General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJob seekers getting asked for Facebook passwords
SEATTLE When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his Facebook username and password.
Bassett, a New York City statistician, had just finished answering a few character questions when the interviewer turned to her computer to search for his Facebook page. But she couldn't see his private profile. She turned back and asked him to hand over his login information.
Bassett refused and withdrew his application, saying he didn't want to work for a company that would seek such personal information. But as the job market steadily improves, other job candidates are confronting the same question from prospective employers, and some of them cannot afford to say no.
In their efforts to vet applicants, some companies and government agencies are going beyond merely glancing at a person's social networking profiles and instead asking to log in as the user to have a look around. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20120320/US.Job.Applicants.Facebook/?cid=hero_media
Cirque du So-What
(25,927 posts)This sort of Orwellian intrusion into private lives sets my spidey senses to tingling.
marmar
(77,072 posts)...... I keep sending them hyperlinks like these.
bart95
(488 posts)there is a basic principle of knowing every ear your voice is speaking to, or keeping quiet
cstanleytech
(26,281 posts)I just dont ever use it but I can understand why you dont and its partly why I dont use it even though I created a basic account.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)barbtries
(28,787 posts)you see my facebook profile, you know my age. i just hope this is the exception and not the rule, because i am not playing.
SWTORFanatic
(385 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)JHB
(37,158 posts)...so if you said you didn't, that would be lying to them, which works against getting a job from them.
nebenaube
(3,496 posts)gkhouston
(21,642 posts)and found that other people also have it. Sure hope potential employers don't get me mixed up with the porn star "me".
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)And mine's not that common.
How would they know if any of the names returned were "you"? Or none of them? What are they going to do, scroll through the possibilities while you sit there in the interview? That would be pretty doubtful, especially if you just said you weren't on Facebook.
coyote
(1,561 posts)What is to prevent the employer doing anything on your facebook account once they have your login details?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)to request all the login info for EVERY fucking employee there...Not just facebook, but EVERYTHING they have an online account for...
After all, if I'm considering your company as a future employer, I have a full right to know any potentially pertinent info of my future co-workers...
David__77
(23,369 posts)I don't think it is.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Motherfuckers. There's NO way I'd consent to that totalitarian crap. I'm a person, not your fucking child.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)employer is also getting access to info posted by that person's "friends." Those third parties may have posted info to be shared with certain friends only - not with nosy 3rd parties.
On reality tv those who refuse to sign the waiver have to be pixilated to protect their identities. Will FB have to introduce a method to pixilate or encrypt one's friends' postings to protect their identities from prying eyes? Seems to me there are a lot of privacy issues here.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I work for a defense contractor and have a security clearance. Not once have I ever been asked to hand over information like that. Actually if my employer asked I'd assume it's some sort of security test to see how easily employees would hand over even their own sensitive information.
JBoy
(8,021 posts)I wouldn't want to hire someone who so willingly complied with an outrageous request.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Julian Englis
(2,309 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)Soon it will be a matter of course. Soon it will be welfare recipients having their facebooks scanned for inappropriate spending.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...and have a real FB page under a fake first name or a nickname.
bart95
(488 posts)a visa program where foreign workers are brought in, can only work for one employer, and can be deported at them employers whim
a culture that creates really timid, compliant workers who never complain about ANY abuse
and if you're a citizen and want a job, well, that's what you have to 'compete' with, if you're not 'compliant' enough, you'll quickly get replaced by someone who is, and you may even have to train them, if you want your severence at a desparate time in your life
or someone else gets/keeps the job
you'd better believe that's what could be on the mind of someone who gets asked their facebook password, and meekly gives it
I don't know if it's directly related to the H-1b visa program, but workers have been beaten on for years, and everybody can complete the sentence, "If you won't do what I'm telling you to do, I'll . . . " Business agents for unions continually run up against the abused employee who is genuinely surprised to find out that he or she doesn't have to jump when the boss says "Frog." I personally trace it back to the late 1970s, when drug testing was ushered in when a couple of stoned train workers derailed a train. I knew then that it would be a matter of time (and a very short time at that) before the "necessity" arose of making sure that people on the job weren't using drugs in their off time, even people you wouldn't think needed to be tested for drugs.
I think Mr. Bassett, cited in the original post, did a gutsy thing in refusing to hand over his password to the nosy interviewer. It's easy to see, however, that another job applicant would immediately comply, and that soon it will be "necessary" for employers to poke through their employees' most personal and intimate doings. The rationale this time will be that employers want to avoid liability for failing to delve deeply enough into someone's life when "all the signs were there" that Dilbert was ready or getting ready to snap.
bart95
(488 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)Digit
(6,163 posts)I replied to a job posting and yesterday received the following reply: "I have received your application for the job. Please complete some follow up questions on our company fanpage on Facebook:", and it gives the link. The link takes me to a blank sign-on page for Facebook. Although I have a basic account on Facebook, I never use it.
I would guess since I have not logged on using this computer, it only brought up a blank page.
It may be a scam...I am not sure. What I am sure about is that I have no intention of logging into my Facebook page to complete follow up questions or anything else.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)If everyone did that it would be a non-issue. If everyone did that then even people who desperately need work wouldn't feel obligated to give in to such unreasonable demands.