HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Hey "some" men ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:34 PM

Hey "some" men of DU

if you feel the need to down play the Hobby Lobby decision
if you feel the need to think righteous anger is "hair on fire"
if you feel the need to diminish the righteous anger by pointing out condoms aren't covered by insurance
if you feel the need to point out that it's only 4 types of contraception that aren't covered (which in fact is an out and out lie)
if you feel the need to say that women can still pay extra for their contraception therefore no rights are infringed upon
if you feel the need to call women who are concerned and angry over the decision hysterical

Kindly go fuck yourself.

361 replies, 10572 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 361 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hey "some" men of DU (Original post)
boston bean Jul 1 OP
undeterred Jul 1 #1
StopTheNeoCons Jul 2 #135
roguevalley Jul 2 #150
boston bean Jul 2 #209
The Magistrate Jul 1 #2
bettyellen Jul 1 #3
truedelphi Jul 2 #162
Katashi_itto Jul 1 #4
boston bean Jul 1 #5
Katashi_itto Jul 1 #6
bettyellen Jul 2 #70
Katashi_itto Jul 2 #77
FSogol Jul 2 #86
bettyellen Jul 2 #211
FSogol Jul 2 #217
Jamastiene Jul 3 #289
bettyellen Jul 3 #291
DURHAM D Jul 3 #306
bettyellen Jul 3 #311
Squinch Jul 4 #336
valerief Jul 2 #103
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2 #166
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #172
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2 #174
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #175
randys1 Jul 2 #176
bettyellen Jul 2 #212
randys1 Jul 2 #214
nomorenomore08 Jul 2 #228
Squinch Jul 3 #312
bettyellen Jul 2 #213
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2 #240
Squinch Jul 3 #321
bettyellen Jul 3 #322
Squinch Jul 3 #323
jeff47 Jul 1 #19
stevenleser Jul 2 #87
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #91
valerief Jul 2 #105
bettyellen Jul 2 #112
KamaAina Jul 2 #139
Ilsa Jul 2 #163
Arugula Latte Jul 2 #171
Katashi_itto Jul 2 #173
randys1 Jul 2 #181
The Roux Comes First Jul 1 #7
AverageJoe90 Jul 1 #17
betsuni Jul 1 #8
hlthe2b Jul 1 #9
HERVEPA Jul 1 #10
boston bean Jul 1 #11
el_bryanto Jul 2 #92
boston bean Jul 2 #93
el_bryanto Jul 2 #95
sheshe2 Jul 1 #12
leftstreet Jul 1 #14
excringency Jul 1 #38
calimary Jul 2 #152
ancianita Jul 1 #22
smirkymonkey Jul 1 #39
Squinch Jul 4 #337
sheshe2 Jul 1 #13
BootinUp Jul 1 #15
onehandle Jul 1 #16
Skittles Jul 1 #31
wandy Jul 1 #18
sheshe2 Jul 1 #37
VWolf Jul 2 #107
DesertDiamond Jul 1 #20
Hekate Jul 1 #21
liberalmuse Jul 1 #23
ColesCountyDem Jul 1 #24
Warren DeMontague Jul 1 #25
ancianita Jul 1 #26
davidpdx Jul 1 #27
steve2470 Jul 1 #28
smirkymonkey Jul 1 #29
Skittles Jul 1 #30
FreedRadical Jul 1 #32
William769 Jul 1 #33
Tanuki Jul 1 #34
liberalhistorian Jul 1 #43
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2 #48
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2 #49
trumad Jul 2 #82
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2 #120
smirkymonkey Jul 2 #74
boston bean Jul 2 #83
redqueen Jul 2 #111
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2 #46
betsuni Jul 2 #69
onehandle Jul 2 #50
randys1 Jul 2 #182
BainsBane Jul 2 #68
PatrickforO Jul 2 #109
wryter2000 Jul 2 #125
William769 Jul 1 #35
Solly Mack Jul 1 #36
sheshe2 Jul 1 #40
William769 Jul 1 #41
liberalhistorian Jul 1 #44
redqueen Jul 2 #110
bettyellen Jul 2 #113
liberalhistorian Jul 2 #141
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #178
Cha Jul 2 #57
greatauntoftriplets Jul 2 #185
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #196
BootinUp Jul 1 #42
ohheckyeah Jul 1 #45
hfojvt Jul 2 #47
bettyellen Jul 2 #66
noiretextatique Jul 2 #153
Squinch Jul 2 #97
hfojvt Jul 2 #127
Squinch Jul 2 #129
hfojvt Jul 2 #137
noiretextatique Jul 2 #154
La Lioness Priyanka Jul 3 #294
CreekDog Jul 3 #310
progree Jul 2 #51
Warpy Jul 2 #52
progree Jul 2 #59
progree Jul 2 #63
VanillaRhapsody Jul 2 #102
myrna minx Jul 2 #131
cui bono Jul 2 #72
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #53
Cha Jul 2 #58
Squinch Jul 4 #338
1StrongBlackMan Jul 4 #340
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #350
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #54
lovemydog Jul 2 #60
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #96
Squinch Jul 4 #339
1StrongBlackMan Jul 8 #361
BainsBane Jul 2 #61
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #89
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #145
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #351
Number23 Jul 2 #165
sheshe2 Jul 2 #71
mcar Jul 2 #108
cui bono Jul 2 #73
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #94
redqueen Jul 2 #115
noiretextatique Jul 2 #155
Number23 Jul 2 #167
rhett o rick Jul 2 #243
Number23 Jul 3 #269
rhett o rick Jul 3 #279
Number23 Jul 3 #319
rhett o rick Jul 3 #327
Number23 Jul 3 #330
rhett o rick Jul 3 #331
Number23 Jul 3 #332
cui bono Jul 3 #270
Squinch Jul 4 #341
1StrongBlackMan Jul 4 #342
rhett o rick Jul 2 #138
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #144
rhett o rick Jul 2 #146
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #148
noiretextatique Jul 2 #156
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #160
noiretextatique Jul 3 #275
rhett o rick Jul 2 #242
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #252
rhett o rick Jul 2 #255
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #260
rhett o rick Jul 2 #261
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #263
rhett o rick Jul 3 #265
1StrongBlackMan Jul 3 #278
rhett o rick Jul 3 #280
1StrongBlackMan Jul 3 #285
rhett o rick Jul 3 #287
Number23 Jul 2 #168
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #231
rhett o rick Jul 2 #239
cyberswede Jul 2 #244
rhett o rick Jul 2 #247
cyberswede Jul 2 #250
rhett o rick Jul 2 #253
cyberswede Jul 2 #257
rhett o rick Jul 3 #286
cyberswede Jul 3 #288
1StrongBlackMan Jul 3 #301
1StrongBlackMan Jul 3 #300
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #356
BainsBane Jul 4 #333
rhett o rick Jul 4 #334
Arugula Latte Jul 3 #296
1StrongBlackMan Jul 3 #302
Arugula Latte Jul 3 #326
Change has come Jul 2 #55
Bobbie Jo Jul 2 #56
alittlelark Jul 2 #62
nolabear Jul 2 #64
bettyellen Jul 2 #65
grahamhgreen Jul 2 #67
MerryBlooms Jul 2 #75
etherealtruth Jul 2 #76
Name removed Jul 2 #78
JTFrog Jul 2 #79
demmiblue Jul 2 #80
redqueen Jul 2 #116
Boom Sound 416 Jul 2 #81
CreekDog Jul 3 #309
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #84
myrna minx Jul 2 #85
planetc Jul 2 #88
ismnotwasm Jul 2 #90
Squinch Jul 2 #98
redqueen Jul 2 #117
Bluenorthwest Jul 2 #99
redqueen Jul 2 #118
valerief Jul 2 #100
ann--- Jul 2 #101
SammyWinstonJack Jul 2 #121
IronLionZion Jul 2 #104
Hepburn Jul 2 #106
SammyWinstonJack Jul 2 #114
UtahLib Jul 2 #119
Javaman Jul 2 #122
Warren DeMontague Jul 2 #157
Electric Monk Jul 2 #158
Warren DeMontague Jul 2 #159
boston bean Jul 2 #187
Warren DeMontague Jul 2 #199
boston bean Jul 2 #202
Warren DeMontague Jul 2 #205
geek tragedy Jul 2 #207
Electric Monk Jul 2 #234
geek tragedy Jul 2 #249
cyberswede Jul 2 #246
Electric Monk Jul 2 #256
cyberswede Jul 2 #259
Warren DeMontague Jul 2 #206
BootinUp Jul 2 #208
Electric Monk Jul 2 #262
stage left Jul 2 #216
Javaman Jul 3 #277
Sherman A1 Jul 2 #123
Sheldon Cooper Jul 2 #134
MarianJack Jul 2 #124
Comrade Grumpy Jul 2 #126
Squinch Jul 2 #132
redqueen Jul 2 #142
ReRe Jul 2 #128
derby378 Jul 2 #130
Squinch Jul 2 #133
Warren Stupidity Jul 2 #136
riqster Jul 2 #140
myrna minx Jul 3 #293
riqster Jul 3 #295
geek tragedy Jul 2 #143
MadrasT Jul 2 #147
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #354
Helen Borg Jul 2 #149
Rider3 Jul 2 #151
Efilroft Sul Jul 2 #161
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #353
JohnnyRingo Jul 2 #164
Squinch Jul 2 #179
boston bean Jul 2 #180
geek tragedy Jul 2 #195
JohnnyRingo Jul 2 #224
geek tragedy Jul 2 #226
JohnnyRingo Jul 3 #266
geek tragedy Jul 3 #267
JohnnyRingo Jul 3 #305
geek tragedy Jul 3 #328
progree Jul 3 #329
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #358
Gormy Cuss Jul 2 #210
hughee99 Jul 2 #219
JohnnyRingo Jul 2 #225
hughee99 Jul 2 #229
CreekDog Jul 3 #292
JohnnyRingo Jul 3 #307
CreekDog Jul 3 #308
DeSwiss Jul 2 #169
Rex Jul 2 #170
Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2 #177
davidn3600 Jul 2 #183
boston bean Jul 2 #186
davidn3600 Jul 2 #194
geek tragedy Jul 2 #197
boston bean Jul 2 #200
geek tragedy Jul 2 #203
boston bean Jul 2 #198
davidn3600 Jul 2 #223
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #357
thucythucy Jul 2 #189
Dr Hobbitstein Jul 2 #191
geek tragedy Jul 2 #193
bettyellen Jul 2 #218
Starry Messenger Jul 2 #221
bettyellen Jul 2 #222
Amaya Jul 2 #184
Brisk Jul 2 #188
boston bean Jul 2 #190
alp227 Jul 2 #227
Logical Jul 2 #233
alp227 Jul 2 #236
Logical Jul 2 #241
alp227 Jul 2 #245
Brisk Jul 3 #264
geek tragedy Jul 3 #268
Brisk Jul 3 #271
boston bean Jul 3 #272
MadrasT Jul 3 #273
Brisk Jul 3 #281
boston bean Jul 3 #282
Name removed Jul 3 #297
Squinch Jul 3 #313
Name removed Jul 3 #315
Squinch Jul 3 #316
Name removed Jul 3 #318
Squinch Jul 3 #320
geek tragedy Jul 2 #192
Squinch Jul 3 #314
PeaceNikki Jul 2 #201
bettyellen Jul 2 #215
cyberswede Jul 2 #248
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 3 #290
Name removed Jul 3 #298
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 3 #299
Name removed Jul 3 #303
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 3 #317
Phentex Jul 7 #344
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 7 #345
Phentex Jul 7 #346
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 7 #347
Phentex Jul 7 #348
Tuesday Afternoon Jul 7 #349
smirkymonkey Jul 8 #359
stage left Jul 2 #204
Gothmog Jul 2 #220
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2 #237
Gothmog Jul 3 #276
City Lights Jul 2 #230
nomorenomore08 Jul 2 #232
mysuzuki2 Jul 2 #235
boston bean Jul 3 #274
phleshdef Jul 3 #325
locdlib Jul 2 #238
Thespian2 Jul 2 #251
yuiyoshida Jul 2 #254
niyad Jul 2 #258
Jamastiene Jul 3 #283
boston bean Jul 3 #284
bettyellen Jul 3 #304
phleshdef Jul 3 #324
Squinch Jul 4 #335
JTFrog Jul 6 #343
bettyellen Jul 8 #352
Silent3 Jul 8 #355
AuntPatsy Jul 8 #360

Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:35 PM

1. + a brazilion

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to undeterred (Reply #1)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:51 AM

135. x 2...nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to undeterred (Reply #1)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:44 PM

150. BOSTON BEAN! I LOVE YOU! HUGS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #150)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:35 PM

209. Luv U too!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:35 PM

2. Hear Hear, Ma'am

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:39 PM

3. they're allowing our health car to be a wedge issue, which encourages RW voters to show up....

they are fucking the Dem party up worse then nyone, by standing on the sidelines.
Fucking idiots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #3)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:22 PM

162. No what the five Justices did was to re-unite the base of voters who are

Left of the Republican party.

Pew Survey results Poll asking how an individual sees themselves)

Spring 2008:

I consider myself a Democratic Party loyalist -- 36% of the voters

I consider myself a Republican Party loyalist -- 22 to 24% of the voters

All the rest - 42 to 4o% of all voters.

Almost same identical stats were compiled by a Gallup poll last Autumn.

So if you unite that 36% of all voters to those in the majority (the 40 to 42% of all voters) assuming that the 40 to 42% is not all libertarians, then the Democratic party should have a shoe in. If people GOTV.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:41 PM

4. There are guys saying that?

What assholes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Katashi_itto (Reply #4)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:42 PM

5. a-yup...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #5)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:43 PM

6. What clueless pricks. They obviously can't see it's a slippery slope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Katashi_itto (Reply #6)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:03 AM

70. and a few suggesting topless protests are great, but boycotts bad.

they are complete assholes who re just here to mock women, and not afraid to show it anymore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #70)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:14 AM

77. Agree! Just saw a few posts too. Total morons.

Discriminate against one sector of the populace and it's then permissible to discriminate against others.

I just directed my company never to buy anything from Hobby Lobby. Don't think it will help in the big picture, but it's damn satisfying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Katashi_itto (Reply #77)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:43 AM

86. They are Conservatives. Each and every one of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FSogol (Reply #86)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:36 PM

211. they are not fooling anyone, and have taken over the hosts' forum and dragged DU

into the fucking mud. Libertarians can post RW shit with impunity, and feminists get degraded here- by hosts. Because Skinner never thought they would game the system.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #211)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:44 PM

217. True. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #211)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:30 PM

289. He could fix that, if he wanted to.

They really have gamed the system. It's a damn shame to see it like this. There are too many out and out conservatives controlling this site. It's a shame that Democrats don't have anywhere to go online where we are not gerrymandered. It's the same concept, really.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jamastiene (Reply #289)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:37 PM

291. exactly- at this point, posters are emboldened to suggest Obama resign, and women show their tits?

And the stupid tits suggestion was from a host, who is openly hostile to women here. Not one host said a thing.
They should just resign instead of being part of the degradation here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #291)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:29 PM

306. I have not seen any indication that

skinner even knows DU has a problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #306)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:56 PM

311. I hate to think he enjoys the extra clicks. But that "educate them" directive is bullshit.

I think he is hard pressed to admit the entire system is gamed by libertarians and childish trolls.
Great sites have actual moderation- but he has allowed the hosts to opt out of all responsibility. At some points Earl G was locking more threads. Juries seem to be doing their work for them these days.

Alerters- I am just discussing the discussion here. Not whining, but stating the god's honest truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DURHAM D (Reply #306)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:35 AM

336. If he doesn't know it, he must have worked awfully hard to avoid knowing it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #70)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:24 AM

103. Those moron topless posts have to be from women haters. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #70)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:30 PM

166. WTF????

There were actually dicks that said that?

And they're not banned?

What? The? Fucking? FUCK?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Reply #166)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:45 PM

172. one is a GD host even!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #172)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:47 PM

174. what. the. FUCK????????????

Are there links to this shit? Like I need my head to explode...........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #175)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:52 PM

176. I saw a topless post but assumed it was from a Woman so I jokingly said yeah...

but I now see the bullshit behind it, sorry

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randys1 (Reply #176)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:38 PM

212. I was surprised you went long with it, because you are usually awesome..... But you know what-

you can sill edit that post. Because we're being trolled by women haters and we;d be grateful if dudes stopped laughing about life and death shit like our reproductive choice. I feel incredibly unwelcome here these days.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #212)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:41 PM

214. It was a total fluke on my part, i can try and find it, i thought it was a lib Woman

saying it...i will try and find it but it may be tough

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #175)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:37 PM

228. I guess it's all just a big joke to that one...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #175)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 04:33 PM

312. What a creep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Reply #174)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:39 PM

213. Courtesy of the hosts, yeah- *some* of them make fun of feminists all the time.

Last edited Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:37 PM - Edit history (1)

And most others look the other way.
So much for community anything these days. Juries are a safer bet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #213)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:56 PM

240. I'm not sure about juries....

But I'm willing to see improvements, if there are any.

That would be nice, to see an increase in the number of people who reject misogynist behavior. It would mean "women's issues" are coming out of the hushed shadows.

The dirty, smelly, weak, stupid, girly, prudish, "no one would want to fuck you anyway", "doesn't affect me", "but what about my unlimited access to sex" shadows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #213)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:32 PM

321. You mean in the host forum? Openly make fun of feminists?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #321)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:36 PM

322. I mean they come out in GD and post "show us your tits" and they call us a "group" in hosts that

can safely be ignored. and pretty much the others say nothing, leave the "tits" thread, ignore the bias.
I should edit to say "some" , the others only look the other way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #322)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:41 PM

323. That's, actually, not surprising. It's beginning to feel like whack-a-mole here with the thinly

disguised conservatives stampeding through every thread. That some of them are hosts was inevitable.

I keep thinking DU can't get uglier with respect to it's tolerance for degrading statements about women and its welcoming of anti-feminist trolls. I keep being proven wrong. It's beginning to feel like a silly form of masochism to post here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Katashi_itto (Reply #4)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:02 AM

87. Ya, hence this response of mine that I thought might earn me my first hide in a while...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #87)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:12 AM

91. oh, ffs. what a total asshole.



(not you, natch)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #87)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:27 AM

105. Good cartoon. I put that OP on Ignore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #87)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:21 AM

112. thank you for taking one for the team, Steve. The anti feminist alerters are rough here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Katashi_itto (Reply #4)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:42 PM

163. Yeah. I pointed out one of them in a new thread and

My thread was locked because it was a "call-out". I was just trying to send lots of DUers over to hammer him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Katashi_itto (Reply #4)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:42 PM

171. Here's another dude telling us wimminfolk to simmer down and not get all outragey:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #171)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:45 PM

173. Quoting Freddy.. "turned out to be media manipulation of the left wing." Just wow....

Blathering away like abortion clinic shootings never happen.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #171)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:02 PM

181. So sick of those folks. so sick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:44 PM

7. Yikes!

I would like to think that at least the great majority of non-troll men here are wholly aghast at the truly obnoxious HL "ruling." I suspect most of us can't help but feel remorse that the tool-kit for a male wanting to limit the chance of pregnancy is so sparse. We should be able to agree that we are in this together, sister. That is certainly my position. This was an absolutely awful paternalistic SC call by a largely out-of-touch a-legalistic RC-dominated court.

But I suspect I am a bit of a naïf on this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Roux Comes First (Reply #7)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:57 PM

17. I know I was horrified by this.

But I suspect I am a bit of a naïf on this.


I don't think so, TBH. There definitely do seem to be a few who really don't get the slippery slope thing, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:45 PM

8. So let it be written, so let it be done

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:49 PM

9. Amen (from an agnostic)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:52 PM

10. Very very very few men of DU feel that way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HERVEPA (Reply #10)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:54 PM

11. Therefore the qualifier of 'some'.

There are enough of them to be very noticeable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #11)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:12 AM

92. For clarification - why is some in quotations?

Generally when I see that I believe that it is included facetiously - the implication is that the opposite is meant. But that doesn't seem to be the case here.

Bryant

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to el_bryanto (Reply #92)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:13 AM

93. right.

I was meant to add emphasis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #93)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:18 AM

95. Thank you for clarifying. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HERVEPA (Reply #10)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:54 PM

12. It's sad that any do. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HERVEPA (Reply #10)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:56 PM

14. I've seen a few his-terical posts from them

Not much though

Although even one can produce a lot of controversy and get said poster a lot of attention

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftstreet (Reply #14)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:40 PM

38. I prefer the term...

..."ballistic."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to excringency (Reply #38)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:28 PM

152. Welcome to DU, excringency!

Glad you're here! Either way, the point is made. I think there are all kinds of directions we should try to follow, in fighting this. How 'bout let's go after that damn religious protection law that's being stretched all outta shape and is now playing center stage in the Unintended Consequences Theater. Let's go after the Hyde Amendment. Let's partner EVERY bill that involves ANY curtailment of contraceptive coverage - with a corresponding curtailment of Viagra coverage. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander. This door swings both ways and we should absolutely help it do precisely that! We have to SHOW them how it hurts them, too, and how draconian approaches like this, which they assume only puts more controls on women, smacks them in the ass too.

Taste of their own medicine. See how they like it. Being nice and trying to reason with them sure doesn't work. Perhaps it's time to try a different approach.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HERVEPA (Reply #10)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:12 PM

22. Agreed. Almost all DU men know this situation is an equality issue for them as much as for women.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HERVEPA (Reply #10)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:41 PM

39. Good to know.

Thank You!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HERVEPA (Reply #10)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:42 AM

337. But those that do are among the most vocal and there are more of them every day.

And as bettyellen has pointed out, they are a force within the hosting group. They are steering the direction of the site, whether most men agree with them or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:55 PM

13. Thank you bean. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:56 PM

15. *Raises voice in agreement*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:57 PM

16. You ladies need to put all of this energy into baking us dudes a pie.

I kid... I kid...

I don't even like pie.

"Some" men of DU can truly go fuck themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #16)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:33 PM

31. I WILL KICK PIE-JOKING ONEHANDLE ASS

YES INDEED

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:04 PM

18. First let me make it clear that I am not one of those "some" men........

If I may, let me bring up something that "some" men may not have thought about.

It's as important to you as it is to her.

Now fellows go sit quietly somewhere and think about that.
If you don't see the logic in that you might ought to do what the lady suggested.
Likely all by your little self.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wandy (Reply #18)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:39 PM

37. You get a huge hug here and now.

wandy.

You got. You got it all!

"It's as important to you as it is to her."


Thank you. You got what so many did not!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wandy (Reply #18)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:50 AM

107. "It's as important to you as it is to her"

And even if it weren't, empathy should be one of our greatest strengths.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:07 PM

20. Well said, boston bean!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:11 PM

21. For me, the HL decision just keeps sinking deeper and deeper in. Stunning. And then to have to fight

...about it here with people ("some" men and at least one woman) who have no intention of changing their minds ...

Well, thank you for the sentiment, boston bean.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:15 PM

23. Someone had to say it!

Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:16 PM

24. +1000! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:16 PM

25. I agree. The decision is atrocious, and not too surprisingly it breaks on ideological lines.

Points up the importance of winning presidential elections. No difference my ass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:17 PM

26. Thanks for the post. It's a timely reminder to men about "jokes."



A few minutes ago, a lawyer friend of mine retracted his "jokey" post about it on FB after I'd made the case that that snark is insidious, women are snark weary and not putting up with it anymore, and how men need to recognize that this decision is also a harbinger of the fascism they'll be living under, as well, if this wannabe theocratic oligarchy gets its way. It took another male friend posting, "Yeah, this is bullshit" for him to delete the post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:17 PM

27. We all need to be pissed about the Hobby Lobby decision

SCOTUS has gone rogue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:20 PM

28. I think the women of DU are reacting very normally to the decision

The decision effectively disenfranchises women of valuable insurance coverage and of equal rights, and opens the Pandora's Box to many ways greedy RW corporations can evade pesky laws pertaining to sexism, racism, homophobia, etc.

Which "religions" are valid ? What's a sincerely held belief that's being burdened by the state ? Can privately held companies now legally pay women much less than men because of....Leviticus or some such nonsense ? Can PHC now refuse to hire PoC because of some nonsense in the Old Testament ?

Justice Ginsberg hit the nail on the freaking head. I'm with you, DU ladies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:22 PM

29. Thank YOU!

And if there are any DU men who feel that way (and I know a lot of you do not, so we are not speaking to you - we know you support us and we very much appreciate you!) please do not condescend to us by making us feel like we are over re-acting to this decision because it it is something that affects our lives very much.

We are hurt and upset by this. Please try to understand. Thank You!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:32 PM

30. THANK YOU

sick of idiots like that who JUST.DO.NOT.F***ING.GET.IT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:33 PM

32. Its really too bad that a statement like that would be required on this site.

It is a god damn shame when you think we have been all over these grounds. People have already fought and died for rights such as choice, voting, and gay freedoms. FREEDOM. Only to find ourselves back at the starting point.

I can't say I am surprised though. We are up against some nasty and vindictive and soulless people. The reason I am not surprised is that in the last 8 years, for every gain made, some shitty vindictive payback from their side has happened. Remember that shit in California on the night this country elected its first Black President. And fox was getting off on blaming Black People for a Mormon sponsored initiative. Just as vindictive as you could possibly be. Now gay marriage is nearly the law of the land, and what happens? A vindictive attack on choice.

Now we have professional trolls on this board intellectualizing hate, and calling it discourse. Just remember fuckers, you may win your little victories, but you know and we know, you are going to lose the revolution.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:34 PM

33. Well said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:37 PM

34. Jury results:

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

I understand the sentiment, but go fuck yourself is a violation. Disruptive, hurtful, rude, OTT, and otherwise inappropriate. Please, we don't need this disruptive META in GD. Please hide.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 1, 2014, 08:34 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Fuck that, alerter. This site has been subjected to so much misogynist bullshit since DU 3 started, much of it left to stand by juries, and lately it has increased noticeably. It is only right to let women fight back. Fair is fair.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Have absolutely no problem with this post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It needed to be said, I am glad it hot said, and there is no way in hell I would vote to hide this. Here's to you boston bean :clapping:
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Methinks the alerter doth protest too much. Hey, alerter, are you one of those "some men"?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Under most circumstances, I'd vote to hide. But this is a response to blatant sexism. Recommend that the poster herself edit last line.
----------------------------

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tanuki (Reply #34)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:52 PM

43. I especially love the first juror's

comment infused with righteous anger! It's been truly shocking to me, as a gal, the level of outright and blatant misogyny and sexism here the past few years and the numbers of men coming out openly against feminism, claiming that DV is as bad, if not worse, for men, that men have it worse because of false accusations, that all the privileges now go to women, etc., etc. Some openly call child support "male enslavement", claim women's very real fears of being raped or assaulted to be hysterical overreaction, etc., etc. I could go on and on. And all of that shit is allowed to stand by juries. They see nonexistent misandry EVERYWHERE, but, to them, there's no such thing as sexism and women have it made in the shade. They can say what they want about women and no one is allowed to challenge them and if they do then they must be a bitter feminazi. But let a poster here tell the truth about them and they're screaming misandry, misandry, alertalertalert. And I am fucking SICK TO DEATH of it. I've been on here for eleven years, and this place didn't used to be like this at all nor did it tolerate this bullshit.

And why is it that almost every single thread devoted to discussing some aspect of sexism is derailed by posters asking "what about this or that ism, that's just as important", such threads are almost NEVER allowed to fully and completely just discuss sexism. And anyone who complains about that is just a bitter, man-hating sexist who's out to get men. GAH.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalhistorian (Reply #43)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:06 AM

48. right on. amen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalhistorian (Reply #43)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:09 AM

49. so with you, and the OP.

Right on, goddammit.

Great jury result, there too. Finally, more people are seeing through these dickbrains that pollute this site.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Reply #49)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:34 AM

82. Love your Cat Gif...

Hilarious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Reply #82)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:44 AM

120. lol!!! thanks!

He cracks me up all the time too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalhistorian (Reply #43)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:44 AM

74. +1000

I could not agree with this more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalhistorian (Reply #43)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:38 AM

83. Thank you for stating this!

It's the righteous truth of the matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalhistorian (Reply #43)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:17 AM

111. Fuckin A!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tanuki (Reply #34)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:04 AM

46. Dear Juror #7 = I agree. Last line needs editing. Please delete the word :Kindly:

Thank you for your cooperation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #46)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:57 AM

69. That's what I thought, too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tanuki (Reply #34)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:15 AM

50. The DU Jury system is fucked.

Time to require that alerters and jurors be star members.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #50)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:03 PM

182. How about using rightwing court punishment on alerters

i.e.

you alert on someone and if your alerting is found to be whiney or right wingy, you get a strike

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tanuki (Reply #34)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:50 AM

68. Excellent jury!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tanuki (Reply #34)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:04 AM

109. LOL. Looks like this jury voted to nullify...

Women need to be able to fight back. She wasn't telling anyone specific to 'f' himself, after all. It was a general comment aimed at 'those men' who don't think the HL decision was a big deal.

It was a big deal though - another skirmish in the ultra-right's war against women.

The idea that women shouldn't be equal is pretty ingrained in our culture, though. My wife and I watched a documentary yesterday that was about some books that didn't make it into the Torah or Bible. Specifically, the documentary told the story of Lilith, who was made side by side with Adam, equal. When she refused to submit to Adam, Lilith was driven away with the threat that 100 of her children would by killed by God each day she continued to refuse to submit (I guess the Judeo-Christian God is a misogynist too). Then, God, regretting that he made Lilith equal to Adam decided to make woman submissive, and Eve was made out of Adam's rib.

So there it is; completely INGRAINED in our culture. Inequality is even in our creation myths.

This is why our government must KEEP US FREE FROM RELIGION.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tanuki (Reply #34)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:18 AM

125. That's a very pleasant surprise eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:38 PM

35. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Tue Jul 1, 2014, 08:28 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Hey "some" men of DU
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025181214

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

I understand the sentiment, but go fuck yourself is a violation. Disruptive, hurtful, rude, OTT, and otherwise inappropriate. Please, we don't need this disruptive META in GD. Please hide.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 1, 2014, 08:34 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Fuck that, alerter. This site has been subjected to so much misogynist bullshit since DU 3 started, much of it left to stand by juries, and lately it has increased noticeably. It is only right to let women fight back. Fair is fair.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Have absolutely no problem with this post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It needed to be said, I am glad it hot said, and there is no way in hell I would vote to hide this. Here's to you boston bean :clapping:
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Methinks the alerter doth protest too much. Hey, alerter, are you one of those "some men"?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Under most circumstances, I'd vote to hide. But this is a response to blatant sexism. Recommend that the poster herself edit last line.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

For transparency, I was juror #5.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #35)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:38 PM

36. Excellent!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #35)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:47 PM

40. Bravo and Brava to the jury!



I have no clue what "some" here at DU do not understand about this decision and how it effects more than just women!

BeJeebus! This is embarrassing

thanks William.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sheshe2 (Reply #40)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:49 PM

41. It was the right thing to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #35)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:53 PM

44. Thank you! I wish juror #1

would come forward so that we could all give him or her a box of virtual roses!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalhistorian (Reply #44)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:06 AM

110. That'd be me.

Checked in after dinner and immediately got called to jury for this thread. What a nice surprise to see the results were 0-7

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to redqueen (Reply #110)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:22 AM

113. well done, RQ!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to redqueen (Reply #110)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:40 PM

141. Good job, RQ!

And keep it up, we need to really start fighting back.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to redqueen (Reply #110)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:55 PM

178. i'm glad you were on that jury, rq

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #35)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:42 AM

57. LOl, William.. I was wondering if anybody might alert on this

righteous callout.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #35)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:07 PM

185. Woo hoo!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #35)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:21 PM

196. i'm glad you were on that jury, Bill!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:51 PM

42. Hey some alerter of this thread! Please re-read the OP!

Take your time with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:59 PM

45. .....sideways. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:05 AM

47. even thinking something is a crime

Why do people think things, anyway?

"The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent be he also refuses to hate him." p. 103

"Here, then, is the hard challenge and the sublime opportunity: to let the spirit of Christ work toward fashioning a truly great Christian nation." p. 210

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hfojvt (Reply #47)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:30 AM

66. Are you confused that RW anti women bullshit should be welcome here?


thinking is a crime where? where did you get that ridiculous idea? Links?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #66)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:36 PM

153. he's a perpetual victim

Of the thought police because "some" of his views are not appreciated. Most actually.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hfojvt (Reply #47)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:34 AM

97. Again, you need to read these OP's before you comment on them. Read this one carefully.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #97)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:24 AM

127. if you feel the need to think I missed something

you could point it out.

Still looks to me like "if you say the wrong thing, or think the wrong thing, then fu$% off."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hfojvt (Reply #127)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:28 AM

129. And no one is surprised.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #129)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:00 PM

137. about what?

You said I misunderstood something, and yet cannot say what it is.

Or will not.

No one is surprised that little old me is one of the people who needs to go fuck himself.

Or no one is surprised that little old me cannot understand this OP which is all about love and compassion and understanding?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #129)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:36 PM

154. not at all eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hfojvt (Reply #47)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:16 PM

294. wtf are you talking about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hfojvt (Reply #47)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:54 PM

310. What are you talking out of?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:19 AM

51. Great list - here's another "it's only a few closely held corporations" (so far). & "a very narrow

Last edited Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:57 PM - Edit history (11)

decision" (somebody on the PBS Newshour)

Added On Edit:

- it was a very narrow decision because:

- it's just some pills and devices for a bunch of women

- it affects only women who are dating / married to a guy too cheap to pick up the tab for the contraceptives

- abstinence is always an option

- there are other jobs out there. Nobody is making you work for a closely held corporation owned by a religious fundamentalist (thx Cui Bono)

- You can always buy your own insurance -- chances are these kinds of companies pay so little that you'll probably qualify for a huge subsidy if you buy on the ACA exchanges, maybe even Medicaid if you live in a Medicaid expansion state (thx Cui Bono)

- the ruling still doesn't allow religious conscience exemptions for transfusions, vaccinations, and so on, only just for contraceptives

- it doesn't impose Sharia law (except on this one issue)

- it's not like they took away your guns or anything really major like that

- it's not like they've let the camel into the tent, it's just the camel's nose under the tent.
(The camel in the tent is the official establishment of Christian Sharia Law (Chriria). That will take many many years. In the meantime, lighten up! )

- the ruling is not taking away ALL the ACA benefits from women. Women still get SOME benefits under the ACA (so let's work on an attitude of gratitude. Turn that frown upside down)


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to progree (Reply #51)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:22 AM

52. Their "clarification" today made it broad enough to cover every Catholic owned business

in the country, including hospitals.

Catholic hospitals are a sick joke for women who can only expect full medical care above the waist and below the knees.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warpy (Reply #52)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:44 AM

59. I'm hoping most Catholic owned businesses won't opt for that or even want to

I've seen surveys that American Catholics use contraception at about the same rates as Americans in general (a very high rate), despite official church doctrine, so hopefully American Catholic business owners will have the same attitudes ... but yes, I saw the "clarification" (below)


http://news.yahoo.com/justices-act-other-health-law-mandate-cases-133633160--politics.html

Tuesday's orders apply to companies owned by Catholics who oppose all contraception. Cases involving Colorado-based Hercules Industries Inc., Illinois-based Korte & Luitjohan Contractors Inc. and Indiana-based Grote Industries Inc. were awaiting action pending resolution of the Hobby Lobby case.


Thread dedicated to the "clarification" for anyone interested in more about it: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025178158

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warpy (Reply #52)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:00 AM

63. Here's 8 Minnesota companies - 5 of the 8 say they are Catholic

Last edited Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:02 PM - Edit history (2)

Here's just two of the five Catholic ones for convenience of reference --

http://www.mprnews.org/story/2014/07/01/hobby-lobby-minnesota-plaintiffs?WT.mc_id=_WT_AUTOGEN_VALUE_

Eight Minnesota companies were among plaintiffs affected by Monday's Supreme Court ruling that some companies with religious objections can avoid the contraceptives requirement in President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. Here are the companies.

Plaintiffs: Feltl and Company, Inc., John C. Feltl and Mary Jo Feltl
Location: Minneapolis
Industry: Securities brokerage and investment banking
Excerpt from the complaint: The Feltls hold sincere religious beliefs based on the Roman Catholic Catechism which states "abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a 'criminal' practice" and which states "direct sterilization" and "contraception" are morally unacceptable.

Plaintiffs: American Mfg Company, Rev. Mr. (Deacon) Gregory E. Hall
Location: St. Joseph, Minn.
Industry: Mud pumps and parts
Excerpt from the complaint: Deacon Hall is a Roman Catholic Deacon of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston assigned to Christ Redeemer Catholic Church where he conducts religious services and preaches...Deacon Hall is required as a Deacon to teach that contraception and abortion are sinful and morally unacceptable under Catholic religious law...Deacon Hall is also required to practice in his life, even in his business, what he preaches as a minister.


8 plaintiffs just in Minnesota. Minnesota has about 1/57 of the U.S.'s population. And I think we (Minnesotans) are less Catholic and less evangelical than the nation on average... So, nationwide, could be a lot of companies, especially considering the likelihood that only a small percentage that feel this way actually signed on as plaintiffs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to progree (Reply #63)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:17 AM

102. and without crosses on thier logo how are we

Supposed to know. I think we need an executive order that says you must publically display your religious affiliation in order to opt out of the requirement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to progree (Reply #63)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:34 AM

131. Thanks for posting. I know people who are in a position to boycott some of these

specialized companies in MN. This is good to know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to progree (Reply #51)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:39 AM

72. I just had someone tell me that one can always get another job or pay for their own insurance.

Completely missing the point that it is discrimination against women and it's allowing individuals to force their religious beliefs on others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:23 AM

53. And if you feel the need to say ...

this decision was bad; but President "Obama's compromise" was just as bad, while pointing out ... twice ... how this decision differed from the compromise, well ... BB told you what to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #53)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:44 AM

58. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #53)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:50 AM

338. That whole thread was just one big troll train wreck.

Thankfully he got smacked down pretty good, but he is someone who has been spreading that manure for a long time here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #338)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:55 AM

340. Yep ...

and he gets mad DU love.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #53)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:25 AM

350. *groan*

some people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:32 AM

54. It amazes me ...

How the pattern always plays out here on DU, a woman/PoC/GLBTQ member reacts to an outrageous act ... and the liberals on DU feel the need to tell us/them that we really shouldn't be upset because ... well ... because!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:53 AM

60. I imagine them reacting to the infamous Dred Scott opinion:

"It only narrowly applies to property law."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lovemydog (Reply #60)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:28 AM

96. LOL ...

Followed by a dissertation on how terrible a decision it was because it benefits the 1% and exacerbates the income equity problem ... the slave-plaintiffs, and Africans as a class, being denied basic personage rights, under the law ... well ... the 1%!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lovemydog (Reply #60)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:52 AM

339. OR: You could go to Canada, so it's not that big a deal. OR: Its REAL danger is in the

slippery slope. Yeah, it means in the short run that an entire race of people will live in eternal slavery, but it is possible that someday it will lead to decisions that affect ME!!!!112@!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #339)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:09 AM

361. LOL ...

Slippery 1% Slope!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:55 AM

61. BECAUSE it's not about them

and therefore can't really be worth getting upset about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #61)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:10 AM

89. Bingo ...

I can't decide whether this is about the privilege, or whether we are just experiencing a wave of narcissism, here at DU.

Well, here this might help:

http://psychcentral.com/quizzes/narcissistic.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #89)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:14 PM

145. I took the test and scored a 6. eom.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #145)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:34 AM

351. I scored a 2. I am not sure that's very healthy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #61)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:29 PM

165. In a nutshell...

You nailed it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:05 AM

71. They know far more than we do.

We need to trust their instincts in these matters, that's what they want us to believe.

My opinion, they don't have a clue what they are talking about and probably never will. Sometimes it takes forever for dawn to break over Marblehead ( that's a metro Boston term) it fits here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sheshe2 (Reply #71)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:55 AM

108. Aah Marblehead

One of my favorite places. My sister lived there for 20 years and is now back in Boston.

Sorry for the off-topic: Boston bean is 100% correct.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:40 AM

73. It's not the liberals saying that stuff.

I hope you meant to put that in quotations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #73)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:18 AM

94. Each and every person that has written the above statements ...

has stated, on several occasions, that they are the really, real liberals, the defenders of liberal principles and the Democratic base ... and there are many here that break their necks to co-sign they're the really, real liberals, the defenders of liberal principles and the Democratic base.

So, No ... No quotation marks are necessary, here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #94)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:25 AM

115. Yes, they are liberals and Dems. Among feminists elsewhere they are commonly referred to as

either brogressives or brocialists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #94)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:42 PM

155. most of these people are socially conservative

But economic liberals, sort of. Thy are by no means socially liberal, no matter how loudly they proclaim to be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #94)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:31 PM

167. Thank you for not falling for that.The disingenous "liberals can't be sexist/racist/homophobic" crap

has been THOROUGHLY disproven for about a hundred years. And even if it hadn't, two days on DU would certainly disprove it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #167)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:06 PM

243. By definition sexist/racist/homophobic ARE NOT LIBERALS. How do they qualify for the label of

liberal if they dont believe the principles that are liberal? And plez dont try the "they call themselves liberal". A lot of people here call themselves liberals that arent.

Why is it so important to disparage liberals, especially in an election year?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #243)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:18 AM

269. Racism is a stew in which this entire country has been steeped.

You keep telling yourself that no white liberals are afflicted by it. The rest of us will continue to live in the real world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #269)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:56 AM

279. So you think that only you "live in the real world"? A bit audacious dont you think?

The very definition of liberalism excludes racists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #279)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 05:49 PM

319. Like I said, you just keep telling yourself that. Perhaps one day you'll convince yourself

The rest of us will CONTINUE to live in the real world where we know what you're saying is la la fantasy land foolishness that is not supported by any historical evidence. Even many abolitionists held racist tendencies.

It is apparent that you are invested in pretending that white liberals can't be racists but it's unfortunate for you that the rest of us know better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #319)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:37 PM

327. BY DEFINITION, RACISTS ARE NOT LIBERAL. Being liberal means, by definition, you are not racist.

Once it's revealed a person is a racist, they lose their "liberal" badge.

You want so badly to paint liberals in a bad light. Why, would you do that on a liberal message board?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #327)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:41 PM

330. KEEP TELLING YOURSELF THAT. SHOUT it if you need to

IT DOES NOT CHANGE REALITY. No matter how desperately you obviously need it to.

Every black leader this country has known has said this same thing about white liberals. MLK, Malcolm you name it. Do you think I'd take your word over theirs, and particularly when I know the truth for myself?

You keep hollering, screaming if you need to do that white liberals cannot and have never been racist. As I've said a hundred times now - THE REST OF US KNOW BETTER.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #330)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:45 PM

331. "The Rest of Us Know Better". Really. You need to hate so badly you dont care who

you include. You dont know better. You would alienate those that would be your friends. How sad.

Liberals arent racists and those that disparage liberals must be conservatives. Now we all know that conservatives are most often racists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #331)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:55 PM

332. You are so invested in your fantasy you are calling the truth "hate"

And it's funny and pathetic as hell as the same time.

Because you are invested in falsehoods and ignorant of history, you expect the rest of us to be too?? Not gonna happen. Sorry that the truth pains you so much. Actually, I'm not sorry one bit. You need to educate yourself and stop wasting time throwing on the Coat of Victimhood and pretending that acknowledging that white liberals -- like ALL people -- are as susceptible to racism as everyone else is such an agonizing, painful thing to acknowledge. You might think liberals are superhuman but no one else does.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #94)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 04:11 AM

270. Yeah, after posting I realized you are probably right.

There's a lot of people on here who I agree with on most policy that say some pretty sexist things. Then there are some who are championing women's rights but defend centrist policy, even right wing policy, and I mean a lot of it. So I think there's a lot of people on here who are very liberal on certain things but not on others. I find it weird myself.

It would be interesting to see a pie chart of it all, see how the percentages are for each area. But it would have to be based on the content of their posts and not how they self-identify.

Because there's a good amount of people on here who think they are liberals but defend policy and stances that are centrist at best. It's surprising really. And it's not just about bigotry/social issues that you mentioned, which I have seen too much of, it's also about a lot of government actions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #94)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 09:04 AM

341. And every single one of them seems to claim that they spend all their

free time as abortion clinic escorts. If you believe what you read on DU, it's all the most sexist and nasty guys escorting women at abortion clinics. I find myself doubting that claim often here.

If this thread weren't petering out, I would expect to get a response to this post from one of them that goes along the lines of, "Well I used to do that, but because you are so mean about it, I won't any more!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #341)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 09:30 AM

342. Yep ...

I would expect to get a response to this post from one of them that goes along the lines of, "Well I used to do that, but because you are so mean about it, I won't any more!"


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:28 PM

138. It amazes me that you use this opportunity to trash liberals. "And the liberals on DU" Apparently

you are including all the liberals on DU. I dont understand this on a liberal message board. If you are not a liberal, what are you?

By the way the liberals on the SCOTUS stood up for women's rights while the Conservatives didnt.

There are a lot of conservative here that claim to be liberals. They are easy to recognize because they support the TPP, XL Pipeline, and fracking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #138)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:05 PM

144. First, I am speaking of a particular sub-set of DU ...

that's what "Each and every person that has written the above statements ..." means. And that's what, "Hey, SOME men ..." means in the OP.

Secondly, what particularly is "liberal" about the statements that this thread has referred to?

By the way the liberals on the SCOTUS stood up for women's rights while the Conservatives didnt.


And the liberals on the SCOTUS haven't made any of the statements that this thread has highlighted; however, the Conservatives on the SCOTUS, and liberals on this site have ... so what are you saying?

There are a lot of conservative here that claim to be liberals. They are easy to recognize because they support the TPP, XL Pipeline, and fracking.


On this, we largely agree; but, I would extend the conservative identifier to include those that support the racial/gender status quo, and/or support the roll-back of a woman's right to control her own body, in general, and those that don't give a sh!t about/attempt to shut down discussions of racial/gender interests. That was largely the point of my post.

Finally, "Chuck a rock ... the dog that yelps, be the dog done got hit."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #144)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:17 PM

146. " First, I am speaking of a particular sub-set of DU" No you werent. You were very clear.

Here are your words, "It amazes me ...How the pattern always plays out here on DU, a woman/PoC/GLBTQ member reacts to an outrageous act ... and the liberals on DU feel the need to tell us/them that we really shouldn't be upset..." That is addressed to "the liberals on DU". And if you are "chucking rocks" at liberals, I am yelping.

You also say, "... I would extend the conservative identifier to include those that support the racial/gender status quo, and/or support the roll-back of a woman's right to control her own body, in general, and those that don't give a sh!t about/attempt to shut down discussions of racial/gender interests. " and I would completely agree. Trying to paint me with that brush is very odd. Why would you do that? Dont we need to stick together on this issue?

On Edit: If you arent liberal, what are you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #146)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:56 PM

148. B.S. ...

as you have pointed out by quoting my words ... I am/was ONLY talking about those "liberals on DU feel the need to tell us/them that we really shouldn't be upset...", when "a woman/PoC/GLBTQ member reacts to an outrageous act ..."

So tell me, Mr./Ms "not all men/liberals", how am talking about all liberals on this site?


You also say, "... I would extend the conservative identifier to include those that support the racial/gender status quo, and/or support the roll-back of a woman's right to control her own body, in general, and those that don't give a sh!t about/attempt to shut down discussions of racial/gender interests. " and I would completely agree. Trying to paint me with that brush is very odd. Why would you do that? Dont we need to stick together on this issue?


Damn ... why do some liberals (I said SOME {ETA: but in this case I am referring specifically to you}) liberals work so hard at placing themselves in a class to be offended?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #148)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:49 PM

156. because they are not liberals

Really. Any troll can come here and claim to be liberal, then spou every racist, sexist meme in the book...that means they are not liberals. Some seem vested in pretending real liberals are actually conservatives, but that makes no sense. So logic tells me that a person who claims to be a liberal has consistently liberal views, whereas a person who does not is not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to noiretextatique (Reply #156)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:11 PM

160. But as you have pointed out ...

there are some/many here that are liberal economically; but not socially. And there are some/many here that seem to claim the economic stuff, as the touchstone of liberal interests ... I disagree. I value social equality/equity over the economic stuff, every time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #160)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 07:43 AM

275. again...they are not liberal

Just as economic conservatives are not liberal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #148)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:02 PM

242. If you think I am offended you give yourself too much credit.

You tried to disparage liberals. Now you say you only meant "some liberals" and I still say BS. No liberals act as you accused. And if you are not a liberal what are you? I dont know, help me out.

"Chuck a rock ... the dog that yelps, be the dog done got hit." Again, if you are chucking rocks at liberals, they will yelp.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #242)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:34 PM

252. I rarely say this; but ...

STFU ...

Trying to paint ME with that brush is very odd. Why would you do that?


If you think I'm talking about you, when I have clearly described the subset of posters that I am talking about ... then, you are full of "working hard to be the victim" sh!t.

Wait ... let me ask ... You do understand the English language, right?

If English is your 4th language, I'll go line by line for you.

You tried to disparage liberals.


No ... I was disparaging those people that post on this site how liberal they are AND tell PoC and woman when, and how, they should reaction to an outrageous act.

Now you say you only meant "some liberals" and I still say BS.


No ... that is what I have been saying from the start; but maybe conditional/sentences with qualifiers confuse you.

No liberals act as you accused.


Yes, they do ... hence the OP. Or, at least they claim to be liberals AND other liberals break in to co-sign their liberalness.

And if you are not a liberal what are you?


Oh ... I am a Democrat that subscribes to liberal principles; and that does not include defending folks that say un-liberal stuff, despite them and others calling them liberals.

Again, if you are chucking rocks at liberals, they will yelp.


Again ... why do you insist on lumping yourself in with a/the subset of posters that call themselves (with other defending them as) liberals, while posting racist/sexist crap?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #252)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:45 PM

255. People that are bigots, sexists, misogynists are not liberal by definition.

If you wish to disparage bigots, sexists, and misogynists, go for it and I will support you. But there are far too many in DU that try to disparage liberals in general.

As far as telling me to Shut The Fuck Up, I've heard that before. I think it was Rahmbo Emanuel. He doesnt like liberals either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #255)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:08 PM

260. And/But ...

If you wish to disparage bigots, sexists, and misogynists, go for it and I will support you. But there are far too many in DU that try to disparage liberals in general.


I'm not one of them.

As far as telling me to Shut The Fuck Up, I've heard that before. I think it was Rahmbo Emanuel. He doesnt like liberals either.


What does that have to do with anything ... other than, a low thinly veiled slap at the President Obama administration of about 5 or 6 years ago?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #260)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:09 PM

261. I apologize if I overreacted. I am sensitive about supposed "politically liberals" attacking

liberals. It happens way too much here. I see it as an attempt to drive a wedge between the liberals and whatever they call themselves (often called DLC, The Third Way, etc.)

I hope we can work together to see that progressive Democrats prevail in 2014 and 2016.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #261)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:20 PM

263. I am working to see Democrats ...

on every ballot ... I prefer progressives, that care about more than just combatting the 1%, and economic issues; but those that will, also, work to address the unacceptable racial/gender/GLBTQ status quo.

And then after the primaries, I will work to get ever Democrat on the ballot elected, whether DLC, 3rd-way, or however ones wishes to categorize them ... because the guy/gal with the "D" after is/will be far better than anyone with an "R" after their name.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #263)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:44 AM

265. I will work extra hard for progressives, but sorry, I have seen too many Blue Dogs stab

us in the back. I understand your reasoning for supporting them but I cant do it. I think we are where we are because the damn Blue Dogs support the Republicans every chance they get. Look who supported Bush?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #265)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:25 AM

278. In truth ...

it's not just the "Blue Dogs." Even the Bluest of Blue-dogs vote with the Democratic Caucus on 70+% of the votes. The seminal, distinctive vote that demonstrates(ed) support for Bush found was the Iraq War Resolution. It found only 156, voting "No" ... and that included some republicans.

I can understand holding one's nose and voting for a Blue dog; but I cannot see not voting for a Blue dog ... it's simply a matter of math and recognized self-interest (e.g., 70 > 1).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #278)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:04 AM

280. I will agree with you on paper. But if a Democrat supported Dick Cheney's war crimes,

or is a known homophobe or racist, for example, I can not vote for them. If the system has gotten so bad that that's our only choice, then we need to do something drastic. Following the lesser of evils method has slowly ratcheted the lower classes to a point of almost total subjugation. Each time it's only a little worse than before until it's too late to fight back. We've been following this method for 30 years and it looks grim to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #280)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 10:47 AM

285. I agree ...

the "lesser of two evils" is frustrating; but what is more frustrating for me is the refusal to acknowledge that there are regions/districts where the "better candidate", cannot win/has not won ... it is there, and IMO, there alone, where the hated Blue-dogs have value.

But the call for "something drastic", is a lot like all of paul ryan's plans ... it relies on some magical event that is unlikely to occur. And relying on/planning based on that magical event is not living in reality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #285)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:03 AM

287. The term "reality" gets bandied about. I see the current "reality" as not having

a path out of this mess. IMO we are getting farther behind every day. Granted we are gaining some much needed social changes, but if we continue on the path of losing our freedoms and liberties via the NSA/CIA and losing our economic liberties via Wall Street, we will get to a point were we can smoke marijuana in the soup lines. Following the status quo wont fix us. We will need something drastic and I am not speaking of violence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #144)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:33 PM

168. "Chuck a rock ... the dog that yelps, be the dog done got hit."



Truth!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #168)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:48 PM

231. For the life of me ...

I can't understand how/why someone would work so hard to put themselves in the/a class being criticized. I've always thought, "If the shoe don't fit, why try and force it on?"

But then again, maybe those whining "notallmen/liberal" see themselves in the criticism?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #168)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:56 PM

239. Yes I totally agree. If you are chucking rocks at liberals then liberals will yelp. But why

are you chucking rocks at liberals.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #239)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:08 PM

244. He's chucking rocks only at the people who behave a certain way.

I'm a liberal, and I know he wasn't referring to me - as I don't engage in the behavior he described.

Likewise, if you don't engage in that behavior, then he wasn't referring to you, either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #244)


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #247)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:33 PM

250. Seriously?

If you can see me reading threads on DU, then you'll see me in threads on those topics. If you think that only people who post prolifically in those threads qualify as liberal, then you're wrong.

I think you misunderstood 1strongblackman's post, and you're digging in your heels trying to remain insulted, for some reason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #250)


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #253)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:55 PM

257. I think we'll have to agree to disagree...

I honestly don't think he intended to disparage liberals.

And I'm glad the liberals on the court supported women's rights.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #257)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 10:57 AM

286. I will admit that I may have overreacted. I have a large chip on my shoulder.

Thanks for the decent discussion. I will delete my above accusation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #286)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:23 AM

288. No biggie...

I know some people do like to kick liberals around - blaming us for being too lefty, or radical, or whatever, and driving centrist voters away.

In reality, though my views are pretty far left (democratic socialist), once upon a time, they were considered typical Democratic views. *sigh*

Keep on keepin' on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #250)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 02:53 PM

301. Just like many meet complaints about ...

Rape or racism with: "Not all men rape" and "Not all white people are racist."

The problem is, while true, it distracts from the men that DO rape and the white people, including liberals, that DO do racist stuff.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #244)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 02:43 PM

300. Thank you ...

Again, for the life of me, I can't understand how/why someone would work so hard to put themselves in the/a class being criticized. I've always thought, "If the shoe don't fit, why try and force it on?"

But then again, maybe those whining "notallmen/liberal" see themselves in the criticism?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #300)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:50 AM

356. Thank YOU!

Excellent point!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #138)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 12:40 AM

333. liberal is a label

The meaning of which is contested, no more so than here on DU. There are people who consider themselves true liberals who are openly hostile to women and people of color. They seem to think political purity is measured by how much one hates Democrats, all while naively buying into national mythology and showing no conception of the role of the state under capitalism. People have contorted the word so that anything they believe is liberal and what others do is RW or centrist. You are one who loves to hurl labels as insults without embarking on any analysis of what that means.

This all reminds me why I never used the term liberal to describe myself and prefer leftist. Classical Liberalism emerged as the political corollary to capitalism and still retains some of that meaning, which is why it is not associated with the left in much of the world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #333)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 12:45 AM

334. My point is that those that are racist, homophobic, sexist, are not by definition liberal.

If people want to disparage the sexist, homophobic and racists among us, go for it. I will support you all the way. But some here see an opportunity to disparage the liberals. It's clearly disruptive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #54)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:29 PM

296. And then we get bizarre posts and even OPs telling us that no one should judge anyone's beliefs!

In such controversial matters, no one is right and no one is wrong, because, golly, people just think differently and that's okay! ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #296)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:00 PM

302. I know, huh? ...

But when I saw that post, I thought that was more about a general world view, which we all have and will passionately defend.

Oh yeah ... that penguin GIF always makes me laugh. I find myself watching it wayyy longer than I should.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #302)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:55 PM

326. Glad you like!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:37 AM

55. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:40 AM

56. Damn straight.



K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:58 AM

62. Righteous Rant!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:05 AM

64. By golly I believe we have reached the "fuck ALL y'all" threshold!

I have seen less "nice" tolerance for the shit we've had to put up with since time began in the last couple of days than I ever have before. We might just be at the beginning of a movement.

BIG love to the men and women who take men and women seriously, and fuck ALL y'all who dare to dismiss and diminish us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:10 AM

65. kick!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:46 AM

67. Literally.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:53 AM

75. amen. k&r

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:01 AM

76. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Sometimes it MUST be said!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:54 AM

79. Thank you.

For saying what needed to be said. I'm impressed you managed to put it "kindly". I don't trust myself to respond to some of the bullshit I've seen here this week.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:14 AM

80. Yep, fuck the mragynists.

It constantly amazes me that they are allowed to post here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demmiblue (Reply #80)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:28 AM

116. Same here. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:17 AM

81. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Boom Sound 416 (Reply #81)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:51 PM

309. well I already liked the post

this just makes it that much more awesome!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:40 AM

84. Sing it, sister.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:41 AM

85. K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:09 AM

88. IMHO, a judicious and effective use of the work "fuck"

Well played.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:11 AM

90. That's the only kind of fucking they deserve

Too bad we can't have a supreme court decision about that...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:38 AM

98. I'm going to add one: If you think the damage from this ruling lies only in the "slippery slope,"

that the problem with this ruling is that it might eventually affect you badly, and that the part about the birth control is not that bad per se, kindly go fuck yourself.

And understand that, if you hold any of these beliefs or needs, even if you don't believe you are a sexist, you are a sexist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #98)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:30 AM

117. Hear, hear! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:52 AM

99. Well said and I am greatly familiar with that attitude, often out of the same people, toward LGBT

issues. It is a conservative and often hyper religious lot that can not bear even the thought of women and LGBT people being equal.
And they should go fuck themselves. They should not even be on DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #99)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:31 AM

118. Yep, and race issues as well.

Which makes for quite a revealing convergence of opinions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:56 AM

100. What a marvelous post! Might I also add, "Go fuck yourself and get pregnant." nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:59 AM

101. And these "some" men forget

that MANY women use birth control pills as therapy for some female problems that have NOTHING to do with preventing births. These rightwingnut fanatics who think contraception is a sin need to grow up and get a life and stop interfering in women's health issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ann--- (Reply #101)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:49 AM

121. +1!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:25 AM

104. This whole issue is the fault of conservative judges appointed by Republicans

and of course the conservative corporations who wish to punish their female employees (and female family members) by denying them important health benefits based on misguided philosophical ideas that are scientifically incorrect, mainly out of spite. Those folks need to go fuck themselves hard.

I share your rage.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:33 AM

106. Hey, any male out there who is OK with the HL decision:

When you get ordered to pay child support for a child you were not planning on...double that "Kindly go fuck yourself." Maybe you should have had that vasectomy that IS covered.

'Nuff said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:24 AM

114. rec!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:40 AM

119. Right on BB! Could not be more obvious.

Different day, same old shit oozing from the same self absorbed shitheads.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:50 AM

122. Do you know the proper use of quotation marks?

Last edited Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:36 PM - Edit history (1)

by using them in your sentence, you make it appears as if you are referring to all men.

But you "knew" that right? LOL

http://www.unnecessaryquotes.com/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #122)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:51 PM

157. Fresh "Fish"

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #157)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:55 PM

158. Exactly. Thank you for illustrating what is so horribly wrong and sexist about this OP. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #158)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:11 PM

159. I just think that unnecessary quotes website is hysterically "funny".

I don't read any malicious "intent" into the use of quotation marks in the OP, however, I do think most "people" would agree it is a "misuse" of the "punctuation".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #159)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:13 PM

187. FFS Warren.

I put it in quotations to emphasize that I did what people demanded that I do on this website. Let everyone know that it is only "some" men.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #187)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:26 PM

199. It doesn't need quotes, that's the point.

And you should look at that website, it's funny.

Plus, in case you didn't notice, I'm agreeing with your point in this thread. If you want to have an argument with me, you'd probably get more traction if you wait until I'm actually disagreeing with you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #199)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:28 PM

202. I don't want to have an argument with you.

I want to set you straight. When someone demands I say something a certain way, I will use quotations to show I have used their verbiage.

If you don't like it, or it's not grammatically correct, I could care less.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #202)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:31 PM

205. It does not actually rise to the level of me not liking it.

I hope you get everything you wanted out of this "thread".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #158)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:33 PM

207. "what is so horribly wrong and sexist about this OP."






Guess you won't be sending any alerts for a while





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #207)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:56 PM

234. I did not alert on this thread, though I did think about doing so. "Thanks" for caring though. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #234)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:29 PM

249. Sorry, I'm still laughing at your claim

that the OP is sexist. Too funny. Hope you can see why

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #158)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:15 PM

246. Don't be absurd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cyberswede (Reply #246)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:46 PM

256. Improper use of punctuation can drastically alter meaning.

eg. adding a comma where it doesn't belong


or leaving commas out





same with periods



and it works with quotation marks, too, as has already been discussed up-thread.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #256)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 10:01 PM

259. Well, you can't use bold or italics for emphasis thread titles...

I usually use asterisks when I want to highlight text in a thread title, but bb obviously chose another method.

If she had posted Hey men of DU, she would have been excoriated for not saying some men...when the context of the thread makes it clear she is only referring to the people who actually fit the criteria she is criticizing.

Your graphics are funny.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #122)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:32 PM

206. "Jesus" is coming

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #206)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:34 PM

208. We're "saved!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BootinUp (Reply #208)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:15 PM

262. "Unnecessary" quotation marks totally "change the meaning" of these "signs"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Javaman (Reply #122)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:42 PM

216. Those of us who have seen the outrageous

Threads from certain outrageous posters in the last couple of days, know exactly what and who Boston Bean meant. I've been lurking here a good while and I'm fairly familiar with the usual suspects, but you're new to me."LOL"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stage left (Reply #216)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:22 AM

277. Well allow me to introduce myself...

I'm Javaman, I've been here for 10 years.

and since I'm new to you, you seem easy to launch accusations.

huh, how about that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:13 AM

123. and yet,

what have you done beyond posting on a discussion board?

Have you even emailed HL to tell them of your displeasure with their policy?

Yawn.................

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sherman A1 (Reply #123)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:38 AM

134. Heh.

Hobby Lobby cared enough about this issue to take it all the way to the US Supreme Court, but an email from BB will almost certainly get them to change their mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:14 AM

124. I'm a 59 year old man, and...

...I'm outraged by the decision.

PEACE!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:21 AM

126. This is a discussion board, not an echo chamber or protected group.

That said, while the Hobby Lobby case probably doesn't augur the coming of the end times, it was a bad decision. That OP that said it was up to women to do something about it was pretty stupid and displayed a real lack of solidarity. An injury to one is an injury to all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Comrade Grumpy (Reply #126)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:34 AM

132. WTF? I think you are saying you agree. So why the cracks about echo chambers, protected groups

and end times?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #132)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:59 PM

142. Good question. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:27 AM

128. Absofuckinglutely!

K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:31 AM

130. Well, since you're obviously not referring to me...

...I'll stand outside this Hobby Lobby and privately fume that nobody will join my protest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Reply #130)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:35 AM

133. What does that mean? Do you have something you want to say?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:54 AM

136. k&r

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:35 PM

140. How about we give them a hashtag that they can embrace:

Like, say, #NotAllSupremeCourts?

Seriously, thanks for your post. Too bad I can only rec it once.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riqster (Reply #140)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:13 PM

293. Ok, that made me snort.

Well played.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to myrna minx (Reply #293)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:19 PM

295. My work here is done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:02 PM

143. always amazed when men WHO SHOULD KNOW BETTER

patronize women (and often minorities and GLBT Americans) and dismiss their civil rights as "distractions" and "gonadal politics" and "lifestyle liberalism"

do they understand how oafish they sound?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #143)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:29 PM

147. No, they don't understand how oafish they sound. They think they are rational, sage, and wise. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #143)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:47 AM

354. *sigh*

This really gets so tiresome. It's exhausting, really. Thanks for pointing it out, Geek Tragedy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:42 PM

149. I'll add to that.

Hey, some "people" of DU.
Because, you know, women who feel that way are even worse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:59 PM

151. well said

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:19 PM

161. Real men stand with women.

Really, there are guys on DU expressing that shite? You were too kind to them, boston bean!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Efilroft Sul (Reply #161)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:43 AM

353. Hear, hear!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:44 PM

164. You think this court decision was about gender?

I'm not sure, but it appears you believe this court decision to be an attack on women, and are taking it personally. I don't have a dog in this particular gender fight you seem to be waging in DU, and I don't know to whom you refer when you name "certain men", but I believe you're somewhat shortsighted.

I'm certain the right wing corporatists on the Supreme could not care less about your reproductive decisions, or the bible for that matter, and more about yet handing another deregulation victory to a major corporation. Even Elaine Kagen, in her minority dissent, made no mention of women's issues, but instead focused on how corporations can interpret this to cheat workers of both sexes out of benefits in the near future.

Your arrogance in finding this decision to be all about you is like my complaining that the Supreme's fateful decision to merge Sirius and XM was all about Robert's disdain for Deadheads like me who enjoy the network's Grateful Dead channel.

You'd find more support if you organized against Hobby Lobby instead of alienating 50% f the population in an imaginary battle against liberal misogyny. I'm personally not going to set foot again in the retail giant's store, but such a shunning is easy in such a competitive market. I'm doing this because of the company's obvious disregard for labor, not just for the couple hundred total female workers that it may affect in the short term.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #164)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:58 PM

179. Oh, FFS. I nominate you as the poster child for the "You're alienating your allies and it's all

about me" party.

And did you think it WASN'T about women?

You need to read the OP more slowly next time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #164)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:00 PM

180. To answer you

1)
it appears you believe this court decision to be an attack on women

I believe the decision was about biological sex of those who use these medications and procedures and devices.

2)
and are taking it personally

I am a woman, I do take it somewhat personally.

3)
you seem to be waging in DU

I am not waging a gender war on DU. Although I could argue, successfully, that you are.

4)
to whom you refer when you name "certain men


I never named "certain men". I used the word "some".

5)
I'm certain the right wing corporatists on the Supreme could not care less about your reproductive decisions


The Supreme Court actually does care about womens reproductive decisions. And I am a woman.

6)
minority dissent, made no mention of women's issues


Since this effects women medical decisions only, I presume it is a given that it effects one SEX, the female sex.

7)
Your arrogance in finding this decision to be all about you

Again, I don't find this to be all about me only.

8)
instead of alienating 50% f the population in an imaginary battle against liberal misogyny


I sincerely doubt I have alienated anyone who agrees that this decision sucks for women.

9)
but such a shunning is easy in such a competitive market


I also won't visit a hobby lobby.

10)
I'm doing this because of the company's obvious disregard for labor, not just for the couple hundred total female workers that it may affect in the short term.

This decision effects more than just women who work for Hobby Lobby, educate yourself please. You are looking foolish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #164)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:20 PM

195. Yeah, attacks on contraception and abortion have NOTHING to do with gender.

Good grief, the cluelessness is truly astounding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #195)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:03 PM

224. This ruling is about exemption for religious reasons

The fact that it was found in a case concerning contraception is purely incidental, it'll be applied in a wide range of policies.

I'm not clueless, and I'm not trying to divide DU by gender lines. Truly astounding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #224)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:11 PM

226. That you claim that this ruling's nexus

Last edited Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:22 PM - Edit history (1)

with women's reproductive choice is "purely incidental" indicates you may be clueless.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #226)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 02:52 AM

266. Then you must assume the majority of the Supreme Court...

...shares a religious concern with women's contraception. I don't believe that, I think they handed a broad brush exemption to big business that allows them to avoid government regulation. That's been a hallmark of the Roberts court.

After some thought, I've come to believe that the "certain men" that the OP concerns herself with may also believe that this court decision only targets women, and make comments that demean the ruling as relatively harmless (to them). I obviously don't agree with that opinion, regardless your view that I'm "clueless".

I guess you just believe the Supreme Court hates women. Unlike the deeper legal ramifications of this decision, that fits nicely on a bumper sticker.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #266)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 02:59 AM

267. Speaking of clueless:

a religious concern with women's contraception.


There are 5 rightwing Catholic men on the court. Care to guess (a) the Catholic church's stance on contraception and the contraception mandate and (b) how those 5 rightwing Catholic men voted in Hobby Lobby?

Just because you have not been paying attention to the Republican coalitions' attacks on women's reproductive choice does not mean it isn't real.

I'm sure the women here appreciate you mansplaining Republican jurisprudence on contraception and abortion to them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #267)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:19 PM

305. There are Catholics that dissented as well

If the Roberts court made a conservative decision based on their religious beliefs, then that'd a first. This court has consistently made rulings that offer corporate relief from various government regulation, and this is no exception.

Several years ago Roberts even frustrated the religious right by stating that he had "no interest" in revisiting Roe/Wade, but you seem to believe that he and other cons have deep held convictions when it comes to birth control pills, presumably because they hate women. That this ruling provides a loophole for huge corporations to save money by denying workers expensive health care is not a coincidence.

This decision is a bow tied gift to companies that want to ignore the expense of Obamacare, not a frontal assault against women. This is backed up by every legitimate pundit who offers a comment. DU seems to be the only place I can find where it's being interpreted as only a women's rights issue. Today we read that corporations predictably are now inquiring if they can use the Roberts decision to discriminate against the LGBT community in general.

Denigrating gender comments and assumptions that I'm too ignorant to be aware of the political environment does not strengthen your argument, but you go ahead if it makes you feel better. I've stated my case and refuse to reiterate for the sole sake of argument.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #305)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 10:40 PM

328. Today's Wheaton ruling appears to further undercut

your nonsense claim that the wingnut justices have zero interest in diminishing women's reproductive choice .

The one where they ruled that a nonprofit was horribly oppressed by being required to fill out a form telling an insurance company that the nonprofit didn't want to to pay for birth control.

After saying 3 days earlier that such a form was a reasonable accommodation.

Your position can only be characterized as willful blindness. Why you choose to adopt such an absurd position is a mystery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #328)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 11:20 PM

329. I hadn't heard. Here's the story for anyone else who missed it (another F.U. from the Sup. Court to

women. And to the men that the women take the contraceptives for. And an F.U. to REAL religious freedom -- the right to not have one's boss dictate his/her religious views).

Supreme Court sides with Christian college in birth control case, Washington Post, 7/3/14

The three female justices of the Supreme Court sharply rebuked their colleagues Thursday for siding with a Christian college in the latest battle over providing women with contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act, saying the court was retreating from assurances offered only days ago.

In a short, unsigned opinion, the court said that Wheaton College in Illinois, at least temporarily, does not have to comply even with compromise provisions in the law that the college says still violate its religious beliefs.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the action cast doubt on the very accommodation the court’s majority seemed to endorse Monday in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, which concerned businesses that objected to providing birth control that offends the owners’ beliefs.

“Those who are bound by our decisions usually believe they can take us at our word,” wrote Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. “Not so today.”

More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/2014/07/03/622f7b12-02f8-11e4-8572-4b1b969b6322_story.html


There's a lot more at the "More", including disagreement on the impact of this.

Yes, Stephen Breyer -- the only male who joined the 3 females in dissent in the Hobby Lobby case -- did not join their dissent in this ruling, no reason given. In case anyone was wondering.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #305)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:57 AM

358. Well, one. Sotomayoro.

A Woman. That's it. She is the only Catholic that dissented. The remaining dissenters were Jewish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #164)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:36 PM

210. How about it's both about gender and broader issues?

How about the IMMEDIATE impact is that HL and dozens of other companies will use this ruling to deny contraceptive coverage to women in spite of the ACA mandate, and the longer term implication is that companies can use this ruling to skate out from under all sorts of worker protections? Calling that 'deregulation' sounds good on a right wing board but here I'd call it erosion of freedom of religion.

Ripple through still waters, ya know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #164)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:50 PM

219. Rule of thumb, If you're not sure who "certain men" are, it's YOU.

My observation on such issues is if you're not leading the charge or part of the cheering section, you're part of the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hughee99 (Reply #219)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:05 PM

225. I don't think you know me

If you did you wouldn't have made such a baseless charge.

Feel free to search my posts for evidence

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #225)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:39 PM

229. I'm not commenting on you at all.

I'm commenting on who "certain men" and based on my observations about who are considered "certain men" by the people who refer to others as "certain men".

As for a baseless charge, I didn't charge you with anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #164)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:10 PM

292. you just said "you don't have a dog in this particular gender fight", why do you think that is?

because it doesn't effect your gender.

clueless.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CreekDog (Reply #292)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:34 PM

307. Welcome to the pile on.

I, and most pundits that have offered an opinion, believe this decision has wide ranging consequences that bound past gender lines. Even Justice Sotomier, in her dissent, outlined how it can be applied universally in the near future. Just today, it was reported that some companies are inquiring if their religious views can now be used to avoid upcoming regulations on hiring from the LGBT community.

This decision is a broad brush gift to corporations that want to avoid government requirements that provide expensive health care to employees, not just an assault against women. Insisting that the Roberts court is out to get you for being born a woman seems a bit self centered. Frankly, your vagina takes a distant back seat to corporate financial interests when it comes to this Supreme Court.

If calling me names strengthens your baseless argument that the court just hates women, then knock yourself out. I refuse to reiterate for the sake of giving you opportunity to employ clever emojis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JohnnyRingo (Reply #307)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:47 PM

308. I didn't call you a name

"clueless" was an empirical observation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:34 PM

169. I'm sure they already do.

- Any asshole saying some shit like that you know ain't gettin' any.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:34 PM

170. If you are here on this site, you should be fighting and arguing for equality.

Totally agree with you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:53 PM

177. Sadly, I was arguing with a woman about this last night...

Her talking points were damn near IDENTICAL to what the guys you are calling out were saying.
She found it to be of no concern. Even mentioned keeping legs crossed. When I called her out, she
told me not to argue with her about her uterus. I replied with "but it's ok for 5 men to make decisions concerning such?"

I was completely flabbergasted that I was having that conversation. I thought to myself, "if only HoF could see this..."

What's really fucked up is she's not a conservative or Christian. She's mostly apolitical (and seems to side with dems on MOST issues when she does chime in with opinion). And she works in the medical profession.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #177)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:06 PM

183. Many dont see it as restricting birth control, just that someone else isn't paying for it

And there is truth to that. This decision doesn't stop a woman from going to the pharmacy and buying birth control pills.

The idea that birth control should be free is mainly a liberal idea, and that's the problem a lot of people have with this debate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #183)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:08 PM

186. No, the issue at the court was about health insurance.

Health insurance that is partly paid by the employee, and partly paid by the employer. There was NO FREE birth control.

The justices mentioned that the gov't could provide free birth control to women to get around their decision.

You got a problem with the Supreme Court recommending that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #186)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:20 PM

194. The deicsion proves how bad ACA really is...

Should have been a single payer to begin with.

Most modern western democracies dont have this issue that we are having right now because they have single payer systems and not employer-provided health insurance that allows corporations to have any say at all.

That's the 800 pound gorilla in the room no one wants to talk about because they are scared of criticizing Obamacare. I knew when this law passed in 2009 it was a bad law. This decision is just the tip of the iceberg of what's coming.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #194)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:23 PM

197. blah blah blah blame Obamacare, blame women for getting upset

whatever you can do to deflect from the rampant sexism being enabled by the judiciary

"should have been single payer to begin with"

this is what is traditionally known as a 'fantasy'

there were not the votes for single payer. So says Bernie Sanders. now, if you want to argue that thousands of people should be allowed to die rather than having the ACA get enacted, own that argument instead of hiding behind silly arguments

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #197)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:26 PM

200. I'm sorry but single payer brings this issue to the forefront even more so.

Public funds to be used for abortion and now with this Supreme ruling, contraception.

It would still be a total cluster. It is about one thing and one thing only. Controlling uteruses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #200)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:28 PM

203. single payer would only remove this particular excuse.

since they couldn't hide behind religous liberty on that one.

at its base it's exactly what Limbaugh said about Sandra Fluke

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #194)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:24 PM

198. Of course it's being discussed. There are many issues.

Including putting restrictions on womens health choices due to religious beliefs.

You want to start a thread about it, please do. That doesn't mean that there aren't other issues that reverberate just as strongly.

For all bills concerning womens health the Hyde amendement is attached, preventing any public funds to be used for abortion. You think that with a public plan this decision from the court would have been different?

The issue lies with religious fucks wanting to control women. They don't want to control men. They want to control uteruses. That makes it about women, ok?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #198)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:57 PM

223. With a public option, there wouldnt even be a case

Congress has the constitutional power to tax...even Justice Roberts says this is true.

If the Congress wants to have a tax, and then use that money for healthcare (even to pay for abortions or contraception), there isn't anything unconstitutional about that. The problem with that though is getting it past the Republicans in Congress (and perhaps even some Democrats).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #198)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:53 AM

357. +1000

Why is this so hard to get through?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #183)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:16 PM

189. Birth control, as part of the coverage offered by employee insurance, isn't "free."

It's a part of one's salary, another form of compensation, a "benefit" like paid vacation or sick time or retirement. Workers PAY for those benefits by accepting lower wages. In other words, workers work for their health insurance.

The idea that health insurance, or any part thereof, is provided for "free" by benevolent for-profit corporations is another right wing shibboleth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #183)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:16 PM

191. Actually, it IS restricting...

In the sense that many other services are covered. Vasectomies and viagra, amongst them. But BC is not. And BC isn't always for BC. Sometimes it's a hormone regulator. This was the wrong ruling. It weakens the ACA as a whole, and opens up a whole slew of "possibilities" for "religious businesses".

Now, women working for those companies have to pay out of pocket for something that was previously covered, because religion.

Also, religion should not get to redefine science. None of those were abortificants, but because they "believe" they are, then we can rule they are? Fuck that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #183)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:19 PM

193. no, there isn't truth to that, contra to what Limbaugh says. it's about an employer being allowed

to meddle in the healthcare offered to women, but not men.

Repeat after me:

contraception is health care
contraception is health care
contraception is health care

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidn3600 (Reply #183)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:48 PM

218. LIES. Birth control is not free with insurance. Why don't you educate yourself just a little bit

before posting this nonsense.
Or just admit you are fine with Hobby Lobby deciding people's medical decisons- because that is what they are trying to accomplish. If it hurt your penis, I bet you'd squeal like a pig.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #218)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:55 PM

221. Love.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #221)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:55 PM

222. Same to you my dear, always!

:thumbs up:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:07 PM

184. Men kindly stay the fuck away from female reproductive

issues! Do women discuss penis issues ?


Fuck off!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:14 PM

188. Breathe deeply and count to 10...

 

Doesn't do any good to spew ugliness on the internet...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:16 PM

190. I suppose I ought to just keep my mouth shut

as not to offend the offensive.

Have a good one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #190)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:31 PM

227. Post kept 2-5.

Mail Message
On Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:47 PM you sent an alert on the following post:

Breathe deeply and count to 10...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5185791

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

YOUR COMMENTS

Rude, ad hom attack on boston bean (possibly misogynist too since bean often posts at the feminist boards)...possible disruptor too due to recent registration date. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=315364

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:26 PM, and voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Don't need direct nastiness from a newbie. n/t
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If it's a troll it will reveal itself soon enough. This post isn't offensive, however. If you alert on one that is, I'll vote to hide it, but I'm not going back through all 21 previous posts to determine if this is a troll or not. That's for the MIRT people, or whatever they're called.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not worthy of hide
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #227)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:53 PM

233. Stupid alert! Nothing wrong with that post. n-t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #233)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:58 PM

236. Seriously?

It's straight-up, undisputable HARASSMENT based on bean standing up for women's issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alp227 (Reply #236)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:01 PM

241. Stuff a LOT worse does not get hidden. n-t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Logical (Reply #241)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:09 PM

245. that's not an argument against hiding a certain post.

"Other things are worse than X" is never an argument against "X".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #190)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:21 AM

264. Hardly...

 

... But an attitude like that is likely to push allies away and cost you instead of gaining support.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #264)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:02 AM

268. MRA bingo!!!

B9: watch your tone, or I'll withhold my support for your cause!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #268)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 04:31 AM

271. Are you suggesting...

 

... That the originator of the 'More flies with honey... ' saying was an MRA advocate whoever he or she was?

They certainly got out in front of that one...

Sometimes I think you guys just want to argue instead of actually winning advancement for an important cause.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #264)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:30 AM

272. Any "ally" that is going to be pushed away for me pointing out

what is offensive was never an ally to begin with, imho.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #272)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:42 AM

273. boston bean for the win

Anyone who is pushed away by "tone" is not an ally to begin with, and is also usually wielding their privilege as a weapon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #272)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:27 AM

281. Do unto others and all that...

 

In the end I suppose it's about what your goals are...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #281)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:29 AM

282. Yeah, my goals align quite nicely with allies who believe in equal rights for women.

Sorry to see you have taken such an offense to my offense of offending the offensive.

Now, go preach to someone else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #282)


Response to Brisk (Reply #264)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 04:45 PM

313. Seriously, can't you guys come up with anything new? Ever? Because this shit is getting monotonous.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #313)


Response to Name removed (Reply #315)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 04:57 PM

316. Oh, look! We can see right through you! Are you a ghost?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squinch (Reply #316)


Response to Name removed (Reply #318)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:30 PM

320. And yet you are clear as glass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:17 PM

192. welcome to DU.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #192)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 04:46 PM

314. Again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:27 PM

201. eye of the beholder and all. i think her op was beautiful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:41 PM

215. Naaah. They deserve that and more. Phony ass progressives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:23 PM

248. Hobby Lobby and SCOTUS are the ones doing ugly things in this case. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 12:34 PM

290. then, why do you insist on doing it?

enjoy your stay.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #290)


Response to Name removed (Reply #298)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:51 PM

299. the part where women are Not treated with respect. Exactly.

keep disrespecting, dude. keep it up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #299)


Response to Name removed (Reply #303)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 05:08 PM

317. I see you are a little slow so let me break it down

For you = disrespect a woman will get someone a big fuck you. Either get with the program or get gone out of the thread.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #317)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:19 AM

344. looks like it got gone!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #345)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:31 AM

346. I think the socks are more rampant than trolls these days...

the posting styles are very similar and they are so obvious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phentex (Reply #346)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:36 AM

347. yes, and I think we have some Zombie Trolls who wear socks, too. =

and then we have some outright disruptors who manage to ride the ToS Line like it is a daily commute.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #347)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:40 AM

348. one day we shall dance...

I don't think I have ever participated in a grave dancing thread but there's a really smelly troll right now and I am going to enjoy a full blown "break-dancing-on-my-back" party when it's gone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phentex (Reply #348)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:44 AM

349. I usually avoid those parties too but, I bet I see you at this one

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brisk (Reply #188)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:01 AM

359. Piss off!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:28 PM

204. Thanks, Boston bean

for saying what needed to be said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:54 PM

220. I have been butting heads with idiots on Discussionist who making these arguments

I enjoy getting in the face of the idiots advancing these claims. I like to "discuss" and there are some idiots on Discussionist who need some education.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gothmog (Reply #220)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:00 PM

237. There are a few here ...

that need some educating, as well.

But then, again, they may be the same people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #237)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 08:19 AM

276. I do not come to DU to debate but to get information and insights

I mostly stay out of any of the fights or debates on DU because I am not looking to debate anyone on this site. I agree with 90%+ of the posters here on most if not all issues. DU is an amazing source of information on a wide range of issues and the materials posted here are great. I love the information and insights that I get from this board.

I go to the Discussionist site because I like debating or discussing issues with conservatives. I like to mix it up with the conservatives on Discussionist website. I am mainly dealing with very conservative types over there and go after the people with the most offensive positions. Some of these people my be DUers or ex-DUers but I doubt it in that I tend to engage mostly with obvious conservative types whose posts are too stupid to be on DU.

I like to argue and debate issues and the Discussionist site is a good place for me to engage with real conservatives. I tend not to get involved in the "debates" or "fights" on DU because I can usually see both sides of the argument and I do not think that it is appropriate to debate with people that I agree with on over 90%+ of the issues. I have been on DU for over 10 years and had lurked for a couple of years before joining. I love the information and insights that I get from DU

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:46 PM

230. Well said!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:50 PM

232. Anyone who downplays the danger of encroaching theocracy is a goddamn fool. Plain and simple. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:57 PM

235. It's hard when not everyone agrees with you 100% isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mysuzuki2 (Reply #235)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 07:03 AM

274. No, it's not.

Sorry to see that its difficult for you though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mysuzuki2 (Reply #235)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:46 PM

325. If you agree with this decision, you should honestly be ran off from DU.

This is the kind of thing that should be against everything we stand for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 08:35 PM

238. I have been saying this for a long time.

Some men don't seem to understand how this impacts them, too. My getting pregnant affects you, my having painful, incapacitating hemorrhaging affects you, having your employer dictate to you what type of birth control you and your girlfriend/wife select affects you. The way I see it, men need to stand up and get involved in this issue or they can quite literally go sit in a corner and fuck themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:33 PM

251. Great Post

except...don't care for CORPORATIST HILLY.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:43 PM

254. Tell it like it is!!!


sendin some luv to Boston Bean!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:59 PM

258. k and r + several gazillion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)


Response to Jamastiene (Reply #283)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:33 AM

284. I'm a woman a human being, I'm not defined as a HoF'er.

But thanks for the K&R. I've never had an issue with you. I don't know why you felt the need to say what you did.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Reply #284)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 03:15 PM

304. OMG, they love to round us into groups they can demonize, LOL, don't they?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:44 PM

324. I'm the first to criticize extreme feminist stuff concerning word policing and sexy magazine outrage

But this is one of those times where we have an actual issue of importance to women and if you support this flawed decision, you aren't a Democrat, you aren't a progressive, you aren't a liberal, you are a sexist asshole, period. This is a REAL battle that needs to be fault for sure. I'm fully on board with getting up in people's faces about this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to phleshdef (Reply #324)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:29 AM

335. Think about that, though.

What, as a society, do we find normal and acceptable? What as "the left" do we display to others about our beliefs?

Our society as a whole is revealing its clear belief, day after day, that women ought not to have agency over their lives and bodies. This ruling upholds that belief.

And when a poster refers to women as "cumdumpsters" on a purportedly left leaning message board, and it is allowed to stand, and it is applauded, we are reinforcing and expanding that same position. Worse, we are saying that it is OK with us that women are treated like garbage. We are saying that the group that ought to be the most dependable in its defense of women's rights share the view that demeaning women is fun and OK.

Objecting to language like that is not "extreme feminist stuff." It is forwarding the same position that you are taking with your post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Sun Jul 6, 2014, 08:58 PM

343. Kick.

Because it obviously needs to be said again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:36 AM

352. as relevant today as it was last week!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:49 AM

355. I'm with you completely on Hobby Lobby and all the related ramifications...

...but I reserve the right to call "hair on fire" on other issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to boston bean (Original post)

Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:02 AM

360. Highly recommended

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread