Why Does U.S. Build Roads If It Can’t Pay to Fix Them?

Geez if we depended on the Feds to fix potholes that would be really stupid.

I could go with that.

They have their Lear jets and helicopters.

You will notice that the streets and roads around the Snob Hill and Gated Communities all seem to have well maintained streets. Snow removal too.

Maybe it's due to prioritization. If I had to guess I'd say it's because the locals are finding exploding health care costs for their employees, retirees and the poor are sucking up more and more money.

Documentary General- Motors- History = Taken- for- a -Ride

Fixing old roads is "construction" and is seen to be annoying, because it slows down commutes. In Minnesota, we are now entering the dreaded "construction" season, which lasts from April through October. Those road repairs slow everyone down every year. Then, in the winter, the snow and ice does the same. It's a vicious cycle.

But, a brand new road? That holds the promise of faster, easier travel. It's never realized in truth, but it's out there as an exciting possibility.

The GOP will build the roads because someone with a construction company can get rich building it. Things like bridges to nowhere and things like that.

They don't want to spend the money to keep them in good working order because much of that work falls on a government agency, the Highway Departments in each state.

Let them privatize the roads so someone can get rich and they will be all over repairs.

It is simple greed that keeps our highways in the terrible shape they are.

Patching potholes may be a highway department job, but resurfacing and major repairs are still done by private companies.

What about Democrat states? Are their roads smooth and shiney?

No, this whole issue is systemic, and party and capitalism has nothing to do with it.

They have been for several years.

There may be others but I cannot verify that.

Indiana's roads are quite well maintained (funded by the trust funded by leasing the public toll road to a private foreign corporation, but that's another issue).

Illinois roads are NOTHING to be proud of, IMHO.

But, by far, WI roads are the GD worst.

They are continually rebuilding it in sections, replacing bridges and roadway. There are a lot of miles to replace and it will take several years, but it is more than you see in most states these days.

The Indiana toll road is an example of what the right wants for all of America, private roads. Roads for profit do not seem to make for better roads either IMO.

New roads are seen as bringing new development while fixing old ones.. where the hell else are you gonna drive?

Deferring maintainence is a short term budget fix, very easy to justify the first couple times. As we see, the long term costs get big once you've blown off a whole maintainence cycle, go up exponentially from there.
And it is easy to dismiss perodic maintainence as "empire building" or self-generating beauraucracy - particularly to those who think working for the Highway Department is an easy, good-paying, "cushy" job.

...all new infrastructure projects, whether roads, power plants, water systems, are built without regard to long term maintenance. I read a very disturbing study about this just the other day.

In essence, if long term maintenance/replacement costs were figured in to these large projects they would never get built. Taxes would have to be raised exponentially to support them. The scam is that politicians can book short term tax base increases without the long term tax rate increases to support the total cost of ownership.

This is what drove the post war suburban expansion that is now blowing up in our faces. To use a popular term - it is an unfunded mandate that can not be paid.

Here is the article:

http://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme/

As far as rural roads are concerned, they are generally maintained by county government. The money to do so comes in the form of subventions from state and federal gas tax receipts. But budget priorities in the expenditure of these funds are determined by a board of elected officials who are in office for terms of 4 years. These elected folks, knowing they are going to be gone after no more than two or three terms, take the short term view when allocating gas tax dollars. And the short term view definitely does not involve the very unsexy expenditure of road funds for maintenance. Much better for you political future to get your picture taken cutting the ribbon for a new road or bridge than patching a pothole.

The good part about this is the gas tax funds cannot be used for things like building new county buildings or hiring more sheriffs or clerks in the finance department. But the people responsible for maintaining the roads are often overruled by the short term thinking of elected officials. Of course those same elected officials are quick to jump on you when constituents complain about the condition of their roads.

sweetheart deals for the politically connected. Even when the taxpayers pony up or a pile of federal dollars are granted, the funds just disappear into deep pockets and the really rich neighborhoods get all that's left over.

Roads are built to create jobs.
Unlike the European system where built roads are guaranteed for at least 10 years or more, the US road system has no guarantees, just looking for the cheapest cost.
Secondly, by allowing the US to have cheaply made roads that don't last long, it is an excuse for the government to pay more road workers to keep them in business.

It is a jobs subsidy program after all.

Maybe things are different in NH - but we have what they call specifications for road work. In fact, when the Interstate system was built, the states determined the specs that their Interstates were built to, as they were more likely to understand local conditions.
A NH Interstate roadbed is 5' deep, with layers of crushed rock and gravel. We have 50 year old interstates and major highways that are smooth as new. But - NH ain't everywhere. This is a small state, and everybody knows everybody - so it's easy to detect a state highway engineer taking a bribe, and substandard materials are detected before they leave the crusher. Indeed, a bid-rigging scandal among the the biggest paving contractors went undetected for decades, because they always did top quality work, and did'nt get greedy - they mostly rigged the bids to work closer to their own plants. Indeed, the quality of paving hereabouts suffered considerably during the 3 years they were enjoined from bidding.
Our neighbor to the south is another story - specs are shaky, and often not met. There are so may "Authourities" that nobody can keep track of where what is going, or who's in charge of what. And you don't want to know what Boston is built on top of.

like California did the SF-Golden Gate Bridge.

This is going to bite us in the ass, along with a list of other infrastruture shortcomings, and other social net failures.

on them. The infrastructure built to support the industrial and manufacturing powerhouse that
US once was is clearly excessive and too expensive to maintain for the "service and information
economy" that it is now.