General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSincere question: "Sexual preference" or "Sexual orientation"?
I tend to use the terms interchangeably, but can see there is really a difference. I put up a post earlier and used the former. In rereading the post, a light bulb just lit. It occurred to me that "preference" implies choice. "Orientation" implies hard wiring.
Is there a practical or semantic difference? Does it matter? Is there . . . . well . . . . a preference for one term over the other?
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Orientation is the better term because "sexual preference" implies a choice. I don't think there is a choice. You are who you are.
gateley
(62,683 posts)it's any different for those who are gay. And I don't understand why anyone would believe someone would "choose" a life that too often involves secrets, shame, alienation and discrimination.
I'm glad your daughter has you for her Mom. And I know you feel blessed to have her, too.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)kiss me im irish
(6 posts)But there are some people who choose to be with another person and it's for reasons other than what they might "prefer" had they felt comfortable choosing so. For instance:
*A woman who is raped who CHOOSES to be with women but may not have been born gay.
*A man who is gay who CHOOSES to marry and have sex (to procreate and satisfy the partner) because he wants to live a conventional life, is religious (where homosexuality is not tolerated), or is in deep denial (and wants to sire children).
*Bisexuals who CHOOSE one sex over the other, even though it appears they are bi. For instance, I read Meredith Baxter-Birney's autobiography where she discusses her marriages and current female relationship and she identifies as lesbian, which provoked a bit of incredulity in me. For one thing, although I realize that it is possible to marry and have several children and be gay, I do feel that she seems to be attracted to men, although they treated her shabbily. So I wonder if she is truly gay or is simply refusing to acknowledge her attraction to mern because of the pain they have brought her?
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)Aren't preferences presented to consciousness as givens?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Please clarify.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)We don't choose to prefer sex with men over women, or football over basketball, or vanilla over chocolate ice cream. While some preferences may be deemed more important in life's journey, that doesn't change the fact that consciousness is presented with certain facts, including preferences, over which we pretty much have no control.
We can choose to act or not act (in general) on our preferences. But we don't choose our preferences.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I prefer baseball over hockey, but in no way is this hardwired in me.
Still am oriented hetero.
Sexual orientation is not a choice but how you are, rather like being right handed.
Preference implies choice. I no longer prefer 22 yr olds. I chose to not have sex with 22 yr olds anymore (ewwww). My preference changed. My sexual orientation has not.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)Yes, preferences can change, but you didn't choose to change them. They change on their own, don't they? You can't pinpoint the time of a certain day when you "decided" to prefer 50 yolds over 22 yolds. One day, you simply preferred 50 yolds.
One of the mysteries of consciousness.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)preference does. Which is my point in that orientation is hard wired, preference isn't.
Yes, I can point to when my preferences changed. The change was gradual but I noticed it when my child's friends came over and were busy flirting with each other, then read some article about a teacher/student thing, looked at the friends and went "ewwwww".
The change was gradual, and other preferences also have change over the yrs. My orientation hasn't and won't as it wasn't a choice.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I happen to agree with him on that. We have all kinds of fluid desires that we do not choose in a conscious manner, but that can and do change with experience and time (and so are not "hard wired" in any biological sense). Godless Biker is calling this "preference."
Whether that kind of middle zone applies to sexual desire or typical attraction, I don't know.
I am uncomfortable with the idea that our desires are fixed at birth, since it seems to be a claim of dubious scientific merit (though it is obviously of very high political worth). "Orientation" and "hard wiring" are certainly more politically effective positions, since they don't require us to get into the thorny questions of how desires take shape and change over time - a deviously complex question that few people want to get into when they're making claims for rights in the political sphere.
gateley
(62,683 posts)appeal to you.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)Certainly, however, some preferences present themselves as stronger than others.
gateley
(62,683 posts)and I'm with your S-I-L -- no pink for me! And vegans will not eat animal products, but I don't believe it's as simple when it comes to sexual attraction.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)middle school, high school, new job, but never a sexual one.
But seriously, I think the "preference" should only be applicable to bi-sexual people, because in that case they do make a choice.
Behind the Aegis
(53,951 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)I meant, choice of partner since either gender is fine.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)The don't "make a choice" to be bisexual, any more than I made choice to be heterosexual.
We do make choices according to our preferences, but the orientation is not a choice.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)The orientation isn't a choice, but the gender of the partner is a choice. Although I bet it really isn't, the heart wants what the heart wants, is that a choice? I don't think so really. Bisexual people have twice the chance of finding love!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)you are using it for, in what manner.
For example, my sexual orientation is hetersexual, my preference is monogamy, someone near my age. I won't go further as tmi, but it does matter, depending on what you are talking about.
I used to use "preference" but learned that it is used wrongly often, in describing orientation, so now don't.
Johonny
(20,835 posts)In general studies find most people don't fall into societal sexual roles. These binned rolls, straight, gay, etc are relatively recent rolls and clearly previous generations and societies had completely different roles.
The role you end up playing in society could be considered a preference (see Marcus Bachmann) your actual sexual orientation is probably more complex than you are willing to accept.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)It still comes down to sexual orientation is not a choice. The choice comes in with what you decide to do with it.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)I don't really see what the big deal is. I "prefer" women. I was probably born that way too. I know that many people think that if "preference" is used that it suggests that it's less a biological function, but I don't think it matters either way. People should be free to choose the gender of their partner as well.
One of the things that sickens me most about the arguments that the cons use about homosexuality is that they'll always suggest that orientation is a choice. I don't believe that's the case, but even if it wasn't, ARE THEY GOING TO DENY THEM THAT CHOICE? This country is all about choice and now they're suggesting that people shouldn't have the choice to choose the ones that they love? It's just a stupid and sickening argument all around.
Behind the Aegis
(53,951 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)"preference implies choice. Orientation implies hard wiring."
However, when we discuss things like marriage and discrimination, whether or not it's 'choice' or 'wiring' should not even be relevant. Why should it matter? Why should it even be considered? (not saying you you think it matters but it seems to be a major con argument)
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)Because for them "orientation" is flexible.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)People I know are born bisexual, that is their orientation. Whom they chose to have sex with, m or f, varies and depends on their preference at the time.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)yardwork
(61,596 posts)There is a lot of misunderstanding, even among gay folks, about bisexuals. If you think about it, you'll see that they aren't different from anybody else. For instance, let's say that you are a straight male. That means that you're attracted to women. But you're not attracted to every woman, right? Within your orientation (straight male) there are individuals whom you find attractive.
Now, suppose you're a gay male. You're attracted to men, but not all men. There are individuals you find attractive.
Same for bisexuals. They aren't attracted to all men and women. They're attracted to some individuals. Those individuals can be male or female.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)My friend told me to think of it as being left or right handed. It's not a preference, it's not a choice, it's pretty much outside my control. That it is in fact, a practical difference rather than a social or verbal volition. I've looked at her concept over and over again; and regardless of the angle, it seems a perfectly logical, valid and truthful statement.
I want (a preference) to use my left hand because I'm biologically wired (an orientation) to use to use my left hand. i.e., the one necessarily follows the other rather my own discretion of the one or the other.
JustAnotherGen
(31,812 posts)That's how I'm oriented. I couldn't choose to be anything other than a het!
The Magistrate
(95,244 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)interesting, nonetheless.
I think what matters most is the speaker's intent. I will say I think I might "prefer" the "orientation" word in my conversations.
guitar man
(15,996 posts)my sexual preference is "yes please, often!"
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)for orientation. As you say, preference implies choice, and I don't have any reason to think that orientation is a choice in the least. It's as hard wired as eye-color and height, IMO.
Being dx'd on the autism spectrum I have some experience with how hard-wiring in the brain works.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)orientation is the better term than preference. Genetically wired? I don't know. Maybe someone can think of a better term than either of the current terms.
SWTORFanatic
(385 posts)it doesn't matter though. Also, please keep in mind that nurture doesn't only mean "how you were raised". It could be something along the lines of a hormone "imbalance" at a very young age (fetus, baby, or toddler) might contribute to someone being gay instead of straight.
I'm also in agreement with you that orientation makes sense.
excuse not to write
(147 posts)As for orientation, well, I like to be on top, but if the lady wants to do it another way, that's fine.
SWTORFanatic
(385 posts)I won't kick blondes or redheads to the curb
Orientation and preference do not imply choice - but the words do mean a bit different. See above for my example.
Also my partner is a blonde. Hm.
Lex
(34,108 posts)do they feel like it is more wired in their brains to be attracted to the opposite sex?
Because it's the same thing for gay folks.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I went to school down the street from the Stonewall way back when. Gays were all around me. It never even occured to me to like women. That being said, gays were no more "strange and weird" than people of other races, religions, etc. Again, you are who you are, and we are not clones of one another.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)I've learned that words I take for granted and use with no intent to, hurt, insult or malign can be taken by some to be hurtful, insulting, and maligning.
As the semantic light switch went on in my head, I decided to post this question rather than presume to know the answer.
Lex
(34,108 posts)Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)"Preference" implies a choice.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Preference would be what you want and orientation is what you need.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Sexual orientation helps determine which sex you like to be on top of or underneath.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I don't think it needs an additional descriptor, really.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)People are entitled to their own opinions, of course, but to me, to call my homosexuality a preference, makes little sense. I didn't wake up one morning and go, "hmmm. I think I'll choose to be attracted to males instead of females." Rather, it just happened. When I was 12, there was something more naturally appealing about being with other males than with females. It was my nature to feel that way; I didn't choose for it to be that way, it is just the way it happened. By age 14, I was having sexual urges for other males. It was my nature to feel that way; it just happened that way.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)"Preference" is propaganda against humans.
Sheesh.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)If I were a sensitive man, I could conclude you're accusing me of that.
You're not.
Are you?
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I haven't accused anyone of anything.
This is a huge issue in political language in this country. It has been for years, especially when it comes to gay rights.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)Instead you put up some snark accompanied by a veiled attack on me for simply asking the question and asking it as sincerely as I possibly can in the one dimensional milieu that is an internet message board.
You demonstrate a good way to win friends and influence allies.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)All you had to do is educate yourself, in the first place. Yet, you didn't do that.
Cut the nonsense.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)You, on the other hand, chose to cop an attitude.
donheld
(21,311 posts)Sexual Orientation is not.
ruggerson
(17,483 posts)and to imply that sexuality is not immutable.
Sexual orientation is always the phrase that should be used.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)I appreciate a straight (pun noted, but not intended) answer.
Not being on the front lines of the fight for equality, but always on the side of it, I was completely unaware the term was code. I shall no longer use the term.
Seriously. Thanks for the answer.
ruggerson
(17,483 posts)You've always been on the right side of the angels on this and many other issues, imho.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)The language evolves and I try to catch up to things I haven't thought about.
Once I thought about it, I saw that "preference" is what you prefer, but "orientation" is what you are.
That one was easy.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)My sexual orientation is straight, and my BIL's orientation is gay. Neither of us made a choice, we just are that way and have been since the issue mattered to either of us.
The complication comes from the fact that the reason he's my BIL is that he was deeply in love with my sister, they were together for 19 years and had two lovely daughters. All during their marriage they both knew he was gay. After she died he dated a couple of women, but immediately realized that it had been specifically the person of my sister he'd fallen in love with - her gender had nothing to do with it. He's been living out his orientation ever since she died 20 years ago - as has his gay brother.
Labels are dangerous, slippery things - they can cause you to make all kinds of unwarranted assumptions about people. But in the choice between "preference" and "orientation" as a label, the latter is closer to the truth in most cases.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)You may prefer one hair color or another, but I am sure gender is significantly more important than hair color (etc.).