Will Phony Populists Hijack the Fight Against Inequality?
http://www.thenation.com/article/179142/will-phony-populists-hijack-fight-against-inequalityThese days everyone wants to ‘create opportunity,’ but few want a class war.
Zoë Carpenter April 2, 2014 | This article appeared in the April 21, 2014 edition of The Nation.
In late January, President Obama met some two dozen CEOs at the White House to discuss the plight of the long-term unemployed. Frustrated by the refusal of congressional Republicans to extend unemployment insurance benefits, Obama persuaded several hundred companies to sign a “best practices” hiring pledge promising not to discriminate against those who have been unable to find work for a lengthy period of time.
Among the executives present was Don Thompson, who made nearly $14 million in 2012 as the CEO of the McDonald’s Corporation, and whose restaurant workers are paid so little that they must rely on $1.2 billion in public assistance each year. Also present was Boeing CEO Jim McNerney, who earned $23.3 million in 2013 while threatening to move his company to a right-to-work state if the machinists’ union did not accept a contract that froze pensions and limited future raises. Walmart, which last year chose to buy back $7.6 billion of its own stock when it could have raised employee pay by more than $5 an hour instead, signed the agreement, as did JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, whose fraudulent mortgage practices helped tank the economy and destroy decades of middle-class wealth. “I was really grateful to all of them for stepping up in this way,” Obama said.
The confab neatly illustrated the Democratic Party’s current predicament. As public disgust with rising inequality and a protracted jobs crisis compels a populist approach to governing and campaigning, the party remains inextricably tied to some of the elites responsible for the underlying problems. Publicly, the party seems united—but who is truly dedicated to reversing the country’s alarming descent into oligarchy, and who is just using the issue of the day to burnish their credentials or troll for votes?
* * *
At first blush, it might seem difficult to discern pretenders from true populists. Almost everyone who identifies as even an inch left of center acknowledges the need to address income inequality. The centrist Democratic think tank Third Way is a notable exception: it issued a lonely warning in a December Wall Street Journal op-ed that economic populism is “a dead end for Democrats.”
But look everywhere else:
....more....
= new reply since forum marked as read
from that description.
The demonization of Trotskyists was actually accomplished from BOTH sides of the political spectrum. The fascists and the RWers hated him because he was a Marxist and one of the main leaders of the Bolshevik revolution in 1917. And on the left he was actually hated even MORE than the RWers did because he stood up to Stalin. Not necessarily stood up to him effectively 
, but when Stalin was consolidating his power, he didn't brook ANY opposition that wasn't demonized and eventually killed. As Trotsky was.
He's actually probably much more influential now than at any point in his life except for the few years immediately during and after the October revolution, say 1917 through 1924. Most groups on the far left worldwide are probably Trotskyist. Even the Stalinist groups don't claim to be Stalinists anymore.
