama labeled Ryan a race supremacist..."

Let's be clear about one thing: Jennifer Rubin doesn't have the slightest idea what she's talking about.

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/04/conservative-confusion-over-obama-and-social-darwinism/255560/

3 replies, 662 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

3 replies	Author	Time	Post
Conservative Confusion over Obama and 'Social Darwinism' (Original post)	HarveyDarkey	Apr 2012	OP
Hell, even William Jennings Bryan used to rail on about that right-wing horseshit	Gibby	Apr 2012	#1
my conclusions: Jennifer Rubin is either obtusely stupid or deliberately deceitful.	provis99	Apr 2012	#2
Charge her with a BWS:	lastlib	Apr 2012	#3

Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 07:00 PM

Gibby (96 posts)

1. Hell, even William Jennings Bryan used to rail on about that right-wing horseshit

Last edited Fri Apr 6, 2012, 07:01 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

a century ago. The Prairie Populists were well aware of the ugly right-wing Social Darwinists of their day were up to...rag on Bryan all you want for other things, but he knew the dark side of the right-wing mindset, and he opposed it eloquently...

Reply to this post

Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 07:16 PM

provis99 (13,062 posts)

2. my conclusions: Jennifer Rubin is either obtusely stupid or deliberately deceitful.

Those are her only two choices. It is up to her to decide which one she is.

Reply to this post

Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 09:16 PM

lastlib (3,807 posts)

3. Charge her with a BWS:

Blogging While Stupid

Reply to this post