Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,022 posts)
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 03:42 PM Mar 2012

NH House Republicans Pass Bill Forcing Doctors To Tell Women That Abortion Causes Breast Cancer

Republicans have successfully pushed an anti-abortion bill through the New Hampshire House of Representatives that would require doctors to lie to women in order to scare them from having an abortion.

The bill, known as HB 1659, not only requires women to wait a mandatory 24 hours before having an abortion, it also requires doctors to give them false information by telling them that abortion cause breast cancer. The bill, sponsored by GOP Rep. Jeanine Notter, states:

“e) Materials that inform the pregnant woman that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer. It is scientifically undisputed that full-term pregnancy reduces a woman’s lifetime risk of breast cancer. It is also undisputed that the earlier a woman has a first full-term pregnancy, the lower her risk of breast cancer becomes, because following a full-term pregnancy the breast tissue exposed to estrogen through the menstrual cycle is more mature and cancer resistant. In fact, for each year that a woman’s first full-term pregnancy is delayed, her risk of breast cancer rises 3.5 percent. The theory that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer builds upon this undisputed foundation. During the first and second trimesters of pregnancy the breasts develop merely by duplicating immature tissues. Once a woman passes the thirty-second week of pregnancy (third trimester), the immature cells develop into mature cancer resistant cells. When an abortion ends a normal pregnancy, the woman is left with more immature breast tissue than she had before she was pregnant. In short, the amount of immature breast tissue is increased and this tissue is exposed to significantly greater amounts of estrogen—a known cause of breast cancer. Women facing an abortion decision have a right to know that such medical data exists. At the very least, women must be informed that it is undisputed that pregnancy provides a protective effect against the later development of breast cancer.”


According to the Huffington Post, Notter believes “that abortion would cause spaces in breast duct tissue to allow for the growth of cancer cells. She said she believed birth control pills lead to the same issue. Notter last month also said that she believed that birth control pills taken by women cause prostate cancer in their male children.”

Read more: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/03/17/new-hampshire-house-republicans-pass-bill-forcing-doctors-to-tell-women-that-abortion-causes-breast-cancer/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
3. Are ANY of these laws being
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 03:58 PM
Mar 2012

challenged anywhere they're enacted?
I mean....come on, this is a national rabid right hysteria.

The breast cancer/abortion link was debunked years ago, it was one of the first scare tactics used the rabid religious right.

Response to asjr (Reply #4)

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
6. Some people apparently love this crap and keep voting them back in over and over and over. I often
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 05:06 PM
Mar 2012

think it's religious guilt at work, those that think they are sinners that want to be punished. That they are unworthy of a life without some form of punishment. And it's unconscious ...


 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
7. Yes we are Nazi Germany.....
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 10:02 PM
Mar 2012

No longer can a doctor, based on his education and experience, counsel and treat his patient. He must parrot the un-truths of the GOP Goebbels of today.

Pregnancy does NOT provide a protective effect against breast cancer. There are sufficient studies to suggest that pregnancy is but one factor in whether a woman is likely to suffer from pregnancy. I know several women that had multiple pregnancies (and lived otherwise healthy lifestyles) and developed breast cancer. On the other side I know several women who were never pregnant and have never developed any symptoms of breast cancer.

This is Goebbels at his best reaching back from the grave. Way to go GOP.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
8. The NH House members who voted for this bill should be criminally
Sun Mar 18, 2012, 11:28 AM
Mar 2012

charged with practicing medicine without a license.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
9. Not only is this bill anti-abortion but it sure seems to encourage girls
Sun Mar 18, 2012, 11:31 AM
Mar 2012

to have babies at a younger age as a method of breast cancer prevention. How stupid!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NH House Republicans Pass...